Call To Readers: How has Feminism helped scoiety?

Poor poor Attila..... Cannot think of a single reason feminism has helped society? I can think of many reasons (below his post):

Attila L. Vinczer Says:

July 22nd, 2009 at 10:03 am
I recall very clearly when this album came out. All the guys knew that this was about a false claim that Michael Jackson got a girl pregnant! Even in the early eighties we knew women trapped men. No clue about child support as I learned about that some 25 years later! At the time I don't think any of us knew the phrase "paternity fraud".

Nor did we know the dangerous path feminists were paving for men while we were chasing girls. I think had we been informed, we would definitely have done something about it.

I believe it is very important to enlighten boys at as an early age as possible about the truth and serious dangers and obstacles they face with respect to the bias that has been created by feminists against men. Whether our current bias has been created by radical or mild feminists is inconsequential.

I have asked this question many times. What good has feminism bestowed on our collective society (Not just for women!) ? I would like to know how has feminism helped society? I have yet to have a female give any insight into this and I think I know why.

Perhaps B.A.M could enlighten us.

First I must address this statement by Attila: "I believe it is very important to enlighten boys at as an early age as possible about the truth and serious dangers and obstacles they face with respect to the bias that has been created by feminists against men." Way to go Attila. I truly feel for your boys (yes readers - that is plural more than one boy) who will move into adulthood with a severe distrust and possibly even hatred for women (one only need read your comments about your ex-wife in particular and women in general to see what you are teaching those boys). But now to see how feminism has helped society. One way society has been helped by feminism (both egnders) has been the decline in the stigmatism of being a child sexual assault victim. Back in the 1950's - 1970's and before then, an underage sexual assault victim by a parent or person in authority does not fear the stigmatism in the ways they did 40-50 years ago. Incest and child sexual abuse were unheard of back then, simply because it was not reported. And this was not because it was not happening, it is because there was a huge stigma assigned to being a child who reported this. While this still exists to some degree today, it is not near as bad as it was then.

Also back 50 years ago women seldom worked outside the home, to do so was a slap in a man's face that he was not good enough to support his family. Some of this load has been removed from the man by the woman, and until this recession hit, families benefitted from this dual employment family. There are other ways in which society has benefitted but I will leave those to my readers.

So please share here readers. How do YOU think feminism has benefitted society?

We never generalize "ALL WOMEN"...

Lying Sacks of horse manure...

93
SteveinTX Says:

April 16th, 2009 at 11:49 am
All women lie, at times.

Feminists lie at all times. (e.g. GG)

SteveinTX

I am a FEMINIST and I am DAMN proud to say it!!!!

I just cannot believe lil ol me has the power to make many men shake and quiver....

They are so scared that they must delete a total of 5 or 6 posts from me and poof just like that, the posts are gone. I must wonder if Glenn really banned me because I would not post my email, or if he realized that myself and many of the other women who were posting on his site were close to exposing his little cult for what it truly is. Now for the newbies, you must be wondering - what in the world is she talking about? A cult? A cult of personality? Blue Oyster Cult? The Family (Charles Manson)? Heaven's Gate? Branch Davidians? Or perhaps one of the most famous of all, Jim Jones of the People's Temple?

No I am not speaking of any of those. I am talking of a group of (in my OPINION) misguided, possibly criminal minded men (and their subsequent spouses or mothers) who feel that a woman should not have the right to say she feels she has been abused by her husband, she is afraid for her safety, and as such afraid for her children's safety as well.

These men (and teh women who help them) have a few Gods they worship in their midst. One of these Gods is a pudge (again only in my opinion) of a man by the name of Glenn Sacks. He has a gift for words, but sadly he uses it to defame, defile, and denigrate any victims of rape or domestic violence who may be near.

He is joined by many of the lesser Gods who run blogs, coordinate the movements of one the biggest groups known for abuse - the F4J (read about the sexual abuse charges levied against one such F4J memeber here) and many others who use Facebook, Myspace, Blogger, Wordpress and many other such avenues in order to spread their message of hate and misogyny to all spots of the world. No one with a computer is safe from their message of hate.

In fact here is just one of the many messages of hate spread by the devoted followers of GS:

41
AnonymousPamphleteer Says:

February 23rd, 2009 at 8:06 pm
I assume that 60% does not include the vast numbers of American women who use children as a cash crop to cash in through the mechanism of American family courts.

