Forty percent of MRA's are female?

John D Says:

November 11th, 2009 at 3:26 pm
Thanks Joan for your kind consideration of mens rights.

When I talk about men's rights to family and friends, the first thing I point out is that MRA members are 40% female--if we were all about "extending control of abusive men" how could this be possible.

Maybe you need those 40% so you can play the games liek Terri Stoddard did:

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_10.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_6812.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_1470.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_641.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_6288.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_5424.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_358.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_1907.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_7891.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_5605.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_9377.html

I will update to clickable links in a bit. Early day at work tomorrow and must go jump in the shower. But you get the drift on these posts if you copy and paste. I guess the reason for women being in the MRA movement is for little slave toys (or maybe because the second wives will not get off their butts and get a job and think that the money being paid for child suipport is a waste). It is one or the other. I actually think both.

Breast Cancer Awareness and MRA's

Now this is not something I write about too frequently as I tend to stick to DV issues. However this is near and dear to my heart. I have several FEMALE relatives who have survived breast cancer. I truly do not believe they would have survived had they been diagnosed 40 years ago or even 20 years ago. They would have probably been left disfigured by the mastectomies that would have been ROUTINELY performed. But they survived, they are NOT disfigured, and I still have my wonderful aunts, sisters, and friends because of advances made in breast cancer research and awareness. So what do these MRA's have to say about research?

Gonzman says:
The damn Disease doesn't belong to you, ladies.

We never claimed it BELONGED to us. However if you look at the number of victims and split it down, breast cancer typically strikes almost 5 times as many women and there are almost 10 times as many female deaths of women due to breast cancer.

Mr. X says:
Breast cancer research is ultimately futile at this point. Over 40 years, billions of dollars and what do we know today we didn't know back then?

I am assuming here that you do not know anybody who has had breast cancer? You do not remember (or maybe you are too young and were too drunk or drugged up to remember what breast cancer meant for a woman (or even a man) in the 60's and 70's? It meant for women that they would forever be disfigured. Insurance would in most cases pay for a mastectomy, but they would NOT pay for reconstruction. So women were walking around lopsided and subjected to cruel stares. Sometimes even worse, the words that would follow would be inhumanely cruel. So yeah, Mr. X lets go back to chopping off women's breasts - that is the answer.

bluegrass says:
The problem with breast cancer research now is that it's basically sucking all of the cancer research dollars. That is, because there is sooo much money directed toward it, it's actually taking money AWAY from the study of other cancers.

Do you have figures on this? Point me to an OFFICIAL cancer research website which says they are losing money due to breast cancer sucking it all up? Didn't think so....

dr e says:
I know that NCI gives breast cancer a good deal more $ than they give prostate but I was wondering the other day about the "total" amount of money that goes to breast cancer which would include charitable contributions and govt funding. Anyone know?

If you researched the number of victims of breast cancer (both survivors and those who succumb to the disease) and those of protate cancer, and the fact that if men would simply set their pride aside and get the test done, those who succumb to breast cancer clearly outnumber those to prostate cancer. If the tests are done at the correct time rather than being full of pride due to the nature of the test, prognosis for prostate cancer is very good. In fact according to WHO, breast cancer deaths outnumber prostate cancer deaths nearly 3 to 1.

Mr. X says:
The price point is too high for the return on investment.

I guess the 1.3 MILLION women who will be diagnosed with breast cancer this year do not matter to Mr. X - as long as one of those women is not a friend or family member of his. Petunia thinks he might change his tune then - what do you readers think?

no2fembots says:
Support firearms rights! This is a Men's Rights Issue!!!

Ahhhhhhh Hah!!!! Now we are at the crux of the issue. NOW we are seeing the true light. MRA's want to have issues that are all about power and control. Because if you are holding a gun, then you are IN CONTROL. Mmm hmmmm......

Mr. X says:
I believe 5% to 10% of breast cancer patients are men. What's sad is these guys get no recognition.

Actually I covered it above. Male deaths to female deaths - more than 10 to one.

Okay I guess this about covers it.

Danno I am not Jennifer but I do not think she is going anywhere anytime soon

Danno Says:

August 11th, 2009 at 8:48 am
Holly’s fabricated story just keeps going. With Jennifer’s obsessive mental health problems she just can’t get on with her life. I noticed she responded to Glen’s recent mention of within the hour of his publishing that article.

