Part Three: Teri Stoddard and her claim to fame in Father's Rights circles

Teri, this is not apples and oranges. You are helping men who have RO's on them (sometimes multiple RO's from many different women) and men who stalk women simply because they supplied one cell that resulted in a pregnancy. Children are nurtured by mothers in ALL species including the human species and mothers should never be removed from a child's life. Children do not NEED fathers, they need to be cared for which requires financial assistance and they need nurturing and love. Abraham Lincoln said it best when he said the best gift a man can give his children is to respect and love their mother. Beating her within an inch of her life or raping her is NOT respect or love.



Stop Family Violence and Liz Library ARE based on TRUE facts and TRUE stories. Women who are featured on SFV have evidence and documentation to support the facts that they or their children were abused and the courts gave the children to the abuser. Stitches and broken bones and black eyes and ripped hymens and STD's do NOT lie Teri.



Children are not protected in Shared Parenting states. I am in contact with many women (some who supply me with information for this blog) and they have either lost their children to the abuser, or the abuser has UNSUPERVISED contact with the children resulting in more abuse. There is one woman in Florida who was abused by her husband. She left and that man proceeded to gain "shared parental responsibility" and then called the state on this woman and several of her supporters. The most recent call involved an elementary aged female child and the removal of all of her clothes due to a sexual abuse claim by this man. This child was humiliated and for what? The child had a heat rash which was verified by the doctor. This father simply wanted to make mom's life a living hell because - how DARE she leave him?

Now here are the links to relevant statutes in Florida concerning DV and child custody.

Parenting Coordinator

This section discusses PC's (those famous court whores) and whether they can be appointed. The woman and children in the paragraph above have been threatened with a PC due to the many unresolved issues surrounding custody. The ONLY reason one has not been appointed is because the abusive father has stated he cannot afford it. NOT because the mother was a victim of DV.

Shared Parental Responsibility

This section discusses whether Shared custody should be granted and states that only a conviction of DV is used. Again the woman above TRIED to get her abuser prosecuted. The State Attorney of Florida where she lives REFUSED to do so, even after they were contacted by a police officer regarding this case. That police officer went on to do everything he could in order to give this woman the proof the SA office so desired but was also unable to get enough proof.

Child Support and DV

This statute discusses the Registry for CS cases and what should be done if there are family violence indicators. The woman listed above has requested anonymity and has been refused until just recently. This is because she now has a caseworker who realizes that she and her children are the client and this caseworker works for her.

Court Whores

We don't need to get into this one as there are many blogs out there that cover those infamous court whores. But, Florida grants full and complete immunity to them like many other states.

Other cases filed between parties

This involves court paperwork requirements and tells how other cases between the parties must be reported to the courts hearing custody/dissolution cases.

More paperwork requirements

More of the same as above.

Inconvenient forum

The woman listed above has tried getting her case moved because she is not being afforded protection in her current court. She has been told that since her abuser was violent once before (YES ONLY ONCE) and no other violent acts occurred until after the birth of the children, that she knew he was violent and now she has to deal with it.

Parenting Course

This has one tiny section about DV which states that a parenting course does not have to be taken by both parents at the same time if DV is present. The woman above was forced to take the class with her abuser while an active RO was in place. She simply disregarded the order and presented paperwork for a completed, certified parenting course when the order was made and was dismissed from this requirement.

Court-ordered electronic communication between a parent and a child.

First it says that each parent's DV history is to be included in whether a determination about communication with the child is made. The woman above had an active RO against the abuser AND the abuser had a history of previous RO's with other intimates and no such determination was given to the children. The abuser was allowed free and ready access to the children.

Parental Relocation with a child

This discusses the rules and laws about relocation. Again, the woman above lived within a few miles of her abuser and was experiencing break-ins, stalking, harassment, and many other such issues. She moved 32 miles away from the father to a more highly populated area and the abuser took her back to court. He knew where the mother lived as he had resumed his stalking behavior yet again but perjured himself to the courts which was proven in court. Nothing was done to the abuser (no punishment for perjury) and thankfully the mother only got a lecture.

Dissolution

This woman asked for and received an injunction but the cases (dissolution and injunction) were combined against her wishes. This allowed the abuser to take the focus off the real issue of family violence and focus it on the non-issue of divorce. Dissolution and injunction/RO cases should NEVER be combined. EVER!

