49
JeanB Says:

March 18th, 2009 at 4:19 pm
jeana,

Not one person here has said what Chris did was right. Not one person here said that Rihanna “asked for it”. Get off that horse already.

JeanB I really think you should go back and look at sonja's comments. See this is what you get for ATTACKING jeana......

More from sonja - this needs the toilet

18
Sonja Says:

May 1st, 2009 at 9:05 pm
...And no, frankly it is NOT your business where they live, what/how they earn money and what handouts they get from the government. They are doing these kids the kind of favour that most people wouldn't DREAM of doing for a child, and that in itself makes them practically saints in my eyes. Good on them for doing it.

So sonja why is it any of YOUR business if a newly created single mother gets assistance after leaving an abusive relationship? Oh yeah because there "could be" a dad out there somewhere and who cares if he was the reason this poor single mother is asking for help and is now single. he has rights damn it and we ust at all costs ensure those rights are adhered to. (end my OWN sarcasm)....

As far as GG mentioning another postsre's family member adopting otherwise "unadoptable" chidlren, those parents now get assiatnce for life in caring for those children. If one of those children is never able to work, the parents receive government handouts FOREVER. I am glad that someone has taken on a job nobody else appears to want, but they should do so if they can afford it. I am sure that the govt. programs helped solidify their decision. Plus you get more as an adoptive parent if a child is deemed unadoptable.

JeanB geez why don't you flush your spews instead of typing them out

You would sure use much less internet space and that is where they belong....

4
JeanB Says:

May 2nd, 2009 at 10:31 am
...So when people say that CPS investigates all allegations I tell them “BS”. They will investigate if mom says dad is abusing, but they can’t be bothered when it’s dad who reports mom because “why would a mother do such a thing?”

I’m with Mister-M, she needs to…………well, what he said.

And for those wondering Mister M was extremely crude (thankfully only using the first letters of each word but enough so readers cvan get the point. Why don't you BOTH do what Mister M suggested?

As far as CPS picking and choosing whose allegations to investigate, I know of several women who have been investigated. One had allegations of physical abuse called in on her. These were promptly added to upon CPS arrival to sexual abuse (both of which were unfounded but caused this woman to have to uproot herself and the children). I know of another case in which the FATHER alleged physical abuse by the motehr's boyfriend. Even managed to get one of his crony friends to call that one in. One problem with that issue - mother had NO boyfriend. CPS still investigated. I know of many other CPS investigations, I would share but confidentiality requests demand I not share, unless those people feel comfortable in doing so. I know of many cases also in the reverse whereby school officials and others have called in neglect or abuse complaints on the father (typically custodial - although I know of several non-custodial cases as well) and those were IGNORED. So go spout (or in this case) flush your shit talk down the drain. Shit belongs in a toilet, not on a blog. BuhBYE!!!!

Sonja you are truly a piece of work...

9
Sonja Says:

May 3rd, 2009 at 6:39 pm
GG, you are beyond belief!!

You read JeanB's post, then call her a liar, knowing NOTHING of her case, her attorney, or her!!! How DARE you make such an arbitrary judgement???

You call out Georgia Girl for supposedly making a statement and you ASS U ME quite a bit about her statement (it is FACT that unless it is not used all spouses former and current get medical benefits from the military). You have called many of the dv and abuse victims who have ATTEMPTED to post on balls website liars and much worse. Well I AM CALLING YOU OUT!!!!

HOW DARE YOU MAKE SUCH AN ABRITRARY JUDGMENT???

Again JeanB - minimizing women.....

5
JeanB Says:

May 3rd, 2009 at 12:34 pm
In any case, in this day and age she should be able to take care of herself. As a former military spouse of 15 years I could have gone after half of my ex’s retirement. I didn’t because I do take care of myself. I don’t expect anyone else to do that for me. Although it would be nice to hit the lottery! lol

Not only does she minimize women but she also basically says here that a woman who is married for 15 years, stays home should just let the ex-husband walk away with all of the joint, marital assets. Retirement is a marital asset, unless it was saved before or after the marriage. You can bet your bottom dollar she would advocate for a man who has stayed home to get child support, alimony (if the wife was able to do so) and that this would include ALL marital assets.

It is sad that some women take the anti-woman agenda to such extremes.

JeanB and drama (created?)

10
JeanB Says:

May 4th, 2009 at 7:37 pm
TF said: “We need drama training for men.”

Can we change that to reality training for women? I don’t know about you, but I can’t stand dealing with drama. Especially when there was no drama in the first place, so it is “created”.

I guess she is "insinuating that ALL women create drama. JeanB I really think you need to get out of your cushy little life and visit the real world. the female sex is being victimized over and over and you have no clue!!!!



BuhBye!!!!!

WARNING!!!!! Stay away from Amy Alkon online!!!!

4
JeanB Says:

May 4th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
Since I read Amy every week I already saw this, and posted a comment under it on the OC site. I had to add an initial, to register you must use at least 6 characters for your user name. So on there I am "JeanLB".

