Glenn's Cult?: Beauty without Brains? (or should be called) Let's poke some fun at women

December 19, 2008

Beauty without Brains? (or should be called) Let's poke some fun at women

As a blond myself I must say that Sacks' diatribe is offensive. Rather than say this is quite funny, you should be appalled at this. Not all blonds are stupid. (here ya go porky - I am giving you a freebie here lol - watch folks he will take it and run lmao)

Sacks must really want women to not like him. Read his post here and you decide.

We've done several protests over anti-male advertising, and when we do them I inevitably get letters from a few people who say "Commercials aren't making only men look stupid--what about the 'dumb blond' commercials"?

As a whole I don't buy this argument--women are portrayed far better than men in advertising in general--but on occasion these people have a point. The Mercedes ad above, which is quite funny, is one example.(LINK - published 12/18/08 @ www.glennsacks.com)

Luckily, there is one woman who I must say is a hero to all feminists. Lisa KS posts this:

Lisa KS Says:

December 18th, 2008 at 10:24 pm
Spoken by someone whose entire interaction with young attractive blonds in any number has obviously consisted solely of drooling over them from a distance. Eye. Roll. :)

And this:

Lisa KS Says:

December 18th, 2008 at 10:24 pm
Jeez, Glenn. Do you ever describe your posted man-bashing commercials as "quite funny?"

And this:

Lisa KS Says:

December 19th, 2008 at 12:13 am
I assure you that my idea of the lives pretty much any subsection of men lead is a lot more accurate than the idea that young, attractive blond women get through their lives without really having to apply themselves. :)

And lastly this:

Lisa KS Says:

December 19th, 2008 at 12:14 am
Glenn--so are you putting up the above commercial as an example of there being nothing wrong with poking good-natured fun at women, or are you putting it up as an example of woman-bashing? I thought you meant it as the latter, but if you meant it as the former, sorry I got you wrong!

Well she gave him an out anyway. She has more patience with him (and his followers) than I do.

Link to Lisa KS blog - enjoy reading she is very edgy :-) She is also one of Glenn's Dissident article wroters and she makes some excellent points on both sites as well as has some fun along the way. Of course she seems to obviously not be one of those who stands to lose should one of the more psycho of Glenn's followers discover her location.

1 comment:

CA mama said...: Oh yeah -- Glenn *would* think it "quite funny"....he could never get a date with anyone in high school -- blonde, brunette, redhead, purple, polka-dotted.....he was never given the time of day by ANY woman in high school -- can we say ...born L-O-S-E-R..... So it is no surprise that eh thinks this is "quite funny".....; December 19, 2008 10:59 PM

WARNING!!!!!!

WARNING!!!!
I must warn all who come to this blog about clicking any links I provide. Unless I state this is a safe website you should take precautions in visiting any site listed as an MRA/FR site. To do so one could open up oneself to being stalked, hunted down, victimized, and even in worst case scenario - assaulted in real life or even killed. The men (and sometimes women) who post on the MRA/FR sites can be dangerous. One nly needs to read the venom spewing from their moouth to see evidence of that. I also post this due to the recent blogs and forums I have discovered over the last few weeks. These will slowly be added to the Cult Wall Of Shame. Please take adequate precaution when visiting these sites.

Fair Use Doctrine

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, entitled, "Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use," is the statutory codification of the fair use doctrine. This judicially developed concept strives to balance the public's need to know and be informed against authors' incentives to create. The copyright law contemplates that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission shall be for purposes such as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching, and that such fair use will not result in the infringement of a copyrighted work. As one may expect, authors and publishers usually take a restrictive view of the fair use doctrine, while users of copyrighted materials generally take a more expansive view.

http://www.publaw.com/work.html

Thank you too!!!!

I am now friends on a message board with a wonderful man. And you all thought we hated men :-) We despise abusive controlling men and women. We like men and women who are decent, honest, and caring. I will say no more as I do not want to ruin this. But those who fight this same fight, keep going!!! We are being seen and our message is getting out there.

Thank you. And thank you for the important work that you do. It gets my dander stirred up when little men hide behind a pen or a computer and spew out fear, hate and stuff that they think makes them look like "real men" but in fact exposes them for the big bullies that they really are. My father and mother are both deceased. But my dad treated my mother the way every man should treat his wife. She was the Queen in our home and he doted on her like she was still his sweetheart until the day she died at age 84. Abraham Lincoln once said, "The greatest gift a father can give to his children is to love their mother." So many men are unhappy with their own lives and they blame women. That way they don't have to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings. Sad. Pathetic. Again, thank you for your very good and important work.

And thank you for giving us hope as well - the hope that there are good and decent people out there - both men and women.

My blog, My rules.....

I would like to welcome everyone who has arrived here - no matter the road you traveled. I only have some very simple rules. Please try to keep your comments clean (I am a mom and as such I do not like extreme vulgar language). I despise the "c" word so it will never be published. Otherwise I will be very lax as I want this site to be a release to those of you who have an issue with the MRAs in general and Sacks and his followers in particular.

I must also slide this little disclaimer in here too (just to protect myself from those pesky little creatures called lawyers and those MRAs who would think they will file a lawsuit or something silly like that against me). I am using YOUR WORDS on this site as well as publishing my opinion of those words. Nothing more, nothing less. I am "not" responsible for comments made by others on my site and if MRAs can behave then they might very well be allowed to post here. Like I said, this is intended to be a release for the women who have been attacked on various sites online to have a little comic break from these constant attacks.

I am posting this blog and all of my comments as a naturally born citizen of the United States and am exercising my right to free speech.

I must also caution my followers and posters against posting any identifying information. This is for your own safety, as I foresee this blog quickly becoming a very hated tool against MRAs who abuse and those who assist them. I mus also make one additional rule concerning posting other people's (such as our exes) personal information. I have been through a very nasty divorce and I know how our exes can react. As such I must make it a number one rule, as much pleasure it would give us, against posting any information which could identify our exes. First names (or initials if the name is uncommon) is fine but no last names. This will be enforced on this blog, unlike "other blogs."