May 29th, 2009 at 9:36 am
...And Robert Franklin’s second reason is that the women had more contraception available to them? Oh god. How can you seriously use that as an excuse?
1 Pills - dozens of viaietes pills are hormones which cause damage
2 Patches more homonal damage
4 Implants even more hormonal damage, plus the difficulty of removal
5 Morning after pill hormones again and moral beliefs
6 Surgery invasive procedure, many time irreversible, many complications
7 Abortion invasive procedure, moral beliefs
8 Adoption moral beliefs, community stigmatism, possibly being found years after the fact and disruption of life for both child and mother
9 Abandonment no comment on this - a motehr who abandons is not mother at all
10 Murder - I added this on due to the number how arent punished foe killing their children please point out the quantity of stories where a mother has murdered her child compared to a man killing his child
1 Condems no hormones, no surgery, maybe not quite "comfortable"
2 Surgery invasive, complications but less so than for a woman
I would like to add another for both the man and the woman. And here is where they are both equals (which is how a true feminist wants things)
WHAT ABOUT ABSTINENCE???????