I assumed Jennifer might have realized her mother has only given her one side of the story since it’s been proven the whole fractured skull incident really happened when he fell out of a shopping cart.

Given the statements from the FFLM, it’s so typical Jennifer can’t disprove this;

“Then Jennifer spoke up, and the audience and moderators gasped when she told of her brother’s skull being broken by their custodial dad (who would violently beat their mother Holly).”

Obviously Jennifer left this tidbit out while trying to rally the extremist who still support her. Those days may be numbered.

She rants over and over that she’s the one who knows because it happened to her but just like PAS, her entire world is built around a lie.

I think Jennifer was hoping she’d have a fresh audience but no one is even listening anymore, except those of us who know the truth which Glen has proven beyond doubt. I’d bet money Jennifer will go back into hiding which is a clue to her lies.

Okay now the FR/MRA's are saying that Jennifer's brother got injured by falling out of a shopping cart? What is it guys? You say she cannot keep her story straight? I think typoes and spreading lies about a grown woman are two different things. Grow up, move on.... Jennifer is here to stay. And just wait until YOUR children grow up. There will be more Jennifer's, more Fatima's, more Jeff's, more Alanna's.... Many many more of them. Until the courts see the abuse for what it is. See that PAS hurts kids, and not because mom is alienating the child, because the courts are giving the chidlren to an ABUSER!!!!

Quentin0352 - I have not forgotten you my dear sweet (sick) MRA

You must be feeling soooooo lonely since it has been several days since I have spoken about you. Never fear, Petunia is gathering the evidence needed to bring your true motive to light. So keep coming back and keep searching for yourself. You will join the great club of those overly concerned that I post their rants on here. Men such as tm99us and Attila. Such great company (cough snort gag puke) for you to be with.

Blogging and blogging

I have been lurking and reading, reading and lurking. I now have a slew of posts ready for you my gentle reader (more in fact than I can finish and publish in a year - and then I will be given new material). As I sit and read some of the unbelievable comments on Sucks' site, I wonder if these men truly believe this. Then I look back at my marriage from hell, and the things my ex-husband said, and I sigh and think - yep they truly believe this. What sort of monster would believe these things? I am not a psychologist or a psychiatrist so I will leave the diagnosis to the professionals. My only job here is to show these MRA/FR types in their true color. Show what disgusting pigs they really are. With that said, prepare to be inundated. These guys (and gals) just do not know how to shut the hell up.

Porky porky porky......or should I say nelson?

Here is another charming bit of anti-male sentiment. This piece is called Menocide (as opposed to the proper term, which is androcide, but one cant expect such a woman to have a vocabulary much beyond that of any other brain damaged psychopath.) and its lyrics were written by a poor excuse for a human female with the unlikely nom-de-guerre of Otep Shamaya, which I believe is Egyptian for “Blithering Idiot”.

You 'claim' to be documenting cases of male hatred by females, yet I can count at least 3 occurrences of female hate by YOU in this above quote. Leaves one to wonder....

Bob Batterbee on Female Mutilation

Read on a website BESIDES Wikipedia about Female Genital Cutting by clicking on Petunia (new name coming soon - get those suggestions in!!)

This is adisgusting practice which at best belittles women and at worst ahs killed many. This is often done with NO anesthetic and with no oversight as far as sanitation. This is more patriarchy in action. Many well-known activists have taken a stand against this practice (Alice Walker is one).

When I first heard of this I was vexed as to why something so rare and isolated was being portrayed as a world wide issue. It is not . Just another feminist exaggeration of fact. Below is a link to the definition and below that is a feminist outreach.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_cutting

Stan's panties are in a knot

Copied from an email so generously sent to me from a member of an FR group :-)

Poor poor Stan.... He is so upset and has his little panties in a knot because some women (and men) are getting together to have a little conference and discuss some divorce and custody cases that have gone extremely awry. They will be talking to abuse victims (and some of those abuse victims will be talking to the professionals as well) about how abused women can protect themselves and their children. And Stan the Man - good PATRIOT that he is - is all a-blubber and wants it to stop. No more BMCC says Stan.

Stan............. go fly a kite!!!! I could think of some other things to say but seriously would you want me to go there?

I must ask though Stan - have you ever gone to the BMCC? How do you know what they promote? Oh I know - because they protect BATTERED MOTHERS, this means they are anti-dad. Now if I was someone who utilized illicit substannces I would ask Stan for some of that good stuff he be smoking lol. But since I am not one of those illicit substance users, I must simply sit back and nod my head in deisbelief.

