Glenn's Cult?: GS

Showing posts with label GS. Show all posts

October 20, 2009

Hmmmm no injury so it was not an assault and DV?

I would never defend what Monserrate did. His act of pulling Giraldo through the hallway was not appropriate behavior, even though it apparently did no injury to her.

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=4309

This link is NOT clickable - I will not give those "male homo sapiens" any credit.

Ummm let me see if I have this right? This man was dragging a woman around and yanking her to and fro and because there is no injury to this woman - we are to say no harm no foul? Just be a good boy and don't do it again? Or hey how about this one - if you must do this again, then by all means make sure you are not caught on video. Yeah that one works, now how do we pass the news along? Oh I KNOW!!!!! We can just post it on GS website!!!! That works!!!! Or maybe how about SYG? How about AM? Oh any of those will work. Or maybe even The Patriarchy. Those women on there listen to us "big, strong, smarter than women" - REAL MEN!!!!! And REAL MEN can do these things.

March 31, 2009

The KING himself is concerned?!?!?!?!?

2) That being said, Yoshida looks so small and frail that I'm a bit concerned about her ability to handle sharp comebackers. Hopefully she's got good reflexes.

2) She throws a sidearm knuckleball--very rare. The only one I ever heard of doing that was Dan Quisenberry, who only used it for a couple years and it wasn't his main pitch. If she can actually throw this pitch, she may be very durable, considering that the knuckleball takes far less out of your arm than other pitches, and the sidearm motion is more natural than the conventional overhand motion. From the video above, there seems to be very little stress on her arm.

3) One thing that I think will be difficult for her is hitting. Pitchers aren't expected to hit much, but they do have to do it a little. Does anybody know if the Japanese leagues use the Designated Hitter rule? That would increase her chances.

Oh Sackypoo, she is just oh so small and oh so frail, we must protect the little womyn....PLEASE!!!!!! Women can do whatever they want, whenever they want. If a woman wants to be POTUS, then she by god has the right to try to do so. If she wants to care for her children by being a SAHM, then she can do that too. WOMEN do not need tubs o' lard like you to protect us. Lose the knight in shining armor act. It does not become you at all.

Oh and learn how to number too.....

March 29, 2009

Moms killing themselves? Not likely - dads are beating us to the punch...

These are some of the headlines which greeted Parenting Magazine’s new “Mad at Dad” survey which found that 31% of mothers get “little or no help” with childcare and 46% of mothers “get irate with their husbands once a week or more.” The New York Times called the survey “disturbing,” while a Washington Post columnist announced that mothers are “literally killing themselves.”

This was lifted from Glenn Sacks website (http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3437) - I will not directly link you will have to work to go to his site. My point over this post and Sacks' misinformation is simply this. One need only look at the recent headlines to see that while women work hard, men are actually killing women (and children, aunts, uncles, grandparents, and basically anyone who gets in their way).

In Florida there has been one murder/suicide carried out by a man every week for the last month. People excuse these murders by blaming the economy or anything so we do not have to truly look at the cause of the problem (angry and controlling men). I have to point out that one of these men (the most recent perp of a murder/suicide) decided to try to take out a police officer (he did not succeed with that task thankfully) as well as his girlfriend, her son, and himself. The news reports state that he was in the midst of a foreclosure. Then we have those same reporters go on to discuss the arsenal this man had in his possession and the lethality and cost of those weapons. One of the weapons in this man's arsenal was a 50 caliber ammo and weapon.

One of the local news shows did a recent story on all of the weapons that Langford had at his disposal and by selling these weapons, any "financial" issues that plagued this man could have been dispatched quickly. According to this local news show, a 50 caliber assault rifle can cost anywhere from 2,000 to 12,000 dollars. This was only one of numerous handguns, rifles, and weaponry at this monster's disposal. To see the weapons available to this man click HERE and watch the video.

You can also learn by going through Orlando Senntinel's website coverage of this case that Langford's ex-wife sought dv injunctions on two separate occasions.

