Porky and his poor poor demented self is at it again

Now I do not know whether we should send out the doctors to help this poor delusional creature or if he should just be ignored or if I should continue because quite honestly this is really rather amusing. This poor creature is IMO suffering from an extreme case of Multiple Personality Disorder. he cannot quite make up his mind which identity he will possess today (or tomorrow for that matter). Read more of his blitherings below:

10
Michael Claymore Says:

February 7th, 2009 at 4:26 am
It is estimated that over 90% of feminists are chronic liars. This is the result of an informal study carried out by the Porky Domesticus Institute for the Propagation of Truth, which, though the work of one lone pig, is far more reliable than this Loeffel person will ever be.

Porky porky porky (this is so fun what a DUMAS!!!)

Now I am having some fun in order to prepare for the heartbreak of my next post or two (that really depends on how much I can stomach of the subsequent posting and the thought that must go into it). Porky is so incensed at this site and has decided to create his own 'educational' blog, for those out of the loop. While I found this amusing to say the least, I stumbled upon his site completely by accident. He had been posting as anonymous (one of the many) on this site. He then created his own user id on Google and a 'new' blog.

Well it is not new (now this site here is new lol), it is simply a rehashing of old worn out tired ideas that hopefully will soon be 'Gone With The Wind'. After several posts on his site, he reveals his true identity. He has now revealed that two commenters on Glenn Sacks website are one and the same. If you go look (I don't have time right now as I am formulating my thoughts on my next few posts which are just so much more important than some worthless MRA) you will see 'nelson' and 'Michael Claymore' posting on the same articles written by Sacks. Now one must wonder, does this MRA have a slight case of dual personality? Oh I guess since he is Claymore, nelson, and porky - he can possibly qualify as having multiple personalities.

Now this is interesting and quite amusing :-) One must also wonder if porky aka nelson aka Michael Claymore will say anything about this post? Nah, because to do so would be attracting attention to what he refers to as a feminazi, crazed woman....Hmmm is that what sacks meant by LOONIES?

One other piece of advice MC aka nelson aka porky.... when designing a website, you should really think of all the users on the 'Net, not just yourself. Creating a page that looks good on your huge monitor set at the highest possible resolution will NOT look good on another computer which is set at 800 by 600 resolution (or quite possibly even smaller). Design 101 - go to school dude.....



UPDATE!!!

Have you seen the new porky sty? OMG lol and that is what took him days and weeks to accomplish? That would be a 4 hour project for me. Blogger.com is so wonderful - they make it easy to create an onlilne forum...Why mess with easy when I have so many thoughts running through my brain that must come out? These men are such bozos - I must shout from the rooftops so the world can see.

Porky porky porky......or should I say nelson?

Here is another charming bit of anti-male sentiment. This piece is called Menocide (as opposed to the proper term, which is androcide, but one cant expect such a woman to have a vocabulary much beyond that of any other brain damaged psychopath.) and its lyrics were written by a poor excuse for a human female with the unlikely nom-de-guerre of Otep Shamaya, which I believe is Egyptian for “Blithering Idiot”.

You 'claim' to be documenting cases of male hatred by females, yet I can count at least 3 occurrences of female hate by YOU in this above quote. Leaves one to wonder....

“Men are human waste--kill them”

Okay now it seems Glenn is targetting a 'Nu-Metal' group who has a song out titled Menocide. First one must look at the obvious. Who has heard of this group? I certainly haven't, Glenn complaining about Beyonce is more apt to draw my attention than this group. They are not mainstream. next we must look at the prevelance of this type of music. How many girl metal bands are there? I did a search for this and here is what I found (courtesy Wikipedia). Notice that some of the names on this list are actually fairly mainstream singers (Lita Ford being one). Also notice if you scroll down to Otep, you will find a link to the band's page on Wikipedia. Amazingly enough what does one discover? The lead vocalist is female, but all the other band members are MALE!!!! I am not in any way condoning the music given to us by this band, but I like many others, have the choice to listen or to not listen. I choose to not listen. One last note, if you read the lyrics as written, the singer (IMO) is simpply saying that she is being killed (smothered?, degraded?, minmized?) by herself and by others. Again, Glenn could find much better things to blog about besdies some little known to many band called OTEP. Like how about discussing the well known rappers who degrade and villify women on a daily basis. Or that these rappers are much more mainstream? How about the music made by men that says things like women should get down on her knees and worse? No discussion of that activity now is there? Read bleow form some cult remarks....