HATE FEST, 2009 Dear Friends Activists, Non-Custodial Mothers and Fathers, and Parents Rights Groups and supportive organizations; You will find a roster for this conference of hate, bigotry, and violence toward men,boys, children, and even women at http://www.battered motherscustodyco nference. org/presenters_ 2009.htm

You will not see Errin Prizzey, Wendy McElroy, Stephen Baskerville, Grayson Walker, or any number of the well credentialed Activists, Researchers, and Authors who have any other view than the Feminist sanctioned rabid male hate presented at this conference in a sometimes ohh soo patronizing manner. They will not even receive an invite to attend.

We can soon expect another 'White Paper' from this group claiming 'international outcries' against the rampant battering of only women as if all women were battered and none were batterers.

We can expect the "White Paper' to exhort the police and courts for whom this collection of myths, misstatements, misdirections, and outright lies will target with a goal of hurting and harming men even more with greater loss of due process and more false and groundless arrests for merely being male.

I have never seen any professional conference in my many years that is so wildly and viciously biased and promoting of hate and abuse of all men and boys for the acts of a few men who are outnumbered (overall) by the women who are abusers, batterers, child abusers, and murderers.

Of course the White Paper will not cover the well researched, documented, and peer reviewed studies and findings that cover women's battering of men and children.

There will be no semblance of perspective on just what very minor percentage of households have real violence.

There will be no reporting on the overall numbers of women perpetrators versus overall numbers of men perpetrators when the same definitions of violence are used on both.

The lies, misdirections, myths, misstatements, and outright hate excreted from this conference will do more to harm more women, children, and men than it could ever help.

These 'faux' professional conventions misdirect funding and services into uses and approaches that are ineffective at best and at worst not just perpetuate Domestic Violence but increase it mathematically.

Let us be ready to answer the vomiting of false news reports and diarrhea flow of 'new findings' that are nothing but retreads of the same old lies we have heard and successfully fought before.

Let us be ready to discredit these haters or humanity in their quests for more money, power, and popularity while sacrificing the rest of us to their goddess of Feminism.

Feminism (not parity or equality) is a decadence of a too wealthy society. We are no longer wealthy.

Here are some of the direct programs and affects of Feminist sponsored government programs supported by this Conference:

A large part of our impoverishment as a nation is is the same thing that has impoverished so many men and women, the Feminist Lie and the government funding to present a facade of respectability for Feminist programs such as paying healthy women to not work.

Further, the government then gives theses government sponsored "stay at home moms" day care so they do not have to take care of the children they are ostensibly being paid to stay home and care for (crazy enough for you?).

It gets even more bizarre as the fiscal candle gets burned at both ends and the middle.

And, then we jail impoverished men who are disabled, ill, laid off, etc... for being impoverished, but only if he is a father and divorced. Jailing a man costs between $60,000 and 80,000 per year (Author's Note: The cost to incarcerate a person in prison is generally around 64.64 a day - click here for a chart of breakdown of actual expense categories for 44 states) so we not only pay the mother big bucks to kick the man out of the children's lives, we then pay big bucks to keep Daddy in jail. We jail Daddies who are innocent in a "No Fault" divorce and of nothing more than not being able to keep up with the ridiculous taxes called child support assigned by the courts with no rhyme or reason based in reality. These taxes on NCP Daddies sometimes are greater than their gross earnings.

The child support is awarded in hearings for divorce where in 70 to 95% of the time the man is presented with a divorce filing he doesn't want that tells him he has "No Fault" then continues to take away children, property, money, future income, civil rights, freedom to travel and more. "At Fault" real criminals have more rights and due process.

And, I have not even covered the prognosis for the children of divorce where Dad has been cut out of his children's life in 'No Fault' divorce.

Lets count the resulting rape, pedophilia, murder, substance abuse, prostitution, and child abuse resulting from this Feminist policy of 'kick daddy out the door, ignore the Constitution, give him just the clothes on his back, and tell him "See Ya!" '. Removing Daddy turns the kids into 'Feral Humans'.

Watch this conference for anyone suggesting that maybe the 'No Fault' Daddies should not be divorced or kicked out of children's lives. It will never happen.

This is what Battered Mothers promotes at its conferences.