I will also remind everyone that if Amy does not have a large enough following the paper is going to drop her. We don't want that to happen. They are using IP's to track her traffic so make sure to read her column every week!!

Okay so now we know how to make sure she gets dropped from more online publications!!! We just do not go read her stories, and we tell everyone we know to stay away from her stories. Her readership goes down, newspapers drop her and wala, we do not have to worry about her spewing FR/MRA garbage much longer!!! Wheeeeeeee problem solved!!!!

The woman blaming runs rampant over THERE

pjk is not the only one who blames women. Read on for many many more below:

12
feelbreeze64 Says:

April 29th, 2009 at 2:59 pm
Spoken like a true victim. Maybe she should of thought twice about who she was having children with, instead of having childern with a man that can't take care of him self but still expecting him to take care of his childern. She is just as at fault as he is for making poor decisions.

11
SerenityNow Says:

April 29th, 2009 at 2:58 pm
I was going to say what pjk said- that Ms. McCaffrey chose to have a child with (if we take her words as fact) an irresponsible drug addict, and now cries BOO HOO HOO.

19
Offended_Dad Says:

April 29th, 2009 at 3:15 pm
Wow, April, you had not one, but *TWO* children with an alcoholic / drug addict that can't hold down a job. What moment of genius inspired this life decision that affects not only you, but the two children you deliberately created? You aparently take ZERO accountability for your bad decision making, but rather propose that the government force someone to work and confiscate their wages to make up for it....

Imagine if women were branded "lying goldigging tramps" until proven otherwise, and you'll start to understand the point of view.

Editor Note: Offended_Dad - women ARE branded liars, god-diggers, and tramps every single day by abusive men. This is why the women file for divorce in many cases.

51
Lonnie Says:

April 29th, 2009 at 10:44 pm
why doesnt she elaborate on her decision to sleep with and have a child with a man who was a drug addict? Or did she drive him to that point lol. Why is it never their fault? Why do they never accept any part of the blame for their decisions? How about taking into consideration that before you spread your legs and get pregnant you think about whether you can afford to raise a child by yourself?? she is a clear loser who wants to pass the blame for her poor decisions.

And my favorite (hack gag puke) comment of the night:

52
JeanB Says:

April 29th, 2009 at 11:00 pm
Lonnie,

Because then she would have to admit she is stupid. Heaven forbid anyone takes responsibility for their own actions anymore.

Kudos yet again to Georgia Girl!!! (or Getting it right in PAS cases)

7
Georgia Girl Says:

April 25th, 2009 at 9:14 pm
I have no doubt that PAS is a real condition of alienation, but not in the context JeanB speaks. I firmly believe the the girlfriend or boyfriend in a divorced spouse's life has no business trying to intervene with the "children" of that spouse.

It is the spouse's responsibility to negotiate with both his ex-wife and with his children. And in jeanb's case, the father of the children was NOT the one who took the initiative. To me, this kind of generosity coming from the new girlfriend would only serve to aggravate the ex-wife (trying to put myself in the shoes of the ex-wife).

It's curious, also, that in this particular case, the father waited until they were college age before taking "action" to involve himself in his daughters' lives. Something sounds skewed here.

Georgia Girl if you read other comments from jeanb you will see that her boyfriend is what one commonly refers to as a deadbeat dad. They have even taken steps to ensure that the state cannot come after him (putting everything in her name). I wonder if when they file taxes does he file or does he ignore that little law too? You see in MRA world, we must do everything to ensure that little court order called child support is never followed.

Oh and step two in the MRA handbook? Make sure that everyone sees how BADLY the father has been alienated from HIS chidlren. Do not allow anyone to see if the FATHER may have actually done anything to turn the children against him on his own. You see yet again women are all powerful and we control the world (okay who is on drugs now).....

Another for the stepmonster hall of shame

Here we have another woman who is PROUD of all she has done to ensure that her new partner's chidlren will not get the support they deserve. I do not think any commentary is necessary here. Oh and notice the veiled threats made also (Durham might get beat?)

31
JeanB Says:

April 27th, 2009 at 2:48 pm
First of all, Durham is putting his life on the line here. Given the volatility of these situations it won’t take long to come across one that is so PO’ed he just beats the hell out of Durham. Not too smart of Durham, I think.

Oh, buddy, I dare Durham to try to hound my BF. I DARE HIM! House is in my name, haha! Sorry, couldn’t resist. Seriously, though, I don’t shake easy, and he doesn’t get shook up, EVER. I almost hope Durham does show up, and he just might since “her” state falsely claims my BF is in arrears. Might be fun.

Polite letter to Lifetime, et al, will be written and sent off for sure.

Shut your Piehole!!!!!!

31 JeanB Says: March 18th, 2009 at 12:11 pm ...From everything I have read, not one person is taking up for Chris Brown. The level of his response to her hitting him was out of line. What everyone is saying, and I agree with, is that Rihanna needs to take responsibility for her part in the fight. He didn’t just start beating her because he felt like it. There was a whole lot that led up to their fight.

NOBODY knows what happened that night except two people, Chris and Rihanna. And since your name, JeanB, is JeanB, I really think you need to follow Dr. Buddy Rydell's advice to Dave Buznik (click play below)......