3 (Editor Note - Post Number)
jim Says:

January 9th, 2009 at 9:08 pm
i like the female circumsision part.... funny that no one talks about it happening to men in our ouwn countrie(s)

Funny how it is that MEN decided males should be circumcised and MEN decided females should be circumcised...yet no mention is made of that.

5 (Editor Note - Post Number)
The Dapper Swindler Says:

January 9th, 2009 at 9:27 pm
Perhaps if someone recorded the antithesis to this song, ie about women, and played it to people who had never heard of it, then gauged their reaction. I suspect we'd get some very telling results about which people value more - men or women. Not that we don't already know the answer to that of course. It's obvious.

Funy thing is we do have it....it is called rap...

11 (Editor Note - Post Number)
David G Says:

January 9th, 2009 at 11:35 pm
"Men are human waste--kill them"

Actually you have to admire her honesty. She's articulating how society thinks of men - disposable and sub-human. And look at the male suicide and longevity figures - we ARE being killed off.

You are being killed off? If it is suicide, then again MALES are the ones doing the killing, not females. Why don't you learn accountability, instead of blaming?

15 (Editor Note - Post Number)
menscollegeactivist.org Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 12:20 am
She mentions Salems burning of witches in her lyrics....Am i mistaken or was it not 2 young girls that were responseable for the mass hystyeria that got these "withches" burned.
Funny how local hysterics blame men, when it was in fact young women who called in the Klan type hysteria, by making the false accusation of witchery, against other women.

Children 'began' the hysteria, but it was MEN who carried out the evil and vile killings of the supposed witches.

17 (Editor Note - Post Number)
John Kimble Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 12:54 am
"She mentions Salems burning of witches in her lyrics....Am i mistaken or was it not 2 young girls that were responseable for the mass hystyeria that got these "withches" burned"

What an excellent point - I guess fatal false allegations by women aren't exactly a new phenomena.

Many also forget that one third of the "witches" executed were in fact male.

And 2/3 were female. Your point? Mor ewomen were still killed due to the hysteria of a few children fueled on by some angry men. Again Men killing MEN and WOMEN.

18 (Editor Note - Post Number)
Just a metalhead Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 1:14 am
This is typical in the more extreme side of metal, lyrics that are violent, provoking, disgusting, racist, mysognynist, misanthropy, etc... Plus most of the time this is just a game, a fantasy, a way to expunge frustration and rage and nothing more. This is probably the case here, I mean she's the only female in a group of 4 in a genre vastly dominated by men. And personally I don't think there are many metal bands that are big enough to be considered "mainstream" or to use them as an example of how society is favorable to hating men and Otep is not one of them. Only reason I know of the group existence is because the name sounds a bit like a much better group called Opeth.

If I may be excused a bit of sarcasm "Wow, a metal song includes hate-filled ramblings, stop the presses!".

Also, to defend metal a bit, it's a much more diverse genre than most people think, there's a world of difference between Dream Theater and Burzum, one's a group reknown for musical prowess, flowing melody and clear voice and the other is a group formed of only one (mad, neo-nazi, christian-hating, murderous) man, with shrieks, horrible production and feverish music. Most metal artists would shirk at having their music called "commercial", that's actually an insult in the community, few metal musicians live from their music and most labels are independent and are run by people passionate enough by the genre that they dedicate a lot of time and effort in it without much return.

To be fair, I have included this post. This commenter is right on the money. If you listen to this (OTEP music or any metal) then more power to you. I myself choose NOT to listen to this. However it is not my right to take that right away from someone else. How often have you seen on the news of a woman who has killed a man simply based on the fact that OTEP discussed it in their music? Yet you often hear of young adult men raping and abusing women bvecause of rap music (or so they claim).

20 (Editor Note - Post Number)
David G Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 2:53 am
Notice the Nirvana t-shirt - an ALL-MALE band the last time I checked.

David, maybe you should go check out this band. They are a 4 person band - one female and 3 males. At one time they had 2 female mebers, but the decision wa smade to make the second female leave due to her age (too young in the other member's opinions to be touring).

25 (Editor Note - Post Number)
Nelson Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 5:17 am
Sounds like she's been reading the Scum Manifesto.
http://gos.sbc.edu/s/solanas.html

And yes, this is another good example of how society tolerates hatred of males in a way it would never tolerate hatred of women, blacks or gays. This woman should be thrown into jail along with all the other psychos, at the very least she should never be allowed to have male children.

