SAVE Elert: Bruised Barbie Photo Proceeds Shouldn't Discriminate OR Teri Stoddard again gets it wrong...

Whortie here reporting from the trenches...

Seems Stoddard again is up to her old games only this time she has some deep pockets to help her play them.

SAVE Elert: Bruised Barbie Photo Proceeds Shouldn't Discriminate

This is a photograph (
http://www.saveserv ices.org/ wp-content/ uploads/bruisedb arbie-300x207. png)
taken recently of television star Heather Morris (Brittany from "Glee")
engaged in mock domestic violence with a male model.

In a series of fashion photos, Tyler Shields shows a black-eyed Morris
dressed as Barbie, staring seductively into the camera, and later merrily
pressing a hot iron to her partner's crotch. The photos depict a
getting-what- he-deserves storyline that reinforces serious misconceptions
about domestic violence. Men are stereotyped as abusers, and Barbie
supposedly strikes a blow for victims everywhere.

The truth is that men are just as likely to be the victims of domestic
violence as women (although they are much less likely to report the crime)
and most of the time, domestic disputes result in mutual violence.
Predictably, reactions to the photos have focused only on the abuse to
Barbie: her assault of Ken has been ignored, even though it is the more
serious crime.

Rita Smith, director of the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence
(NCADV), was asked about the photos, but it was as if she had seen a
different set of photos. "I don't know if Tyler is aware but I'm quite sure
there are plenty of women who have been abused by these kinds of household
appliances and children as well being hit with electrical cords," she told
E! News, disregarding male victims everywhere.

Even worse, nothing has been said about the photographer' s donation to an
advocacy group that disregards male victims of domestic violence. Shields
told the Daily Mail that he would donate the proceeds to Glamour magazine's
Tell Somebody campaign, which focuses exclusively on violence perpetrated
against women.

We want you to ask Shields, politely, to select a different beneficiary- one
that serves all victims, whether they are female or male, gay or straight-so
that proceeds from the sale of a photo making light of domestic violence
victims will not go to a project that stereotypes men as the only abusers.

Write to Tyler Shields: info@tylershields. com

Sincerely,

*Teri*

Teri Stoddard, Program Director

Hmmmm still peddling your own statistics I see Ms. Stoddard?

Well Whortie and Petunia and those THOUSANDS of victims that Teri says do not exist are asking you the reader to wrote to the photographer as well and thank Shields for choosing such a wonderful benefactor in order to assist the TRUE victims of domestic violence. You can reach Tyler Shields at info@tylershields.com

Batterers 101: Another look at the power and control wheel

We are nearing the end of another year. There have been some victories for battered moms and their children. There have also been many more moms forced into this strange twilight existence known as non-custodial mommy. We made progress and we have been shoved down. I thought now would be a good time to point out that the holidays are the worst time for the victims, especially those victims of the father's rights crowd and their leaders, followers, and assorted cult gang members.



So we have here a lesson in Battering 101. We turn to the Power and Control wheel and focus on two of the wedges. The first is the using "Using Coercion and Threats" wedge and the second is the "Using Isolation" wedge. You may ask why I am going over this with you gentle reader. Many of you know the tactics, it is simply amazing it is not more apparent to others.

Now to connect the dots for you.

I was sent this image (as far as I know it is unaltered and you can check this information by dates and times if you feel so inclined. We have a well-known woman hater, father's rights advocates stating this:

Removing "friends" who associate with and promote a gender-biased (man-hating) unbalanced (disturbed) mothers rights advocate. The rest of us know that this has nothing to do with gender. CD, your hatred is counter-productive to real reform. But thanks for showing your true colors.

and directly below it, this:

I'll give people until Jan. 1 to disassociate from her before I cut them. This is warning #1.

Okay so first we have an "advocate" for "equality" and presumably peace telling people that they MUST remove 'CD' or they will be removed from her friends list. Now to me (forgive me if I am wrong) sounds a lot like isolation to me. IE: You either do not be friends with this person and only with people I deem to be okay, or I will take you off my friends list. So she is now isolating the people on her friends list from being friends with the mysterious 'CD' or they will no longer be allowed the privilege of being her friend.

