Gee whiz - can they make up their minds now?

First the MRA/FR groups say that women are evil and try to tear up and destroy families. Then they condemn them because they want to keep a family together. Click Petunia to check out the latest ramblings on the CULT, and click here to get the full story. Unbelievably there are even some on that news site that are condemning this mother as well.....for keeping her family together....

Clive Boustred

Now I would be afraid if I was a court clerk and some strange man was coming in with numerous motions (or even just one) and acting in this fashion. You never know what is going to happen in a courtroom. Even with security people are able to sneak weapons into these offices, people can even be shot at while the perpetrator is not even in the courthouse (Darren Mack). So these clerks (IMO rightly so) had this man removed. Just watch the video and then we will dissect the "fan" (aka cultist) comments below the vid.

tenbarrels5

...To Clive, I can only say, America and its masses have betrayed you. Invest your resources into an escape, grab your children and go into hiding......

greenman92553

They day man is a evicted form his home, looses his right as a father and is trampled upon by the state is the day that man has the responsability to kill those who subjugate him

joe80dman

The cockroaches don't like being videoed, do they!?!? Did you see that dumb cop, using the stance that he was taught at the Academy, to intimidate this man from seeking justice? Is this JUSTICE in Communist California? Why does a father have to get permission from the State to see his own son? Where are the MEN in that state? They should storm that building with guns blazing! That's right, you all heard what I said. It's the only way to take back this country, brute force!

intrepidxxx

I trust patriots will deal with those criminals in due course. And I expect it to happen sooner than expected - although not soon enough for many.

Now folks what is wrong with these posts? They are all apparently men, they are all threatening acts of violence or illegal acts. And I will say it again - THESE ARE THE MEN WHO WANT TO RAISE OUR NEXT GENERATION?!?!?!?!?!?

Good dads?

These are the men folks who are these good dads who want responsibility for the children of the next generation......

Keep reading there will be more on this

Watch this video

"A lot of mothers can be vindictive bitches..."

"Social services decides to honor a restraining order that the 'so-called' mother...."

"Marital Rape is on the rise....all the wife has to do is say just before she leaves to her new boyfriend....is accuse a man....of rape....."

"There are people out there ready to put a bullet in a few judges' head, more than a few..."

Nothing more needs to be said here.....

Just watch this news clip - nothing more needs to be said. The men on Sacks' website sadly are very similar to this man in their thought processes and ideas. Will one of our senators end up with egg on their face due to a man like this?

Louise Uccio and your comments

I let the first one slide through since you were civil. While you were mostly civil in your second one, that one is staying right where it is. Sadly you have to believe what you believe. If your children are being brainwashed against you, that is abuse - no need to add a label to it. You say men and women are equally guilty of this, well the courts do not see it that way. I know of a lady who has suffered many losses in her life. Her abusive husband while in the midst of a divorce said some sick things to their children. One of the children was effected deeply by this, not allowing the mother near. It was proven in court that the dad had said these things (witnessed by CPS and many others), yet NOTHING was done to the father. The judge in that case simply told the mother she had best stop denying visitation to the father or she would be in jail - he did not take kindly to mothers alienating the children from the father.

So with that said (and again that was one of the worst cases I know of - there are thousands more. PAS is JUNK SCIENCE!!! Brainwashing, telling lies about the other parent to the child - IA ABUSE. Call it what it is. BUT!!!!!! If the parent who says there is brainwashing happening was abusive, then it is not abuse - it is SPEAKING THE TRUTH. Using junk science to further your own agenda is only playing into the abusers hands. So unless you have something to contribute with helping those who have been victimized - go back to NANCM or Glenn Sacks (since you like to frequent his blog and you can count on not being banned from there). Guess what? You are banned from here. Anyone who furthers the PAS agenda is not welcome here. We are attempting to discover ways to show how the court whores profit from taking children away from the protective parent (generally speaking - the mother), how to better assist the victims of domestic violence, and above all else - work towards children's rights - IE: THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD!

Now this one is even worse - Custodial Dad denies mother the ability to feed herself?

This one comes from a previously showcased "wonderful dad". Delanddale welcome back to my world. Here you will not find the good ol' boys who will pat you on the back and sympathize with you. Here you will get the no holds barred view from Petunia. Petunia thinks you are one lucky man that she is not near you to come sit on you, or snort and drool all over your nice clean suits you bought with the blood money you call child support. Petunia would also love to slurp up all that booze you are buying too (what can she say she is a boozer - she had to be to fit into the good ol' boys club). What has really not settled in Petunia's snout very well is the fact that you would like to deny this woman who is unemployed (like many Americans right now) the ability to purchase food so she can EAT!!!! As an eater too (you see Petunia also lovessssssssssss to eat), taking food away from someone ranks up there pretty high.

The only thing that makes Petunia any madder is when a dad uses junk science to take a child away from the mother. Now wondering reader, you may ask - what is this "junk science" you speak of Petunia? Well Petunia answers her gentle and ever so kind readers, that "junk science" is Parental Alienation Syndrome aka PAS. So dear old dad hunts down momma like a deer in a car's headlights and rams it to her in court, then he wants to deny her the ability to feed herself, and gets mad at his brother in law because BIL refused to call the police on his ex-sister in law for driving on a suspended license - at the UNEMPLOYMENT office? Men are constantly claiming women do this to them and it is wrong, yet here we have a MAN who wants to do this to the mother of his child(ren)? Petunia is not happy no sireee!!!!! Now tell me Delanddale, did you use PAS and cry and whine to the courts about how mean momma was, your children (let's not forget about the chattel law these men want to see come back into vogue) did not want to see you, were god forbid afraid of you? But okay let's see - now the kids live with you, I am sure from your "tone" that your kids are not in the dark as to child support (because again PAS is not used against dads - only moms, so you have no fear that she will claim alienation) and dear mom who at one time you promised to honor and cherish - is now a worthless piece of garbage? She doesn't even deserve to eat?

