Who cares how we do it, lets just do it

donnie w Says:

August 13th, 2009 at 7:05 am
barbara...your points are well taken, however anytime an injustice can be righted, that's a win. speaking as a man, a win is a win. even though a law may not be changed as yet, usable precedent is always a good thing where fathers rights are concerned.

Lets ignore laws rather than change them, possibly even break the existing law than change it. This is how we should be teaching our children. Now THIS makes COMPLETE sense :-)

Cancers who has it worse? Or otherwise entitled - lets hate on women some more.

Gunner Retired Says:

August 16th, 2009 at 4:24 am

....And do not insult me by inferring I do not have grounds to be upset, or by accusing me of having 'anger management issues' because I appear more than "well gee wally, that's swell" over what I've been entreated to.

My daughter was STOLEN from me.

My daughters college tuition fund was STOLEN from me.

My savings and investments and retirement annuity were STOLEN ftom me.

My ability to provide for any family I might wish to try to start again was STOLEN from me.

My good reputation was STOLEN from me.

Shall we discuss my dignity and self respect?

And you speak of "what's fair"?

And do excuse me please if I don't boo fooking hoo over your womens plight.

Gunner Retired

Your daughter is not just YOUR daughter. She also has a mother. Are you leaving anything out? Like maybe this child WANTS to be with her mom? Girls need a female figure to look up to, and maybe this female child decided it was time to be with mom. And wah wah wah you got no child support? Seems from your post HERE that you make twice what she does. And here we go again with I said this happened so it did and it does not matter what she says, because we all know all women lie all the time. Yeah okay GR go cry a river, build a bridge, and get the hell over it already.

Now for the readers who are wondering what the original article concerns, it is about women's cancer funding for breast, ovarian, and cervical cancerS (yes that is more than one kind of cancer) versus the funding for male prostate cancer (one cancer). So lets see now, the types of cancers that affect women can hit at generally any age after puberty, and prostate cancer hits in middle age. Women's cancers affect child bearing, wheras prostate cancer victims/survivors are generally past child producing stages.

The older you are, the greater the risk for getting prostate cancer. The remarkably sharp increase in incidence with age is a hallmark of the disease. Sixty percent of all newly diagnosed cases and almost 80 percent of all deaths occur in men 70 years of age and older.

From 1998 to 2002, the median age at diagnosis was 68 years. The percentages of people diagnosed with prostate cancer based on age were as follows:

0.0 percent were diagnosed under age 20
0.0 percent between 20 and 34
0.5 percent between 35 and 44
8.3 percent between 45 and 54
26.9 percent between 55 and 64
37.0 percent between 65 and 74
22.6 percent between 75 and 84
4.7 percent 85+ years of age.

Compare to the breast cancer stats:

Approximately 0.0% were diagnosed under age 20;
1.9% between 20 and 34;
10.5% between 35 and 44;
22.5% between 45 and 54;
23.7% between 55 and 64;
19.6% between 65 and 74;
16.2% between 75 and 84;
and 5.5% 85+ years of age.

Now how about cervical cancer:

Approximately 0.2% were diagnosed under age 20;
14.9% between 20 and 34;
26.2% between 35 and 44;
23.5% between 45 and 54;
15.8% between 55 and 64;
10.4% between 65 and 74;
6.6% between 75 and 84;
and 2.5% 85+ years of age.

Here we see that women under the age of 20 are being diagnosed with cervical cancer - hear that UNDER 20!!!! And almost half of all cervical cancer cases (41.3 percent) were diagnosed in women who were still in childbearing stage. Couple that to men at .5 percent - 1/2 of one percent.

Now on with the last one - ovarian cancer - one that will directly affect childbearing more so than cervical cancer. For those men who need a science lesson, this is where our HALF of the genetic material for those beautiful children comes from. Yes we donate one half, you dimwits!!!