Isn't having a child to as to access a man's money a form of trafficking? The child is used for his money-getting potential, and is not necessarily cared about as a human being, just a resource to be used to extract money from a male.

Think about it.

These men in fact are so nasty to women and to those who desire a more modern sort of life (you know - one in which we are not drug around by our hair while the man beats on his chest me man, you woman blah blah blah) that GS has had to make "rules" about what sorts of words the men can and cannot use to describe feminists. These "followers" were fond of using the term femi-nazi. While I am not directly related to anyone who suffered during the Holocaust, I can read, I can look at pictures. What I saw of the Holocaust disgusted me beyond belief. And for any man (and speaking of men - wasn't it MEN who primarily carried out the orders of Hitler, who was himself another MAN), to compare a woman who wants to be free from abuse, free to make choices about her own body, free to have a VOICE compare these women to HITLER who took freedoms away, in fact took many many LIVES away is despicable.

The fact that there even needs to be a "rule page" taht says you cannot call feminists feminazis, leads me to question to very credibility of any of these men.

Click Petunia to go directly to the "RULE PAGE".



UPDATE:

It should be noted that by clicking here you can see as I did that in the the little over 2 years that Glenn Sacks has been posting his blog, the word FEMINAZI has been used over 550 times. It has 38 pages on a Google search. Form your own opinion on this man and his followers, gentle readers.

Porky porky porky......or should I say nelson?

Here is another charming bit of anti-male sentiment. This piece is called Menocide (as opposed to the proper term, which is androcide, but one cant expect such a woman to have a vocabulary much beyond that of any other brain damaged psychopath.) and its lyrics were written by a poor excuse for a human female with the unlikely nom-de-guerre of Otep Shamaya, which I believe is Egyptian for “Blithering Idiot”.

You 'claim' to be documenting cases of male hatred by females, yet I can count at least 3 occurrences of female hate by YOU in this above quote. Leaves one to wonder....

Stan's panties are in a knot

Copied from an email so generously sent to me from a member of an FR group :-)

Poor poor Stan.... He is so upset and has his little panties in a knot because some women (and men) are getting together to have a little conference and discuss some divorce and custody cases that have gone extremely awry. They will be talking to abuse victims (and some of those abuse victims will be talking to the professionals as well) about how abused women can protect themselves and their children. And Stan the Man - good PATRIOT that he is - is all a-blubber and wants it to stop. No more BMCC says Stan.

Stan............. go fly a kite!!!! I could think of some other things to say but seriously would you want me to go there?

I must ask though Stan - have you ever gone to the BMCC? How do you know what they promote? Oh I know - because they protect BATTERED MOTHERS, this means they are anti-dad. Now if I was someone who utilized illicit substannces I would ask Stan for some of that good stuff he be smoking lol. But since I am not one of those illicit substance users, I must simply sit back and nod my head in deisbelief.

HATE FEST, 2009 Dear Friends Activists, Non-Custodial Mothers and Fathers, and Parents Rights Groups and supportive organizations; You will find a roster for this conference of hate, bigotry, and violence toward men,boys, children, and even women at http://www.battered motherscustodyco nference. org/presenters_ 2009.htm

You will not see Errin Prizzey, Wendy McElroy, Stephen Baskerville, Grayson Walker, or any number of the well credentialed Activists, Researchers, and Authors who have any other view than the Feminist sanctioned rabid male hate presented at this conference in a sometimes ohh soo patronizing manner. They will not even receive an invite to attend.

We can soon expect another 'White Paper' from this group claiming 'international outcries' against the rampant battering of only women as if all women were battered and none were batterers.

We can expect the "White Paper' to exhort the police and courts for whom this collection of myths, misstatements, misdirections, and outright lies will target with a goal of hurting and harming men even more with greater loss of due process and more false and groundless arrests for merely being male.

I have never seen any professional conference in my many years that is so wildly and viciously biased and promoting of hate and abuse of all men and boys for the acts of a few men who are outnumbered (overall) by the women who are abusers, batterers, child abusers, and murderers.

Of course the White Paper will not cover the well researched, documented, and peer reviewed studies and findings that cover women's battering of men and children.

There will be no semblance of perspective on just what very minor percentage of households have real violence.

