Glenn's Cult?: huffington Post engages in censorship and hatred of women yet again

January 26, 2011

huffington Post engages in censorship and hatred of women yet again

Warshack recently published a false article on PA/PAS/PAD/HAP/MMS and the protective parents movement tried to comment to show a balance and give information from the viewpoint of the abused mother and child. Sadly Warshack and/or Huff Post felt these comments did not need to be published.

We now have another writer who is engaging in the same censorship. On Huff Post we have "Parental Alienation: It's About More Than "A Uterus, Divorce Papers and Bruises" by Cathy Meyer. Another "expert" as you can see by her bio:

Cathy Meyer is a Certified Divorce Coach, Marriage Educator and Legal Investigator. She works with people who expected to be married forever but are now facing divorce. Through her writing and individual coaching, Cathy provides clients with strategies and resources that empower them and equip
them with the skills needed to grow through a time of adversity.

Cathy is the Guide to Divorce Support@About.com, a resource writer for First Wives World and the co-founder of Divorced Women Online. An online magazine written by divorced women, for divorced women.

Certified Divorce Coach? What the hell is that? Oh I know - someone else to make money off the heartache people invariably suffer when going through a divorce. And someone else who OBVIOUSLY has NO CLUE what abuse in a marriage is about. Have you ever sat and watched your parents or your child or even yourself get shot at? How about stabbed Cathy? Or wait here is even one better. How about having your abuser kill himself and have that forever weighing on your conscious? Or read the hundreds of stories daily where a FATHER who is supposed to LOVE his children, supposed to honor and protect and CHERISH his wife, belittles and beats them daily? No? Didn't think so. Then you need to shut your trap about abuse in a marriage and the aftermath of a divorce afterward. What type of domestic violence and abuse training have you had? Didn't think so.

Now what has spurred Petunia into this rant. A reader took a screenshot of a post she made as well as a post made in response to a well known protective parent blogger. It seems Ms Meyers feels that a parents right to have their child trumps a mother's (and many times child's) right to be free from abuse. Yep there you have it. Women are crap in Cathy's mind. Don't believe me just look below for the actual text and a screenshot of the comment:

I am more interested in protecting a child from the harm parental alienation does than protecting a few women who have suffered abuse.

So there you have it folks. We are finally getting to the bottom of this. The FReaks and FRags could give two shits less about abused women. Just make sure those daddies (all of them even the nasties) are allowed to continue to control and manipulate the children.

No comments:

Post a Comment

WARNING!!!!!!

WARNING!!!!
I must warn all who come to this blog about clicking any links I provide. Unless I state this is a safe website you should take precautions in visiting any site listed as an MRA/FR site. To do so one could open up oneself to being stalked, hunted down, victimized, and even in worst case scenario - assaulted in real life or even killed. The men (and sometimes women) who post on the MRA/FR sites can be dangerous. One nly needs to read the venom spewing from their moouth to see evidence of that. I also post this due to the recent blogs and forums I have discovered over the last few weeks. These will slowly be added to the Cult Wall Of Shame. Please take adequate precaution when visiting these sites.

Fair Use Doctrine

Section 107 of the Copyright Act, entitled, "Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use," is the statutory codification of the fair use doctrine. This judicially developed concept strives to balance the public's need to know and be informed against authors' incentives to create. The copyright law contemplates that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission shall be for purposes such as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching, and that such fair use will not result in the infringement of a copyrighted work. As one may expect, authors and publishers usually take a restrictive view of the fair use doctrine, while users of copyrighted materials generally take a more expansive view.

http://www.publaw.com/work.html

Thank you too!!!!

I am now friends on a message board with a wonderful man. And you all thought we hated men :-) We despise abusive controlling men and women. We like men and women who are decent, honest, and caring. I will say no more as I do not want to ruin this. But those who fight this same fight, keep going!!! We are being seen and our message is getting out there.

Thank you. And thank you for the important work that you do. It gets my dander stirred up when little men hide behind a pen or a computer and spew out fear, hate and stuff that they think makes them look like "real men" but in fact exposes them for the big bullies that they really are. My father and mother are both deceased. But my dad treated my mother the way every man should treat his wife. She was the Queen in our home and he doted on her like she was still his sweetheart until the day she died at age 84. Abraham Lincoln once said, "The greatest gift a father can give to his children is to love their mother." So many men are unhappy with their own lives and they blame women. That way they don't have to accept responsibility for their own shortcomings. Sad. Pathetic. Again, thank you for your very good and important work.

And thank you for giving us hope as well - the hope that there are good and decent people out there - both men and women.

My blog, My rules.....

I would like to welcome everyone who has arrived here - no matter the road you traveled. I only have some very simple rules. Please try to keep your comments clean (I am a mom and as such I do not like extreme vulgar language). I despise the "c" word so it will never be published. Otherwise I will be very lax as I want this site to be a release to those of you who have an issue with the MRAs in general and Sacks and his followers in particular.

I must also slide this little disclaimer in here too (just to protect myself from those pesky little creatures called lawyers and those MRAs who would think they will file a lawsuit or something silly like that against me). I am using YOUR WORDS on this site as well as publishing my opinion of those words. Nothing more, nothing less. I am "not" responsible for comments made by others on my site and if MRAs can behave then they might very well be allowed to post here. Like I said, this is intended to be a release for the women who have been attacked on various sites online to have a little comic break from these constant attacks.

I am posting this blog and all of my comments as a naturally born citizen of the United States and am exercising my right to free speech.

I must also caution my followers and posters against posting any identifying information. This is for your own safety, as I foresee this blog quickly becoming a very hated tool against MRAs who abuse and those who assist them. I mus also make one additional rule concerning posting other people's (such as our exes) personal information. I have been through a very nasty divorce and I know how our exes can react. As such I must make it a number one rule, as much pleasure it would give us, against posting any information which could identify our exes. First names (or initials if the name is uncommon) is fine but no last names. This will be enforced on this blog, unlike "other blogs."