Definitions

Again this states that domestic violence is to be considered when creating a parenting plan, yet we can see from the many examples above that no such consideration was afforded this woman.

Now what do you suppose was the reason for all these 'blunders?' Well if you guessed that this woman was a SAHM and had not worked in many years and was only able to get a minimum wage job and relied on legal aid for a lawyer, you would have guessed right.

But enough of that - we should move on here. This is not about her this is about you, Teri, and just how deluded you can be.

You also state here that 80% of abuse claims are false? Other times you say 50%, other times it has been 90%. Which is it Teri? Can't you get your statistics straight?

Onward Ho!



I know of many cases where the NON-CUSTODIAL mother has sought assistance from a fatherhood program for visitation and child support in order to reduce the child support so she may be able to afford to live and NOT be HOMELESS and the result was being dumped to other agencies and then being turned away. These mothers are still homeless.

NEXT!







I only have one thing to say to this.

CLICK HERE!

HUNDREDS and HUNDREDS of cases where the father killed the children and there are so many this blogger has not time to list every single one. And often the stories do not make the news. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.....



Ah so we should have parents spying and stripping their children in order to keep an eye out for marks? We saw what happened to the woman and young female child above with shared parenting and abuser dad keeping an eye out for marks. Which by the way, the abuser also would get heat rashes due to his weight, just like the child does. Should a complaint of abuse or neglect be called in on abuser's new wife? Maybe on himself since he has a rash?

As far as your argument that mothers commit more abuse, we should factor in time spent with children. If it is as you say and women get custody 90% of the time and fathers only 10% of the time, we should play with the numbers some. Let's say there are 1,000 custody cases (there are more but this is just for example). So 900 children with moms, 100 children with dads. So if moms commit twice the abuse of dads, that must mean that mom abuser is 66% and dad abuse is 33% (again simplified because there is stranger abuse as well). How many children are abused? Let's say 100, unless you can give me a percentage of abused children compared to the whole population of children. So if you have 2/3 of 100 children abused by mom that would mean 66 children by mom and 33 children by dad. Now lets compare that to the entire group (not just the abuse victims). Sixty-children out of 900 works out to 7.3% of mothers abuse and 33% of the fathers abuse. There is no other way to work the numbers Teri, MEN do abuse more often than women - the numbers are completely skewed if you look at only part of the picture.

And if my small explanation is not helpful to you, you can simply go HERE and see what the NIS-3 (the most complete study which lists gender and marital status of abusers - the NIS-4 does not separate like the NIS-3 - hmmmm Fatherhood groups at work here?).

NEEEEEEEEEEEXXXXT......



Now we move on to placating and condescending behavior. What you are known for best. Next you will block and talk about behind their backs. Watch out ladies, myself and several others are on her little block list. She even has some from the father's movement on her little list as well, isn't that right Ray? And do not deny Teri is right out there in the open for everyone to see. Well most everyone :-)

You also help alleged abusers, why else would you be searching for a ride for a well-known father's rights activist who was supposed to be in court in OHIO yet was stranded in ILLINOIS, which just so happened to be where his alleged victims live?



Ahh here we go.... Why don't you name some of these alleged victims you have helped? Name one man who is known to have been a victim in your circle of friends. I imagine between myself and others we could dig up his history and show a history of abuse and self indulgent behavior (traffic tickets, civil lawsuits, etc). Are you talking about Mark Godbey? Hmmmm that one was recently in court for violations. Have any more you want to share? I am up for tearing any claim you have completely apart, Teri.



This is so not even worth the time to discuss - NEXXXXXXXTTTTT!



There are no lies about you Teri. Did you forget you condoned child sexual abuse on your single parents email group? Did you forget your run that group like a little Gestapo and those who disagree are moderated or kicked off? Do we need to remind you of your sexist website - Jugs For Justice? No link back - not giving THAT filth any kudos.

Oh and we all know WHY you write about fathers more than mothers. Isn't it because your son and his ex-girlfriend went through a custody battle back in 2002 or 2003? And you were angry at HER mother because she hired a lawyer for her daughter and grandaughter? You sure complained about it often enough on not only the group you now own (which you did NOT own back then) and several other single parent/mom groups. You go so angry with one group that you quit that group. Like I said, know thine enemy Teri and I know you rather well.



Oh here we go. Teri says we are done so we are done. Well guess what Teri? You cannot control Facebook like you do your little Gestapo single parents group. So again put THAT in your little pipe.



