Glenn's Cult?: duncan macleod

Showing posts with label duncan macleod. Show all posts

September 21, 2009

Out of context?????

Duncan Macleod Says:

September 20th, 2009 at 6:24 pm
Atilla mate ..... dont feed the livestoclk , referencing other sites only give them thrills when they troll here to take things out of context , your a better man than that mate,.

Okay Duncan MATE, explain to me how I take things out of context when I copy and paste everything that appears on the cult site? Please explain that one to me doo fus.

May 12, 2009

duncan and his spews yet AGAIN!!!!

91
duncan macleod Says:

May 12th, 2009 at 6:28 am
Jeana, you have avoided my question ........ do i apoligise for chastising those who were abusive to you earlier in this thread ??

duncan you and some of those FR advocates you associate with believe that all women should be at your beck and call and we are all awful and vile creatures simply because you were allegedly abused by a woman. Again we have a goose/gander situation. You demand that women do something because of your life situation (and that applies to all women) yet men are all different and as such women should not stereotype. You can however. Uhhh yeah I like THAT scenario.....

duncan if you ACTUALLY defneded female victims of abuse....

Then I would agree with you. However since you only defend male victims of abuse (how quickly you have forgotten your attacks of me and several other female victims of abuse at the hands of their now ex-husbands). Or do I need to search these out and point them out to you? Won't be too hard as Google and the wayback machine are wonderful inventions. For now lets just read what you wrote on that female hater board.

77
duncan macleod Says:

May 11th, 2009 at 8:24 pm
so ill ask do you feel its " our turn" or do guys like me who will defend any wrong deserving of support?

NO COMMENT!!!!

April 17, 2009

More manure spewing from Duncan Macleod....

First without further ado, please visit this site before you jump to conclusions.....False rape has been statistically proven to be between 2-8%. False Rape does NOT include cases in which a jury found the perp "not guilty" - that simply means they did not believe it was a proven case, not that it was false. You mehnz sure do need to clean out the wax in your ears, shut your pieholes and listen for once....

131
duncan macleod Says:

April 16th, 2009 at 8:47 pm
Seriously . are you even on this planet ?????? you have been posting here for how long now and you still trot out the 2% lie ............ http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=cdc+false+rape+claims&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a

A few links to data, cdc uk information the lot that shows the 2% fact is a lie.

April 16, 2009

Woohoo this video is coming in very handy!!!!

55
duncan macleod Says:

April 16th, 2009 at 6:57 am
...Fact ......... it was coke that was used, not a " date rape drug " ( of which there has been no case ever seen in the uk ) if she had been drugged she would have been unresponsive, there would have been proof in the video that she was not capable.

I have only 3 things to present to you DUNCAN MACLEOD....

1. UK bans date-rape drug

2. Date Rape Drug find in victim for first time

and last but certainly not least

WARNING!!!!!!

WARNING!!!!
I must warn all who come to this blog about clicking any links I provide. Unless I state this is a safe website you should take precautions in visiting any site listed as an MRA/FR site. To do so one could open up oneself to being stalked, hunted down, victimized, and even in worst case scenario - assaulted in real life or even killed. The men (and sometimes women) who post on the MRA/FR sites can be dangerous. One nly needs to read the venom spewing from their moouth to see evidence of that. I also post this due to the recent blogs and forums I have discovered over the last few weeks. These will slowly be added to the Cult Wall Of Shame. Please take adequate precaution when visiting these sites.

Fair Use Doctrine

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, entitled, "Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use," is the statutory codification of the fair use doctrine. This judicially developed concept strives to balance the public's need to know and be informed against authors' incentives to create. The copyright law contemplates that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission shall be for purposes such as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching, and that such fair use will not result in the infringement of a copyrighted work. As one may expect, authors and publishers usually take a restrictive view of the fair use doctrine, while users of copyrighted materials generally take a more expansive view.

http://www.publaw.com/work.html

Thank you too!!!!

I am now friends on a message board with a wonderful man. And you all thought we hated men :-) We despise abusive controlling men and women. We like men and women who are decent, honest, and caring. I will say no more as I do not want to ruin this. But those who fight this same fight, keep going!!! We are being seen and our message is getting out there.

Thank you. And thank you for the important work that you do. It gets my dander stirred up when little men hide behind a pen or a computer and spew out fear, hate and stuff that they think makes them look like "real men" but in fact exposes them for the big bullies that they really are. My father and mother are both deceased. But my dad treated my mother the way every man should treat his wife. She was the Queen in our home and he doted on her like she was still his sweetheart until the day she died at age 84. Abraham Lincoln once said, "The greatest gift a father can give to his children is to love their mother." So many men are unhappy with their own lives and they blame women. That way they don't have to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings. Sad. Pathetic. Again, thank you for your very good and important work.

And thank you for giving us hope as well - the hope that there are good and decent people out there - both men and women.

My blog, My rules.....

I would like to welcome everyone who has arrived here - no matter the road you traveled. I only have some very simple rules. Please try to keep your comments clean (I am a mom and as such I do not like extreme vulgar language). I despise the "c" word so it will never be published. Otherwise I will be very lax as I want this site to be a release to those of you who have an issue with the MRAs in general and Sacks and his followers in particular.

I must also slide this little disclaimer in here too (just to protect myself from those pesky little creatures called lawyers and those MRAs who would think they will file a lawsuit or something silly like that against me). I am using YOUR WORDS on this site as well as publishing my opinion of those words. Nothing more, nothing less. I am "not" responsible for comments made by others on my site and if MRAs can behave then they might very well be allowed to post here. Like I said, this is intended to be a release for the women who have been attacked on various sites online to have a little comic break from these constant attacks.

I am posting this blog and all of my comments as a naturally born citizen of the United States and am exercising my right to free speech.

I must also caution my followers and posters against posting any identifying information. This is for your own safety, as I foresee this blog quickly becoming a very hated tool against MRAs who abuse and those who assist them. I mus also make one additional rule concerning posting other people's (such as our exes) personal information. I have been through a very nasty divorce and I know how our exes can react. As such I must make it a number one rule, as much pleasure it would give us, against posting any information which could identify our exes. First names (or initials if the name is uncommon) is fine but no last names. This will be enforced on this blog, unlike "other blogs."