Showing posts with label jeana. Show all posts
Showing posts with label jeana. Show all posts

August 30, 2009

She is back!!!!






Ahh a voice of reason among the many quaks.

jeana Says:

August 27th, 2009 at 4:04 pm
There may not be enough evidence of domestic violence, but enough that the judge would rather be safe than sorry. Just because someone isn't convicted of something doesn't mean they're not guilty.


This is what PROTECTIVE MOTHERS have been saying all along. DV does hot happen in the open as shown in this video:



Domestic violence happens in secret - behind closed doors. Who sees it? Nobody except the victim and the perpetrator. Maybe the chidlren who generally are either too young to testify (unless the abuse escalates to murder) or too aligned with the abuser after years of being told their mother is stupid. Just search for Susan Still. Her 13 year old son was forced to video tape his father beating his mother. This is about the only time you will hear of abuse being corroborated. Any other time it is NEARLY ALWAYS a he said she said situation.

So jeana it is a welcome sight for sore eyes to see you back and posting again. Welcome back to the insanity!

June 1, 2009

To Georgia Girl and jeana!!!

I must add in this little post that I think you are totally wonderful. Your strength in the face of arguing with the (cough gag puke snort) men over there is beyond words!!! And yes I posted this just to see the reaction) :-)



May 12, 2009

Color, race, economic status in crime reports



Wow jeana hit the mail on the head again, I think we need to create some sort of honorary award or something!!!! Read below:

8
jeana Says:

May 12th, 2009 at 2:18 pm
I really think this is more about race and socioeconomic status than gender. While there’s more sympathy for dead females than dead males, think about what it would be like if the genders were reversed. Would they care more about a dead Latina immigrant than a white successful businessman? I’m betting not.


I would like to go one step further in this. If you have two white girls missing, one is from a successful family and one is from a family at poverty level (ie: what one would consider a white trash sort of family) chances are great you will hear more about the rich little white girl. Let's take this one step further, if it was a rich little white boy and a poor little white girl, chances are great rich kid/family will get more press. Case in point: Caylee Anthony versus Hayleigh Cummings. There is news nearly every day on Caylee and we know where she is sadly. Not so with Hayleigh, but when was the last time you heard about her? Need I say more?

I would like to add that race and socio-economic status are about equal in the playing field, I really do not know which comes first. Although a poor minority girl who is dead or missing sadly in society's eyes (IE: White Men) is not as important as a rich white girl. I wonder who would be more important, a poor white girl or a rich minority girl? Now that is one to ponder.....

duncan and his spews yet AGAIN!!!!

91
duncan macleod Says:

May 12th, 2009 at 6:28 am
Jeana, you have avoided my question ........ do i apoligise for chastising those who were abusive to you earlier in this thread ??


duncan you and some of those FR advocates you associate with believe that all women should be at your beck and call and we are all awful and vile creatures simply because you were allegedly abused by a woman. Again we have a goose/gander situation. You demand that women do something because of your life situation (and that applies to all women) yet men are all different and as such women should not stereotype. You can however. Uhhh yeah I like THAT scenario.....



May 10, 2009

jeana? HAMMER, NAIL, HEAD!!!!!

28
jeana Says:

May 5th, 2009 at 1:34 am
Michele,

“I truly think he only wanted shared parenting to avoid financial obligation”

Bingo. And therein lies one of the main issues “feminists” (and anyone who actually cares about the well being of children) are wary of so many men demanding shared parenting. Because what “shared parenting” means to most of them is that they don’t have to share any of their money with their kids or share any of their time with their kids. Ask any second wife. She’ll pretend to be all for shared parenting because it means that not a penny will go to the first wife. That is all it means. And the mother has to lose her children and watch them be ignored or worse by her ex-husband. Although I’ve never been divorced, I think that if a guy is not very involved with the kids while he’s married to the mother, what in God’s name would make anyone think he is all of a sudden willing and able to be a super duper fantastic father once he’s divorced? It makes no sense.


jeana all I can say is WOW!!!!! You hit the NAIL on the HEAD with a HAMMER!!!!!





49
JeanB Says:

March 18th, 2009 at 4:19 pm
jeana,

Not one person here has said what Chris did was right. Not one person here said that Rihanna “asked for it”. Get off that horse already.


JeanB I really think you should go back and look at sonja's comments. See this is what you get for ATTACKING jeana......



