Glenn's Cult?: Child support idiocy and father's rights activists

November 14, 2009

Child support idiocy and father's rights activists

Well the two go hand in hand let me tell you. First check out what the guy is saying (not highlighted portions). Petunia Commentary to follow...

Laryy Broyer (ldbroy2001@yahoo.com) says:

I'm curious if anybody has sued thier EX for making false
statements, regarding support payments. My Ex is playing games,
Gonna have to hire a lawyer etc. etc. I've been through so much
crap with this women, and her sneaky underhanded actions, continue
to surprise me.
I've got lock solid proof her accounting practices are far from
reality. There has to be away to teach her a lesson, to never again
temped to manipulate the system for personal gain.
I'm old now, and really just don't want the added stress of dealing
with this stuff anymore. 28 years of constant attacks is enough.
Gonna hire a lawyer, and be done with it. Can't afford it, but
what else can I do. All those years of stress, have taken thier toll.
Recently the company I was working for closed. They always seem to hit
you when your most vulnerable. Then thiers my son, he doesn't need this crap either, can I sue on both of our behalfs.

Larry Broyer

Well doing the math would love for you to point out to me why you have been dealing with this for TWENTY EIGHT (28) years? The longest period of time to be paiyng child support is generally 18-22 years (if you must continue through college). generally though it is 18 years of age. So an extra 10 years on top? Maybe, just maybe Lumpen Larry, it is because you did not pay what you were supposed to pay and she got a judgment for interest. Now you will be paying this for a very long time. Should have saved your self some money and aggravation. A bank would have been cheaper from which to borrow than the state.

Do we have to spell it out for these guys?

2 comments:

Unknown said...: OK Mister mathematician, ever think the children ages range father then 12 years apart, please put your head back in the sand, see you on the food lines in a few years.; November 22, 2009 7:43 PM
Glenn's Cult? said...: Okay mr larry of the hidden blogger profile (what are you afraid of), have you ever done the math yourself? The only way for you to have any more than 18 years of child support total (or 21 depending on the laws of your state) is if you went back to your ex wife (the one you say is so awful) after your older child aged out. If you had a 17 year old and a newborn, max you would pay would be 18-21 years. Not the 28 like you are saying.

So let me explain this so someone who is not a mathematician can understand it.

You have a child who is say 12, and then you have another child and get divorced as soon as said child is conceived. You would pay support in some states for 18 years (19 if you seperate right when woman discovers pregnancy). So you would pay cs for two children for 6 years (oldest one ages out at 18). You will then have another 12-13 years for the next child until they age out. So that is a total of 18-19 years (which is the actual age of the youngest child). The ONLY way for you to have to pay more than that is if you divorced mom and had a 1 year old, then when that child was 11 you and ex got back together conceived another child and she left you again (or you left her). Then you would have already paid for 10 years and would have another 18 years to go to make it 28. But then YOU GOT BACK WITH HER. So that was YOUR CHOICE!!!

There is no other way unless (and this is the likely scenario) you fell behind in your support payments. Then you would be paying arrears and interest.

I foresee that as the likely scenario because with all the venom you spew towards your ex, I do not picture you getting back together with her for a little rendevouz. Why do I say this? because you are on a father's rights email group. And men who are FR's HATE their ex wives. And unless you are just a sex crazed fool, I cannot see you getting back with your ex wife for sex.

So there you have it. Why don't you explain how it came about that you have been paying child support for 28 years?; November 23, 2009 12:00 AM

WARNING!!!!!!

WARNING!!!!
I must warn all who come to this blog about clicking any links I provide. Unless I state this is a safe website you should take precautions in visiting any site listed as an MRA/FR site. To do so one could open up oneself to being stalked, hunted down, victimized, and even in worst case scenario - assaulted in real life or even killed. The men (and sometimes women) who post on the MRA/FR sites can be dangerous. One nly needs to read the venom spewing from their moouth to see evidence of that. I also post this due to the recent blogs and forums I have discovered over the last few weeks. These will slowly be added to the Cult Wall Of Shame. Please take adequate precaution when visiting these sites.

Fair Use Doctrine

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, entitled, "Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use," is the statutory codification of the fair use doctrine. This judicially developed concept strives to balance the public's need to know and be informed against authors' incentives to create. The copyright law contemplates that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission shall be for purposes such as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching, and that such fair use will not result in the infringement of a copyrighted work. As one may expect, authors and publishers usually take a restrictive view of the fair use doctrine, while users of copyrighted materials generally take a more expansive view.

http://www.publaw.com/work.html

Thank you too!!!!

I am now friends on a message board with a wonderful man. And you all thought we hated men :-) We despise abusive controlling men and women. We like men and women who are decent, honest, and caring. I will say no more as I do not want to ruin this. But those who fight this same fight, keep going!!! We are being seen and our message is getting out there.

Thank you. And thank you for the important work that you do. It gets my dander stirred up when little men hide behind a pen or a computer and spew out fear, hate and stuff that they think makes them look like "real men" but in fact exposes them for the big bullies that they really are. My father and mother are both deceased. But my dad treated my mother the way every man should treat his wife. She was the Queen in our home and he doted on her like she was still his sweetheart until the day she died at age 84. Abraham Lincoln once said, "The greatest gift a father can give to his children is to love their mother." So many men are unhappy with their own lives and they blame women. That way they don't have to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings. Sad. Pathetic. Again, thank you for your very good and important work.

And thank you for giving us hope as well - the hope that there are good and decent people out there - both men and women.

My blog, My rules.....

I would like to welcome everyone who has arrived here - no matter the road you traveled. I only have some very simple rules. Please try to keep your comments clean (I am a mom and as such I do not like extreme vulgar language). I despise the "c" word so it will never be published. Otherwise I will be very lax as I want this site to be a release to those of you who have an issue with the MRAs in general and Sacks and his followers in particular.

I must also slide this little disclaimer in here too (just to protect myself from those pesky little creatures called lawyers and those MRAs who would think they will file a lawsuit or something silly like that against me). I am using YOUR WORDS on this site as well as publishing my opinion of those words. Nothing more, nothing less. I am "not" responsible for comments made by others on my site and if MRAs can behave then they might very well be allowed to post here. Like I said, this is intended to be a release for the women who have been attacked on various sites online to have a little comic break from these constant attacks.

I am posting this blog and all of my comments as a naturally born citizen of the United States and am exercising my right to free speech.

I must also caution my followers and posters against posting any identifying information. This is for your own safety, as I foresee this blog quickly becoming a very hated tool against MRAs who abuse and those who assist them. I mus also make one additional rule concerning posting other people's (such as our exes) personal information. I have been through a very nasty divorce and I know how our exes can react. As such I must make it a number one rule, as much pleasure it would give us, against posting any information which could identify our exes. First names (or initials if the name is uncommon) is fine but no last names. This will be enforced on this blog, unlike "other blogs."