The Truth??????

Biscuit Queen signature line on SYG:

There are always two extremes....the truth lies in the middle.

Umm actually that saying goes:

There are three sides to every story, his, hers and the turth lies somewhere between.

And we on the side of protective mothers have found by speaking to the mothers and to the "now grown and abused by dad" children that the truth is actually closer to moms.

Bogus Facts and Bogus Arguments?

So why is it that the anti-dad crowd pretends that the rare instances in which fathers injure their children support the proposition that, as a matter of public policy, fathers generally should be suspect and fathers' parental rights truncated? Mothers injure more and, as the cases mentioned illustrate, every bit as brutally as the worst father.

and this as well:

It's long past time that we stopped using bogus facts and bogus arguments to continue to separate children from the fathers who love them.

I only have one comment for the statement above about bogus facts and bogus arguments:

Well Sacks, we are waiting!!!! When are YOU going to stop using bogis facts and misleading YOUR readers about the goings on of F&F? On Rights For Mothers, there was an article dated August 11th entitled "California Call To Action - Give Children a Voice in Court:

Looks like Glenn Sacks is wrong again. This is from the Center from Judicial Excellence (CJE), who is also helping parents, including father Jayraj Nair, in their criminal complaints against corrupt California custody evaluator Janelle Burrill, in a fashion similar to how AB 2475, which Fathers & Families claims is dead (it’s not), will help all parents get relief from such corrupt, biased individuals. {Read More}

I could also copy and paste every single story at Dastardly Dads but with nearly 3500 articles, that is simply not feasible. Not many of those articles are duplicate "dastardly dads" and you will find several from history databases. Wow! Dads have been killing the kids for this many years and we never knew? Nah, we knew but we are ignored.

Now it is time to ignore the purveyor of "bogus facts" and "bogus arguments" before our children are wiped off the face of the earth. Just watch this little video clip to get an understanding of why moms are as a rule - protective, and dads simply are not (again as a rule).



Dumbo's mom (who has no name) is locked away for simply wanting to protect her child. Are we going to outlaw motherhood as many of the FReaks and FRags would like? Stop outlawing motherhood and return children to their natural parent - the mother.

The daughter did not steal the Mary Jane, but I know who did....

Robert Franklin writes of ONE woman (yes you read that right - just ONE woman) who abused her children. We protective mothers do not say that NO mother has ever abused her children. We simlpy say that when a moher who is protective like we are, and has an abusive ex partner (or ex husband) like we do, who have been abused, like we were and are - the courts should listen and should not force shared parenting down our children's throats. That is what we are saying.

So you want to know where the "abusers getting custody" group is - Robert Franlklin king high ass kisser of glenn cult fame? Right here. We NEVER say that women do not abuse. We do however say that when women bring in stories of abuse, your groups have screamed from the rooftops for so long that it takes an act of God for the courts to believe a woman has been abused. Look at Wyatt.... Look at Darcy Freeman.... Look at Jean Paul Lacombe.... How many more do I need to put out here. Found another blog today. Two children mentioned in that one. I wish the blogger would come back and post soon. I am starting to get a little worried because there have been no posts. Lets add her Emily and John to this mix too..... Anyone else want to join ranks?

So who is stealing the Mary Jane now? I have my own opinion about that one and it should not take a rocket scientist to figure this one out now should it?

Oh and Robert Franklin should you care to do so, you can go look at Dastardly Dads and see literally hundreds of stories of dads killing their children every day. Last count in just this last year we were up to over 80 fathers who killed their chidlren de to custody disputes with the mother - the old if I can't have them nobody will adage.

Why don't you write about that one RF? Or are you like we are - we miss many of these stories due to the sheer volume of men killing their children, men killing their wives, men killing their girlfriends, men killing just about anyone who stands in the way of his property (children, wife, girlfriend). Now when you get this through your thick skulls over there at glenn sucks (oppps glennsacks) dot com, the world might be a better place. Shared parenting does not work with an abuser. And trotting out the occasional story of the bad mom will not make up for the sheer volume of dastardly dads out there who are intent on hurting and even killing everyone who ever cared about him.

So put that in the Mary Jane pipe and smoke it.....

the TRUTH about the creator of the FAKE anonymummies site

Some of you may have seen (if you follow my site and are aware of my sisters in arms), that there is an impostor in our midst. No I am not speaking of any of the wonderful men and women who spread the TRUTH about family court and the treatment abused women and children receive at the hands of those in power (and those not in power). No, gentle readers, I am speaking of a certain FATHER'S RIGHTS blogger who has decided imitation is NOT the best form of flattery. He has in fact taken an awesome organization who helps protective moms and the abused children and sullied their name. That "OTHER" blog site (not Blogger) has decided to ignore this blatant copyright infringement and allow this FATHER'S RIGHTS blogger to continue to spread his hate and misogyny. Not only does he do this on his own "Parental Father's Rights blog, but now he is attacking decent hard working WOMEN with his hate.

