Are YOU ready to rumble?

Okay so we start with the expose. Whortie and Petunia are steamin' mad now. So here we go on to the games, no holds barred. Our first job is to expose some "victim blamers." You see we have run across a photo from a protest about sexual assault and the comments beneath the photo show many still have the mentality of blaming the victim. She was wearing skimpy clothes. She was drunk. She was coming onto the perpetrator. These and so many more excuses are given to the rapist. There were even comments about the brevity of the crime. For shizzel sake, the victim should not have been assaulted!!! Anyway now onto the BLAMER WALL OF SHAME:

Tony Mortika Lacrosse Medley (Mortika Lacrosse)

Derek Trunk

Cindy Richards

Dustin Lester

Patrick Delar

James Robert Crumpacker Harbour

Christina Chavez

Screen shots to follow.

Even more on Teri Stoddard

Now I promised you some more on Teri and I do deliver. Sometimes I deliver in a better late than never fashion, but I do deliver. I will also continue to report on this issue.

First she writes this on Facebook:



Tenn's case has been publicized enough Teri. There was NO kidnapping, only a mother who was granted permission to leave an abusive relationship. At last count per publicized documents, Tenn was not allowed to go near the mother. Why do you only publish half truths?

Then we have this one:



A Facebook user has asked for support for AWN (Autism Women's Network) and Teri automatically Ass U Me's that this is another "gender" feminist group. And rather than apologize for Ass U Me'ing she simply ignores and thinks a simple "Thanks for explaining" should suffice. But lordy lordy if you dare to be critical of any men's movement, you should be hung. Or in the case of my previous post and doing this on her little Gestapo group on Yahoo, you get banned.

Now Teri moves on to Dr. Phil and his alleged ignorance of the issues. Dr. Phil is actually coming close to "getting it" sad to say. Sad that it took so long for him to get it.



Here she says she fears Dr. Phil's gender bias? I have rarely if ever seen Dr. Phil promote gender bias, except in cases where he tries to promote fatherhood, even when it should not be promoted (in cases of severe abuse). Thankfully he is starting to see that the women/mothers are not lying. And how did that come about? By listening to the grown child victims of PAS/PA/PAD/HAP diagnosis. Thank you Jennifer Collins for your work in this area. I must add I am sorry you and your brother had to endure the torture at the abuser's hands, but may I say I am extremely proud of you for coming through to the other side.



Now she fears CJE (Center For Judicial Excellence)? Why do you fear them Teri? Maybe it is because they can expose the lies of the fatherhood movement for the lies they are?

One last note before I move on to bigger fish. Moms who are undergoing systematic and vicious torture, we mus unite. This much Teri writes is true. We must unite and fight this fight for our children. We must keep them safe from harm since the system refuses to protect them.

---CALLING ALL VICTIMS OF JANELLE BURRILL (URGENT REQUEST)---

There will be a hearing on February 19, 2010 (2/19/2010) at the Sacramento Superior Court located at 3341 Power Inn Road, Sacramento, CA 95826, Department 128 beginning at 8:00 AM in which JANELLE BURRILL will be called as an “expert” witness (she was the reunification therapist that abused and traumatized my daughter!). Since she is a witness, we will have the opportunity to cross-examine her and SHRED her credibility!

WE NEED YOUR INPUT!!! If you would be willing to be a witness and testify to the abuse, fraud, and negligence you experienced with your OWN case with regard to Janelle Burrill, we would like to hear from you ASAP!!!

Together, if we can successfully debase Janelle Burrill’s credibility, it could set a legal precedence that would help debase her credibility with ALL cases. Lets FILL THE COURT WITH WITNESSES and work together to rid Sacramento of this menace!!!

Please contact me by email at yippyyea1@yahoo.com. Thank you!

Mike Hunter on child support (this one gets its own post due to the extreme hatred)

Mike Hunter Says:

October 25th, 2009 at 12:11 pm
"My ex makes 150K but will only pay 30 percent of first 75k for child support. Not enough to keep the kids at home with me home schooling."

Cry me a river. That comes out to $22,500 a year; much more then it costs to support a kid or two. I support a family of 3 on $17,500 a year, go to college full time, and actually have to work for my money instead of the government taking from someone and giving it to me. Not to mention that I have to pay taxes on the money I make unlike child support which is tax free. Also I bet Texas has a much lower cost of living then Florida.

I have to find a job to support them.

You mean you have to find a job to support yourself. Child support is not mommy support. How did you plan to obtain money to live if you have no job, and use child support for the children? The magical money tree in your back yard?

Also shouldn't you be required to support your children. Child support is suppose to cover 50% of the cost of raising a child. The custodial parent is responsible for paying for the other 50%. I'm willing to bet that the child support you receive covers a lot more then half of the cost of raising your children. If the child support gets spent on the children at all.

I do believe you're entitled to some financial support.

Why? She chose not to continue her education. She chose to stay at home instead of working. Why shouldn't be responsible for her decisions? If any other person would have chose not to continue their education, and not to advance their career they would still be expected to work.

