Glenn's Cult?: buying custody of children

December 30, 2009

AS promised, Carol and her place on the Hall of Shame.

(My comments in red)

1.Hold UP!?
Who is the STUPID one here?
I say it’s Bristol Palin…… and her parents….who did not teach their child to “just say NO” to premarital sex;

blame the female for the male and his sex drive this is priceless

they didn’t even teach the dumb, little twit name calling to shame the female?how to use “protection” to prevent STD’s! And they are damn lucky that all she got was pregnanc and not herpes, gardinella or HIV/AIDS!
Failure to educate your kids? That is stupid.
To blame Levi for the stupidity of Bristol and her parents is ludicrous.
Levi appears to be your average, red blooded, horney little dude……which describes millions of teenage boys around the globe. Did you ever think (oh I forgot you do not know how to THINK) that maybe just maybe Bristol might have those same feelings? Or are females not allowed those feelings?
He took what he could get….and Bristol gave it up..willingly and without protection for her own health.
Again, another stupid move on her part. more name calling and shaming
Levi’s not stupid…he’s young and an opportunist. Let's pump up the male and give him more power and control, women are supposed to be frail and weak and need protection. WHATEVER!!!!
It wasn’t Levi’s idea to strut across the national stage during Mc Cain’s campaign for President. oh was she supposed to go to a convent halfway across the country to hide the fact that she was pregnant because good little girls just do not do these types of things? AGAIN WHATEVER!!!!!
It wasn’t Levi’s idea to tell the whole, wide world how he “nailed” the Vice Presidential hopeful’s daughter. but he was sure there afterwards so he could keep being famous, keep having his 15 minutes in the spotlight. I think his 15 minutes has stretched into 24 hours and it is more than enough.
That was Sarah and her political advisors who made those decisions.
Stupid is as stupid does.
Levi was only 18….with no parents to advise him…or so it appears….in any case…..Levi did what Levi was told to do….as did Bristol. so it is okay that Levi did as the Palins tol dhim and Bristol should have done differently? AGAIN AND AGAIN WHATEVER!!!
They stupidly followed “stupid directives” from adults who should have known better….and who had an obligation to protect these kids.
In my mind…I keep thinking, ‘Good Lord Sarah Palin! Even in the animal kingdom, a mother protects her young!’ What is wrong with you!!!!!!
Did Sarah NOT think that these two kids would be devoured by the media?
Is Sarah so stupid…….. that she didn’t think people would judge the situation? Or that her child would suffer from all the world’s attention?
If she did…..Sarah is not only stupid……. she is “Queen Stupid”.
Sarah’s blind ambition got in the way of teaching her daughter the values and mores that she herself believes in…..
Sarah’s raw desire for fame and power….. got in the way of good decision making for the sake of her family…….and she did nothing to protect her child and her future grandbaby from the cruelty of media scrutiny; commentary and ridicule.
Queen Stupid.
Sarah threw these kids to the wolves….to further her own political ambitions.
And Levi…..teenage stud muffin that he ismaybe in your eyes, but in mine that towel was awful damn small!!!…..is taking advantage of it…..and why not?
Bristol is no more fit to parent a child than her mother is…..obviously.
I suspect God sent that special needs baby, Trig, to Sarah for one good reason…… so that maybe she could get her priorities straight and to teach her….. that children are a “gift” and they need mother’s attention and protection. to say this is a punishment from God is so beyoind comprehension, one must only assume you are a self-professed Christian. Your type of christian needs to stay away from me!!!!!
Ah, but Queen Stupid is instead out all over the country promoting and signing her book.
Meanwhile, she resents that Levi is taking advantage of the spotlight she put on him!

Like I said…..Queen Stupid.

Now I must say as other commenters on this site have said - you really have issues with Sarah Palin and you seriously need help. If you would like to email me and tell me your location, I willattempt to find you a good therapist so you can work through this Sarah anxiety you are having :-).

September 7, 2009

LISTEN TO ME AND LISTEN GOOD!!!! Children "BELONG" to FATHERS!

Derek Says:

September 6th, 2009 at 11:22 pm
Sounds like the state is enforcing old common law: Children born out of wedlock belong to the parents. It's unfortunate they don't enforce the other side of common law: All kids that are born into wedlock belong to the father. It was a much better system for the kids.

Got that?????? I figured you would see it too.

June 28, 2009

Truth is shown in their own words (or if you have money and deny that money to your ex-wife you can torture her)

6
John Boy Says:

June 24th, 2009 at 7:46 pm
I am lucky in that I had enough money during both of my daughter's custody evaluations that I could afford to pick an evaluator. As was explained to me by both of the attorneys I hired that if my ex-wife and I could not agree to an evaluator or did not have the scratch to get a good one that we would be subject to the luck of the draw.