Can we say COERCION/THREATS and ISOLATION? I wonder if we were to look back at many of the nasty things being said by this "advocate" whether we would indeed find more similarities to the Power and Control wheel? Does she engage in any other activities like this destined to make the P/C list?

Readers your call. Send me pics like this one below and what wedge of the wheel you think she is violating? I can think of another one just from this posting on Facebook alone, but I have had my fun tonight. YOUR TURN!!!!

Teri Stoddard and self reporting staticstics

Now if this were not extremely rich I would be rolling on the floor. And let me tell you, the sight of Mz Pigg rolling on the floor is one to behold. Or so I have been told. Now on to the gist of this post. It seems (from my informant) that Teri is now claiming that women are MORE abusive than men. Any other time it was "AS" abusive as men. Guess you had to up the ante huh Teri? It did not serve YOUR purpose to say as violent, now women must be MORE violent? And people wonder why I have informants (and you cannot chase all of them away Scary Teri) to INFORM me of what is happening in the FReak and FRag world. It is like the Twilight Zone but for SCARY people. You fit in real well Scary Teri.

And it seems that Scary is extremely proud of the fact that she is self-reporting her own stats about how abusive widdle ol' women folk truly are. Scary news flash..... you are a woman too. Well you APPEAR to be a woman. After looking at that nasty foot shot in the DC fountain, one has to truly wonder :-)

On to the screen shot (Thanks A). I have even made it super convenient so you can simply close out the picture and keep this open for commenting.

Even more on Teri Stoddard

Now I promised you some more on Teri and I do deliver. Sometimes I deliver in a better late than never fashion, but I do deliver. I will also continue to report on this issue.

First she writes this on Facebook:



Tenn's case has been publicized enough Teri. There was NO kidnapping, only a mother who was granted permission to leave an abusive relationship. At last count per publicized documents, Tenn was not allowed to go near the mother. Why do you only publish half truths?

Then we have this one:



A Facebook user has asked for support for AWN (Autism Women's Network) and Teri automatically Ass U Me's that this is another "gender" feminist group. And rather than apologize for Ass U Me'ing she simply ignores and thinks a simple "Thanks for explaining" should suffice. But lordy lordy if you dare to be critical of any men's movement, you should be hung. Or in the case of my previous post and doing this on her little Gestapo group on Yahoo, you get banned.

Now Teri moves on to Dr. Phil and his alleged ignorance of the issues. Dr. Phil is actually coming close to "getting it" sad to say. Sad that it took so long for him to get it.



Here she says she fears Dr. Phil's gender bias? I have rarely if ever seen Dr. Phil promote gender bias, except in cases where he tries to promote fatherhood, even when it should not be promoted (in cases of severe abuse). Thankfully he is starting to see that the women/mothers are not lying. And how did that come about? By listening to the grown child victims of PAS/PA/PAD/HAP diagnosis. Thank you Jennifer Collins for your work in this area. I must add I am sorry you and your brother had to endure the torture at the abuser's hands, but may I say I am extremely proud of you for coming through to the other side.



Now she fears CJE (Center For Judicial Excellence)? Why do you fear them Teri? Maybe it is because they can expose the lies of the fatherhood movement for the lies they are?

One last note before I move on to bigger fish. Moms who are undergoing systematic and vicious torture, we mus unite. This much Teri writes is true. We must unite and fight this fight for our children. We must keep them safe from harm since the system refuses to protect them.

More on Teri Stoddard

Now this has become simply amusing. Teri thinks she is getting one over on Petunia by blocking me and all the poor people who joined her little email group, and in doing so she is keeping me from reporting on her. Teri we are everywhere. Get over yourself. I only post on you because you leave yourself wide open for it. Besides it amuses my readers as well. So with that said let's move on to some of the lighter stuff in this post and then we will get on with the serious (hurtful and hateful to protective mothers and others) in a second and possibly third post.



Now Teri has advertised everywhere that she is a former foster parent, daycare provider, and now lists on Facebook that she operates a Nanny service. As a parent, I would be mortified to send my child into a home where she has 3 elderly cats and one dog who continually urinate everywhere. So much so that she is considering banishing the cats to a laundry room and purchasing a doggy diaper to stop the dog. How about this as a solution Teri? Get your butt off of the computer and take care of your animals. Cats who have these issues require medical attention. Or you might be using a litter that is creating sensitivities in them. As far as the dog, maybe you should not have taken on such responsibilities since you are so busy with all of your little "projects".