Oh boo hoo hoo, poor widdle Teri has someone picking on her. Actually it looks like to me that teri is having fact and logic thrown at her and she has no clue how to respond. She is very much like some of the alleged abusers she helps. When the victim does not back down Teri resorts to the "oh woe is me routine". Pretty sad....

Nextttttttttttt!



One comment:

NOW THAT IS A SCARY THOUGHT!

Nexxxxtttttttttt!



Murray Straus? That explains the skewed reports. He does not know anything about intimate partner violence. If a woman yells at her partner to stop beating her she is just as violent as he is - even if he is shooting at her with a gun or trying to stab her. Yeah go on with yo bad self Teri.

Nextttttttttttt!



Names Teri, Names. And again because you cannot take it like you dish it out and you cannot silence these two women, you are done. WHATEVER!!!!

NEXTTTTTTTTT!! (This is getting really old btw Teri - when will you just go away?)......



Oh and here we go with the self promotion. You keep right up with that Teri. See how far it gets you.

Part Two: Teri Stoddard and her claim to fame in Father's Rights circles

As promised more information on Teri - the Queen of Equality. Well she got that half right ;-)

So on to her resume. She now works for S.A.V.E Services which is online at SAVE: Stop Abusive and Violent Environments.

Now this all look peachy doesn't it? A nice new organization to help those victims of abuse. Well dig into it and it does not look so peachy after all. Who (or what) is SAVE Services? Looking at the domain registration shows that Natasha Spivack is the owner (registrant) of saveservices.org. Her email is through encount.com.

Screen shots below in case the owner is mysteriously changed or hidden (and these are saved in case anyone would like them for their own use):





What is encount.com and who is Natasha Spivack?

Eeeny meeeeny miney moe - Encount.com wins first exposure. Encount.com is a mail order bride company run by Natasha Spivack. This is quite interesting given the recent attention that has been made to regulating these types of businesses.

Now why is Natasha Spivack so important? Well it seems that Ms. Spivack was the recent litigant in a case against her and her company Encounters International by one of her former female clients.

Read about one of her male clients here (he was oh so shy yet this was his third marriage?).

Or you can read about Nataliya Fox here and how she was lied to, battered, and traumatized not just by her abusive ex husband, but also by the very organization who should have helped her. Link to appeal from that court case is HERE. Another story about this travesty-turned-fair is HERE. Notice that the case against the alleged abuser was dropped after he was ordered to attend a batterers intervention class in order to have his record expunged AND he claims that Nataliya attacked him. He also claims she was "nutty" and "a fruitcake." Hmmmmmm makes you think doesn't it especially in light of the recent posts on Teri's Single Parent Group on Yahoo?

Now is it just me or is it seemingly odd that a woman who was found guilty and ordered to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to another woman has now started an organization for the falsely accused? And that Teri our own Queen of Equality is helping her in that endeavor?



Now more postings will follow but I think this is enough for now. R tells me she is constantly researching this issue so as to make all of this fair and impartial (instead of the one-sided affair that Teri like to present).

More to come......

Part One: Teri Stoddard and her claim to fame in Father's Rights circles

I have been promising this article and plan to deliver several installments. I must first thank the woman whose diligence and persistence to help me has definitely paid off. I do not think I would have been able to collect half of what she has given to me any time soon. These big old hooves get in the way of typing really well and I usually use a speech to text program :-). Thank you again R for all of your hard work to researching and exposing this for all of us.

First we must ask who is Teri? Well according to her facebook page this is what she writes:

Queen of (parental) Equality: a children's advocate, day care provider turned journalist. Working for family law reform to bring due process and abolish gender-biased abuse policies. SHARED PARENTING WORKS! Free parenting plans below.

Now that is confusing to me since she has posted these kinds of things on other email groups:

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_10.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_6812.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_1470.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_641.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_6288.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_5424.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_358.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_1907.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_7891.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_5605.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_9377.html

Now I can understand a little bit - possibly Teri WANTS women to be subservient to men? Or does she WANT to be in control of other women?

Well we will continue to explore these as options. However let's see what her parenting experience entails:



If you read this email carefully you will see that she has four children by four different men. Hmmmm Teri think you could have picked any better? Maybe then you could have gone the route of what you preach. Oh yeah I know!!!! It is do as I say, not as I do.

We have another prime example of this below:



And now we have where this anger towards women mothers has come from:



You see how she has to start getting digs on the mother of "her" grandchild? Does it get worse? You bet!

