Bring back the old ways

dad4justice Says:

November 10th, 2009 at 11:50 pm
It's a sad world. Poor kids. Bring back the old ways.

Now I wonder how far back he wants us to go? Oooops never mind, I almost forgot - back to BEFORE women had rights - NOW I remember......

SHUT EVERYTHING OFF!!!!!

Jim A. Hall Says:

September 23rd, 2009 at 10:23 am
He should immediately turn off all utilities in his name: electric, water, sewer, natural gas.........

MRA lessons for how to get a woman out of your hosue after you beat her and she has you removed through the court system.

Chris_C on Tila Tequila

Chris_C Says:

September 18th, 2009 at 11:07 am
Being thrown to the ground bruised her forearms?

No you DU MASS, being grabbed, touched innapropriately by someone without being invited to do so by Tila is what bruised her arms. (rolls eyes yet again)

Mariner on Tila Tequila

Mariner Says:

September 17th, 2009 at 3:55 am
Did anyone notice what a funny round head Tequila has? She'll look very odd as she grows older.

Now we resort dear readers to making fun of her simply because of her head? (rolls eyes)

Norman L on Tila Tequila

Norman L Says:

September 16th, 2009 at 5:28 am
It seems that something very obvious has been overlooked - if a person wants to bruise themselves, the upper arms (and probably neck) are the easiest place to do it. All you do is reach across with the the other hand and squeeze. It would have been too obvious if she did her neck - she would probably have to prove he tried to strangle her, by having witnesses or something.

Okay now we have here folks a man who says she did this to herself? Shut your piehole Norman, the flies are getting thick from your shit spews.

Cousin Dave

Cousin Dave Says:

September 15th, 2009 at 1:27 pm
To me, those photos don't look like impact or squeezing bruises. They look like she's been shooting up.

And here we go again with more of the "she's a druggy" theories. Are you a doctor, do you have access to her life day in, day out, 24/7? No? Well then shut your damn FR idjut trap!!!!! MOOOOOOORON!!!!!

Muuru on Tila Tequila

Muuru Says:

September 15th, 2009 at 5:09 am
If the DA had proceeded with charges, she'd have received heightened attention from the media, a book deal and a Lifetime movie-of-the-week, plus a chance at some of Merriman's cash.

Since the authorities have declined to participate in her career plans, she's simply moving on to the "bonus-round" where she'll receive heightened attention from the media, a book deal and a Lifetime movie-of-the-week, and another chance at Merriman's cash.

It's a no-downside proposition for "poor little lamb" Tila.

Perhaps breathing her drunken last gasp in a twisted, flaming wreck at the bottom of a ravine might have served us all better.

You think all women who file charges because a man hits them are out for a Lifetime movie deal, a book, media attention, and MONEY????? Maybe she is like many of victims of dv? SICK AND DAMNED TIRED OF MEN THINKING THEY CAN DO WHATEVER THEY WANT TO DO TO WOMEN AND GETTING AWAY WITH IT!!!!!!!! And then notice, gentle readers, the closing statement of this idjut FR:

Perhaps breathing her drunken last gasp in a twisted, flaming wreck at the bottom of a ravine might have served us all better.

Need I say more?

menscollegeactivist.org on Tila Tequila

menscollegeactivist.org Says:

September 14th, 2009 at 11:34 pm
Shes a violent crackhead....just like Rhianna. These crackhead girls think they are unstoppable and untouchable.

Okay now let's attack not just Tila, but Rihanna as well. Was YOUR ex-wife a crackhead to MCA? Oh yeah that's right - all of you idiot FR's say any woman who does not bow down to your every command is either nuts, sluts, or on drugs. G'bye idjut.

mrcustodycoach on Tila Tequila

mrcustodycoach.com Says:

September 14th, 2009 at 9:46 pm
I dare not speculate as to the source of "Tila's" alleged bruising. What I can say with the utmost confidence is that a California DA is NOT dropping a high profile case against an athlete, particularly in these times of highly publicized incidents, if she shows those arms to either the police or the district attorney.