Is there some reason that she can't work such as disability? If she wanted to find employment she could find a job somewhere to support herself. Jobs flipping burgers, cleaning toilets, or washing dishes aren't too hard to find. Why should she not be forced to be financially accountable for herself, and the children she elected to have; just like every male born in this country is.

Okay nothing like some real hatred right at first blow - "Cry me a river"?

Now again we come to choices and decisions. Terri and her husband made a choice as to what Terri would do if they had children and up until this point, they had been following that path. Now because her husband has made a choice without consulting anyone and with very little thought as to how this would affect the children, he is going to become a woman. Hmmm lets see if I have this right? Two people discussing how life will work in regards to homeschooling versus one person arbitrarily deciding to do something which will not only affect himself but many others? Yep I think I got that scenario right - PATRIARCHY and it is okay in this FR/MRA eyes.

And gotta love this one - child support is supposed to be 50%. Men constantly are saying oh but I buy them clothes, I buy them food, I do this or I do that when they are with me. They do not get the costs of raising a child. They do not see the day in day out costs. This woman might be lucky and find a job (in this economy people with excellent resumes are unemployed so good luck with that one). So she is going to be able to find a job to go along with the 22.5k PER YEAR that she might or might not get from him. Again this is what she MIGHT get.

And again in his closing statement he is de-focusing on the choice made by the husband and focusing on a choice that was in all likelihood made by both the wife and the husband and condemning her for it. Nothing like victim blame in all it's glory here.

On a side note - Mike please share where in Florida you live so when I vacation there with my family, I can avoid the obvious hate filled area in which you live. And I say that simply because you are walking about able to post on websites and nobody has seen fit to expose your hate? You have yet to commit a hate crime against anyone? And you expect a judge to give you some sort of parenting time with your children? What so you can perpetuate your hate? Give us another generation of haterz?

Women mean nothing in Ohio

Ohio Bill Would Include Father's Right's in Abortion Decision-Making Process

An Ohio lawmaker has re-introduced legislation that would include a father's rights in the abortion decision-making process. Under Roe v. Wade, fathers are left out of the equation when a woman considers whether or not to have an abortion that would end the life of their child.

I really have no comments on this. This would be a huge blow to victims rights, womens rights and would make some FR/MRA types very happy as evidenced by the pure joy in the original article. Imagine if you can the horror of the victim of incest or rape when she attempts to secure an abortion for whatever reason, and she is told, I am sorry we must have the alleged father appear and give his "permission"?

Let's charge Rihanna....

79
Rubic Says:

March 18th, 2009 at 7:31 pm
Jeana,

I'd say the consensus is more that Rhianna should at least be investigated also, and at worst, also charged. Nobody is excusing Brown, we just refuse to excuse Rhianna.

Quit putting words into people's mouths.

I see Rubic....Rihanna should be charged, so what do we charge her with? Ummm lets see....Is there such a thing as having her face in the wrong place? Like she moved her face so it would collide with his FIST????? And what kind of drug are you smoking? I now see why if you are a NCF, why that is in place. The judge realized that was the best choice for all parties concerned.......

If you can't take the heat......

Well I guess there are quite a few who would choose to not be in the kitchen then sonja....

47
Sonja Says:

March 18th, 2009 at 4:08 pm
And I said it in the other thread, jeana: She copped a few bruises.

Yep, I feel SOOOOO sorry for her that she was *gasp* put in hospital over a few bruises.

I believe the phrase "poor diddems" applies.

She was as much a victim of her own stupidity as she was of his fists. Fact of life: Fights escalate. If you can't take the heat...

Satchmo join your sisters in hate

People think I am mentally ill. That is the furthest thing from the turth. I am so f-ing sick of men (and even more so of women) who spout this woman hate. Men and women who blame another woman when she is a victim. We would never dream of blaming someone who has had their wallet lifted. We would never dream of blaming someone whose family member was injured or killed by a drunk drive. I can see that scenario now - well Mr. Bob I am sure sorry your wife was paralyzed by this drunk driver but you see, she was out driving around and she just so happened to get in his/her path. Did she really need to be out driving. She should have stayed home.

Ummmm okay stachmo get off your dam high horse and quit with the female hate. It doe NOT become you.

One last thing, we are to believe that you as a female and yoru boyfriend are continual victims of his ex-wife simply because YOU say it is so? Ummmmm again okay......

License to Kill? Not likely.....

23
IG Says:

March 29th, 2009 at 9:11 am
You could have the nicest husband and kill him in cold blood and just say "domestic violence" and walk.

Yep, the courts pretty much give them a liscense to kill....

So IG explain to me then why a woman who was abused (numerous people testified about this and this was during the time when abuse was NOT recognized) was tried for a murder that she did not commit - her husband committed this murder - was found guilty and was thrown in jail for 29 years!!!! Click Here to read more about Connie Keel.

Moms killing themselves? Not likely - dads are beating us to the punch...

