Glenn's Cult?: ---CALLING ALL VICTIMS OF JANELLE BURRILL (URGENT REQUEST)---

January 31, 2010

---CALLING ALL VICTIMS OF JANELLE BURRILL (URGENT REQUEST)---

There will be a hearing on February 19, 2010 (2/19/2010) at the Sacramento Superior Court located at 3341 Power Inn Road, Sacramento, CA 95826, Department 128 beginning at 8:00 AM in which JANELLE BURRILL will be called as an “expert” witness (she was the reunification therapist that abused and traumatized my daughter!). Since she is a witness, we will have the opportunity to cross-examine her and SHRED her credibility!

WE NEED YOUR INPUT!!! If you would be willing to be a witness and testify to the abuse, fraud, and negligence you experienced with your OWN case with regard to Janelle Burrill, we would like to hear from you ASAP!!!

Together, if we can successfully debase Janelle Burrill’s credibility, it could set a legal precedence that would help debase her credibility with ALL cases. Lets FILL THE COURT WITH WITNESSES and work together to rid Sacramento of this menace!!!

Please contact me by email at yippyyea1@yahoo.com. Thank you!

1 comment:

Unknown said...: Corrupt Fraud Janelle Burrill Exposed on CNN ireports

http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-450254

http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-448492

http://www.ireport.com/docs/DOC-447867

California Board of Behavioral Sciences (BBS)
Top 5 Cases against Janelle Burrill LCS 16216 Sacramento
Collectively Open for 1735 days or 4.735 yrs
1.09-00739-BS filed Jan 30 2009 485 days, 1.329yr
2.09-00958-BS filed Feb 19 2009 465 days, 1.274yr
3.09-00973-BS filed May 28 2009 367 days, 1.005yr
4.09-01426-BS filed Nov 02 2009 209 days, 0.572yr
5.09-01427-BS filed Nov 02 2009 209 days, 0.572yr

California Board of Psychology (BOP)
Top 3 Cases against Janelle Burrill (unlicensed) Sacramento
Collectively Open for 107 days or “3 months 16 days”
1.1F-2010-205943 – Apr 06 2010 54 days
2.1F-2010-206255 – Apr 19 2010 41 days
3.1F-2010-205955 – May18 2010 12 days

Janelle Burrill is a DCA Board of Behavioral Sciences licensed clinical social worker LCSW 16216 based in Sacramento with extensive ties to the Sacramento family courts. Dozens of her victims have been coming forward since 2002 with allegations of abuse, fraud and corruption by this social worker and she continues to practice with impunity harming California families with Junk Science called Parental Alienation Syndrome.

The evidence of fraud, corruption, perjury, child abuse by her is very compelling and clear yet inaction by enforcement divisions of licensing/credentialing agencies are victimizing more California families.

Her nexus with local attorneys, commissioners and judges in the Sacramento, Placer and El-Dorado courts have enabled her to sustain and grow her revenue while inflicting vindictive retribution, libel and gag orders on her victims for the last ten years. In 2009, over a dozen complaints were made with BBS seeking protection from Janelle Burrill’s fraud and vindictive retribution.

Her board certification as a BCD was revoked by ABE recently on March 18th however, her BBS licence LCS 16216 and network with the courts continue to fill her pipeline with more victims. Dept of consumer affairs – Board of Behavioral sciences has over dozen cases open (listed above) anywhere from 150-500 days. Is this standard practice and acceptable?; May 28, 2010 10:26 PM

Post a Comment

WARNING!!!!!!

WARNING!!!!
I must warn all who come to this blog about clicking any links I provide. Unless I state this is a safe website you should take precautions in visiting any site listed as an MRA/FR site. To do so one could open up oneself to being stalked, hunted down, victimized, and even in worst case scenario - assaulted in real life or even killed. The men (and sometimes women) who post on the MRA/FR sites can be dangerous. One nly needs to read the venom spewing from their moouth to see evidence of that. I also post this due to the recent blogs and forums I have discovered over the last few weeks. These will slowly be added to the Cult Wall Of Shame. Please take adequate precaution when visiting these sites.

Fair Use Doctrine

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, entitled, "Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use," is the statutory codification of the fair use doctrine. This judicially developed concept strives to balance the public's need to know and be informed against authors' incentives to create. The copyright law contemplates that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission shall be for purposes such as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching, and that such fair use will not result in the infringement of a copyrighted work. As one may expect, authors and publishers usually take a restrictive view of the fair use doctrine, while users of copyrighted materials generally take a more expansive view.

http://www.publaw.com/work.html

Thank you too!!!!

I am now friends on a message board with a wonderful man. And you all thought we hated men :-) We despise abusive controlling men and women. We like men and women who are decent, honest, and caring. I will say no more as I do not want to ruin this. But those who fight this same fight, keep going!!! We are being seen and our message is getting out there.

Thank you. And thank you for the important work that you do. It gets my dander stirred up when little men hide behind a pen or a computer and spew out fear, hate and stuff that they think makes them look like "real men" but in fact exposes them for the big bullies that they really are. My father and mother are both deceased. But my dad treated my mother the way every man should treat his wife. She was the Queen in our home and he doted on her like she was still his sweetheart until the day she died at age 84. Abraham Lincoln once said, "The greatest gift a father can give to his children is to love their mother." So many men are unhappy with their own lives and they blame women. That way they don't have to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings. Sad. Pathetic. Again, thank you for your very good and important work.

And thank you for giving us hope as well - the hope that there are good and decent people out there - both men and women.

My blog, My rules.....

I would like to welcome everyone who has arrived here - no matter the road you traveled. I only have some very simple rules. Please try to keep your comments clean (I am a mom and as such I do not like extreme vulgar language). I despise the "c" word so it will never be published. Otherwise I will be very lax as I want this site to be a release to those of you who have an issue with the MRAs in general and Sacks and his followers in particular.

I must also slide this little disclaimer in here too (just to protect myself from those pesky little creatures called lawyers and those MRAs who would think they will file a lawsuit or something silly like that against me). I am using YOUR WORDS on this site as well as publishing my opinion of those words. Nothing more, nothing less. I am "not" responsible for comments made by others on my site and if MRAs can behave then they might very well be allowed to post here. Like I said, this is intended to be a release for the women who have been attacked on various sites online to have a little comic break from these constant attacks.

I am posting this blog and all of my comments as a naturally born citizen of the United States and am exercising my right to free speech.

I must also caution my followers and posters against posting any identifying information. This is for your own safety, as I foresee this blog quickly becoming a very hated tool against MRAs who abuse and those who assist them. I mus also make one additional rule concerning posting other people's (such as our exes) personal information. I have been through a very nasty divorce and I know how our exes can react. As such I must make it a number one rule, as much pleasure it would give us, against posting any information which could identify our exes. First names (or initials if the name is uncommon) is fine but no last names. This will be enforced on this blog, unlike "other blogs."