Glenn's Cult?: stalking

Showing posts with label stalking. Show all posts

November 19, 2010

Quentin0352 complaining again about alleged stalking

I wonder what he calls it when he comes to my site and others (and his little MRA butt buddies do the same) to see what we are saying? I report vulgarities, they come to see if they are being featured and then complain when they are not? Or they complain because we refuse to allow them to derail a conversation about one thing and turn it into a discussion about how men are victims? Oh and lets not forget that they practice deception as well by creating new accounts when they are banned due to improper behavior?

Oh and shall I add that he is not being censored at the RHReality article. However with that said, his comments are being rated. TROLL ALERT!!!

Screen shot here:

June 20, 2010

Warning to ex-wife of Bob Norton from Mass

Calling out to the mother of the children and ex wife of Bob Norton of Mass. Your ex-husband plans to attempt to have you jailed so he may steal your children. Fair warning - you may want to find a father's rights group (aka FReaks) in order to ascertain what his next move may be. Or you could just keep an eye on him here.

My ex refused to turn over the children on Friday for my weekend.

I called police and gently insisted they file charges under 265 (26a) parental kidnapping.

Met with one cop at station and reviewed the law. He committed to file.

Later another, more enlightened cop came to do a safety check of kids. He spent 45 minutes inside the house and talked to the kids etc.

Told her he would be filing charges against her. Still not release of kids.

Last cop I talked to (about 2 months ago when she did same) said he would FORCE kids release from kidnapping. This guy say he “could not imagine how that would work”.

FOUR COPS I DISCUSSED THIS LAW WITH (include one who gave me the ticket for the sign). FOUR TOTALLY DIFFERENT INTERPRETATIONS!!! CRAZY STUPID!

Long story short they agreed if the kids were not delivered later that night.

They claimed it is a misdemeanor and no arrest. That is not how I read this statute.

I will ask for the maximum fine ($1,000) and 30 days suspended sentence with probation for one year. Any reoccurrence = jail term immediately imposed.

To the ex Mrs. Norton - good luck to you. You are stuck with one of the worst FReaks out there.

How to legally hunt and stalk your ex-wife

Well it seems the FReaks are not done with their stupidity. Now they are passing on an email group instructions on how you can legally stalk your wife and if she goes into hiding in order to be safe from your beating this is what you must do:

Don Mathis wrote:
Bio Dad (and every noncustodial father) needs to know the license plate of the custodial mother's car.
If she moves, he can find out where the car is registered.
There are many other ways to find the mom's new address.

Don, the 14%er

Hmm Don the 14%er..... Did you in fact do this with your ex-wife after she left you? I hope that she is diligent and finds this post. Should be simple since I tag everything. Only be a matter of time and it will be found. Numbnuts.....

WARNING!!!!!!

WARNING!!!!
I must warn all who come to this blog about clicking any links I provide. Unless I state this is a safe website you should take precautions in visiting any site listed as an MRA/FR site. To do so one could open up oneself to being stalked, hunted down, victimized, and even in worst case scenario - assaulted in real life or even killed. The men (and sometimes women) who post on the MRA/FR sites can be dangerous. One nly needs to read the venom spewing from their moouth to see evidence of that. I also post this due to the recent blogs and forums I have discovered over the last few weeks. These will slowly be added to the Cult Wall Of Shame. Please take adequate precaution when visiting these sites.

Fair Use Doctrine

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, entitled, "Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use," is the statutory codification of the fair use doctrine. This judicially developed concept strives to balance the public's need to know and be informed against authors' incentives to create. The copyright law contemplates that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission shall be for purposes such as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching, and that such fair use will not result in the infringement of a copyrighted work. As one may expect, authors and publishers usually take a restrictive view of the fair use doctrine, while users of copyrighted materials generally take a more expansive view.

http://www.publaw.com/work.html

Thank you too!!!!

I am now friends on a message board with a wonderful man. And you all thought we hated men :-) We despise abusive controlling men and women. We like men and women who are decent, honest, and caring. I will say no more as I do not want to ruin this. But those who fight this same fight, keep going!!! We are being seen and our message is getting out there.

Thank you. And thank you for the important work that you do. It gets my dander stirred up when little men hide behind a pen or a computer and spew out fear, hate and stuff that they think makes them look like "real men" but in fact exposes them for the big bullies that they really are. My father and mother are both deceased. But my dad treated my mother the way every man should treat his wife. She was the Queen in our home and he doted on her like she was still his sweetheart until the day she died at age 84. Abraham Lincoln once said, "The greatest gift a father can give to his children is to love their mother." So many men are unhappy with their own lives and they blame women. That way they don't have to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings. Sad. Pathetic. Again, thank you for your very good and important work.

And thank you for giving us hope as well - the hope that there are good and decent people out there - both men and women.

My blog, My rules.....

I would like to welcome everyone who has arrived here - no matter the road you traveled. I only have some very simple rules. Please try to keep your comments clean (I am a mom and as such I do not like extreme vulgar language). I despise the "c" word so it will never be published. Otherwise I will be very lax as I want this site to be a release to those of you who have an issue with the MRAs in general and Sacks and his followers in particular.

I must also slide this little disclaimer in here too (just to protect myself from those pesky little creatures called lawyers and those MRAs who would think they will file a lawsuit or something silly like that against me). I am using YOUR WORDS on this site as well as publishing my opinion of those words. Nothing more, nothing less. I am "not" responsible for comments made by others on my site and if MRAs can behave then they might very well be allowed to post here. Like I said, this is intended to be a release for the women who have been attacked on various sites online to have a little comic break from these constant attacks.

I am posting this blog and all of my comments as a naturally born citizen of the United States and am exercising my right to free speech.

I must also caution my followers and posters against posting any identifying information. This is for your own safety, as I foresee this blog quickly becoming a very hated tool against MRAs who abuse and those who assist them. I mus also make one additional rule concerning posting other people's (such as our exes) personal information. I have been through a very nasty divorce and I know how our exes can react. As such I must make it a number one rule, as much pleasure it would give us, against posting any information which could identify our exes. First names (or initials if the name is uncommon) is fine but no last names. This will be enforced on this blog, unlike "other blogs."