One word nelson aka porky -RAP!!!

28 (Editor Note - Post Number)
David M Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 7:55 am
I get sooo tired of these immature women. They have been convinced that they don't "need " men. Most women can't last 24 hours without a man.

Stop living in your fantasy land sisters.

And how do you propose to live without women? Oh yeah I remember - surrogacy - slavery of women in order to continue YOUR lineage...

30 (Editor Note - Post Number)
peter Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 8:15 am
In the eyes of the Feminist Court we are Human Debris. When this "Debris" cannot pay child support due to excessive child support, no contact with my children and the weight of the Divorce Industry then I am "Wanted" in the worst way. Hyprocrites, thieves, liars, and lawyers. I may be exiled from this country but the truth will stand for me.......someday.

One dumb question here, peter....What does seeing your children have to do with paying your support? We women are told over and over like a mantra to our brains, you MUST allow dad to see the kids, whether he pays support or not. Why is it again, something that is good for the gander is NOT good for the goose? Or could it be that you are simply too angry and REFUSE to pay support? You state yourself you are in 'exile'....

32 (Editor Note - Post Number)
jeana Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 11:04 am
I’m sorry, Robert Franklin, I must have missed which feminist commentators praised this song. Could you point me to them?

And I would expect some kind of comparison to the violent, misogynistic lyrics that are in rap music. I guess what’s good for the gander is good for the goose. Or is can only guys sing about raping and beating (and who knows what else) girls?

Woohoooo I knew jeana would not be long before posting to this thread. Well I will fall to the standrads laid down by these men and completely fulfill their expectation with this....
YOU GO GIRL!!!
LMAO :-)

34 (Editor Note - Post Number)
jake steed Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 11:23 am
JEANNA

the point is that if a male wrote this song there will be an outcry from feminists.
the point is that why cant you feminists take things easy sometimes and stop bitching about stupid things.

because feminists bitch about stupid things it means men have to do it too to have EQUALITY.

for instance 99.9% of men dont give a fuck about those "boys are stupid....throw rocks at them" because we can take things easy.

but if it were "girls are sissies ...hit them with bricks" then there will be an outrage from the feministas.

if they take things easy there will be no REACTIONARY bitching about stupid things on glen sacks

and

35 (Editor Note - Post Number)
jerry Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Jeana, perhaps no stated support for this song, but we have definitely seen lots of support for

Boys are stupid throw rocks at them

and of course, that wonderful old chestnut:

A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.

Not much support for the song menocide itself, but there seems to be lots of support, cheers, booyahs, for women expressing the concept behind the song...

how much longer do we need to hear about the "Boys are Stpuid" product line? As a mother of male and female chidlren, I would never allow any of my children to wear such garbage. A parent that does is not looking out for their child's best interests. I do not like those products and most women I know concerned over abusive men gaining rights through family court by using techniques such as named on many MRA wesbites would not allow their chidlren to wear or own any of these products.

We have reached 38 posts as of this writing. I will display all new women hating comments below as updates until there are no longer any new posts.

Porky da Pig on Female Serial Killers

Western society spends a lot of time avoiding mention of violence committed by women. For example, if you ask of those you know “What percentage of Serial Killers are women?” would any of them guess that one in six convicted serial killers is a female?

I must ask this question then.....What are the other 5 of the 6 serial killers? Dogs? Cats? Pigs? Children? Oh wait let me think here.............. (LIGHTBULB ahha moment!!!) MEN!!!!!!!

Speaking of calendars.......

In my post here, I discuss porky's 'exposure' of the Boys Are Stupid calendars. I then make one last journey to "THE" site and lo and behold what do my wondering eyes reveal? Click Petunia to read on!!!! (No comments as of January 4th 1:00 AM CST) We WILL however be following this post :-)

Tomorrow look for updates on the Collins hatred saga, 'MRAs' on Beyonce and her new song and her beliefs, and a new honoree on "The Cult" - Mike from Canada. He is truly fun to read (SARCASM again!!!) and I will have some fun with him. I also have some more MRA emails to print (one is actually good news for moms) and the other is more attempts by men to minimize women. Until tomorrow good night and happy reading.

How ironic..............