Approximately 1.3% were diagnosed under age 20;
3.5% between 20 and 34;
7.4% between 35 and 44;
18.9% between 45 and 54;
22.3% between 55 and 64;
19.9% between 65 and 74;
19.0% between 75 and 84;
and 7.6% 85+ years of age.

Again we have 12.2 percent of all diagnosis are made in child bearing years and women under 20 are affected AGAIN!!!! Men truly do not become affected by prostate cancer until the age of 45. If precautions are taken and MEN get over there I am he-man attitudes and go to their doctors for the exam (oh yeah lets not get into THAT conversation) chances are excellent that discovery will be made at an early point in time. Many of the survivors of prostate cancer implore men to get THE exam, they say they did not.

Okay now that we have seen more female hatred in full swing, lets move on.

You heard it here first folks! Men REALLY do want to remove mothers from children.

lujlp Says:

August 15th, 2009 at 11:52 am
Given 1 in 12 womne will develop breast cancer it would be cheaper to remove the breast buds of all women at birth and issue vouchers for free breast jobs when they turn 18.

If people are going to argue cricucision to prevent one of of thousands of men getting cancer then why arent we argueing the same for women when it is one out of every dozen?

Now if we remove all breats from women, then how will the babies be fed? Oh that's why MAN created the bottle nipple we know today (Elijah Pratt). So women would no longer be needed except as the vessel to carry the child to life to be STOLEN by man.

I see how it works now.....

Danno I am not Jennifer but I do not think she is going anywhere anytime soon

Danno Says:

August 11th, 2009 at 8:48 am
Holly’s fabricated story just keeps going. With Jennifer’s obsessive mental health problems she just can’t get on with her life. I noticed she responded to Glen’s recent mention of within the hour of his publishing that article.

I assumed Jennifer might have realized her mother has only given her one side of the story since it’s been proven the whole fractured skull incident really happened when he fell out of a shopping cart.

Given the statements from the FFLM, it’s so typical Jennifer can’t disprove this;

“Then Jennifer spoke up, and the audience and moderators gasped when she told of her brother’s skull being broken by their custodial dad (who would violently beat their mother Holly).”

Obviously Jennifer left this tidbit out while trying to rally the extremist who still support her. Those days may be numbered.

She rants over and over that she’s the one who knows because it happened to her but just like PAS, her entire world is built around a lie.

I think Jennifer was hoping she’d have a fresh audience but no one is even listening anymore, except those of us who know the truth which Glen has proven beyond doubt. I’d bet money Jennifer will go back into hiding which is a clue to her lies.

Okay now the FR/MRA's are saying that Jennifer's brother got injured by falling out of a shopping cart? What is it guys? You say she cannot keep her story straight? I think typoes and spreading lies about a grown woman are two different things. Grow up, move on.... Jennifer is here to stay. And just wait until YOUR children grow up. There will be more Jennifer's, more Fatima's, more Jeff's, more Alanna's.... Many many more of them. Until the courts see the abuse for what it is. See that PAS hurts kids, and not because mom is alienating the child, because the courts are giving the chidlren to an ABUSER!!!!

Mpre from those "ggod guys at 'THAT' site

Paul Says:

August 8th, 2009 at 10:40 am
Actually, the girls had a good thing with this guy and just should have worked out a time share.

I dispute that the guy did anything at all loathsome, it takes skill and talent to attract and keep women happy.

Had a man or group of men done this to a woman we'd be hearing 'hate crime' noises and calls for legislation.

This needs no comments.....

At least from me, my gentle readers can have at him lol!!!!!!

Lightbulb moment? Not hardly - read this bit of 'wisdom'

gwallan Says:

August 8th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
Robert said...

How he can be an unfit parent to one child and a fit parent to the other is one I'm still working on. I'll get back to you just as soon as I figure it out.

Look at the genders of the children involved.

Boys don't need nor deserve "fit parents".

Now if gwallan had even read the original article, he would have seen that the boy was older (I believe if memory serves me correct - older teens, where the young girl was pre-teens and even younger when the case began). Older children have a harder time in foster care and being placed due to their age. This begins about preteen years.

