Showing posts with label lujlp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lujlp. Show all posts

September 12, 2009

They want multiple wives and many servant girls......






lujlp Says:

September 11th, 2009 at 11:44 pm
Becuase ture tradition marrige was one man half a dozen wifes and however many servent girls there were in the house


So I guess lujlp, you want this? Would these multiple wives you request be the variety to bow down to your every whim?










Please tell me when you invent that time machine, I would love to go back in time and get the first tv (nope not far enough back), maybe the first car? (nah still not far enough). Oh I know!!!!!! I can bring back the first wheel.

August 16, 2009

You heard it here first folks! Men REALLY do want to remove mothers from children.

lujlp Says:

August 15th, 2009 at 11:52 am
Given 1 in 12 womne will develop breast cancer it would be cheaper to remove the breast buds of all women at birth and issue vouchers for free breast jobs when they turn 18.

If people are going to argue cricucision to prevent one of of thousands of men getting cancer then why arent we argueing the same for women when it is one out of every dozen?


Now if we remove all breats from women, then how will the babies be fed? Oh that's why MAN created the bottle nipple we know today (Elijah Pratt). So women would no longer be needed except as the vessel to carry the child to life to be STOLEN by man.

I see how it works now.....




May 31, 2009

Notice the word "Transparently"?





9
lujlp Says:

May 29th, 2009 at 9:36 am
...Funny how angry MRAs get when one woman has one baby on her own. This idiot fathered 20. And can’t support them. And never will. The ultimate deadbeat dad. But I bet there is more support among MRAs for him than for a female who unexpectedly got pregnant and then continued the pregnancy


Seriouly can you not read? Quoted from Robert Franklin in the post above - should be easy enough to find its the first paragraph talking about this man

"Let me say clearly that Hatchett's behavior is transparently irresponsible. As a poorly-paid blue-collar worker, he cannot possibly support all those children. He cannot possibly contribute his fair share of support to them, and he knows it. His behavior is outrageous."

Yea, I can see how someone out of touch with reality would find that statment supportive


One must wonder why the octomom is labelled as irresponsible (with no qulifying adjectives) and this man who fathered 7 more children than octomom, is labelled as trasparently irresponsible? And exactly what does transparently irresponsible actually mean? That maybe there is more to this than meets the eyes? That maybe he is only slightly irresponsible?

Men's opinion of birth control (my comments in red)





9
lujlp Says:

May 29th, 2009 at 9:36 am
...And Robert Franklin’s second reason is that the women had more contraception available to them? Oh god. How can you seriously use that as an excuse?

Womens
1 Pills - dozens of viaietes pills are hormones which cause damage
2 Patches more homonal damage
3 Shots
4 Implants even more hormonal damage, plus the difficulty of removal
5 Morning after pill hormones again and moral beliefs
6 Surgery invasive procedure, many time irreversible, many complications
7 Abortion invasive procedure, moral beliefs
8 Adoption moral beliefs, community stigmatism, possibly being found years after the fact and disruption of life for both child and mother
9 Abandonment no comment on this - a motehr who abandons is not mother at all
10 Murder - I added this on due to the number how arent punished foe killing their children please point out the quantity of stories where a mother has murdered her child compared to a man killing his child

Mens
1 Condems no hormones, no surgery, maybe not quite "comfortable"
2 Surgery invasive, complications but less so than for a woman


I would like to add another for both the man and the woman. And here is where they are both equals (which is how a true feminist wants things)

WHAT ABOUT ABSTINENCE???????

'Nuff said.

Simple math and we can care for children

9
lujlp Says:

May 29th, 2009 at 9:36 am
Ok, so Robert Franklin thinks that a guy who fathered and can’t care of 20 kids by least 11 different women is somehow better than a woman who has 14 kids from one man. One of the reasons being that the children all have mothers to take care of them????

Lets see 14 kids divided by 1 parent equals 14
And 20 kids divided by 12 parents equals 1.6666

So yes simple math shows us it is better


Why don't you do this math then lujlp? 21 kids divided by one dad still equals 21 kids sharing ONE dad.



enter