I don't even want to think about the comments that will be made on this post. Can we possibly even fathom what these power-hungry, woman hating cult members will say about this one? Gee I wonder what porky aka nelson will add to this discussion? We await this with baited breath (NOT!!!!!) But this just goes to show you that no matter the cause it is supporting (and I am glad the money goes for a good cause - our veterans), this still degrades and sexualizes women - making sure that women are seen as nothing more than objects for men to drool over. Why are comical calendars which people do not take seriously if they have half a brain that say Boys are Stupid given more weight than this? Click Petunia to read more :-)

Holly Collins and the Collins family under attack yet again by Sacks and cult

This poor family cannot get a rest it seems. First they are attacked by a vengeful judge and GAL, then attacked again by the half brother's father and his wife, then by Sacks, and again by Sacks. It is hard to tell which one is worse, although the cult takes this to a new high (low?). And what does the cult have to say about this? Well to save you, the reader, the agony of having to click Petunia, I will post some of the 'better' comments here, so you may get an idea of the hatred for this poor woman in her plight to save her children from a life of abuse. They start out comical and slide steadily downhill from there (and be warned - this post will be long).

Charlie Says:

December 29th, 2008 at 4:51 pm
Collins continues to look for a life, and exploits the media in that quest. Another person not happy with her 15 minutes of fame.

I 'highly doubt' that when Jennifer was 8 or 9 years old years old that she said to herself - self, I want to be in the public eye when I am 23, so I am going to let my father keep abusing me just so I will not have '15 minutes of fame.' And then when it looks like I am falling out of the public view, I will harp on some poor men's rights website so I can keep myself in the public eye. I am soooooooooo sure Jennifer said this to herself when she was 8. (NOTE THE SARCASM HERE!!!!)

TF Says:

December 29th, 2008 at 5:25 pm
So, she is alienated from her father. What does she remember about her father that was not drilled into her by her mother? If she doesn't condemn her father, her mother will reject her. Abuse is a great word without any clear definition, so is anything which is unpleasant abuse?
Look at any PA site and see that the daughter's reaction is typical of alienated children. Will the daughter talk to her father or hear what he has to say and offer; NO. Has the daughter talked to all the others who supported her father,NO. That is the Parental Alienation.
Pure brainwashing; just as the North Koreans thank their Great Leader when foreign doctors come to North Korea to restore their lost eyesight. The alienated child praises the aliennator for her alienation.

Okay, not very much commentary will be needed here. Jennifer was old enough to remember for herself abuse at her father's hands. The 'duh' award of the day goes to this poster :-)

Sister Charity Says:

December 29th, 2008 at 6:56 pm
This family is suffering and Jennifer has obviously been abused by one of her parents, but I am not sure that it is her father that was abusive to her. She sounds very much like other adults that I have spoken to when they are still under the control of an alienator. I pray that she is able to move on to have a healthy and truthful relationship with both of her parents.

It has been my experience that the majority of people that attack PA/HAP have never lived with the pain of the targeted parent nor that of the alienated child. If someone really looks at the tatics used by a person using PA/HAP and the tatics used by a person that actually is abusive and guilty of DV they might be surprised to find out that it's the same hurt inflicted on the victims.

Okay, pages upon pages of court documents whereby her father has admitted to abuse, and you still think mom is the abuser? Get a real life please. It must also be pointed out (per postings on Jennifer's own blog and in the news reports on this situation) that Jennifer did try to communicate with her father. He REFUSED!!!!

Infidel Says:

December 29th, 2008 at 7:19 pm
I believe that Jennifer Collins was a victim of PAS based on her letter to Glenn. Whenever a women use the term "real man" to try and shame a man into doing something it raises flags. Maybe a poor little girl with no father had to come up with reasons in her 8 year old mind for the trauma she felt. "If he really loved me he'd cross the ocean and come get me", she may have told herself while crying herself to sleep over the pain in her heart. And the mother fed the dark hole by poisoning the memory of the man in a hundred ways overt and covert.

Geraldo, Mr. Prompt, is such a piece of sycophant slime. Glenn, how you shared a stage with him like a gentleman shows a lot of intestinal fortitude and restraint!

Jennifer is rightfully angry that a person she has never met would suggest that people in essence stalk her and peer into her life, all in the name of proving her story. SHE SAYS SHE WAS ABUSED AT HER FATHER'S HANDS, HER BROTHER SAYS HE WAS ABUSED AT HIS FATHER'S HANDS, SO WHY MUST THEY 'PROVE' THIS? And yet again when you cannot debate, you resort to nastiness as displayed towards Geraldo.

mjaybee Says:

December 29th, 2008 at 8:32 pm
Well, Lisa:

Since Jennifer Collins may have been on the receiving end of distorted information about her father and was abducted from him, don't you think that may make her an unreliable source of information?