Now for the second issue (which is amusing and sad at the same time).



Teri has taken over the running of a very old Single Parents Group on Yahoo. It was on Onelist before Yahoo Groups days and at that time she had just joined. Somehow (although the posts on the group do not show how or when) Teri managed to take over as owner of the group. She now runs this little group as her own Gestapo. Do not disagree with her or you get sent to the corner. Do not state an opinion (unless you agree with Teri) or you get removed. Do not post any news article unless it shows how bad moms and women are. Again you get sent to the corner or put on moderation. Fathers are allowed to post multiple stories on how bad women/moms are, but when a single mom complains about her ex (not every man in the world - just her ex), said mom gets called on the carpet. Have you ever wondered Teri why you only get 50-75 posts per week with a member list of over 7000?



Do you really think Claudine has made ALL of these blogs Teri? Really? Really? On that note, Claudine you must tell me how you manage to do all of these blogs (at last count there were hundreds of them, including this one), alleging be mentally ill, do all of the protests you do, sit down for long media interviews regarding your abuse, and still manage to have time for yourself? You have a secret and I want it. Oh yeah I forgot, Teri think Claudine created this blog also, so it is a no-brainer, there is no asking Claudine for advice on how to stretch my days, since I am Claudine. Did you all follow that? I think I confused myself with it all, how about you?

One last item before we move on:



Now poor Teri wants everyone to stop picking on her because she is just oh so sensitive. Cry me a river, build a bridge, and get over it, Teri.

Okay enough with the fun stuff, now on to more serious and extreme hate issues.

Part Three: Teri Stoddard and her claim to fame in Father's Rights circles

Teri, this is not apples and oranges. You are helping men who have RO's on them (sometimes multiple RO's from many different women) and men who stalk women simply because they supplied one cell that resulted in a pregnancy. Children are nurtured by mothers in ALL species including the human species and mothers should never be removed from a child's life. Children do not NEED fathers, they need to be cared for which requires financial assistance and they need nurturing and love. Abraham Lincoln said it best when he said the best gift a man can give his children is to respect and love their mother. Beating her within an inch of her life or raping her is NOT respect or love.



Stop Family Violence and Liz Library ARE based on TRUE facts and TRUE stories. Women who are featured on SFV have evidence and documentation to support the facts that they or their children were abused and the courts gave the children to the abuser. Stitches and broken bones and black eyes and ripped hymens and STD's do NOT lie Teri.



Children are not protected in Shared Parenting states. I am in contact with many women (some who supply me with information for this blog) and they have either lost their children to the abuser, or the abuser has UNSUPERVISED contact with the children resulting in more abuse. There is one woman in Florida who was abused by her husband. She left and that man proceeded to gain "shared parental responsibility" and then called the state on this woman and several of her supporters. The most recent call involved an elementary aged female child and the removal of all of her clothes due to a sexual abuse claim by this man. This child was humiliated and for what? The child had a heat rash which was verified by the doctor. This father simply wanted to make mom's life a living hell because - how DARE she leave him?

Now here are the links to relevant statutes in Florida concerning DV and child custody.

Parenting Coordinator

This section discusses PC's (those famous court whores) and whether they can be appointed. The woman and children in the paragraph above have been threatened with a PC due to the many unresolved issues surrounding custody. The ONLY reason one has not been appointed is because the abusive father has stated he cannot afford it. NOT because the mother was a victim of DV.

Shared Parental Responsibility

This section discusses whether Shared custody should be granted and states that only a conviction of DV is used. Again the woman above TRIED to get her abuser prosecuted. The State Attorney of Florida where she lives REFUSED to do so, even after they were contacted by a police officer regarding this case. That police officer went on to do everything he could in order to give this woman the proof the SA office so desired but was also unable to get enough proof.