And, if they did, it is they she should be suing, not Merriman.

And why shouldn't she sue Merriam? Oh because he was only doing what any good "man" would do? Maybe just maybe she wasn't drunk, maybe she was just damned tired of a bossy fool man tellilng her what to do? I am pretty sick myself of men thinking they are smarter, better, etc etc than women (meaning 99.9999999999% of the FR idiots out there, especially those who insist on searching for themselves in order to see if I am "talking" about them again. Have you found what you are looking for YET Atilla?)

Tila Tequila's DV Charges Against NFL's Merriman Dropped, Tequila Plans Civil Suit

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=4222

The bruises are pictured above. They could have been made by Merriman and, frankly, they could be anything. They could be makeup, bruises from something else, bruises because he grabbed her to prevent her driving drunk, or a multitude of other things. Some women bruise very easily--I've no idea if Tequila is one of them.

Okay let's go through these one at a time.

They could be makeup MAKEUP?!?!?!? Like she has the time to do something like this and to even make sure that the bruises "match" as time goes on?, bruises from something else WHAT ELSE?!?!?!?!?, bruises because he grabbed her He should not have "GRABBED HER" PERIOD, he could have alerted law enforcement to prevent her driving drunk, or a multitude of other things WHAT OTHER THINGS?!?!??!?!?!?!. Some women bruise very easily--I've no idea if Tequila is one of them Who cares if she bruises easily or normally or if it takes a herd of elephants trampling her to make her bruise - the point is he touched her inappropriately, she bruised as a result. Whether she bruised or not is irrelevant, he TOUCHED HER INAPPROPRIATELY!!!! He should be charged!!!!.

Now let's go back to the opening sentence in this little diatribe:

They could have been made by Merriman and, frankly, they could be anything.The real question "BS" GS is this:

Should this alleged perpetrator be allowed to put his hands on another person because of his alleged reason? There is ABSOLUTELY no reason anyone should touch anyone else for any reason. PERIOD!!!! Put that in your woman hating pipe and smoke it!!!!!

Now I wonder what his cultists have to say about this issue?

They want multiple wives and many servant girls......

lujlp Says:

September 11th, 2009 at 11:44 pm
Becuase ture tradition marrige was one man half a dozen wifes and however many servent girls there were in the house

So I guess lujlp, you want this? Would these multiple wives you request be the variety to bow down to your every whim?










Please tell me when you invent that time machine, I would love to go back in time and get the first tv (nope not far enough back), maybe the first car? (nah still not far enough). Oh I know!!!!!! I can bring back the first wheel.

NCP Moms - a rarely discussed topic

Doug Says:

July 28th, 2009 at 4:40 pm
Trisha,

I do sympathize with your plight, as much as I sympathize with any one (male or female) in this situation. Bad people come in both genders.

But this is equality....why should you be treated differently? Are you saying you should be?

I read the article and in no place did I see her ask to be treated differently. I saw her say that men are not the only ones to go through this issue. I know many women who are on the verge of homelessness or those who are there. Yet when "society" looks at these moms, they must be unfit monsters. They are not. They are many times women who have issues that could be fixed (like Spears) or in most cases, they have battled against an abusive ex-partner and LOST. And the NCM's who have lost ahve something else to bear, the children have lost too.

Armageddon Says:

July 28th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
Trisha-

NC Moms are like men with breast cancer. Same problem, tiny percentage of those who suffer from the condition.

However, unlike male breast cancer, NC Moms often don't have as severe of a condition. (If I remember correctly) less than half of NC Mothers are ordered to pay CS. When they are ordered, it's often a lower amount. From anecdotal evidence, I've seen mothers who are behind in CS get lenient treatment compared to men with arrears.

Okay lets examine this statistic posed by Armageddon. According to http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_1X_What_are_the_key_statistics_for_male_breast_cancer_28.asp, there were 1910 diagnosed cases of breast cancer in the US. Now how many diagnosed cases are there of NCM's? According to http://www.brainchildmag.com/essays/spring2009_read.asp there are over 2.2 million NCM's in the US. Hmmm that sort of puts your little comparison in doubt now doesn;t it Armageddon?

