Glenn's Cult?: One last post

December 11, 2008

One last post - Delusion?

Apparently Glenn's database of comments crashed sometime on December 10th. This was one of his followers comments:

Nelson Says:

December 11th, 2008 at 4:45 am
Glenn's being diplomatic- it was feminist gremlins and he knows it.

Nothing needs to be added here. Oh wait one moment - I will add something. How many abused women have been targetted by their batterer and are made to appear paranoid? I will say nothing more regarding this. Let my followers speak the truth to this.

7 comments:

Anonymous said...: “Glenn's being diplomatic- it was feminist gremlins and he knows it.

Nothing needs to be added here.”

One thing needs to be added- only someone like would see this as anything other than a joke, unless of course Nelson truly believes that gremlins exist and that some of them are feminists, which is unlikely.

“ Let my followers speak the truth to this.”
If the comments are anything to go by I am your only follower- at least until the lawyers get involved – so let me say it “Oink Oink.”; December 12, 2008 3:42 AM
Anonymous said...: Ha ha ha, I think they call it "projection" I think many of his visitors have this problem.; December 12, 2008 9:26 AM
Glenn's Cult? said...: Sorry to burst your bubble but I have people viewing this site all over the world. When the word gets out (and it will) then the visits will increase). Also again I do not see how you will "get lawyers involved" when I am merely stating my opinion. Last I looked this is a free country (contrary to what some of Glenn's FOLLOWERS wish).

I am glad you are taking the time to create a blog about my blog about Sacks' blog. Must be quite fun to have to go between three sites in order to keep up. Have fun porky :-); December 12, 2008 7:29 PM
Glenn's Cult? said...: May I also add that it is quite amusing (and telling) that you do NOT have a way for comments to be left on your site. Is there anything you are afraid of that we should know about?; December 12, 2008 9:28 PM
Anonymous said...: "also again I do not see how you will "get lawyers involved" when I am merely stating my opinion."
I said they would get involved, i did not say that i would be the one involving them- you are not very observant are you?; December 13, 2008 3:11 AM
Rj said...: There is a site that is about your site? Damn, people are so original these days. How arrogant for him to believe that he (or she) is the only follower. A lot of people are afraid to comment on blogs like this against major Patriarchal figures that people cling to like God.; December 14, 2008 12:28 PM
Glenn's Cult? said...: RJ and others:
I am trying to figure out a way for people who have supporting positions to be able to log in without fear of repurcussions and post their opinions. Funny how Sacks can say he is a journalist who has been published in X, Y, and Z publications. I looked yesterday and one of those newspapers where he claims to have been published only has 4 articles with him as author and the last was in 2005.; December 14, 2008 5:06 PM

WARNING!!!!!!

WARNING!!!!
I must warn all who come to this blog about clicking any links I provide. Unless I state this is a safe website you should take precautions in visiting any site listed as an MRA/FR site. To do so one could open up oneself to being stalked, hunted down, victimized, and even in worst case scenario - assaulted in real life or even killed. The men (and sometimes women) who post on the MRA/FR sites can be dangerous. One nly needs to read the venom spewing from their moouth to see evidence of that. I also post this due to the recent blogs and forums I have discovered over the last few weeks. These will slowly be added to the Cult Wall Of Shame. Please take adequate precaution when visiting these sites.

Fair Use Doctrine

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, entitled, "Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use," is the statutory codification of the fair use doctrine. This judicially developed concept strives to balance the public's need to know and be informed against authors' incentives to create. The copyright law contemplates that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission shall be for purposes such as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching, and that such fair use will not result in the infringement of a copyrighted work. As one may expect, authors and publishers usually take a restrictive view of the fair use doctrine, while users of copyrighted materials generally take a more expansive view.

http://www.publaw.com/work.html

Thank you too!!!!

I am now friends on a message board with a wonderful man. And you all thought we hated men :-) We despise abusive controlling men and women. We like men and women who are decent, honest, and caring. I will say no more as I do not want to ruin this. But those who fight this same fight, keep going!!! We are being seen and our message is getting out there.

Thank you. And thank you for the important work that you do. It gets my dander stirred up when little men hide behind a pen or a computer and spew out fear, hate and stuff that they think makes them look like "real men" but in fact exposes them for the big bullies that they really are. My father and mother are both deceased. But my dad treated my mother the way every man should treat his wife. She was the Queen in our home and he doted on her like she was still his sweetheart until the day she died at age 84. Abraham Lincoln once said, "The greatest gift a father can give to his children is to love their mother." So many men are unhappy with their own lives and they blame women. That way they don't have to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings. Sad. Pathetic. Again, thank you for your very good and important work.

And thank you for giving us hope as well - the hope that there are good and decent people out there - both men and women.

My blog, My rules.....

I would like to welcome everyone who has arrived here - no matter the road you traveled. I only have some very simple rules. Please try to keep your comments clean (I am a mom and as such I do not like extreme vulgar language). I despise the "c" word so it will never be published. Otherwise I will be very lax as I want this site to be a release to those of you who have an issue with the MRAs in general and Sacks and his followers in particular.

I must also slide this little disclaimer in here too (just to protect myself from those pesky little creatures called lawyers and those MRAs who would think they will file a lawsuit or something silly like that against me). I am using YOUR WORDS on this site as well as publishing my opinion of those words. Nothing more, nothing less. I am "not" responsible for comments made by others on my site and if MRAs can behave then they might very well be allowed to post here. Like I said, this is intended to be a release for the women who have been attacked on various sites online to have a little comic break from these constant attacks.

I am posting this blog and all of my comments as a naturally born citizen of the United States and am exercising my right to free speech.

I must also caution my followers and posters against posting any identifying information. This is for your own safety, as I foresee this blog quickly becoming a very hated tool against MRAs who abuse and those who assist them. I mus also make one additional rule concerning posting other people's (such as our exes) personal information. I have been through a very nasty divorce and I know how our exes can react. As such I must make it a number one rule, as much pleasure it would give us, against posting any information which could identify our exes. First names (or initials if the name is uncommon) is fine but no last names. This will be enforced on this blog, unlike "other blogs."