Child Support and DV

This statute discusses the Registry for CS cases and what should be done if there are family violence indicators. The woman listed above has requested anonymity and has been refused until just recently. This is because she now has a caseworker who realizes that she and her children are the client and this caseworker works for her.

Court Whores

We don't need to get into this one as there are many blogs out there that cover those infamous court whores. But, Florida grants full and complete immunity to them like many other states.

Other cases filed between parties

This involves court paperwork requirements and tells how other cases between the parties must be reported to the courts hearing custody/dissolution cases.

More paperwork requirements

More of the same as above.

Inconvenient forum

The woman listed above has tried getting her case moved because she is not being afforded protection in her current court. She has been told that since her abuser was violent once before (YES ONLY ONCE) and no other violent acts occurred until after the birth of the children, that she knew he was violent and now she has to deal with it.

Parenting Course

This has one tiny section about DV which states that a parenting course does not have to be taken by both parents at the same time if DV is present. The woman above was forced to take the class with her abuser while an active RO was in place. She simply disregarded the order and presented paperwork for a completed, certified parenting course when the order was made and was dismissed from this requirement.

Court-ordered electronic communication between a parent and a child.

First it says that each parent's DV history is to be included in whether a determination about communication with the child is made. The woman above had an active RO against the abuser AND the abuser had a history of previous RO's with other intimates and no such determination was given to the children. The abuser was allowed free and ready access to the children.

Parental Relocation with a child

This discusses the rules and laws about relocation. Again, the woman above lived within a few miles of her abuser and was experiencing break-ins, stalking, harassment, and many other such issues. She moved 32 miles away from the father to a more highly populated area and the abuser took her back to court. He knew where the mother lived as he had resumed his stalking behavior yet again but perjured himself to the courts which was proven in court. Nothing was done to the abuser (no punishment for perjury) and thankfully the mother only got a lecture.

Dissolution

This woman asked for and received an injunction but the cases (dissolution and injunction) were combined against her wishes. This allowed the abuser to take the focus off the real issue of family violence and focus it on the non-issue of divorce. Dissolution and injunction/RO cases should NEVER be combined. EVER!

Definitions

Again this states that domestic violence is to be considered when creating a parenting plan, yet we can see from the many examples above that no such consideration was afforded this woman.

Now what do you suppose was the reason for all these 'blunders?' Well if you guessed that this woman was a SAHM and had not worked in many years and was only able to get a minimum wage job and relied on legal aid for a lawyer, you would have guessed right.

But enough of that - we should move on here. This is not about her this is about you, Teri, and just how deluded you can be.

You also state here that 80% of abuse claims are false? Other times you say 50%, other times it has been 90%. Which is it Teri? Can't you get your statistics straight?

Onward Ho!



I know of many cases where the NON-CUSTODIAL mother has sought assistance from a fatherhood program for visitation and child support in order to reduce the child support so she may be able to afford to live and NOT be HOMELESS and the result was being dumped to other agencies and then being turned away. These mothers are still homeless.

NEXT!







I only have one thing to say to this.

CLICK HERE!

HUNDREDS and HUNDREDS of cases where the father killed the children and there are so many this blogger has not time to list every single one. And often the stories do not make the news. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.....



Ah so we should have parents spying and stripping their children in order to keep an eye out for marks? We saw what happened to the woman and young female child above with shared parenting and abuser dad keeping an eye out for marks. Which by the way, the abuser also would get heat rashes due to his weight, just like the child does. Should a complaint of abuse or neglect be called in on abuser's new wife? Maybe on himself since he has a rash?

As far as your argument that mothers commit more abuse, we should factor in time spent with children. If it is as you say and women get custody 90% of the time and fathers only 10% of the time, we should play with the numbers some. Let's say there are 1,000 custody cases (there are more but this is just for example). So 900 children with moms, 100 children with dads. So if moms commit twice the abuse of dads, that must mean that mom abuser is 66% and dad abuse is 33% (again simplified because there is stranger abuse as well). How many children are abused? Let's say 100, unless you can give me a percentage of abused children compared to the whole population of children. So if you have 2/3 of 100 children abused by mom that would mean 66 children by mom and 33 children by dad. Now lets compare that to the entire group (not just the abuse victims). Sixty-children out of 900 works out to 7.3% of mothers abuse and 33% of the fathers abuse. There is no other way to work the numbers Teri, MEN do abuse more often than women - the numbers are completely skewed if you look at only part of the picture.