She is on a single mothers group and she whines on and on about how her son is so wonderful and the mother of her grandchild and the "other grandmother" are so awful and terrible. That group did not buy into her BS and Teri eventually left that group.

She has to post about how long she has gone without sex:



Wow oh wow! Six whole years as of 2002? Wonder if any of those lonely father's rights guys has indulged her (see earlier posts on here entitled real play or role play for that answer)?

So really what is it that has got her so upset that she flips from being a normal woman who was spurned and whose kids are not cared for by dad (read earlier picture about child support/welfare) to this crazed fanatic for men's/father's rights?



Now she is writing articles for the Examiner (claims she is a reporter now because she does this - hey I am a reporter too) :-). She also works for a nanny service (maybe this service should be warned?) and newly added to her resume is S.A.V.E. Services for Falsely Accused. R researched this issue for me (thank you again R) and with that we move to our second post.

Here is a sneak peek at what provoked R to forward all of her information to me before she was completely done with her research.

Notice the male bashing subject line (as if having a speech or protest against abuse could be considered male bashing?):

More Stodfart lies and hate

Why shouldn't Claudine be supported? Is she not a parent who is being denied the right to see her child - just like many of the MEN you support? Oh I guess Claudine has the wrong equipment.



Yes lets hope that Dr Phil sees PA/PAS/PAD for what it is - another ploy to get money by court whores.



You were appalled - why? Because Dr Phil will expose the father's rights moevment for what it is?



Claudine is a hero! Just like Holly Collins, Jennifer Collins, Genia, Wendy and the other mothers and children who have gone before and after her.

More lies and libel from Stoddard

Okay so why all these lies Teri? Just wondering you know......

Another nosy Stepmonster - Rhonda aka rhondakmorse@yahoo.com

I only have a few comments about this email from rhondakmorse@yahoo.com (her name must be Rhonda - I assume). Rhonda - first you are a step parent. You have no right to force your insurance on this mother. If she is lying about her income then make your phone call. You know you want to do it. As far as the kid's lunches - what business is it of yours how much she pays? Again you are a step parent - so STEP BACK!! Last and most important you speak of how the biological mom is alienating the children. What do you call it when you are bitching about the money you think she should pay back? And the children know about that money? I guess it was okay for you to RECEIVE child support, but not for your new hubby to PAY child support. We know how it works honestly. Instead of going through your 2 page spiel about how blessed you THINK this teenager will be in your care, why don;t you just get HONEST and admit you are pissy about her getting any of your husband's money. You want to make a case of this so you can steal her other children. Whatever.

Again folks that is rhondakmorse@yahoo.com aka Rhonda?

You have all been a great help to us, Yes the case is between my
husband and his
ex-wife..WE are thrilled that his daughter has decided to move in with us..but
of course even though his ex has stated in person, email, text messages to her
daughter, my husband, and even to me that although she is not happy
about it she
will let her stay with us(yes she is stupid enough to put in text message all
sorts of things)

On June 8th she called to ask if her daughter could stay with us until her
parents came home from Florida..for her wedding Aug 7th...because she
was out of
control?!?! and she can't hire a babysitter for a 17 year old(in June she was 2
weeks from 17)..nor could she leave her alone while she and her future husband
worked..there is a 7 year old also..but she had summer day care for
her..The out
of control is based on Mom doesn't like the daughters boyfriend..the daughter
has only gone on 3 out of school building dates with this young man in 2 1/2
years..her daughter also got a B+ in AP Chemistry...ok...of course she can stay
she is always welcome...Mom had threatened her all school year if she didn't
"get it together"..she was going to live with us...well it came to a
head..according to my stepdaughter and not denied by mom an argument became
physical while coming home from Lansing to St. Johns..Daughter became
scared..while mom, future stepdad and lil sis ran an errand...she called her
best friend to come and get her...they drove her to our house..

This was the evening of June 10th..we listened to his daughter tell what
happened...we live in Holt so I am sure she did not suspect she was at
our house
right away..but within an hour she called and demanded her daughter return to
her home NOW or stay with us her Senior year...My husband held the
phone so each
side could hear, while mom repeated herself...his daughter said she refused to
come home and wanted to stay with us...Her mother again made it clear that the
decision being made right then...was permanent...my husband and I supported his
daughter..