Petunia deduces this was not a man ravaged by guilt over financial issues, she believes this was another man who was not able to control his victims any longer.

And in short order we now have more victims to add to the statistics of dv.

March 9, 2009

Nothing more needs to be said here.....

Just watch this news clip - nothing more needs to be said. The men on Sacks' website sadly are very similar to this man in their thought processes and ideas. Will one of our senators end up with egg on their face due to a man like this?

March 6, 2009

Spam?!?!?!? OR Have you missed lil ol' me?

Well I have been super busy this week, brainstorming with my sisters, working, being a great mom to the kiddoes... I have also been cybersleuthing and more. I knew I should have been a PI in another life...well maybe my next life :-)

Now onto today's business at hand. This would be ironic if it weren't so dam funny. I had been on Glenn's email list for quite a while under another email addy, however due to stalking issues by my ex, I had long ago abandoned that email. I however am in possession of his latest tripe over the fiasco by Conway selectman Crow Dickinson's comments regarding domestic violence - he in fact stated that women will use dv as a tool in divorce. His exact comment follows:

"There are a lot of women who use (domestic violence) as a gimmick in divorce proceedings," Selectman Crow Dickinson said in explaining his vote. "All they have to do is call the police and get the person thrown out. If I call the police and say you're abusing me, they'd have to believe me. I wish people would split up and be more polite about it."

Now what is so ironic about this (and hence the reason for the title of this article), is that I want to send out a commendation for Yahoo. Seems Yahoo believes that Glenn Sacks' newsletter is spam!!!! The proof (as they say) is in the pudding and a picture speaks a thousand words. Just see below:

Now I suppose those poor picked on Loonies (as Glenn Calls them) will come up with a reason for this. I am on many mother's groups and seldom does one hit my Spam folder, not on Yahoo, not in Gmail. Now if we could just work on those three little letters (PAS) and have Yahoo declare those Spam as well, abused mothers and children will be safe. Hmmmmmm...............

KUDOS YAHOO FOR RECOGNIZING SPAM AS SPAM!!!!

February 23, 2009

Links directly to my posts (and others) that are no longer available?

These are all posts which will no longer work on this page. This is due to the deletion of my 5 or 6 posts. Lets see I will try to recount all of those posts for you. The first one I wrote a vague commentary on the article. mca (menscollegeactivist) then addressed me and his posts were deleted as well. Jason then decided to join his brother in arms with this post:

26
Jason Says:

February 22nd, 2009 at 8:42 pm
"Yet the men on here (and some women) say that when a woman has beaten a conviction in court, she is being given a sentencing discount."

Um... no.

What people mean when they talk about a sentencing discount is that when comparing men and women who have been convicted of the same crime, women tends to receive more lenient punative measures.

This is not the same thing as beating a conviction altogether.

You have misunderstood the terminology and how it is used.

Several more of my posts are then deleted again (again none with foul language, all asking if we could discuss this matter civilly as I had read through most of the report quoted in the quoted newspaper article. Jason then said something to the effect of two other hated female posters on that blog were "attacking" him as was I in his opinion and one of these women had some sort of obsession over his "private areas". I then asked him if he would provide a link to the obsession over his private areas by georgia girl, and he refused (makes me think he quite possibly HOPED georgia girl had this obsession, but again that is just my opinion. I challenge anyone to find this so-called obsession on gg's part over Jason's private parts. I pride myself on being somewhat Internet search savvy, and I could not locate it.

Norman then jumps into the fray by adding his two cents into the mix (which I might add has NOT been deleted):

30
Norman L. Says:

February 23rd, 2009 at 2:12 am
Jason,

sounds like a loser, doesn't she?

If you choose to read the rest of the attacks on New friend or Glenn's Cult (well at least the ones that were left up by GS or RF) you may do so by clicking Petunia.