And if my small explanation is not helpful to you, you can simply go HERE and see what the NIS-3 (the most complete study which lists gender and marital status of abusers - the NIS-4 does not separate like the NIS-3 - hmmmm Fatherhood groups at work here?).

NEEEEEEEEEEEXXXXT......



Now we move on to placating and condescending behavior. What you are known for best. Next you will block and talk about behind their backs. Watch out ladies, myself and several others are on her little block list. She even has some from the father's movement on her little list as well, isn't that right Ray? And do not deny Teri is right out there in the open for everyone to see. Well most everyone :-)

You also help alleged abusers, why else would you be searching for a ride for a well-known father's rights activist who was supposed to be in court in OHIO yet was stranded in ILLINOIS, which just so happened to be where his alleged victims live?



Ahh here we go.... Why don't you name some of these alleged victims you have helped? Name one man who is known to have been a victim in your circle of friends. I imagine between myself and others we could dig up his history and show a history of abuse and self indulgent behavior (traffic tickets, civil lawsuits, etc). Are you talking about Mark Godbey? Hmmmm that one was recently in court for violations. Have any more you want to share? I am up for tearing any claim you have completely apart, Teri.



This is so not even worth the time to discuss - NEXXXXXXXTTTTT!



There are no lies about you Teri. Did you forget you condoned child sexual abuse on your single parents email group? Did you forget your run that group like a little Gestapo and those who disagree are moderated or kicked off? Do we need to remind you of your sexist website - Jugs For Justice? No link back - not giving THAT filth any kudos.

Oh and we all know WHY you write about fathers more than mothers. Isn't it because your son and his ex-girlfriend went through a custody battle back in 2002 or 2003? And you were angry at HER mother because she hired a lawyer for her daughter and grandaughter? You sure complained about it often enough on not only the group you now own (which you did NOT own back then) and several other single parent/mom groups. You go so angry with one group that you quit that group. Like I said, know thine enemy Teri and I know you rather well.



Oh here we go. Teri says we are done so we are done. Well guess what Teri? You cannot control Facebook like you do your little Gestapo single parents group. So again put THAT in your little pipe.



Oh boo hoo hoo, poor widdle Teri has someone picking on her. Actually it looks like to me that teri is having fact and logic thrown at her and she has no clue how to respond. She is very much like some of the alleged abusers she helps. When the victim does not back down Teri resorts to the "oh woe is me routine". Pretty sad....

Nextttttttttttt!



One comment:

NOW THAT IS A SCARY THOUGHT!

Nexxxxtttttttttt!



Murray Straus? That explains the skewed reports. He does not know anything about intimate partner violence. If a woman yells at her partner to stop beating her she is just as violent as he is - even if he is shooting at her with a gun or trying to stab her. Yeah go on with yo bad self Teri.

Nextttttttttttt!



Names Teri, Names. And again because you cannot take it like you dish it out and you cannot silence these two women, you are done. WHATEVER!!!!

NEXTTTTTTTTT!! (This is getting really old btw Teri - when will you just go away?)......



Oh and here we go with the self promotion. You keep right up with that Teri. See how far it gets you.

Part Two: Teri Stoddard and her claim to fame in Father's Rights circles

As promised more information on Teri - the Queen of Equality. Well she got that half right ;-)

So on to her resume. She now works for S.A.V.E Services which is online at SAVE: Stop Abusive and Violent Environments.

Now this all look peachy doesn't it? A nice new organization to help those victims of abuse. Well dig into it and it does not look so peachy after all. Who (or what) is SAVE Services? Looking at the domain registration shows that Natasha Spivack is the owner (registrant) of saveservices.org. Her email is through encount.com.

Screen shots below in case the owner is mysteriously changed or hidden (and these are saved in case anyone would like them for their own use):





What is encount.com and who is Natasha Spivack?

Eeeny meeeeny miney moe - Encount.com wins first exposure. Encount.com is a mail order bride company run by Natasha Spivack. This is quite interesting given the recent attention that has been made to regulating these types of businesses.

