Glenn's Cult?: Porky's Identity?

December 26, 2008

Porky's Identity?

It seems we might have stumbled on porky's true identity. I figured it must be a regular "fan" of Sacks. Have fun porky.............ble ble ble that's all folks............

4 comments:

Glenn's Cult? said...: Originally posted by Friendofanonymum - reposted by me and saved as a post needing moderating due to revealing names which might need concealed.

Post below:

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3097#comments

This article from Australia appeared on BallSacks website. This is completely false and is an embarassment to BallSack as he should have done some research or then again maybe he knewthe real story.
The guy "Steve" in this story is Simon XXXX, a former member of Shared Parenting Councill of Australia until they threw him out. Now he is a militant FR member and a well known misogynist. The story reads like the Family Court took away his right to see his daughter when the truth is he was in Melbourne County Court for a breach of an existing AVO. He went to his ex wifes house. There are sexual abuse allegations that he has done something to his daughter and the fact that the courts have kept him away from his daughter for 15 years suggests some merit to those allegations. He also posted his ex wife's address on the internet as well as personal details which was a direct breach of his current order.

Now this was NOT posted by me - the only change I made was giving the man's last name. As much pleasure as it would give me to divulge the identity of an abusive man, I must protect the woman and her child - just as I try to protect myself and my child. To the ex Mrs. XXXXX - my heart goes out to you. Should you stumble upon this please know there are those in your position - some have even lost their child(ren) to the abuser. There are many women in your country - just do an internet search for us.; December 29, 2008 9:40 PM
A Friend Who Cares said...: Perhaps you could post his alias that he uses on the internet and even signed the comments page below the story in the newspaper originally with his real name and then edited to Vascopajama?

I do not like to Hunt.; December 30, 2008 12:08 AM
Glenn's Cult? said...: This I will do :-) Please come back and post a link to the original article. I am too tired to go hunting it on Sacks site tonight - maybe tomorrow. I have been busy having fun tonight and am now off to dream world. I hope my baby is okay. She is very sick tonight and entitled doofus thinks I have no right to know how she is faring.; December 30, 2008 1:15 AM
A Friend Who Cares said...: http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24761929-661,00.html

Comment Number 141 is who the story is about.

A search on Vascopajama will bring up his name and if you search further you will even find a copy of his Restraining Order with his ex wifes address on it.

I wish I did HUNT.; December 31, 2008 2:10 AM

WARNING!!!!!!

WARNING!!!!
I must warn all who come to this blog about clicking any links I provide. Unless I state this is a safe website you should take precautions in visiting any site listed as an MRA/FR site. To do so one could open up oneself to being stalked, hunted down, victimized, and even in worst case scenario - assaulted in real life or even killed. The men (and sometimes women) who post on the MRA/FR sites can be dangerous. One nly needs to read the venom spewing from their moouth to see evidence of that. I also post this due to the recent blogs and forums I have discovered over the last few weeks. These will slowly be added to the Cult Wall Of Shame. Please take adequate precaution when visiting these sites.

Fair Use Doctrine

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, entitled, "Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use," is the statutory codification of the fair use doctrine. This judicially developed concept strives to balance the public's need to know and be informed against authors' incentives to create. The copyright law contemplates that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission shall be for purposes such as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching, and that such fair use will not result in the infringement of a copyrighted work. As one may expect, authors and publishers usually take a restrictive view of the fair use doctrine, while users of copyrighted materials generally take a more expansive view.

http://www.publaw.com/work.html

Thank you too!!!!

I am now friends on a message board with a wonderful man. And you all thought we hated men :-) We despise abusive controlling men and women. We like men and women who are decent, honest, and caring. I will say no more as I do not want to ruin this. But those who fight this same fight, keep going!!! We are being seen and our message is getting out there.

Thank you. And thank you for the important work that you do. It gets my dander stirred up when little men hide behind a pen or a computer and spew out fear, hate and stuff that they think makes them look like "real men" but in fact exposes them for the big bullies that they really are. My father and mother are both deceased. But my dad treated my mother the way every man should treat his wife. She was the Queen in our home and he doted on her like she was still his sweetheart until the day she died at age 84. Abraham Lincoln once said, "The greatest gift a father can give to his children is to love their mother." So many men are unhappy with their own lives and they blame women. That way they don't have to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings. Sad. Pathetic. Again, thank you for your very good and important work.

And thank you for giving us hope as well - the hope that there are good and decent people out there - both men and women.

My blog, My rules.....

I would like to welcome everyone who has arrived here - no matter the road you traveled. I only have some very simple rules. Please try to keep your comments clean (I am a mom and as such I do not like extreme vulgar language). I despise the "c" word so it will never be published. Otherwise I will be very lax as I want this site to be a release to those of you who have an issue with the MRAs in general and Sacks and his followers in particular.

I must also slide this little disclaimer in here too (just to protect myself from those pesky little creatures called lawyers and those MRAs who would think they will file a lawsuit or something silly like that against me). I am using YOUR WORDS on this site as well as publishing my opinion of those words. Nothing more, nothing less. I am "not" responsible for comments made by others on my site and if MRAs can behave then they might very well be allowed to post here. Like I said, this is intended to be a release for the women who have been attacked on various sites online to have a little comic break from these constant attacks.

I am posting this blog and all of my comments as a naturally born citizen of the United States and am exercising my right to free speech.

I must also caution my followers and posters against posting any identifying information. This is for your own safety, as I foresee this blog quickly becoming a very hated tool against MRAs who abuse and those who assist them. I mus also make one additional rule concerning posting other people's (such as our exes) personal information. I have been through a very nasty divorce and I know how our exes can react. As such I must make it a number one rule, as much pleasure it would give us, against posting any information which could identify our exes. First names (or initials if the name is uncommon) is fine but no last names. This will be enforced on this blog, unlike "other blogs."