Glenn's Cult?: Egads even more.......Holstein in Newsweek: Courts should start with presumption of joint physical custody

December 15, 2008

Egads even more.......Holstein in Newsweek: Courts should start with presumption of joint physical custody

Pass this along to all groups - make them aware of this. Email, call, write to Newsweek with your stories if possible. Tell them how dads are using junk science in order to rip children away from protective mothers. Give them the information on the petition with the IACHR filed right before Mothers Day last year. Remember the victims - mothers and children of these abusers. I will only link to the Newsweek article (HERE, and not to that site.

I will state that I do not know which state offers MORE child support if the mother keeps the child from the father, because it is not where I live. I am extremely well versed in child support issues due to an at time non paying deadbeat. I know that you are allowed to ask the judge to add in certain "non-monetary" compensation, such as a company provided and paid for vehicle, a company provided and paid for residence or anything that is non-monetary that decreases your actual cost of living. You may ask for a deviation from the standard award but you have to show evidence as to why this deviation is needed. Fathers on the other hand can and do take lower paying jobs in order to keep from paying child support in the full amount deemed by law, or they take a cut in hours for this same reason. They can and do seek extra time with the children are are advised at numerous websites to do this and document all overnights so they can decrease the obligation.

I have a solution. Rather than fight child support, why don't these dads just pay what the standard support would be, work with the ex for extra time with the child, DO NOT ACT ABUSIVELY TOWARDS THE EX, and do not seek to lower support based on extra parenting time? Hmmm what a novel concept. If you have the money to pay lawyers 300-1000 an hour to fight these issues for you, then you obviously can pay 400-1000 a month in child support. Just pay it - don't fight it. be on time with your payments so that the children can be cared for in the manner to which they have become accustomed and be cared for by the person who did so during the marriage. Why must you fight?

I know - because you can and you will do anything to pay that beeyotch back. Sounds realllllllllllllll healthy for the children, that does.

No comments:

WARNING!!!!!!

WARNING!!!!
I must warn all who come to this blog about clicking any links I provide. Unless I state this is a safe website you should take precautions in visiting any site listed as an MRA/FR site. To do so one could open up oneself to being stalked, hunted down, victimized, and even in worst case scenario - assaulted in real life or even killed. The men (and sometimes women) who post on the MRA/FR sites can be dangerous. One nly needs to read the venom spewing from their moouth to see evidence of that. I also post this due to the recent blogs and forums I have discovered over the last few weeks. These will slowly be added to the Cult Wall Of Shame. Please take adequate precaution when visiting these sites.

Fair Use Doctrine

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, entitled, "Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use," is the statutory codification of the fair use doctrine. This judicially developed concept strives to balance the public's need to know and be informed against authors' incentives to create. The copyright law contemplates that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission shall be for purposes such as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching, and that such fair use will not result in the infringement of a copyrighted work. As one may expect, authors and publishers usually take a restrictive view of the fair use doctrine, while users of copyrighted materials generally take a more expansive view.

http://www.publaw.com/work.html

Thank you too!!!!

I am now friends on a message board with a wonderful man. And you all thought we hated men :-) We despise abusive controlling men and women. We like men and women who are decent, honest, and caring. I will say no more as I do not want to ruin this. But those who fight this same fight, keep going!!! We are being seen and our message is getting out there.

Thank you. And thank you for the important work that you do. It gets my dander stirred up when little men hide behind a pen or a computer and spew out fear, hate and stuff that they think makes them look like "real men" but in fact exposes them for the big bullies that they really are. My father and mother are both deceased. But my dad treated my mother the way every man should treat his wife. She was the Queen in our home and he doted on her like she was still his sweetheart until the day she died at age 84. Abraham Lincoln once said, "The greatest gift a father can give to his children is to love their mother." So many men are unhappy with their own lives and they blame women. That way they don't have to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings. Sad. Pathetic. Again, thank you for your very good and important work.

And thank you for giving us hope as well - the hope that there are good and decent people out there - both men and women.

My blog, My rules.....

I would like to welcome everyone who has arrived here - no matter the road you traveled. I only have some very simple rules. Please try to keep your comments clean (I am a mom and as such I do not like extreme vulgar language). I despise the "c" word so it will never be published. Otherwise I will be very lax as I want this site to be a release to those of you who have an issue with the MRAs in general and Sacks and his followers in particular.

I must also slide this little disclaimer in here too (just to protect myself from those pesky little creatures called lawyers and those MRAs who would think they will file a lawsuit or something silly like that against me). I am using YOUR WORDS on this site as well as publishing my opinion of those words. Nothing more, nothing less. I am "not" responsible for comments made by others on my site and if MRAs can behave then they might very well be allowed to post here. Like I said, this is intended to be a release for the women who have been attacked on various sites online to have a little comic break from these constant attacks.

I am posting this blog and all of my comments as a naturally born citizen of the United States and am exercising my right to free speech.

I must also caution my followers and posters against posting any identifying information. This is for your own safety, as I foresee this blog quickly becoming a very hated tool against MRAs who abuse and those who assist them. I mus also make one additional rule concerning posting other people's (such as our exes) personal information. I have been through a very nasty divorce and I know how our exes can react. As such I must make it a number one rule, as much pleasure it would give us, against posting any information which could identify our exes. First names (or initials if the name is uncommon) is fine but no last names. This will be enforced on this blog, unlike "other blogs."