Now why is Natasha Spivack so important? Well it seems that Ms. Spivack was the recent litigant in a case against her and her company Encounters International by one of her former female clients.

Read about one of her male clients here (he was oh so shy yet this was his third marriage?).

Or you can read about Nataliya Fox here and how she was lied to, battered, and traumatized not just by her abusive ex husband, but also by the very organization who should have helped her. Link to appeal from that court case is HERE. Another story about this travesty-turned-fair is HERE. Notice that the case against the alleged abuser was dropped after he was ordered to attend a batterers intervention class in order to have his record expunged AND he claims that Nataliya attacked him. He also claims she was "nutty" and "a fruitcake." Hmmmmmm makes you think doesn't it especially in light of the recent posts on Teri's Single Parent Group on Yahoo?

Now is it just me or is it seemingly odd that a woman who was found guilty and ordered to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to another woman has now started an organization for the falsely accused? And that Teri our own Queen of Equality is helping her in that endeavor?



Now more postings will follow but I think this is enough for now. R tells me she is constantly researching this issue so as to make all of this fair and impartial (instead of the one-sided affair that Teri like to present).

More to come......

Part One: Teri Stoddard and her claim to fame in Father's Rights circles

I have been promising this article and plan to deliver several installments. I must first thank the woman whose diligence and persistence to help me has definitely paid off. I do not think I would have been able to collect half of what she has given to me any time soon. These big old hooves get in the way of typing really well and I usually use a speech to text program :-). Thank you again R for all of your hard work to researching and exposing this for all of us.

First we must ask who is Teri? Well according to her facebook page this is what she writes:

Queen of (parental) Equality: a children's advocate, day care provider turned journalist. Working for family law reform to bring due process and abolish gender-biased abuse policies. SHARED PARENTING WORKS! Free parenting plans below.

Now that is confusing to me since she has posted these kinds of things on other email groups:

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_10.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_6812.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_1470.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_641.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_6288.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_5424.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_358.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_1907.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_7891.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_5605.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_9377.html

Now I can understand a little bit - possibly Teri WANTS women to be subservient to men? Or does she WANT to be in control of other women?

Well we will continue to explore these as options. However let's see what her parenting experience entails:



If you read this email carefully you will see that she has four children by four different men. Hmmmm Teri think you could have picked any better? Maybe then you could have gone the route of what you preach. Oh yeah I know!!!! It is do as I say, not as I do.

We have another prime example of this below:



And now we have where this anger towards women mothers has come from:



You see how she has to start getting digs on the mother of "her" grandchild? Does it get worse? You bet!

She is on a single mothers group and she whines on and on about how her son is so wonderful and the mother of her grandchild and the "other grandmother" are so awful and terrible. That group did not buy into her BS and Teri eventually left that group.

She has to post about how long she has gone without sex:



Wow oh wow! Six whole years as of 2002? Wonder if any of those lonely father's rights guys has indulged her (see earlier posts on here entitled real play or role play for that answer)?

So really what is it that has got her so upset that she flips from being a normal woman who was spurned and whose kids are not cared for by dad (read earlier picture about child support/welfare) to this crazed fanatic for men's/father's rights?



Now she is writing articles for the Examiner (claims she is a reporter now because she does this - hey I am a reporter too) :-). She also works for a nanny service (maybe this service should be warned?) and newly added to her resume is S.A.V.E. Services for Falsely Accused. R researched this issue for me (thank you again R) and with that we move to our second post.

Here is a sneak peek at what provoked R to forward all of her information to me before she was completely done with her research.

Notice the male bashing subject line (as if having a speech or protest against abuse could be considered male bashing?):

Biscuit Queen AKA Jen from SYG

I tried warning her yet she paid no mind. Now you can click on any of these links:

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_10.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_6812.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_1470.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_641.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_6288.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_5424.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_358.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_1907.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_7891.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_5605.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_9377.html

Or perhaps even go here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePatriarchy/ to see just how BQ aka Jen views her own sex. She will subject herself to denigration in the name of father's rights - just like her cohort Teri Stoddard. We even have a small picture of her (possibly).