Isn't the search for objective information in cases like this more important than the he said/she said hearsay which so often sways judges in Family Court?

For a biased, censorship-loving blogger who usually only tolerates one side of a story on your own blog, you sure have a lot of nerve criticizing Glenn for an open-minded search for objective information.

Lisa's comment will get its own post since it is just about the only post that defends the Collins' family - specifically Jennifer. Now onto this poster......Do I need to say it again? Jennifer was abused and has clear recollections of that abuse. She was not a baby, toddler, or preschooler when this happened. She was 9 years old!!!!

Dittohd Says:

December 29th, 2008 at 8:37 pm
Sorry, when I listened to that girl on the video and she said her father was "always" abusive, I immediately stopped believing her. She didn't strike me as credible at all. She gave the impression that she came to that show ready for bear and just couldn't wait to heap on her father, and I'd bet she remembers of him only what her mother told her.

Ummm okay - this is real logical. My ex was 'always' abusive to me when the abuse started, so I guess I should not be believed either. Runner-up 'duh' award.

From 'him':

Here you’re essentially asking me to take Jennifer’s word for it, against the ruling of the court, and independent of any evidence except her and her mother’s claims. I think that’s asking a lot. And contrary to what you may believe, I generally don’t do that for fathers, either.

No he just publicizes many 'anonymous' letters from men, second wives, grandmothers, friends about 'supposed' bad acts by mothers. But that is 'okay.'

Also, Jennifer was very young—seven years old or younger—when the alleged abuse happened. Given that children are sometimes programmed by an alienating parent to believe various things about the target parent, I think it’s fair of me to not simply take this as the gospel truth.

Thirdly, time and again the Feminist Family Law Movement has foisted cases on the media—cases which I’ve investigated--which have turned out to not be at all what the FFLM claims. For example, the Sadia Loeliger case was publicized by the same people who are helping to publicize the Jennifer Collins case. The FFLM told us that Loeliger was a heroic mom who had lost custody of her daughter due to her ex-husband's family court machinations.

He then states that Jennifer was 'too young' to remember any abuse. I myself remember when I was 4 years old and events that happened at that time (my father was in the Air Force and my mother and younger brother were living overseas). I remember vividly our residence (as well as subsequent residences) and I also remember the day we came back to US soil. I also remember an event from when I was in 2nd grade (and I was 7 - younger than Jennifer when Holly ran) very vividly as well. Children can and do remember many different things. And for you to assume that Jennifer's recollection of these events in her life, is just plain demeaning. You are in essence stating that because she is a 'hysterical' female, that she could not have remembered it that way. And if she says she was abused, isn't it better to be safe than sorry? Not if you are an MRA apparently.

He also goes on and on about Sadia Lelinger and her child Fatima. Read more about Sadia and Fatima here.

Celia Says:

December 29th, 2008 at 11:02 pm
.......Holly’s own mother strongly believed that Holly was not a fit mother – I wonder why? That was rhetorical, I know the answer – it lies in the realm objective truth, standing in stark contrast to the emotional.

If you would take the time to actually 'read' Jennifer's blog, you would discover that Holly was abused by her parents (mother and do not recall if it was bio-dad or step-dad). This 'might' explain why Holly's mother would say something like this. Maybe trying to keep her own abuse of her child private - as all abusers do.

Norman L. Says:

December 30th, 2008 at 1:02 am
"Medal of Courage by the California Protective Parents Association"

The majority of these medals should of course to to fathers (whatever the status of a given marriage), as the father has traditionally been considered the protector of his children, and in fact is the protector against any excesses by the mother. (see Baskerville).


Norman L. Says:

December 30th, 2008 at 1:03 am
the above should say the "The majority of these medals should of course go to fathers"

Actually this is not quite true. Consistently in nature it is the female of the species who 'protects' the young. Fathers 'provide' for the young and the family. This is a far stretch from 'protecting', especially when there is documented and admitted abuse as there is in the Collins' case.

Ivo Vos Says:

December 30th, 2008 at 3:52 am
One of the biggest problems with emotional truth, or ego-oriented truth, is that, based on that truth alone, we would never be able to rise out of our biological existence level. Luckily for the human kind, there exists something called the human male, normally called a man.