JeanB must have a very low IQ or.... well I guess there really is NO excuse for her stupidity

First TF who is one of the cult followers (and a regular one at that since he has been featured here before) makes remarks about a woman's appearance. Again this is one of the signs/symptoms of a controlling and angry man (verbal abuse). Second he is on an angry MRA/FR blog forum (sign #2). We must watch for further comments and see if sign #3 exists (wife accused me of abuse and stole my house, my car, my kids, and my money). If sign #3 exists then Petunia can just about guarantee he is an abusive person. Only way to figure this fact out quicker would be to deduce TF's identity and then do a search for his court records. Petunia doesn't waste her time on that though. Before deducing several of the cult members' identities she always guessed correctly as to their nature.

Well after TF insult Marcia Pappas, JeanB then gets into the fray by throwing out insults as only a woman colluder can. She appears to be insulting herself while all the while she is insulting Ms. Pappas.

Well JeanB, you say you are overweight due to being in your 40's and having had how many children? One? Well I have had multiple children (close to the octomom before the babies arrived) and I am not fat, not considered overweight and I am alsio in my 40's. In fact as a mom to an overweight child, feel the insults you are putting out to anyone who is overweight. Having children a long time ago does not make you overweight. Being over a certain age does not make you overweight. You become overweight when your metabolism slows down, when you do not eat properly and when you do not get the right combinations of food, vitamins and exercise.

So take your veiled insults and shove them where the sun don't shine (or better yet - send them down the drain in our flush-o-matic).

14
TF Says:

March 29th, 2009 at 9:49 pm
I've met Pappas and she is a very obese feminist who at my last meeting took and standing in front of me fed her fat face with three cream filled doughnuts from those provided by the fathers group at a legislative meeting. Her problem with men is her extreme obesity. Men are not responsible for her obesity.
Obesity is not an excuse for misandry and Pappas' cadre of feminist psychopath bimbos deserve no respect. Pappas is the poster child for a NOW feminist and the reason for their misandry..

16
JeanB Says:

March 29th, 2009 at 10:05 pm
#14, TF, as much as I am busting out laughing right now, shame on you for picking on the poor woman for her disorder. That’s what obesity is, yes? And we know that disorders are never one’s own fault.

And before anyone jumps all over me, I am about 25 or so pounds heavier than I should be. And yes, it is my own fault. But hey, I have a kid and am over 40. Such is life.

ROTFLMAO!

JeanB - pay attention please.... Oh I forgot you belong over there you can't....

Wow. The "Mother and Father" added to "Father Only" is still less than the "Mother Only." So, how do they figure it is usually the father who hurts or murders these children?

This study does not account for time spent by each abuser with the child. In mother abuse cases, the mother typically spends more time with the child. In father abuse cases this is not true. If we factor in the time spent by each perpetrator with the child and accounted for that in these figures, you would see the father abuse percentages skyrocket. Just simple math, not rocket science... Do you understand now?

Guess not you will still spout the tired old statistics, and all the supposed bad stories on men, the dead broke stories, the lies, the propaganda that MEN have created. So go back to your little commune.

Poor jeana :-( Everyone must pick on her....

'jeana' is attacked from all walks. The men (and even moreso - the women) of Sack's cult must attack and hurt jeana. She speaks a voice of reason. She never fully takes on the hard-nose feminist stance many accuse her of doing, nor does she fool hardily align herself with nutjob FR's (or as Sacks calls them - loonies). Read below to see what I mean:

29
jeana Says:

February 12th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
Very wise to separate out MRAs from Father’s Rights people. Better chance that you’ll be taken seriously. Good luck.

The Attacks?:

33
Hurley Hacker Says:

February 12th, 2009 at 6:46 pm
Jeana;

So what are you a MRA or a Father's Rights advocate??

35
Nick S Says:

February 12th, 2009 at 8:33 pm
Hurley Hacker, I think Jeana is saying that father's rights supporters should separate from MRAs, as MRAs are more extreme and only father's rights supporters have any legitimate claims.

Methinks Jeana takes us seriously merely by being here.

36
JeanB Says:

February 12th, 2009 at 9:06 pm
Hurley Hacker (33), I was wondering the same thing myself! But let her "talk", she just keeps digging deeper each time. I was also considering changing my user name so people don't confuse us.....................but I have been on here a long time with this user name, so I think I'll keep it. All I ask is other users please keep us straight. K? Thx!

Glenn, we know you will still be around, and we are so glad! So far, I like Robert. He is doing a good job. And we know you will be doing great work with Father's & Families. Our household is so proud of you!! Editor Note: Puke gag vomit JeanB get a life....

Episodic Illogicality?

Okay now I HAVE heard it all.....Might I add here that the entire website on which this was written is HATE SPEECH?

46
Norman L. Says:

February 6th, 2009 at 11:12 pm
JeanB,

In "defense" of the men here (though I know you're not attacking us), some of us have "episodic illogicality". Also in a sense we are free to rant here, as long as there's not anything like hate speech and we are within blog rules.