December 4, 2008

Now what should we do?

Poor Glenn. He is so despondent over the fact that he has banned me from posting on his site.

Glenn’s Cult Writes “I tried speaking on Sacks website, then realized I had been banned. I have been told that if I reveal personal information about me in a place I do not feel safe that my permissions will be reinstated.”

Actually, “Glenn’s Cult” was permitted to publish hundreds of critical comments on my website. However, she repeatedly violated rule # 1 of My Rules on Blog Comments prohibiting “Personal attacks.”

Normally when someone violates the rules I send them a note explaining what the violation was. If they continue over and over again, I’ll ban them, but usually not until they’ve had several chances. Because “Glenn’s Cult” refused to leave a valid email address, I had no way of communicating with her after she violated the rules, so eventually I got tired of wasting time and banned her.

She could come back if she wants, but only with a valid email address.

BTW, a valid email address–which I ask for from all posters–is all she means when she says I’m demanding that she “reveal personal information.” Another example (sigh) of how feminists twist and distort simple, reasonable things I do. –GS


http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2008/12/02/anti-feminists-protest-domestic-violence-awareness-ads-in-dallas/#comment-346797


I would love to know where I personally attacked anyone (I recall it was more like defending myself). But that is neither here nor there. Numerous of his followers have stated that he deleted those comments so what proof does either side have of these attacks. Again, this boils down to a he said she said situation. Hmmmm where does that sound familiar? Anyone care to hazard a guess where he said she said is prevelant?



NOTE: I should note here that I have published a true and accesible email on several blogs (Alas, Womanist Musings, Randi James, and many more) and Glenn still has me blocked. He has in fact taken the route of blocking all people from posting links to their own sites and has removed all link to others sites on his blog in order to be "protective" of his followers. Jim Jones was protective of his followers also. Well until they drank the koolaid.

2 comments:

denise from Newcastyle said...

I should note here that I have published a true and accesible email on several blogs (Alas, Womanist Musings, Randi James, and many more) and Glenn still has me blocked.

Thats because you didnt give him a valid email- giving it to alas wont get you into womanist so why should Sacks have diff rules?
Either learn to think or stop lying.

Glenn's Cult? said...

He banned me from posting because of attacks as he said, not for posting a false email. Or is it because he wanted to know what my email was so he could sic his followers on me? Hmmm one must wonder. Porky is also extremely amusing, now I have 2 to watch :-)

Again I will reiterate what the purpose of this blog is and will be.....
This is a safe place for those who do not agree with Sacks or his followers to comment and contribute (through my email) items of interest from his website. Then anyone who does not agree will be given the opportunity to comment on these issues.

I started this website and will continue it utilizing my right to free speech. I can take something I have read and state my opinion on that article/book/newspaper/magazine under the first ammendment. Good luck Porky!!!!

enter