Two days later we had regular visitation planned with his 7 year old..she
dropped her off and on Sunday when we met to return her my ex without accusing
her of hitting her daughter while driving a car...asked what
happened..she again
said she lost it..she doesn't remember what she said or did..and didn't
care..whatever happened her daughter deserved...she stated she can stay with
you, you will find out how expensive she is(I have a 21y girl, and a 10y old
girl...yes we know)...handed over her driving permit information and said she
would arrange for all records to be changed....She called FOC first and changed
the daughters address...as well as her school..she had asked us to pay half for
band camp...of course we said yes..before we could pay half...she paid
hers...fight occured...now with daughter living with us...she called
and had her
$350 refunded...its ok...not about the $ to us...but snarky on her part...they
fought(mother and daughter) during text messages and emails...mom refusing to
give her any possession...she at one point said she needed to return home when
her sister came back from next visitation..(June 17th) Her daughter had said
numerous times she was not coming back...we went to FOC within 21 days(June
16th) and my husband spoke with a case worker..explained the details...Mom did
deliver all belongings including SS card, insurance cards, and birth
certificate
on June 24th...FOC had told my husband that if mom is saying she is agreeing
then just type a letter of agreement and submit it to them..they would
recommend
changes to child support and legal orders would be drawn up...well my husband
has a hard time with this....AS A LOT OF MEN BURNED LIKE HE HAS BEEN...we have
for the most part all gotten along because I see no point in behaving like
idiots...His ex said she wasn't writing it because she chose to leave her...so
she wanted me to do it...send it to her..she would make changes..send it
back..etc...

Heck no..we have a family friend who is a family court lawyer..drafted an
agreement to everything mom has done in action, word, etc....well you know that
made it hit the fan so to speak...

I believe life is about relationships so we have encouraged her to mend her
situation with mom...mom is not so forgiving..constantly on this girl..cell
phone..email..every time they see each other...Mom was married in August...this
had not changed..we waited to see if things would heal and she would return to
mom...she does not want to..as a matter of fact she wants to speak to the judge
if this is not done soon.....

Soooo the letter says exactly what she had written for visitation in her
original divorce/custody agreement..just reverse for her older daughter to come
there on opposite weekends that we have her sister...the agreement states "Both
parties agree to child support as recommended by FOC" Mom has spoken
about this,
said well she will have lived there for half the year so claim her on
taxes...etc..she has stated FOC should stop payment by my husband for the 17y
old living with us...continue with 7 year old as ordered...Okie no
problem..until the last line recommends the changes be made effective June
10th...

Oh HOLY CRAP...you could feel the earthquake in Lansing when she opened that
letter...she won't sign it..she is offended a lawyer drafted it...and she isn't
paying my husband back a dime...honestly we couldn't care less...We
paid in full
for band camp and all the other things like haircut hi-lights for her hair for
moms wedding..driving test..insurance...cheap car...have and always will be
treated as another member of our family....She states she doesn't have
to pay us
anything because she said her daughter was to return on the 27th and
she was not
informed by daughter any different...flat out lie..as she delivered all her
belongings...changed her address..and said in numerous forms how her
daughter is
turning against her family and if she is happy here then fine..she will accept
it..but never forgive her for betraying her....NUT JOB

Ok...sorry for the lengthy description....we can pay $100 to file it as an
Ex-Parte motion..the lawyer feels this will send a strong message to her and to
the court that he is strong in wanting to do what is fair for all and best for
his older daughter...BUT also for his younger daughter...we have documented for
the past 3 years the parenting time violations she has made...we both feel we
should be flexible..i.e. Florida vacations with grandparents...with the wedding
and then the honeymoon we did not see his 7 year old for 6 weeks...she backed
out of the Florida trip with grandma and instead had her new in-laws care for
her 7 year old...although my husband very clearly asked for his daughter to be
with him for his weekend as soon as the plans fell through for the
trip...if she
was staying in Michigan he wanted her for his weekend..and offered to have her
for as many days as his ex would allow...she refused...said she was
not going to
put her new inlaws through this.....There is a very strong verbal and nonverbal
parental alienation...7 year old has said mom has told her she wishes
my husband
was not her dad..poor kid is confused....

Do we drop last sentence in order to get her to sign the agreement..or
submit it
as the lawyer advises...Mind you the only wait on our part was for a mother and
daughter to heal hurt feelings...We are thrilled to have her and to see her
thrive...