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747880

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747771

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747799

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747774

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747732

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747860

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747751

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747759

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747830

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747799

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747722

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747829

Now to show you that these links do work for the active posts which are viewable right now please go to:

jeana's post, one of Jason's MANY posts, now one must wonder why my posts were deleted? I followed GS's rules, I provided a good email address. It is my firm opinion that GS and the others involved in this attempt to beat women down, must not ever allow anyone who shows credibility the permission to post. It also goes against everything the cult followers of this entity state. GS does censore his website. My only question is

What are you in fear of GS?

WARNING!!!!!!

WARNING!!!!
I must warn all who come to this blog about clicking any links I provide. Unless I state this is a safe website you should take precautions in visiting any site listed as an MRA/FR site. To do so one could open up oneself to being stalked, hunted down, victimized, and even in worst case scenario - assaulted in real life or even killed. The men (and sometimes women) who post on the MRA/FR sites can be dangerous. One nly needs to read the venom spewing from their moouth to see evidence of that. I also post this due to the recent blogs and forums I have discovered over the last few weeks. These will slowly be added to the Cult Wall Of Shame. Please take adequate precaution when visiting these sites.

Fair Use Doctrine

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, entitled, "Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use," is the statutory codification of the fair use doctrine. This judicially developed concept strives to balance the public's need to know and be informed against authors' incentives to create. The copyright law contemplates that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission shall be for purposes such as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching, and that such fair use will not result in the infringement of a copyrighted work. As one may expect, authors and publishers usually take a restrictive view of the fair use doctrine, while users of copyrighted materials generally take a more expansive view.

http://www.publaw.com/work.html

Thank you too!!!!

I am now friends on a message board with a wonderful man. And you all thought we hated men :-) We despise abusive controlling men and women. We like men and women who are decent, honest, and caring. I will say no more as I do not want to ruin this. But those who fight this same fight, keep going!!! We are being seen and our message is getting out there.

Thank you. And thank you for the important work that you do. It gets my dander stirred up when little men hide behind a pen or a computer and spew out fear, hate and stuff that they think makes them look like "real men" but in fact exposes them for the big bullies that they really are. My father and mother are both deceased. But my dad treated my mother the way every man should treat his wife. She was the Queen in our home and he doted on her like she was still his sweetheart until the day she died at age 84. Abraham Lincoln once said, "The greatest gift a father can give to his children is to love their mother." So many men are unhappy with their own lives and they blame women. That way they don't have to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings. Sad. Pathetic. Again, thank you for your very good and important work.

And thank you for giving us hope as well - the hope that there are good and decent people out there - both men and women.

My blog, My rules.....

I would like to welcome everyone who has arrived here - no matter the road you traveled. I only have some very simple rules. Please try to keep your comments clean (I am a mom and as such I do not like extreme vulgar language). I despise the "c" word so it will never be published. Otherwise I will be very lax as I want this site to be a release to those of you who have an issue with the MRAs in general and Sacks and his followers in particular.

I must also slide this little disclaimer in here too (just to protect myself from those pesky little creatures called lawyers and those MRAs who would think they will file a lawsuit or something silly like that against me). I am using YOUR WORDS on this site as well as publishing my opinion of those words. Nothing more, nothing less. I am "not" responsible for comments made by others on my site and if MRAs can behave then they might very well be allowed to post here. Like I said, this is intended to be a release for the women who have been attacked on various sites online to have a little comic break from these constant attacks.

I am posting this blog and all of my comments as a naturally born citizen of the United States and am exercising my right to free speech.

I must also caution my followers and posters against posting any identifying information. This is for your own safety, as I foresee this blog quickly becoming a very hated tool against MRAs who abuse and those who assist them. I mus also make one additional rule concerning posting other people's (such as our exes) personal information. I have been through a very nasty divorce and I know how our exes can react. As such I must make it a number one rule, as much pleasure it would give us, against posting any information which could identify our exes. First names (or initials if the name is uncommon) is fine but no last names. This will be enforced on this blog, unlike "other blogs."