Hmmm she is with a man here. One must wonder if she is a standing member of the second wives club? Oh and for one last perusal you really should look to this post on SYG where she plays suck up to one of the crazies who has decided that nobody will listen to him so their little club should just delete his account. What outdoors - you can't figure it out on your own how to delete your account? You have to make some public display of oh woe is me so everyone will feel sorry for you? Or do you truly not know how to operate a computer? I think we should start a "I do not know how to operate a computer and I am a angry man who used to beat my wife and kids" club. Oh wait they already have several of those online - they are just disguised as "My wife left me and hates all men so I will post online as a man who is hated by women" club or even better they are disgguised as "I beat my wife because she would not do what I told her to do and she defended herself so now I am a victim" club. Their names are:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Do I really need to post the names? I think all of my readers are computer literate and can figuse out what boards and forums I am talking about.

Oh and be looking for more information on this Biscuit Queen - a preliminary search of Google has turned up quite a bit of material :-)

More on Steele - the "artist" and "author"

Okay so now if anyone who cares has been following this you can see that from my blog that Steele was arrested for spray painting all over the side of the courthouse building - "Steele Boys Rights Denide" (spelling error HIS) in Boston. The fathers rights movement is up in arms to protect their poor abused comrade in arms. First let's check out The Examiner and what is being said over there:

It seems Steele's wife wanted him to bring in most of the family income so she could continue to enjoy the stay-at-home parent lifestyle. Was that fair? Equal parenting adocates ask, "Shouldn't marriage be about give and take, compromise, co-parenting? Why couldn't Steele be the stay-at-home parent while he worked on his writing career?" One wonders what exactly prevented Mrs. Steele from stepping up and using her education to benefit her family.

I posted earlier why Mrs. Steele was staying home. They had two chidlren who were considered special needs children and Mr. Steele by all court records and accounts of those present at the court hearing was incapable and unwilling to accept that fact. (posted here).

Then we move onto the actual men involved in this thing and that is where it gets scary and amusing.

Part 1:

Judge Dineen decided to release Steele on Jan 12 pending receipt of $2800 in restitution being sent by his mother. There will be no probation either. Steele's case wasn't heard until about 10:20 and was moved ahead because there were four of us there support of Steele. As I witnessed Dineen's handling of the cases before his court, it struck me that he was a fair and compassionate judge. He proved that with his decision in the Steele case.

Now let's look at this statement. First Steele's MOTHER has to pay for his transgessions. Isn't that classic? Then there is no probation? I wonder if Joe Blow spray painting the courthouse would have been so lucky? Another instance of fathers being given every chance in the world to step up to the plate. And of course you have the ever present bloated heads of those who showed up (all FOUR of them) who truly believe that they influenced the court to move up Steele's hearing. Petunia thinks is it much more likely that the judge wanted these guys gone but hey I am no mind reader. Too bad these men claim to be just that.

We then move on to the scary here:

They had to get him out easy. If there was a trial, we could easily prove the abuse and criminal conduct of that court system. We could have supplied hundreds of victims of that corrupt court. I wonder if the state knew about us wanting to support this guy. I've always said it will take some kind of physical attack and subsequent trial to break up their RICO. I'm surprised they even want him to pay restitution. If he had conviction (balls), he would say no deal and force a trial against the state. It took a shooting of a judge to change things in Nevada.

Now does anyone see anything wrong with this?!?!?!?!?!? Is this person actually suggesting and condoning violence against others? And to clarify - the shooting of a judge also entailed the MURDER of the shooter's wife who was in the process of divorcing him. This person (the shooter) had joint custody. So much for the theory that joint custody solves everything.

You can even do a search for him and see so many misguided individuals who are actually defending him. If he had stuck around, if he had not ignored his son's special needs, if he had not decided on a whim to be a writer when he has 4 children to support, if, if, if, if, we could go on with the "ifs" all night. Fact of the matter is, the divorce judge was presented with the details of this case. She decided his divorce on the merits that both parties presented. If Steele was unhappy about the decision there are appeals and other LEGAL measuers he could have pursued. But the fact remains he did none of this and instead chose to become a martyr. Thankfully by the comments on the news articles he is not fooling everyone. Maybe there is hope yet.