This is going to all of my lists. I would hope that each and everyone of you does the same.

This conference needs to be exposed for what it is, a symposium promoting hate violence, and bigotry.

Patriot Dad

Speaking of calendars.......

In my post here, I discuss porky's 'exposure' of the Boys Are Stupid calendars. I then make one last journey to "THE" site and lo and behold what do my wondering eyes reveal? Click Petunia to read on!!!! (No comments as of January 4th 1:00 AM CST) We WILL however be following this post :-)

Tomorrow look for updates on the Collins hatred saga, 'MRAs' on Beyonce and her new song and her beliefs, and a new honoree on "The Cult" - Mike from Canada. He is truly fun to read (SARCASM again!!!) and I will have some fun with him. I also have some more MRA emails to print (one is actually good news for moms) and the other is more attempts by men to minimize women. Until tomorrow good night and happy reading.

Collins Family on Sacks - final chapter (hopefully)

And this one is actually 'nice'... I must say that Lisa KS is extremely fair and tries to view things with an open mind (and no I am not just saying this because of her nice comments because there have been times I do not agree with her, I think she tries to view things openly and not approach something with the dead-on determination of woman bad man good as many of Sacks cult does). Whew that was long!!!! Well on to her post. No more commentary - the post speaks for itself. Lisa KS has reached the point I reached (probably not as bad, but close) and she speaks her mind. Now I wonder if she will be banned as I was? Probably not because she writes for the Dissident column and therefore brings more traffic to Sacks' site. The co-bloggers from her site as well as other who follow her blog as well as normal feminists. So Glenn generates a lot of traffic which bring his stats up and in turn he can now produce these inflated stats to his advertisers as to what they are getting for their 9.95+ a week for the ads placed around his site.

Lisa KS Says:

December 29th, 2008 at 8:05 pm
Okay, this is it. Eww! I'm sorry, Glenn, but this is so gross, I can't do this anymore. At all! You've printed many stories since I first started reading your blog about kids who talk about how their mother unfairly alienated them from their father, etc., and never once have you suggested that your readers investigate any of them to ascertain whether or not they were telling the "truth." And yes, Jennifer Collins has every right to be offended--you're running right over her by saying you have "no idea" what happened between her and her father, because she's clearly willing to say what did, and she is twenty-three years old...not three, not thirteen--twenty-three...and you are acting as if she doesn't exist--you pointedly did not contact her at all. You take the word of any other twenty-three-year-old...as long as that twenty-three-year-old is claiming that he or she was abused, abducted or kidnapped wrongly by his or her mother. And if the father is asking you to do this, you've been remarkably silent about that--it really appears that you personally just hate the existence of this story and are determined to crush it underfoot--putting up some diatribe from someone who is only willing to identify him or herself by initials who claims that during supervised visits, they got the real idea of what was going on..

Visit Lisa KS site here.

More porky and he can't even be creative enough to think of something that hasn't been done yet

Well I am sure he will claim - oh this is a calendar and Sacks targeted the shirts, but whatever. He seems to forget that women (and subsequently young girls) are targeted by men's 'pin-up' calendars and have been so targeted since the beginning of time. While this calendar is obviously something that shouldn't exist (the boy calendar), women and females have been targeted for many decades by the pin-up calendar. Why are these still around? Why is there no whining and crying about females being victimized by pin-up calendars by the MRA?

I can tell ya why - don't take a rocket scientist either :-)

Men 'LIKE' the pin-up calendars - they get their jollies looking at naked or subservient females, so these calendars will NEVER go away. And indeed, if we look at the pro-rated portion of male bashing or victimizing calendars versus the portion of female victimizing calendars - we would see that females are the victims of this at an extremely higher rate than males. And sadly, nobody will say a dam word about female victims - good ol boy's club at work there folks.

See this link (click here) for more info on female degrading calendars. These are more than just 'naked women' though. These are pure abuse in its finest form. WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING!!!! Extreme photos - not meant for work environment. Not meant for viewing around children either.

And more from Delanddale@XXX.com

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

patriotdad@XXXXX.com AGAIN (boy he sure does like to email!!!)