And here we have the ever-present "doubter":

Lewis Says:

July 28th, 2009 at 8:46 pm
I hate to be the cynic here and I'm certainly sorry for Trisha's plight but I have to ask if 'Trisha' is an alias? I can't help but wonder if she might have a more traditionally masculine appellation and got snagged because some bureaucrat thought she was male.

I'm also curious as to how many men may have been got up in the burst of energy that netted Trisha. Mostly this sort of thing comes as part of a big effort by the bureaucracy to crack down on the 'deadbeats' doesn't it?

Hmmm I wonder if his name was Tom would we be having this conversation Lewis?

And here we have more woman hate from Armageddon:

Armageddon Says:

July 29th, 2009 at 10:00 am
i find this hilarious because I've heard it a lot usually from the same people who claim that family courts are gender neutral

Isn't cognitive dissonance a wonderful thing? ;)

The courts are gender neutral, but there is no way a mother would lose custody unless she was really unfit!

Either they are holding two opposing beliefs as true, or their definition of "gender neutral" means women are superior to men.

You notice he does exactly as the NCM's say? Well if she lost the kids, she was unfit.

Or how about this (now we know again that this IS All about child support):

Burke Says:

July 29th, 2009 at 1:32 pm
...I myself am fairly lucky now that my kids are getting older, and are spending more time with me. I get them more then 50% of the time in the summer and vacations i get them plus every second week-end. I'm not sure what that works out to as a % but my payments sure don't change in the summer thats for sure.

Burke your time in the summer is already figured into the child support calculations. Also the need for the chidlren to have a home does not magically "go away" just because they are visiting you.

And last but not least, the ultimate "she must be bad, this never happens to women cry - the one these men are so damned good at:

DC Wornock Says:

August 6th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
The story is an obvious fabrication. It is not possible for that to have happened to a woman.

Father's Day is done for another year...

And out of respect for those good dads out there (not the ones whining on various blogs, message boards, and email groups around the world) I can now resume my life's calling. I will now post as many "Bad father" posts as I can. I will go at this with a vengeance only equalled by theirs when they were abusing their wives and chidlren. You see it will take that type of determination to stop these pigs from hurting us more.

pat says - inventors sonja?

9
pat Says:

June 2nd, 2009 at 2:41 am
...Sonja, name ten major inventions by women from the last 10,000 years. The woman's innovation ought to be independent of her husbands initial work. I'll give you a start: Kevlar, Liquid Paper, windshield wiper, ....

Randi Altschul - Virgie Ammons - Betsy Ancker-Johnson - Mary Anderson - Virginia Apgar - Barbara Askins - Patricia E. Bath - Miriam E. Benjamin - Patricia Billings - Katherine Blodgett - Bessie Blount - Sarah Boone - Rachel Fuller Brown - Josephine Garis Cochran - Martha J. Coston - Dianne Croteau - Marie Curie - Marion Donovan - Gertrude Belle Elion - Edith Flanigen - Helen Free - Sally Fox - Frances Gabe - Lillian Gilbreth - Sarah E. Goode - Bette Nesmith Graham - Temple Grandin - KK Gregory - Ruth Handler - Joycelyn Harrison - Elizabeth Lee Hazen - Beulah Henry - Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin - Krisztina Holly - Erna Schneider Hoover - Grace Hopper - Mary Phelps Jacob - Amanda Theodosia Jones - Marjorie Stewart Joyner - Anna Keichline - Mary Kies - Gabriele Knecht - Margaret Knight - Stephanie Louise Kwolek - Hedy Lamarr - Ada Lovelace - Sybilla Masters - Ann Moore - Krysta Morlan - Lyda Newman - Julie Newmar - Ellen Ochoa - Alice H Parker - Betty Rozier - Valerie Thomas - Ann Tsukamoto - Harriet Tubman - Lisa Vallino - Madame Walker - Mary Walton - Carol Wior

Need I say anything more? And I could add this as well

LINK

In 1809, Mary Dixon Kies received the first U. S. patent issued to a woman. Kies, a Connecticut native, invented a process for weaving straw with silk or thread. First Lady Dolley Madison praised her for boosting the nation’s hat industry. Unfortunately, the patent file was destroyed in the great Patent Office fire in 1836.

