Okay enough fooling around, now it is serious time

Well the time has come folks and it is now time to get serious. Sadly I knew this day would come. Some people are like dogs. Give them a bone and they will never let go until the bone is in shreds, torn into tiny little slivers. This is now what is being done to Jennifer Collins, Holly Collins, Zachary Collins, and to Holly's minor child whose name I will not mention due to his age. His natural father (from what I have read) can only be classified in the questionable category. What type of father who claims to be interested in a child's best interest wants to root the child up from the only environment he has ever known and from his entire family? I will offer my own opinion on this and it is green and there are quite a few of them and they have pictures of dead presidents on them.

Amazingly we have yet to hear any denials from the now famous father of Jennifer and Zachary. No denials.... nothing.... One must wonder why this is? And of course we have the ever famous (maybe in his mind and the minds of his cult followers) man who has decided to make it his life's mission to rip this mother to shreds as a dog would a good bone. I will say one thing in this post before I get to the hard work. The children in question were 7 and 9 when the mother fled the US. This is old enough to form an opinion about something. To delude yourself into thinking that these children could not have possibly remembered themselves or their mother being abused is quite frankly - in a word - disgusting.

Now folks the posts you have been anxiously awaiting are on the way. This could very well be a several day project, so please be patient. He has pretended to engage in a full investigation of Holly's charges and claims, yet he only presents one side of the issues. I will now take all of his claims and using the Internet will show why his claims and how his claims can be proven false. Also be warned, this post will probably not provide the entertainment value of some of my previous posts. But then again, it just might. This is something I need to do. I feel as though I know Jennifer, although we have never met. I see my own daughter and sons in her eyes and in Zachary's eyes. I see myself in Holly's eyes. I only hope that things can start changing.

Holly, Jennifer, Zachary... this is for you. I can only hope I will do you justice and bring to light the truth. My prayer is that you Holly will see this and say yes yes yes over and over again, this is what I meant, this is what I was talking about. SHE gets it. Well I get it because I live it. So with that my sisters in this war, I salute you. Let's get on with this.

Here's yer sign award for the night

Actually state are allowed to set standard interest and it changes on a regular basis - usually yearly. Florida for example has set as standard interest right now of 10 or 11 percent. learn dude before ya post - here's yer sign!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Harrison Says:

December 22nd, 2008 at 2:38 pm
12% is double that of what the federial law allows!!! States are to set an interest rate with a min. 3% and max. 6%!!!!!

Ban everyone except the good - fathers!!!!

AdVader Says:

December 16th, 2008 at 6:52 am
Divorced children adapt immediately because they trust their parents even if the parents or mother or father 'think' their 'choices' are 'good' but in fact so so wrong. Divorce is never normal, and, childabuse. Also defathering is an unwritten crime even worse then horsethieves who were hanged immediately! Ban 2nd dads, lesbofamilies and sole mothers, heal families and recover fathership !!!

Okay lets get rid of everyone because they are second class. It is only fathers who are good and right. More patriarchy and only men are good.

A commenter on my blog makes a comment that is so true

Many times we will read on many father's rights websites about men who are being treated savagely and inhumanely in family courts across the land. These posts often leave out material items. I am discussing a recent mens rights blog post. This blog post discusses a man who has been jailed over child support issues. He has issues which have caused him to be unable to pay support. Now if what happened to him is true, why did he not contact any mainstream newspapers or television reporters? If he did so please feel free to post the link here (only mainstream websites - not "mens rights" sites). His savior is also engaging in slightly less than stellar performance by publishing the ex-wife's personal information via their website. If this man wants to put his information on the Internet, then that is his prerogative. However his ex-wife should be able to pursue a case against him as well as this website for exposing her information in this fashion. There are ways to go about this and to publish documents with personal information without the approval of the person to which they pertain is against the law. Now I wonder if the "savior" site will black out the offending personal information, or if our site will be attacked yet again?

Also of mention is the fact that there were several cases against the man mentioned in this story, beginning in 2000.

I challenge all sites that contain links to this information to remove the offending "personal" information and black it out if these documents must be published.

Reminder - what this blog is about

This is just a small reminder (not sure if I made it clear or not from the start) about why I created this blog. I am a victim of dv and in going through the divorce initiated by my then husband, I went online to research custody issues and domestic violence in order to protect myself and my child. In the course of my research I was horrified at what I discovered. Women were losing custody to abusive men on a daily basis all over the world!!! I researched my state statutes in order to determine how to best protect us, and was dismayed to discover that there was probably little protection. In the years since the finalization of my divorce I have discovered that to be true. Women who claim to be abused are basically ignored in Family Court. Women who claim that their children have been molested by their husbands are treated even worse.

I have had the privilege of meeting many people online who to some degree or other either agree or disagree with this statement. I was then given the dubious honor of being introduced to Sacks' website. I was warned against posting due to the abusive nature of many of his followers, but I said - oh they cannot be that bad. I had read some questionable posts, but still I gave the benefit of the doubt. I said to myself - self, if you just tell them what you have been through maybe they will see that not every woman is bad and not every woman uses dv as a tool to gain custody (which did me no good in my case even though the allegations were true - we just had little verifiable proof). I was attacked on Sacks' site, I posted on the Parade article about shared parenting and was attacked on there as well. I am sure the attacks on Sacks' site have been removed by now and teh Parade website is difficult to reach since Parade disabled the forum. That generated nearly 40 pages of comments when I was last there (I gave up on trying to give an opposing viewpoint - it was futile). Then I saw www.jugsforjustice.com and was even more horrified. Women are sexualized at every turn, and here was a woman who was posting pictures of female anatomy on her site in order to induce men to join the FR's in their movement.

It went downhill from that point on. So when I was banned for alleged personal attacks on Sacks' site, I had been threatening to expose his followers for blatant misogyny, I did it. I made this blog. I hope to provide information to warn others who might think these people can be your friends (numerous sites online claim to be assisting Non-Custodial Mothers, yet they are simply a front for FRs (Father's Rights). So with all of this stated, enjoy the serious and sometimes humorous poke at Sacks and his followers.

No cares over possible bankrupt agency

Yet another uncaring unfeeling individual:


Mister-M Says:

December 2nd, 2008 at 7:24 am
Just as an aside... even had "The Family Place" gone bankrupt as a result of the campaign's efforts - I would have felt no sorrow for the organization. The ads were offensive, misleading, and disgusting. Expressing that sentiment rationally is not "bullying" and if the persuasive efforts of the group resulted in financial catastrophe for "The Family Place" - I (for one) would have felt no guilt about it.

They did the wrong thing and then stood their ground in the face of the outrage. You deal with those consequences.

Frankly, I'm very proud of the way the entire campaign was handled and comparing it to an assault on a church (or similar) is just ridiculous.


http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3018#comment-604655

Comments such as these from a person who is the author of this website are no wonder. Nothing more needs to be said here. We only have his unconfirmed word that his ex-wife is psycho (one of the MRAs favorite words BTW) and that she suffers from BPD. He is undertaking a course of action that the MRAs are screaming about from the rooftops: smearing someone's name without allowing them the opportunity to defend themselves.