My Dearest x77054@XXXXX. com , As I will explain latter, sweetie, I believe you are a female. I have good cause to say this. You will have no one to blame, but yourself for the type of answer I provide you. If you want to insult a man for taking a legitimate stand and to demean other fathers with real concerns about the Biden-Obama ticket (VAWA-galore) then expect insult in return. If you were not afraid of real discussion and exchange of ideas you would not have begun tossing insults. That is a very female trait to toss an insult and then take offense when someone responds in kind. So, in the vein of your own presentation, I respond in kind. Are you an absolute idiot?Or What? You sound like the damn feminists who always say to ignore the Constitutional rights of men so they can steal our children, money, futures, and all too often even lives. You use misstatement, undeserved insult, ridicule, and demeaning behavior with all the skill of a dysfunctional and sociopathic Women's Shelter Director making $165,000 + a year in Dallas, Texas. I normally do not 'flame' people, but when someone misquotes the established facts (Obama has dual citizenship, Yes, Kenyan and Indonesian but not American) and then calls a man with a legitimate and patriotic stance requesting that our President, Commander in Chief, our Senior Governmental Executive Officer provide simple proof of citizenship, a moron, I step in to defend. Are you an absolute idiot? If the U.S. hires Obama and he does not provide proof of citizenship, who gets the fine and jail sentence? Are you an absolute idiot? Obama could at anytime have become an American citizen to add to his passport portfolio by merely performing a few simple administrative steps. He, nor his mother, nor the grandparents who raised him ever did this. He still would not have been a "naturalized citizen" born in America, as our former movie star, California Governor found out. The information is readily available at any postoffice or federal building for the asking. Are you an absolute idiot? And as for as taking care of the economy? Obama, who has less experience than Pallin, can always point to one of his mentors in economic policy, THE GOOD GOVERNOR OF HIS HOME STATE or, he can point to THE CONVICT WHO GAVE HIM HIS HOUSE. Are you an absolute idiot? You want to put a man in charge of Homeland Security, which will not let American Citizens travel freely in and out of our own country because of what illegal aliens did,who is himself an illegal alien until he can provide the basic documentation showing he is a natural born American citizen. Are you an absolute idiot? Are you one of the female, feminazi plants who occasionally get involved in certain discussion groups to fragment, misdirect, and generally cause harm? Or, are you just a stupid illegal alien s***, yourself? Or, Are you an absolute idiot? If you are a father then you are an absolute idiot, but if you are a woman, you are just an everyday garden variety of child murdering, man killing feminist sociopath. And, I am being kind to you in not fully addressing exactly who and what you are, especially when you snipe from behind the cloak of anonymity with provably false statements. Have a nice day, ma'am. By the way, profiling is not 100% accurate, but it does provide more info than tossing a coin. And you did profile yourself for all of us to see. Stan

More vermin from patriotdad@XXXXX.com

In a recent article below, one writer bemoans the fact that non-profits are going to be shutting their doors left and right when it is really good news for millions of families. This means that Women's shelters are going to have to start cutting back on those $150K to $350K salaried directors. As audits have repeatedly shown very few of the women who live in the shelters really fit the model that the shelter workers like to claim to donors and supporters. Fraud in and fraud out. We are going to have to begin to prioritize and review much more carefully who gets our community service money and what bogus, sociopathic, emotional plea, scam gets whacked in the wallet. I can think of nothing better to bring legitimacy to the Domestic Violence For Profit Industry than to get rid of the big money. Then only the altruists will be left. When we quit destroying our families and their assets with Feminist policies and no fault divorce we will have less need in our communities and more wealth to help those who really need it. We can save literally tens of millions of fathers, children, and even mothers by getting rid of the false advocacies of many in the DV industry who like to make such false claims as 70% of male batterers get custody; the greatest danger to pregnant women is the child's father; and women go to the ER more for Domestic Violence injuries than any other reason. In the past when unchallenged by the media, these types of false pleas would have brought in a treasure trove of wealth as a result of these shocking, but knowingly very false claims. The director of a Dallas Womens Shelter very recently admitted to using shelter funds to present shocking but completely misrepresentative statements about DV. She said she did it to raise awareness (and to collect more money from donors?) This director, who makes over $150,000/year admitted these claims were knowingly false in an interview with a liberal journalist. Excerpts of this transcript can be found at www.glennsacks. com . Now the public has began to be aware of the DV industry scams and falsehoods. The recent Dallas Bus Signs, as exposed at www.glennsacks. com are a prime example of an out of control non-profit defrauding their donors. Many have pulled their support as a result of those horrendously false ads.

More Yahoo hatred...........

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.