Glenn's Cult?: DUMAS

Showing posts with label DUMAS. Show all posts

October 25, 2009

MRA opens mouth inserts foot

Cordell Walker says:
southwest has never been hijacked either, I dont think

How about these links DUMAS!!!!!

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/01/25/flight.incident/index.html

http://www.airsafe.com/events/hijack.htm

http://digg.com/travel_places/Man_Attempts_to_Hijack_Plane_Using_Plastic_Knife

http://copycateffect.blogspot.com/2008/01/suicide-hijack-plot.html

http://tvnews.vanderbilt.edu/program.pl?ID=21491

I stopped at five - I think that should be enough even though Google shows 24000 links for the search term southwest airlines hijack. Think (AND RESEARCH) before you speak.....(fill in the blank here)......

March 29, 2009

More from Gunner Retired.....

9
Gunner Retired Says:

March 29th, 2009 at 8:31 pm
.......Gunner Retired

PS: And innocent mens lives will continue to be devastated over mere accusations... and why shouldn't they? Review the Desiree Nall case in Florida.

Gunner why don't you discuss the 2 murder suicides in Miami and the most recent one in Orange City - this one not only were there multiple victims, one of the victims of the MAN who shot and killed people including himself - he decided to ambush the police who were coming to check on him at the insistence of his ex-wife. The ex-wife in fact who had previously asked for RO's on two separate occasions. Hmmm makes me wonder exactly what was going on there.

So yes Gunner Retired aka Gunn Retarded, let's talk about Florida you DUMAS!!!!

February 21, 2009

Well aint I just the special one - Robert Gartner has paid lil ol me a visit

Hate to burst your teeny tiny little bubble in that teeny tiny little world you live in, but you might as well not let the door hit you in the ass RG. YOUR KIND is NOT welcome here. Buh bye.......

February 20, 2009

Egads!!!! I should have read more of this disgusting dribble....

Had I have read further I would have awarded Eagle30 with the DUMAS of the Day award. Ehhh no worries eagle30, your day will come I am sure. Read below for more of his superman leaping abilities.

49
Eagle30 Says:

February 20th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Jenna: "Did I encourage the cover-up of male victims drugged by their girlfriends? No I didn’t."

Again, I quote you:

"It’s a shame when ANY rapist doesn’t go to jail. Vast majority of them are male, tho’. So to concentrate on the teeny tiny percentage who are female kind of makes me shake my head. Every time."

The fact you think you shake your head whenever this "Teeny" percentage of female abusers are focused on says it all. You condone male abuse.

Now where did jeana say that she did not want the perps of male victims, be they male or female locked up? She stated that these loonies only focus on male victims or in the case of female victim-female perps, the FEMALES who commit rape. This is so very true. Glenn and his cult never comment on any male perps.

Eagle30 I want your powers of leaping to conclusions please....

Now how he jumps from women are the vast majority of rape victims to feminists want to ignore any male victims out there is beyond me. jeana never stated that male victims should be ignored, she simply said female victims are the norm whereas male victims are not. Nowhere in her statement did she say male victims should be ignored. It is getting harder and harder to narrow down just one person a day for the DUMAS of the day award.

42
Eagle30 Says:

February 20th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
Jenna: "It’s a shame when ANY rapist doesn’t go to jail. Vast majority of them are male, tho’. So to concentrate on the teeny tiny percentage who are female kind of makes me shake my head. Every time."

So you would rather this issue not be addressed and swept under the rug? You think male victims of female abuse don't count because they're not the majority?

I actually see jeana saying here that all rapists should go to jail. Readers what do you see?

Ed learn to read DUMAS!!!!!

37
ed Says:

February 20th, 2009 at 3:25 pm
Jeana says: Children belong to women and so putting women in jail is bad for children. THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!

Gee...I hadn't thought of it (or heard it put) that way before. What a new and invigorating thought.

Ed why don't you go back and re-read what jeana wrote. You men have got to learn how to quote better - or at least use copy and paste.

Readers: Please click Petunia and when the page open do a search on that page for "belong to women" and you will see our dear misguided DUMAS Ed is the only one to have made that comment. Oh but again I digress...in these men;s minds wimmin are just too damn stupid to be able to think that much.

WARNING!!!!!!

WARNING!!!!
I must warn all who come to this blog about clicking any links I provide. Unless I state this is a safe website you should take precautions in visiting any site listed as an MRA/FR site. To do so one could open up oneself to being stalked, hunted down, victimized, and even in worst case scenario - assaulted in real life or even killed. The men (and sometimes women) who post on the MRA/FR sites can be dangerous. One nly needs to read the venom spewing from their moouth to see evidence of that. I also post this due to the recent blogs and forums I have discovered over the last few weeks. These will slowly be added to the Cult Wall Of Shame. Please take adequate precaution when visiting these sites.

Fair Use Doctrine

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, entitled, "Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use," is the statutory codification of the fair use doctrine. This judicially developed concept strives to balance the public's need to know and be informed against authors' incentives to create. The copyright law contemplates that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission shall be for purposes such as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching, and that such fair use will not result in the infringement of a copyrighted work. As one may expect, authors and publishers usually take a restrictive view of the fair use doctrine, while users of copyrighted materials generally take a more expansive view.

http://www.publaw.com/work.html

Thank you too!!!!

I am now friends on a message board with a wonderful man. And you all thought we hated men :-) We despise abusive controlling men and women. We like men and women who are decent, honest, and caring. I will say no more as I do not want to ruin this. But those who fight this same fight, keep going!!! We are being seen and our message is getting out there.

Thank you. And thank you for the important work that you do. It gets my dander stirred up when little men hide behind a pen or a computer and spew out fear, hate and stuff that they think makes them look like "real men" but in fact exposes them for the big bullies that they really are. My father and mother are both deceased. But my dad treated my mother the way every man should treat his wife. She was the Queen in our home and he doted on her like she was still his sweetheart until the day she died at age 84. Abraham Lincoln once said, "The greatest gift a father can give to his children is to love their mother." So many men are unhappy with their own lives and they blame women. That way they don't have to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings. Sad. Pathetic. Again, thank you for your very good and important work.

And thank you for giving us hope as well - the hope that there are good and decent people out there - both men and women.

My blog, My rules.....

I would like to welcome everyone who has arrived here - no matter the road you traveled. I only have some very simple rules. Please try to keep your comments clean (I am a mom and as such I do not like extreme vulgar language). I despise the "c" word so it will never be published. Otherwise I will be very lax as I want this site to be a release to those of you who have an issue with the MRAs in general and Sacks and his followers in particular.

I must also slide this little disclaimer in here too (just to protect myself from those pesky little creatures called lawyers and those MRAs who would think they will file a lawsuit or something silly like that against me). I am using YOUR WORDS on this site as well as publishing my opinion of those words. Nothing more, nothing less. I am "not" responsible for comments made by others on my site and if MRAs can behave then they might very well be allowed to post here. Like I said, this is intended to be a release for the women who have been attacked on various sites online to have a little comic break from these constant attacks.

I am posting this blog and all of my comments as a naturally born citizen of the United States and am exercising my right to free speech.

I must also caution my followers and posters against posting any identifying information. This is for your own safety, as I foresee this blog quickly becoming a very hated tool against MRAs who abuse and those who assist them. I mus also make one additional rule concerning posting other people's (such as our exes) personal information. I have been through a very nasty divorce and I know how our exes can react. As such I must make it a number one rule, as much pleasure it would give us, against posting any information which could identify our exes. First names (or initials if the name is uncommon) is fine but no last names. This will be enforced on this blog, unlike "other blogs."