March 6, 2009

Some of these men want your pity? NOT!!!

Poor, poor Markypoo. He is mad at the IRS because they only recognize that ONE person has ONE home (as it should be). They say that a child has a custodial or primary home and a non-custodial (or secondary home). My question is this: Why is this such a huge ordeal for a man, yet hundreds of thousands of women are being forcibly removed from their children's lives in the name os PAS and that means nothing? read more of Mark's little complaint below:

I found out something I didn't know. I have shared parenting.I talked to IRS for about 45 minutes the other day. The revenue service that keeps track of all of our income does not acknowledge shared, joint or any other false terms. They told me it is either Custodial or non-custodial. I told them shared but she is considered residential. They told me again we don't know any other terminology than custodial. In his words your state calls custodial, residential.
Another way of falsely pacifying us men.

Mark Ohio




5 comments:

Louise Uccio said...

What about the women/mothers who have been aliebated by the abuser? PA/PAS is NOT gender specific..and if you keep on fighting this war for those womens groups who refuse to accept that women also alienate.. you own children may be fighting against an abuser who manipulated the children using PA after the survivor left him. Wake up!

Glenn's Cult? said...

Because PAS IS junk science. We must show these bad parents (because some are women - not nearly as many women as men however) as abusers. We must NOT use junk science to remove a child from a parent. If a parent is abusing the child by saying negative things about the other parent that are FALSE then that is wrong and should simply be shown as such.

But a parent who was abused or a protective parent should not have junk science used against them. And PAS is being used by abusive men who use it to remove a protective mother from a child's life.

This MUST stop!!!!

Glenn's Cult? said...

I must also add Lousie, show me case histories where PA/PAS is alleged with mothers and fathers equally being accused and terrorized by its use. You will not be able to do that because PA/PAS is used in 95% of cases involving abusive men!!!!

Parental Alienation Fraud Victim said...

To Louise Unccio, the proper terminology for a mother being deprived of being with her child as a form of abuse inflicted by a domestic abuser is Maternal Deprivation Abuse. It is extremely harmful to the child to be deprived of the love and support of the mother. It causes severe trauma, anxiety, and is THE WORST FORM OF ABUSE THAT ANYONE CAN INFLICT ON A CHILD.
http://batteredmomslosecustody.wordpress.com/2009/02/24/maternal-deprivation-research/

Michele said...

How funny, this is my exhusband who lost his right to claim any of his children this year for taxes at the hands of a child support magistrate because he is not exercising his shared parenting time, not following our divorce agreement by helping with any extra expenses for the children, and at that time he did not even pay child support! He did however claim he supported two of them enough to receive government money for his college tuition! Joke this man did not spend on cent on his kids for four years and has never done his parenting time for our shared parenting agreement!

enter