As a part of the child support order revised last year..her income had gone
up..his down..so we know what she submitted to the court for
income..normally we
would not care....She did qualify financially for MiChild...and even in the
recent revised order it says both parties should try to obtain comprehensive
commercial insurance...my husbands work does not offer it...but mine does...we
asked to place them on my insurance 3 years ago..she threatened us and refused
to supply SS #'s...and kept the kids from my husband numerous times for up to 6
weeks....We decided when we saw the lawyer that we should add them..I already
pay for family...and it is great coverage and includes stepchildren not living
with us....Her new husband can also insure at least the 7 year old living there
if not both....

She had a FIT...and absolute FIT...screamed swore threatened that my husband
would never see his daughter again...that "YOU had no right to mess up my open
enrollment for my daughter" I don't want your insurance..I pay for
MiChild...yes
you do $100/yr and I as a taxpayer subsidize the rest...if income is
involved we
are clueless as to how she qualifies....this also resulted in my stepdaughter
telling me while we prepared for school Tuesday..that lunch is no problem...her
mom has a deal with the school where her lunch is only
50cents....OMGosh...UGH...my husband informed her of the federal income
guidelines and her income alone before child support of $42,000/year does not
qualify for reduced lunch...add in over $10,000 for child support that is
required to be recorded on the form...as well as the income of any adult..New
husband is a GM engineer...great I like the guy...but come on...its on the form

My stepdaughter thinks it is disgusting her mom is fighting over repaying (if
the judge even orders it) about $200/mo and pretty soon to be 3 months....

As I said its not about the $ spent..not to us...but the games she is
playing....

When we inform FOC of the insurance...it arrived today...will she be forced to
drop from the MiChild...all I can find is that it can't be used as a secondary
insurance...and supposedly upon enrollment in a comprehensive commercial
plan...the state drops them at the end of that month.

Does anyone have experience with this...

My husband is easily stressed by her games...I am more of a right is
right wrong
is wrong person...I would love her and allow her to live here no
matter what the
outcome...I have been married and divorced twice with two kids and opted out of
FOC both times...my ex husband has liberal visitation....to the point
he is very
close friends with my current husband...and the guys and our girls often fish
and golf together while I work...I can't stand to see my husband hurt...and now
to hear the brainwashing that his daughter believed...it is heartbreaking...we
remind her she will be an adult soon..and she has one mom..and she loves
her...and maybe she will have to move 75% of the way towards repairing this
relationship....our fears are now for her sister...
Help anyone...

Community service and back to court

Patrick McCabe (mccabepatrick@yahoo.com) on Community service:

Do you get to pick your own community service?

I did.

Consider this,

If you pick the right type of community service you will find there are babes
trolling for down trodden men at the right community service
locations, it could

be a lot of fun!!!!

Worked for me.

Original Post Link



Trolls Lawyers for Abuser WOS (waste of skin) Hal Richardson are cruising a lot of websites lately, thinking they belong to Claudine Dombrowski. Rest assured, she is sitting back while the rest of the world expresses outrage. I was the one writing notes at the January hearing in Topeka…oh there were a few of us. Here's a mighty fine video to enjoy, because I am nice like that.


Love, Nancy



PS (From Petunia): I am also not Nancy nor am I Claudine, so guess again. There are more than one of us, two of us, three of us.... You get the gist?

Eenie weenie minie mite - which Hoffman is on my site?

I feel like I should ask him to relax, maybe go for a swim (well if I had a pool), have a bite to eat, maybe grab a brewsky? He has been on my site now for 3 days and each time for several hours. The first day he was here for over 5 hours. Now today he is going to see what our visitors are saying about the good Doctor. Guess what Hoffman? You turn will be next. I will find links for rating you. Well both of you since I do not have a looking glass, I can only see your IP is stalking my site. Hope you are having fun! Toodle ooooo!

He said She said the latest

Well there have been comments received regarding the latest scuffle between Claudine Dombrowski and Halleck Richardson. These people "CLAIM" that Rikki does not want to see mom and has not for a long time. And we know this because you say so? We are saying she does not want to see mom and you say she does not. How about we get a completely new person - one who is not invested in this in order to steal money from a disabled woman - one who I might add is disabled because of the child's father Halleck Richardson? Why don't you - if you know so much about this case - have Rikki contact someone who is not in this to beat a woman down - unlike all the other professionals out there? Oh yeah maybe it is because this is not the case?

Whatever..... Halleck Richardson is a wife beater and worse, one need only look at his CONVICTION record to see that.