DUH!!!!!

Attila, Attila, Attila, your version of her side does not count!!!!

Lastly, the eventual book that I will write and have published will contain not just my side but my ex-wife’s side as well as I have documented verbatim every moment of every day for the past three years so both sides of the truth will be put forward.

Can we all say it at once? CONTROL!!!!! Attila, your words as to her version of the events that led to your denial of a mother to children do NOT equate to her side of the story.

If you did not understand that let me make it really clear for you:

Your words, your version - your side

Your words for her, your version for her - your side.

She is SILENCED!!!! Now gee readers - doesn't THAT sound familiar? Oh yeah I forgot

you
CAN'T HEAR
SILENCE!!!!

Will we hear from "Atilla -ex"?

Knock Knock Says:

August 12th, 2009 at 7:54 pm
Attila,

Once your family matter is finally settled, and six months or longer have passed, may I suggest that you write up your story and submit it as a guest blog posting to glennsacks.com? I'm sure Glenn and Robert would welcome your submission.

(In the interest of fairness, I would equally encourage your ex-wife to write and submit her perspective, but I realize that she may not want to do so, or that you might not like it if she did.)

Now the million dollar question is - will Atilla take his offer up? Will he write his story?

I for one seriously doubt he will do so. Why? you ask? Simply put - if he gives us too much information, he will be opening the door to scrutiny. And ya know? We just night find out about Atilla. We just might discover all there is to know about Atilla.

Oh yeah and lest we forget, Atilla must control his ex-wife, even though they are no longer married, so he would NEVER allow her to share her side of the story. God forbid she should happen to run across Badass Mamas. That would definitely NOT be something Atilla would want to see. Hell she might be able to change things.....

New blog worth watching

I am following a blog which is attempting to tell the truth about a recent tragedy in Florida. The case is concerning Trenton Duckett and his now deceased mother Melinda. I would suggest to all of my readers to visit this blog, follow it and listen to it. We all might learn something about Family Court.

Anger Issues?

Okay here is the comment from one of our favorite stalkers (ATILLA)....

I recall my very foolish wife inviting me out to Polo for Heart in Richmond Hill where her boyfriend was one of the polo players. At one point he actually came up to me and put his arm around me and said “Attila. How are you doing?” At that moment in time It took every ounce of my martial arts discipline training to refrain from violent behaviour, and I walked away. Lucky for him and more importantly lucky for me and the children as I would be useless to them in jail.

Now lets go through this a little at a time. First he calls his ex-wife "foolish". Is it any wonder she wanted to leave him? If he speaks of her this way in a public forum where anyone can see it, how did he speak to her at home in private (and in front of the children I might add)?

Next he says she invited him to a polo match in which her boyfriend was a competitor. Hmmm maybe she wanted to have some semblance of sanity for the children? Maybe she wanted to "get along"? Maybe even see the children to whom she gave birth? Nah.... That couldn't be the case because Atilla is ALWAYS right.

Then the boyfriend came up to Atilla and put his arm around him and said "How are you doing?" Hmmmmm what is wrong with that statement? My family absolutely hates what my ex has done to me and our children but they are still civil in public. Maybe ex-wife's boyfriend was "trying" to be civil? Nah.... Again because Atilla is ALWAYS right.

Then we have "At that moment in time It took every ounce of my martial arts discipline training to refrain from violent behaviour, and I walked away." Ohhhhhh, so we should be proud that Atilla walked away from a man asking him how he was doing? That makes a lot of sense....

Then we have this line, "Lucky for him and more importantly lucky for me and the children as I would be useless to them in jail." Ummmmmm okay now we should be impressed because you have martial arts training? That reminds me of the 1st and 2nd graders my kids grew up with - leave me alone or I will karate chop you. I know karate. {rolls eyes} Seriously Atilla - is it any wonder your wife left you? So sad that YOU decided children don't need mom, they only need dad especially in your case, because again....








ATILLA IS ALWAYS RIGHT!!!!!!