Well Petunia made a promise and I follow through on my promises. I did my research and BAM, WHOP, POP, SOCKEM (just like batman) I hit the JACKPOT!!!!

Petunia!!!!!!! Have you gone off your rocker? No, I say, the light is just so much clearer now that I have the actual court docket on front of my eyes.

First let me same damn!!!!! MKG you are like a dog with a damn good bone. You REALLY do NOT want to let go of this do you? Is 10 years not long enough to be terrorizing your ex-wife in court?

Now that I have your interest piqued, lets move on with the good stuff. How about Restraining orders? Oh yeah this case is full of them. Now who asked for what is unclear, but we know how it actually works right? One must wonder how many belong to ex-wife, and how many are MKG and his ANGER at work? Lets see total RO mentions to date number: more than 10 in 10 years. His ex-wife has had to ask that the TRO be reinstated at least 3 times.

Now contempt charges? No mention of the petitioning party regarding these contempt charges but there are at least 3 separate charges.

Child support? Oh that is mentioned - EVERY OTHER LINE!!!!!

So we see where MKG's heart lies.....

The children apparently have their own attorney, and it appears from knowledge gleaned from elsewhere (other woman-hate websites and from MKG's own website) that these children do NOT want to have any contact with MKG, whatsoever. MKG will you come forward about that or will you keep hiding behind your fake and pathetic woman-hate sites?

Now with these little tidbits of info, Petunia has this advice for you MKG. I really think you would do yourself and the world a favor if you stopped spreading your hate and lies. I will continue to spread the truth and protection for the TRUE victims out there if your hate continues.

Got it?

Oh and one must wonder why this case is one in which a noted DV attorney is now (or was at one time) involved in? Hmmm does MKG have something to hide? I truly hope his ex has a great support system. Sister, you are in this for life, you got a bone hog for an ex-husband. My condolences go out to you.

Father's Day is done for another year...

And out of respect for those good dads out there (not the ones whining on various blogs, message boards, and email groups around the world) I can now resume my life's calling. I will now post as many "Bad father" posts as I can. I will go at this with a vengeance only equalled by theirs when they were abusing their wives and chidlren. You see it will take that type of determination to stop these pigs from hurting us more.

Mike Lordi on DV

13
Mike Lordi Says:

April 27th, 2009 at 7:45 am
In addition, we should also send letters to ABC about last nights "HOme Makeover". The mother of the family works with a domestic violence group since her daughter was killed by her boyfriend. So the team decides to raise awareness of DV and sets up a demonstration which included cutouts of people who had been killed by DV. There was 7-10 wooden cutouts with names on them, all women. So in all of Alabama there wasn't ONE victim of DV that was male?

We MUST make sure that no victim has a voice, no child is allowed to tell of trauma. Men must be allowed to return (RETURN?!?!?!!?!?!?) to their reigns of all-knowing and all-powerful. A man is the king and all others must follow HIM!!!

Oh puke gag, puke gag.........Mike, do a search for "Alabama domestic violence murder victim." The only time a male is mentioned in the first 10 pages is when he is the perp or he is a dv worker assisting the family of the murder victim. In all of those pages, there were no mentions made of a male murder victim through dv.

(Mike's crybaby response) But the media doesn't mention those men, they live in a dreamland where only women are victims.

(Petunia) Well Mike that could simply be because men are more violent than women and cause more damage. Men use guns, knnives, fists. When you read of the odd case of a woman who truly was commiting dv, it is an anomoly. Women are violent generally (you see I used the word generally not "all the time" here) in response to violence. They are being abused, their children are alleged to have been abused. Generally women do not "beat" a man if he does not "do" what she wants. Unless you call keeping HIS hands to HIMSELF doing what she wants.

Men hurting themselves?

4
Stan Says:

March 31st, 2009 at 1:04 pm
Sad situation.

The injure-yourself theme is fairly common with women. Mostly to hurt a male, to make it look like "he" did it.

I have not heard about a male harming himself in order to frame a female as perpetrator.

Anybody?

Well Stan I can tell you from my years as an advocate and also as a former victim that yes men do hurt themselves, intentionally so they can get the women in trouble. My own abusive ex did this. I watched him and so did our children. In fact that is what saved me from sure jail time - one of the little buggers (sadly the one who when visiting dear ol dad gets the comments - dam I thought I divorced that beeyotch, but she comes back every other weekend). Ladies we have been challenged I believce. Has your ex ever hurt himself, or done something to make it appear he was the victim rather than you? Please comment below, send yoru friends to comment as well. I will turn anonymous commenting back on to protect your identity. And Stan your comment goes to the flush-o-matic as well.



BuhBye!!!!!