How 'patriarchal' of you Ivo Vos.......

Burke Says:

December 30th, 2008 at 10:54 am
http://americanchildrenunderground.blogspot.com/

She's already posted in response to this and Glen is attacking her again. She also said the got a huge amount of threatening emails from Glen followers. I can not imagine anyone threatening her, nor do I even see a way to reach her or contact her.

Again someone who just cannot see, Jennifer's contact information is in several spots on her page. I might just have to take away TF's award for this one ;-)

fish Says:

December 30th, 2008 at 11:12 am
The real issue here is disrespect for the law. Irregardless of whether a father agrees with contact orders or child support he must do as he is commanded by the family court over lord or suffer torture and incarceration. No reason is considered good enough to evade this very special American style of incentive. If this mother was being truthful about abuse then why didnt she have it investigated, instead she just split? She broke the law, to jail she must go, with taser blasts guiding the way to her gang rape in the shower. Her children should be stripped from her as she is publicly humiliated, she should be forced to work a minimum wage job and pay the support of a hundred thousand a year earner for children she never sees while the father teaches the children about all the abuse they suffered at the hands of their mother.

This one will win the 'Misogynistic' Award of the day. Okay this young lady says she was abused by her father. The answer to that is to force her to be with her father, strip her away from the only person who has protected her? Then we will top that with having the protector jailed, humiliated, and forced to labor at a debt that will never go away? Then we will brainwash the abuse victim too?

Oh I know - this poster is comparing this to himself!!!! Yeah okay - more ocean front property in Arizona for ya'.

John Boy Says:

December 30th, 2008 at 12:56 pm
Women's identities in general and some in particular are much more heavely wrapped up in being a mother then men are as a fathers. For some women being a mother is their only area of prestige and status and the children are the only thing they have power over. Losing custody, even partial custody, can be absolutely devestating emotionally.

In fairness, men's identities are sometimes too wrapped up in their work which is why too many of them go "postal" but we will save that for another day.

This same underlying dynamic happens in many many divorces albeit they do not reach this level of conflict. This solipsistic behavior is what drives many women to fight without compunction for every penny and every minute extra of custody they can lay their hands on whether or not it is in their childs best interest or not. This is what makes divorces bitter and the healing process impossible. This women thinks she is a hero but is really a goat.

Can you tell yet how tired I am of this drivel? But I still continue to deliver the misogyny run rampant at that site. First paragraph this commenter states that when a woman loses any form of custody she is devastated because she has lost control over the children. Could it possibly be because she has lost the ability to PROTECT that child? When the mother and father were still living together, the mother was able to safeguard the child from the father's abuse and in many cases, take that abuse on her shoulders rather than exposing the child to it. Now she cannot do that simply because the uneducated courts force her to send the child to the abuser - unsupervised.

'Postal'? Okay I would love to see the sommentary on this one. Any wonder what it will contain? Excuses excuses excuses.....

A goat? Can you not come up with something a little more creative? Even porky is better than this......

To be continued in the next post (too many comments for one post :-)............

porky...........keep the day job................

Porky's "attempt" at humor leaves a little (no actually QUITE A LOT) to be desired. My advice? Keep your day job porky (aka Nelson).

porky sighting two?

Nelson Says:

December 24th, 2008 at 8:27 pm
Holy crap, it's a Christmas miracle!

While we are on the subject of which proky? is speaking on, let me add my own two cents (for what it is worth):

Children do better in a two parent NON-ABUSIVE household. When there is abuse from either parent towards either the children or the non-abusive parent, the child will fare better ina single parent household. And that single parent household should be a sole custody household led by the non-offending parent.

Possible porky sighting..........

Nelson Says:

December 29th, 2008 at 5:42 pm
"Dear Mr. Sacks,

I say it so it must be the truth, so there!"

E-v-i-d-e-n-c-e, madam, e-v-i-d-e-n-c-e.

There is evidence - several people testified to the abuse of the mother and the father admitted to this abuse - in the court files.

Porky's Identity?

It seems we might have stumbled on porky's true identity. I figured it must be a regular "fan" of Sacks. Have fun porky.............ble ble ble that's all folks............