Until about 1840, only 20 other U.S. patents were issued to women. The inventions related to apparel, tools, cook stoves, and fire places. Patents are the proof of "ownership" of an invention and only the inventor(s) can apply for a patent. In the past, women were not allowed equal rights of property ownership (patents are a form of intellectual property) and many women patented their inventions under their husband's or father's names. In the past, women were also prevented from receiving the higher education necessary for inventing. (Unfortunately, some countries in the world today still deny women equal rights and an equal education.)

We will never know all the women who deserve credit for their creative labor, as the Patent and Trademark Office does not require gender, racial, or ethnic identification in patent or trademark applications. Through diligent research and a few educated guesses, we can identify trends in patenting by women. Here are a few highlights of recent statistical analysis to ponder, to celebrate, and to give reason to encourage girls and women to pursue science-, math-, and technology-based courses and careers.

The women inventor patent share of annually granted U.S. origin patents rose from 2.6 percent in 1977 to 10.3 percent in 1998.

The majority of the U.S. origin woman-inventor patents are in the chemical technologies.

In 1996, 11.2 percent of the U.S. origin patent grants which were owned by the Federal Government at the time of grant included a woman inventor.

In the past 20 years, about 83 percent of the U.S. origin patent grants to women were for utility patents, 16.5 percent for design patents, and 0.5 for plant patents.

About 35 percent of the U.S. origin women inventors patents granted during the 1977 to 1996 period originated from California, New York, or New Jersey.

Today, hundreds of thousands of women apply for and receive a patent every year. So the real answer to the question "how many women inventors are there?" is more than you can count and growing. About 20% of all inventors are currently female and that number should quickly rise to 50% over the next generation.

Stick that in your pipe, pat, and smoke it. Might be better than what you are smoking right now. Who knows maybe you will actually see how loony you sound and come around. But I digress, I know this is not possible with all that koolaid you drink. And of course your answer will be - well they didn;t invent anything that really means anything. Everything makes the world go around. There is nothing too little or not enough to not mean something. But you hate women so we mean nothing to you, like many of your brothers.

Hip Hip Hooray for Joshua Cartwright

Time to stand up and cheer:
Hip Hip Hooray!
Hip Hip Hooray!
Hip Hip Hooray for Joshua Cartwright!

You must be wondering - what in the world? Has Petunia lost her mind? Who is this "Joshua Cartwright? And why is she cheering him on?

Gentle Readers, it is not Petunia who cheers on the women haters of today. It is the lunacy of the MRA/FR movement who does so.

Read about Cartwright here:

Shooting deaths: 'None of it makes sense'

The events that led to the shooting deaths of two Okaloosa County sheriff's deputies Saturday began in a small top-floor apartment in Fort Walton Beach - with an argument over a tube of Clearasil.

Apparently this had much more to do with an an insane person than a "tube of Clearasil", however.

Now you understand why this is on here but who in god's name would be cheering on a man such as this you may ask?

For his courage, valor, and gun control in the face of violent criminal assault by the enemies of men, Mr. Joshua Cartwright is hereby awarded the coveted Golden Bull Award.

WARNING! MRA WEBSITE!!!!
The World According To Bob

In the future, Petunia will refer to comments from Bob and his site as TWAT Bob comments, so the reader can choose to visiti or not to visit. Keep in mind Petunia only posts what is out there, she never makes anything up. Please use caution when visiting these sites.

Petunia cannot even fathom the rantings of this man who claims to be an MRA/FR enough to even begin writing an opinion. I mean - where would she start? So gentle readers - I leave this one to you. Please comment and comment heavily!!!