These are some of the headlines which greeted Parenting Magazine’s new “Mad at Dad” survey which found that 31% of mothers get “little or no help” with childcare and 46% of mothers “get irate with their husbands once a week or more.” The New York Times called the survey “disturbing,” while a Washington Post columnist announced that mothers are “literally killing themselves.”

This was lifted from Glenn Sacks website (http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3437) - I will not directly link you will have to work to go to his site. My point over this post and Sacks' misinformation is simply this. One need only look at the recent headlines to see that while women work hard, men are actually killing women (and children, aunts, uncles, grandparents, and basically anyone who gets in their way).

In Florida there has been one murder/suicide carried out by a man every week for the last month. People excuse these murders by blaming the economy or anything so we do not have to truly look at the cause of the problem (angry and controlling men). I have to point out that one of these men (the most recent perp of a murder/suicide) decided to try to take out a police officer (he did not succeed with that task thankfully) as well as his girlfriend, her son, and himself. The news reports state that he was in the midst of a foreclosure. Then we have those same reporters go on to discuss the arsenal this man had in his possession and the lethality and cost of those weapons. One of the weapons in this man's arsenal was a 50 caliber ammo and weapon.

One of the local news shows did a recent story on all of the weapons that Langford had at his disposal and by selling these weapons, any "financial" issues that plagued this man could have been dispatched quickly. According to this local news show, a 50 caliber assault rifle can cost anywhere from 2,000 to 12,000 dollars. This was only one of numerous handguns, rifles, and weaponry at this monster's disposal. To see the weapons available to this man click HERE and watch the video.

You can also learn by going through Orlando Senntinel's website coverage of this case that Langford's ex-wife sought dv injunctions on two separate occasions.

Petunia deduces this was not a man ravaged by guilt over financial issues, she believes this was another man who was not able to control his victims any longer.

And in short order we now have more victims to add to the statistics of dv.

Good dads?

These are the men folks who are these good dads who want responsibility for the children of the next generation......

Keep reading there will be more on this

Watch this video

"A lot of mothers can be vindictive bitches..."

"Social services decides to honor a restraining order that the 'so-called' mother...."

"Marital Rape is on the rise....all the wife has to do is say just before she leaves to her new boyfriend....is accuse a man....of rape....."

"There are people out there ready to put a bullet in a few judges' head, more than a few..."

Orlando to have new program to assist in determining lethality in DV situations

Questionnaire helps Orlando police break spiral of domestic abuse

Now this is one SMALL step in the right direction. Also notice that there are 52 comments as of 4:00PM EST February 24, 2009.

Some of the comments while possibly an attempmt at humor are nonetheless so very true. Men who attempt to control their wives through the use of violence are then left windering why she then tires of the assaults and uses that information in her divorce of him. One poster on this site sums it up while humorously, in terms we can all understand:

honeypot
Springfield, VA
Reply »
|Report Abuse |#20 Wednesday Feb 11
Amen to Orlando for taking a Pro-Active approach to domestic violence. Years ago I was the victim of a violent stalker and there were no laws to protect. LE's hands were tied until a crime was committed. If this new technique can thwart even one assault, there is value. Prevention is a large part of the cure and it doesn't cost the taxpayers anything for the cops to ask questions.

And a note to the poster who believes women use Domestic Violence to prosper in divorce proceedings. B/S. Women use MEN to prosper in divorce proceedings. For some, that's what marriage is for. Don't like it; don't marry -- it's a fools' investment.

One can only hope that surrounding cities and counties in Florida will step up to the plate as OPD and Orlando has done.

Do the twist....They sure do know how to 'twist' scenarios to fit into their teeny tiny little world over at Sacks

Robert Franklin sure knows how to do the twist and make facts and statistics fir into his teeny tiny little bubble of a world. He states that because 60% of all those convicted of human trafficking are female, this means that us awful evil wimmin are bad, bad, bad.

Well RF could it also mean that those who are high up in this little chain of trafficking are simply not being caught and convicted and the little person is caught, tried and convicted?

Let's look at this on this side of the border. When you think of human trafficking (or using humans - no matter their sex) for profit, what comes to mind? What pops into my mind is the ever present prostitution racket. Now what pops into mind when you think of prostitutes? Ahh again females, with a rare exception here and there for a male prostitute. Now what comes to mind when thinking of the pimps (or "traffickers")? Ahh yes again - males come to mind when thinking of the pimps or traffickers of the prostitution trade. There are rare exceptions for a female pimp. Now one last question (I realize all these questions are really taxing you limited intellectual abilities here). What types of punishment is there for the actual prostitutes versus the pimps or even shall we say the customers?

Click here to read an article on targeting of prostitutes and customers. In the first paragraph it is stated that customers are only targeted in 10% of the cases. There really is not the volume of information about pimping or pandering available online as there is for prostitution.

So what does this say to me? It says again women are targeted and men are given a virtual free pass. One note to the pandering information available....There are pages upon pages of information about Hiedi Fleiss available. So yet again we have more women/females targeted. What is wrong with this picture people?