More on Porky

Porky ASS U MEs here that I have no readers because there are only three commenters. There have been actually more than three people commenting. Andddddddddd, my blog is here in order to give those who are against the questionable actions of the fringe MRAs to come to and read and say yep yep yep I agree, OMG she hit the nail on the head!, or wow someone is standing up to them. I welcome any comments, but they are not required. I do not profess to have the largest vocabulary around, nor will I waste time using a thesaurus in order to use different words when I type. I say what I feel like saying and in the manner I feel like saying it. I challenge "porky" to open up his blog to comments. It is my firm opinion that he will not do so, because to do so would open himself up to the women who read my blog to comment on his. And why must he hide behind his current alias of "porky", leaving the reader to wonder - which one of Sacks' regular followers is this? Or is it the incredible Mr. Sacks himself?

He also makes note of my "comment to myself". Rather than post an update on an already busy posting day, I simply put my remarks in the comments section (as anyone who cares to view will see it is indeed an update).

So my challenge to you porky - open your site up to comments. Ahhh but I know how this goes. You will simply delete any comments which do not praise your work. Hmmmm reminiscent of anyone we know?

I should also mention that some of my posts have been covered by other blogs. Not that I have to report to you dimwit. Oh here we go, I called him/her a dimwit so now I will have to answer for a defamation lawsuit. Ummm last I looked (and studied in school) defense of truth against a defamation suit is still a defense against a defamation suit.

One last thing..... He mentions he hopes to get quite a bit of traffic. How does he plan on doing that? Unless he plans to invest a small fortune in gaining links etc, or plans to spend quite a bit of time going to other blogs etc, how does he plan to "get traffic?" His site was created because of my site. Therefore his traffic would mainly come from my site (which it likely won't due to his own transparency).

The last oink for the night

Incidentally, if I wanted to continue to comment I would simply get a false email account and a false Blogger id, but I suspect Obama/Biden will give us all much bigger fish to fry.

I for one am extremely grateful that we will have the Obama/Biden team leading our country. This just might be the time where women are recognized for the contributions we have made to society. The fringe movements in our society might very well have something to fear. And those deadbeats and those who would abuse a mother and/or child will be held to account for those crimes instead of skating. Maybe the laws will get tougher on those inclined to exert their will onto someone else in the form of entitlement, POWER, and CONTROL. I wait patiently for that day.

With that I bid you all a good night and see you tomorrow with more from the world known as MRA. (oh and lets not forget porky either - we must mention him so we can feed that thing called an ego).

Porky have fun :-)

Again, as a long time reader i can tell you that it is not a change- this has been his attitude for at least the 18 plus months ive been reading his blog. I also detect something of a hint that it is her doing that he has "changed his attitude". If i am correct in this, she is kidding herself as to how much power someone with a readership of one person actually has.

Now I am not going to argue semantics with "porky, but I too have been a long time reader of Mr. Sacks. I was in fact a subsriber to his weekly ENewsletter. I believe I subscribed to this newsletter back in 2006, possibly early 2007. When the time is right I can prove this by providing the email address I used to subsribe as well as one of the emails sent by Sacks himself. In fact I can provide several of those newsletters. I can say as a general rule, Sacks does not publish this many articles in a row that are positive in nature. I am also not claiming to be responsible for the change in his behavior. Porky is simply ASS U ME ing again ;-). If I was asked my opinion on why the multiple posts about positive non-degrading reports, I would simply say that my OPINION is that the holidays are near and most people do not feel atagonistic during the holiday season. Perhaps the feel good from his child's birthday is sticking around. I do not claim responsibility for this change however.

As far as porky being my only reader, I can show otherwise, but I need not prove this. Even if there is only one other person reading this blog, then I will have accomplished my purpose. I am simply trying to show that many of the men who claim to be only interested in being a part of their children's lives do indeed have an ulterior motive. In fact if anyone reading this blog cares to actually read his blog, they will see that the most strenuous comments and the most read articles are the ones which contain references to child support and child custody. Custody articles contain references to child support (which most claim is illegal - except those trying to collect from low income mothers - then they are all for it and are quick to complain about the deadbeat moms). Then we have those posts about child support and again the attitudes are perfectly clear. Child support in their minds is illegal - again unless it is the mother who is obligated to pay such support and these men are quick to point out the deadbeat in their own life.

More ROFLMAO from porky (more from GS to follow)

As for her claim to have “followers”, if she has them they aren’t bothering to comment on her posts. Indeed, my humble self seems to be the only follower she has- at least until the men she is defaming decide to take legal action.