Women only have rights because men supported those rights

68
Sonja Says:

May 11th, 2009 at 7:06 pm
GG, men supported women's rights. If they hadn't, women wouldn't have the freedoms they do.

I wonder sonja does this mean that since there are now men who are unhappy that a woman has these rights that were so nobly "given" to them by these wonderful men, that we should have to give them back? Or does it mean that we have to allow men to treat us however they would like and we cannot speak up about it? You were born in the wrong generation my dear, you need to move your date of birth back about 6 or 8 decades.

So Pankaj, why do we have to........

......listen to your "brothers" when they whine and moan and sing the blues about their mean nasty vindictive ex-wives? Oh yeah, I forgot because you are MEN and because you said so.....Thanks for clearing that up for me......

42
Pankaj Says:

May 5th, 2009 at 9:38 am
Michelle,

Did I or anyone else, lets say - society - ASK you to marry that man? You did that on your own, who knows what you agreed to do with him. Now that you don't like his behavior, you want everyone else to force him to do it your way? Morally and personally, I would think he would pay for the kids and spend time with them. But then, he is not me. This business is between yourself and him - why should anyone else care?

More MINIMIZATION by another cultist

10
Fembuzzender Says:

April 4th, 2009 at 5:09 pm
Domestic violence is overblown. The real problems that we need to face are the low marriage rate and false accusations. Abuse isn't that common and doesn't affect the lives of many people.

The woman blaming runs rampant over THERE

pjk is not the only one who blames women. Read on for many many more below:

12
feelbreeze64 Says:

April 29th, 2009 at 2:59 pm
Spoken like a true victim. Maybe she should of thought twice about who she was having children with, instead of having childern with a man that can't take care of him self but still expecting him to take care of his childern. She is just as at fault as he is for making poor decisions.

11
SerenityNow Says:

April 29th, 2009 at 2:58 pm
I was going to say what pjk said- that Ms. McCaffrey chose to have a child with (if we take her words as fact) an irresponsible drug addict, and now cries BOO HOO HOO.

19
Offended_Dad Says:

April 29th, 2009 at 3:15 pm
Wow, April, you had not one, but *TWO* children with an alcoholic / drug addict that can't hold down a job. What moment of genius inspired this life decision that affects not only you, but the two children you deliberately created? You aparently take ZERO accountability for your bad decision making, but rather propose that the government force someone to work and confiscate their wages to make up for it....

Imagine if women were branded "lying goldigging tramps" until proven otherwise, and you'll start to understand the point of view.

Editor Note: Offended_Dad - women ARE branded liars, god-diggers, and tramps every single day by abusive men. This is why the women file for divorce in many cases.

51
Lonnie Says:

April 29th, 2009 at 10:44 pm
why doesnt she elaborate on her decision to sleep with and have a child with a man who was a drug addict? Or did she drive him to that point lol. Why is it never their fault? Why do they never accept any part of the blame for their decisions? How about taking into consideration that before you spread your legs and get pregnant you think about whether you can afford to raise a child by yourself?? she is a clear loser who wants to pass the blame for her poor decisions.

And my favorite (hack gag puke) comment of the night:

52
JeanB Says:

April 29th, 2009 at 11:00 pm
Lonnie,

Because then she would have to admit she is stupid. Heaven forbid anyone takes responsibility for their own actions anymore.

Women are not allowed to compare all men......

I have been called out numerous times for comparing all men because my ex was a nasty, mean-spirited, narcissistic abuser. Yet we have so many on the cult board who do this same thing. Read below for one such comment and realize there are many, many more of these:

5
Bob Denton Says:

April 4th, 2009 at 8:23 pm
Women are so physically attractive,but their moral bankruptcy and aversion to personal responsibility makes them otherwise unappealing

Now Bob Denton is saying women - he is not quantifying that with some women, most women, a few women - he is just saying women. So Bob, are you speaking of all women?