In my situation, my wife was / and again is accusing me of false DV. The last thing I wanted was a quack or closet feminist who would automatically assume that I must be either guilty or worse, a man (unfortunately that is the same to some people). During all three legal bouts I have had, we always look for the most competent and respected evaluators or MFT types for a couple of reasons. First, we want someone who has seen enough cases to see through the ruse. Second, we want someone whos opinion will carry alot of weight in front of a judge.

The first custody evaluation when badly for my ex-wife and so I got to keep custody. Unfortunately, that did not seem to stop her. Robert, you are right to say that these people are surrogate parrents. God help you if you get a lousy one.

You see where John Boy went into this prepared. His lawyer used the tricks of the court whores and told John Boy to hire a GAL/Evaluator and of course I am sure that good lawyer that he was, he had many father friendly evaluators lined up with their hands out. MONEY, MONEY, MONEY!!!! Show me the money. John Boy did and was able to get out of an abuse allegation.

WARNING!!!!!!

WARNING!!!!
I must warn all who come to this blog about clicking any links I provide. Unless I state this is a safe website you should take precautions in visiting any site listed as an MRA/FR site. To do so one could open up oneself to being stalked, hunted down, victimized, and even in worst case scenario - assaulted in real life or even killed. The men (and sometimes women) who post on the MRA/FR sites can be dangerous. One nly needs to read the venom spewing from their moouth to see evidence of that. I also post this due to the recent blogs and forums I have discovered over the last few weeks. These will slowly be added to the Cult Wall Of Shame. Please take adequate precaution when visiting these sites.

Fair Use Doctrine

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, entitled, "Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use," is the statutory codification of the fair use doctrine. This judicially developed concept strives to balance the public's need to know and be informed against authors' incentives to create. The copyright law contemplates that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission shall be for purposes such as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching, and that such fair use will not result in the infringement of a copyrighted work. As one may expect, authors and publishers usually take a restrictive view of the fair use doctrine, while users of copyrighted materials generally take a more expansive view.

http://www.publaw.com/work.html

Thank you too!!!!

I am now friends on a message board with a wonderful man. And you all thought we hated men :-) We despise abusive controlling men and women. We like men and women who are decent, honest, and caring. I will say no more as I do not want to ruin this. But those who fight this same fight, keep going!!! We are being seen and our message is getting out there.

Thank you. And thank you for the important work that you do. It gets my dander stirred up when little men hide behind a pen or a computer and spew out fear, hate and stuff that they think makes them look like "real men" but in fact exposes them for the big bullies that they really are. My father and mother are both deceased. But my dad treated my mother the way every man should treat his wife. She was the Queen in our home and he doted on her like she was still his sweetheart until the day she died at age 84. Abraham Lincoln once said, "The greatest gift a father can give to his children is to love their mother." So many men are unhappy with their own lives and they blame women. That way they don't have to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings. Sad. Pathetic. Again, thank you for your very good and important work.

And thank you for giving us hope as well - the hope that there are good and decent people out there - both men and women.

My blog, My rules.....

I would like to welcome everyone who has arrived here - no matter the road you traveled. I only have some very simple rules. Please try to keep your comments clean (I am a mom and as such I do not like extreme vulgar language). I despise the "c" word so it will never be published. Otherwise I will be very lax as I want this site to be a release to those of you who have an issue with the MRAs in general and Sacks and his followers in particular.

I must also slide this little disclaimer in here too (just to protect myself from those pesky little creatures called lawyers and those MRAs who would think they will file a lawsuit or something silly like that against me). I am using YOUR WORDS on this site as well as publishing my opinion of those words. Nothing more, nothing less. I am "not" responsible for comments made by others on my site and if MRAs can behave then they might very well be allowed to post here. Like I said, this is intended to be a release for the women who have been attacked on various sites online to have a little comic break from these constant attacks.

I am posting this blog and all of my comments as a naturally born citizen of the United States and am exercising my right to free speech.

I must also caution my followers and posters against posting any identifying information. This is for your own safety, as I foresee this blog quickly becoming a very hated tool against MRAs who abuse and those who assist them. I mus also make one additional rule concerning posting other people's (such as our exes) personal information. I have been through a very nasty divorce and I know how our exes can react. As such I must make it a number one rule, as much pleasure it would give us, against posting any information which could identify our exes. First names (or initials if the name is uncommon) is fine but no last names. This will be enforced on this blog, unlike "other blogs."