There will be no reporting on the overall numbers of women perpetrators versus overall numbers of men perpetrators when the same definitions of violence are used on both.

The lies, misdirections, myths, misstatements, and outright hate excreted from this conference will do more to harm more women, children, and men than it could ever help.

These 'faux' professional conventions misdirect funding and services into uses and approaches that are ineffective at best and at worst not just perpetuate Domestic Violence but increase it mathematically.

Let us be ready to answer the vomiting of false news reports and diarrhea flow of 'new findings' that are nothing but retreads of the same old lies we have heard and successfully fought before.

Let us be ready to discredit these haters or humanity in their quests for more money, power, and popularity while sacrificing the rest of us to their goddess of Feminism.

Feminism (not parity or equality) is a decadence of a too wealthy society. We are no longer wealthy.

Here are some of the direct programs and affects of Feminist sponsored government programs supported by this Conference:

A large part of our impoverishment as a nation is is the same thing that has impoverished so many men and women, the Feminist Lie and the government funding to present a facade of respectability for Feminist programs such as paying healthy women to not work.

Further, the government then gives theses government sponsored "stay at home moms" day care so they do not have to take care of the children they are ostensibly being paid to stay home and care for (crazy enough for you?).

It gets even more bizarre as the fiscal candle gets burned at both ends and the middle.

And, then we jail impoverished men who are disabled, ill, laid off, etc... for being impoverished, but only if he is a father and divorced. Jailing a man costs between $60,000 and 80,000 per year (Author's Note: The cost to incarcerate a person in prison is generally around 64.64 a day - click here for a chart of breakdown of actual expense categories for 44 states) so we not only pay the mother big bucks to kick the man out of the children's lives, we then pay big bucks to keep Daddy in jail. We jail Daddies who are innocent in a "No Fault" divorce and of nothing more than not being able to keep up with the ridiculous taxes called child support assigned by the courts with no rhyme or reason based in reality. These taxes on NCP Daddies sometimes are greater than their gross earnings.

The child support is awarded in hearings for divorce where in 70 to 95% of the time the man is presented with a divorce filing he doesn't want that tells him he has "No Fault" then continues to take away children, property, money, future income, civil rights, freedom to travel and more. "At Fault" real criminals have more rights and due process.

And, I have not even covered the prognosis for the children of divorce where Dad has been cut out of his children's life in 'No Fault' divorce.

Lets count the resulting rape, pedophilia, murder, substance abuse, prostitution, and child abuse resulting from this Feminist policy of 'kick daddy out the door, ignore the Constitution, give him just the clothes on his back, and tell him "See Ya!" '. Removing Daddy turns the kids into 'Feral Humans'.

Watch this conference for anyone suggesting that maybe the 'No Fault' Daddies should not be divorced or kicked out of children's lives. It will never happen.

This is what Battered Mothers promotes at its conferences.

This is going to all of my lists. I would hope that each and everyone of you does the same.

This conference needs to be exposed for what it is, a symposium promoting hate violence, and bigotry.

Patriot Dad

More porky and he can't even be creative enough to think of something that hasn't been done yet

Well I am sure he will claim - oh this is a calendar and Sacks targeted the shirts, but whatever. He seems to forget that women (and subsequently young girls) are targeted by men's 'pin-up' calendars and have been so targeted since the beginning of time. While this calendar is obviously something that shouldn't exist (the boy calendar), women and females have been targeted for many decades by the pin-up calendar. Why are these still around? Why is there no whining and crying about females being victimized by pin-up calendars by the MRA?

I can tell ya why - don't take a rocket scientist either :-)

Men 'LIKE' the pin-up calendars - they get their jollies looking at naked or subservient females, so these calendars will NEVER go away. And indeed, if we look at the pro-rated portion of male bashing or victimizing calendars versus the portion of female victimizing calendars - we would see that females are the victims of this at an extremely higher rate than males. And sadly, nobody will say a dam word about female victims - good ol boy's club at work there folks.

See this link (click here) for more info on female degrading calendars. These are more than just 'naked women' though. These are pure abuse in its finest form. WARNING WARNING WARNING WARNING!!!! Extreme photos - not meant for work environment. Not meant for viewing around children either.

Patriotdad@xxxxx.com times one thousand

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.