Glenn's Cult?: Assistance for The Family Place

December 2, 2008

Assistance for The Family Place

As stated in a previous post, Glenn Sacks was responsible for the removal of funds through his "campaign". I am the original author of the post referred to in this post below:

Rev. Richard Says:

December 2nd, 2008 at 11:25 am
Glenn, If I recall you never attacked or attempted to reduce their normal funding. The comment regarding funding was in response to another article which stated that all who do not appreciate the advertising should send $5 each to assist paying for their next ads.
Personally, I don't know too many people who'd financially support an organization who they already don't appreciate the methods they use to do business and assist them in continuing to do so.

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3018#comment-604953

I simply had read Sacks post (again mentioned earlier in my blog) about some of The Family Place's sponsors either completely removing funding or reducing the funding provided previously. I stated that everyone in Dallas (and indeed all over the world) should simply send in 5 or 10 dollars in order to make up for the lost funding, removed by Sacks and his followers. I will now go as far as to ask that anyone who donates money to The Family Place in this vein, ask who the contributors are that reduced or eliminated the funding to TFP. Then we must all boycott those organizations until they restore funding to TFP.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...: Wow !
Where on earth did you manage to find a pic of my ex ????? I thought he sent them all to Glenn - - - -; December 03, 2008 7:23 PM
Anonymous said...: Thank goodness I read Stephen Hawking in the bathroom. I might be accused of having a brain -Ever hear of walking talking nut jobs ? - the ones you cross the street to avoid when you see/hear them coming? - thank goodness for delete buttons !; December 03, 2008 7:38 PM
Anonymous said...: Really- "feminists" prefer fiction ? I wonder what these -people think a feminist IS ???? Answer: they have no idea- they are just blathering-major stupid- trouble is- stupidity hates easily- and without reason. You can educate ignorance- sometimes- but crass stupidity is not fixable.; December 03, 2008 7:42 PM
Anonymous said...: The pic that appears through this site looks familiar? Oh yeah I remember now!!!!! MY ex!!!!!; December 03, 2008 10:38 PM
Glenn's Cult? said...: @ anon 9:38PM

Is he my exes twin?; December 03, 2008 10:39 PM

WARNING!!!!!!

WARNING!!!!
I must warn all who come to this blog about clicking any links I provide. Unless I state this is a safe website you should take precautions in visiting any site listed as an MRA/FR site. To do so one could open up oneself to being stalked, hunted down, victimized, and even in worst case scenario - assaulted in real life or even killed. The men (and sometimes women) who post on the MRA/FR sites can be dangerous. One nly needs to read the venom spewing from their moouth to see evidence of that. I also post this due to the recent blogs and forums I have discovered over the last few weeks. These will slowly be added to the Cult Wall Of Shame. Please take adequate precaution when visiting these sites.

Fair Use Doctrine

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, entitled, "Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use," is the statutory codification of the fair use doctrine. This judicially developed concept strives to balance the public's need to know and be informed against authors' incentives to create. The copyright law contemplates that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission shall be for purposes such as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching, and that such fair use will not result in the infringement of a copyrighted work. As one may expect, authors and publishers usually take a restrictive view of the fair use doctrine, while users of copyrighted materials generally take a more expansive view.

http://www.publaw.com/work.html

Thank you too!!!!

I am now friends on a message board with a wonderful man. And you all thought we hated men :-) We despise abusive controlling men and women. We like men and women who are decent, honest, and caring. I will say no more as I do not want to ruin this. But those who fight this same fight, keep going!!! We are being seen and our message is getting out there.

Thank you. And thank you for the important work that you do. It gets my dander stirred up when little men hide behind a pen or a computer and spew out fear, hate and stuff that they think makes them look like "real men" but in fact exposes them for the big bullies that they really are. My father and mother are both deceased. But my dad treated my mother the way every man should treat his wife. She was the Queen in our home and he doted on her like she was still his sweetheart until the day she died at age 84. Abraham Lincoln once said, "The greatest gift a father can give to his children is to love their mother." So many men are unhappy with their own lives and they blame women. That way they don't have to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings. Sad. Pathetic. Again, thank you for your very good and important work.

And thank you for giving us hope as well - the hope that there are good and decent people out there - both men and women.

My blog, My rules.....

I would like to welcome everyone who has arrived here - no matter the road you traveled. I only have some very simple rules. Please try to keep your comments clean (I am a mom and as such I do not like extreme vulgar language). I despise the "c" word so it will never be published. Otherwise I will be very lax as I want this site to be a release to those of you who have an issue with the MRAs in general and Sacks and his followers in particular.

I must also slide this little disclaimer in here too (just to protect myself from those pesky little creatures called lawyers and those MRAs who would think they will file a lawsuit or something silly like that against me). I am using YOUR WORDS on this site as well as publishing my opinion of those words. Nothing more, nothing less. I am "not" responsible for comments made by others on my site and if MRAs can behave then they might very well be allowed to post here. Like I said, this is intended to be a release for the women who have been attacked on various sites online to have a little comic break from these constant attacks.

I am posting this blog and all of my comments as a naturally born citizen of the United States and am exercising my right to free speech.

I must also caution my followers and posters against posting any identifying information. This is for your own safety, as I foresee this blog quickly becoming a very hated tool against MRAs who abuse and those who assist them. I mus also make one additional rule concerning posting other people's (such as our exes) personal information. I have been through a very nasty divorce and I know how our exes can react. As such I must make it a number one rule, as much pleasure it would give us, against posting any information which could identify our exes. First names (or initials if the name is uncommon) is fine but no last names. This will be enforced on this blog, unlike "other blogs."