This is actually amusing to say the least. I am completely stating my opinion on this website. I did not realize that by taking what these men write, analyzing it as one would a work of literature, and then providing my opinion in that analysis would be or could be actionable in a court of law. Hmmmm didn't think so, if that was the case then there would have been hundreds upon thousands of lawsuits being filed. Everyone who has a blog is at risk for this, since that is what blogging is about. In fact the definition of blog is a personal online journal that is frequently updated and intended for general public consumption. Blogs are defined by their format: a series of entries posted to a single page in reverse-chronological order. Blogs generally represent the personality of the author or reflect the purpose of the Web site that hosts the blog. Topics sometimes include brief philosophical musings, commentary on Internet and other social issues, and links to other sites the author favors, especially those that support a point being made on a post.

So it seems I completely fit the definition of a blogger maintaining a blog. I could point out that many times over Glenn (or more often his followers) have made comments about a person or entity and have no worries about being sued. I am not worried either. Now on to better stuff than mr porky. Althouh he is rather amusing to tease, kind of like the kitten with a pinch of catnip chasing the ball of yarn.

Hmmmmmm - A characteristic common among feminists- an absent sense of humor

Glenn’s cult writes...

One last post - Delusion?
Apparently Glenn's database of comments crashed sometime on December 10th. This was one of his followers comments:
Nelson Says:

December 11th, 2008 at 4:45 am
Glenn's being diplomatic- it was feminist gremlins and he knows it.


Nothing needs to be added here. Oh wait one moment - I will add something. How many abused women have been targetted by their batterer and are made to appear paranoid? I will say nothing more regarding this. Let my followers speak the truth to this.”

Now, as I pointed out to the sad, befuddled creature, only a fool would see this as anything other than an attempt at humor, but as often happens with feminists they are so blinded by their anger they take seriously people who go on about gremlins. As for her claim to have “followers”, if she has them they aren’t bothering to comment on her posts. Indeed, my humble self seems to be the only follower she has- at least until the men she is defaming decide to take legal action.

Now must we really debate why I (along with numerous other women) have no sense of humor when dealing with a man/woman whose writings are so reminiscent of our abusers words? Are we supposed to laugh and go along with everything? Sing Kumbaya while holding hands at the campfire? I think not. To even suggest that an abused woman even be in the same city as someone who has abused her is insane.

I have a story for you. You own a fairly nice house in a nice neighborhood. You hear through the neighborhood grapevine that there has been a rash of burglaries nearby. You make an appointment for a security system to be installed to protect yourself. Before the company can arrive to install this equipment however, you are robbed. Oh the horror. But wait!!!! The thieves have been apprehended and your belongings were found as well!!! Granted they have to remain in police lockup until such time as the trial is complete but hey no biggie you say, at least they are safe and protected from theft now. Your house is only a day or two away from having state of the art security equipment installed so you feel rather safe. The day comes to go to court to prosecute the person or persons who engaged in this invasion of your space. Imagine your surprise when the judge looks at you and tells you that you must share this property with the thief. Huh? You wonder..... Maybe this is just a fluke, you think. The attorney prosecuting this case comes to you after court and tells you that you must work out some sort of arrangement with the thief so that person may have time with your property. You are amazed and bewildered. How can this happen you ask? State attorney says that Thief Rights' Activists online have been pushing for a thief's bill of rights. Even though they broke laws in obtaining your property, they are still granted rights of access to the same property they stole because they have develpoed an attachment to it.

Thankfully we have the Constitution to protect against a scenario like this involving true robberies and theft of "personal" property. But what about children? Children are by no means anyone's property, but many times an abused mother will seek assistance from the courts to get away from an abuser. He is stealing her identity, the children's identities, and robbing all of a good life and a good future. Yet many times the courts simply tell this abuse victim that she must allow the abuser (the criminal) access to something (someone) most precious to this victim - the children. When will the courts see that this simply must not go on? When will the court understand that mothers generally are the only protection a child has. I am not speaking of those few well publicized moms who are awful - because there are some of those moms out there - I am speaking of those moms who are good, who face powerful and controlling domineering men in court. I am speaking of those women who have been beaten and beaten to the point that they lose their identity. Are we not going to provide these women and children with some sort of protection?

(LINK)

We have our first regular "fan?". You decide. I think it is quite ironic that this "porky" refuses to discuss "every" post I make. Too tired porky from your other blog?