Read below gentle readers

I would like how many fathers who are eligible financially to receive food stamps, but can't get them because they owe child support? I ask this because if a woman owes child support she can still get this assistance that also blocks her from having to pay for the support she owes. So is it the same for fathers?

I just found out that my Ex must have gotten sanction lifted and is now collecting. I found this out after speaking to someone at our local Child Support Enforcement office and I am pissed. Now all that is left is for her to get busted for driving with no drivers license which is another thing that the local authorities have not done yet. Which brings to mind a resentment I have with my sisters husband.

He saw her the other day and id not call the law on her. In fact she was coming out of the unemployment office probably turning in some report on the work she claims she looked for but never really did. I know her so well because she did the same thing when we were together. Either way the government need to change it's rules or try to do a much deeper investigation on most applicants who apply for assistance, Especially the ones who have already violated their rules and have been busted before by lying to them.

Butch

Some of these men want your pity? NOT!!!

Poor, poor Markypoo. He is mad at the IRS because they only recognize that ONE person has ONE home (as it should be). They say that a child has a custodial or primary home and a non-custodial (or secondary home). My question is this: Why is this such a huge ordeal for a man, yet hundreds of thousands of women are being forcibly removed from their children's lives in the name os PAS and that means nothing? read more of Mark's little complaint below:

I found out something I didn't know. I have shared parenting.I talked to IRS for about 45 minutes the other day. The revenue service that keeps track of all of our income does not acknowledge shared, joint or any other false terms. They told me it is either Custodial or non-custodial. I told them shared but she is considered residential. They told me again we don't know any other terminology than custodial. In his words your state calls custodial, residential.
Another way of falsely pacifying us men.

Mark Ohio

Spam?!?!?!? OR Have you missed lil ol' me?

Well I have been super busy this week, brainstorming with my sisters, working, being a great mom to the kiddoes... I have also been cybersleuthing and more. I knew I should have been a PI in another life...well maybe my next life :-)

Now onto today's business at hand. This would be ironic if it weren't so dam funny. I had been on Glenn's email list for quite a while under another email addy, however due to stalking issues by my ex, I had long ago abandoned that email. I however am in possession of his latest tripe over the fiasco by Conway selectman Crow Dickinson's comments regarding domestic violence - he in fact stated that women will use dv as a tool in divorce. His exact comment follows:

"There are a lot of women who use (domestic violence) as a gimmick in divorce proceedings," Selectman Crow Dickinson said in explaining his vote. "All they have to do is call the police and get the person thrown out. If I call the police and say you're abusing me, they'd have to believe me. I wish people would split up and be more polite about it."

Now what is so ironic about this (and hence the reason for the title of this article), is that I want to send out a commendation for Yahoo. Seems Yahoo believes that Glenn Sacks' newsletter is spam!!!! The proof (as they say) is in the pudding and a picture speaks a thousand words. Just see below:



Now I suppose those poor picked on Loonies (as Glenn Calls them) will come up with a reason for this. I am on many mother's groups and seldom does one hit my Spam folder, not on Yahoo, not in Gmail. Now if we could just work on those three little letters (PAS) and have Yahoo declare those Spam as well, abused mothers and children will be safe. Hmmmmmm...............

KUDOS YAHOO FOR RECOGNIZING SPAM AS SPAM!!!!

Moderation????? Hmmmmmmm............

A comment left that may or may not be approved on a fellow blogger's website:

I consider your site essentially no better than a hate crime against children and fathers. You will go down in history as a nut case. Your moderation alone shows you work to prevent the trusth from getting out for some sick motive.

Now why is it not okay for us to moderate our blogs and protect the sometimes very fragile abuse victims who may frequent our sites? Now I am not one of those fragile victims, I am mor in line with a fed-up victim. I am tired of being re-victimized every chance they get. And seriously "Anonymous" (one must wonder about those so afraid to even give a handle - as to what your motives are. May I also point out on Sacks' website, the moderation in place. I managed to "get around" the blocks he had in place against me, only to be deleted. His first excuse? No valid email. One must wonder what his second excuse will be since I GAVE a valid email address at this go-around?

I will not hold my breath awaiting his answer :-)

Now as for this lowly piece of dog doo, come out come out wherever you are. Oh gee I forgot, you can't because you are HIDING (behind that magical word - ANONYMOUS!!!!! The question with you (not Sacks - I am done with him for the moment) is what are YOU hiding from?

Another one for our woman wall of shame.....

While it is admirable that Ms. Tami has decided to post about the terrible nature of abuse and the victims, it is also decidedly ironic that she NEVER makes a post about a man who is doing the abusing. You can do a search on any website and type in murder suicide and what do your wondering eyes behold? MEN!!!!! Okay tami p you know who you are - I will not give you a link here and I hope you find this.

I have followed most of the FR movement (starting many moons ago) and have seen this name pop up quite frequently. The one time I did not make the connection was when she joined in on an argument for shared parenting on a nationwide publication. I think the information discovered tonight might very well leap frog ms. tami right to head queen of colluders.