April 6, 2009

Future Olympic Long Jump Champion of the Millenium?

48
SerenityNow Says:

April 6th, 2009 at 3:21 pm
On April 3, 2009, at 10:PM Jeana said:"I have a young son, so I would NEVER be for the statutory or otherwise rape of boys. Yes, please dig that up for me. I’d like to see where I said it was ok to have sex with children."

On July 2, 2008 at 3:19 Jeana said: "I don’t care if they were all in the same age range. Whether 15 or 16 or 17—it doesn’t make a practical difference. It was consensual"

There may be other examples, but I am disinclined to waste any more of my time on this.


From the looks of this INCOMPLETE post (and only one) that SerenityNow has managed to locate (and one must wonder why there is no linkback to this "alleged" post) it appears to Petunia (from her vast perusals of the cult site and her first hand knowledge of the many cult followers (and the few rebels as well), that jeana was speaking quite possibly of a case where all underage children were involved.

Okay first some background for this...

jeana had made some comments on a blog post on the cult site about mandatory sentencing for teacher/student sex crimes (see below):

12
jeana Says:

April 3rd, 2009 at 10:12 pm
SerenityNow:

I have a young son, so I would NEVER be for the statutory or otherwise rape of boys. Yes, please dig that up for me. I’d like to see where I said it was ok to have sex with children.

I think you are referring to a 13 year old (not nearly 18) who had sex with a 22 year old. I could care less if a 17 or 16 year old had sex with a 22 year; but a 13 year old is not ok.

And if I “excused” the teacher because the boy “consented”, I did so to make a point—you males love to excuse even little girls if they “consent”. Make no mistake—I think sex with a child is DISGUSTING! And should be punished by jail. Got it, SerenityNow?


So SerenityNow had decided to be snarky and rude and just downright mysogynistic towards jeana with this post:

11
SerenityNow Says:

April 3rd, 2009 at 9:51 pm
Jenna formerly excused female statutory rape of boys if the boy wanted or consented to the sex. I don't have time to dig up her post right now- I have to leave. Perhaps someone else would like to illuminate her hypocrisy.....


jeana then goes on to (as always) pointlessly debate with these one tracked mindless cult followers and we arrive at the last post on this article:

48
SerenityNow Says:

April 6th, 2009 at 3:21 pm
On April 3, 2009, at 10:PM Jeana said:"I have a young son, so I would NEVER be for the statutory or otherwise rape of boys. Yes, please dig that up for me. I’d like to see where I said it was ok to have sex with children."

On July 2, 2008 at 3:19 Jeana said: "I don’t care if they were all in the same age range. Whether 15 or 16 or 17—it doesn’t make a practical difference. It was consensual"

There may be other examples, but I am disinclined to waste any more of my time on this.


SerenityNow you need to try out for the Olympic Long Jump Team, because the distance you covered by using this comment from jeana to saying that she condoned teacher/student sex, or any underage/adult sex is mind boggling. You could easily win gold......



February 23, 2009

Links directly to my posts (and others) that are no longer available?

These are all posts which will no longer work on this page. This is due to the deletion of my 5 or 6 posts. Lets see I will try to recount all of those posts for you. The first one I wrote a vague commentary on the article. mca (menscollegeactivist) then addressed me and his posts were deleted as well. Jason then decided to join his brother in arms with this post:

26
Jason Says:

February 22nd, 2009 at 8:42 pm
"Yet the men on here (and some women) say that when a woman has beaten a conviction in court, she is being given a sentencing discount."

Um... no.

What people mean when they talk about a sentencing discount is that when comparing men and women who have been convicted of the same crime, women tends to receive more lenient punative measures.

This is not the same thing as beating a conviction altogether.

You have misunderstood the terminology and how it is used.


Several more of my posts are then deleted again (again none with foul language, all asking if we could discuss this matter civilly as I had read through most of the report quoted in the quoted newspaper article. Jason then said something to the effect of two other hated female posters on that blog were "attacking" him as was I in his opinion and one of these women had some sort of obsession over his "private areas". I then asked him if he would provide a link to the obsession over his private areas by georgia girl, and he refused (makes me think he quite possibly HOPED georgia girl had this obsession, but again that is just my opinion. I challenge anyone to find this so-called obsession on gg's part over Jason's private parts. I pride myself on being somewhat Internet search savvy, and I could not locate it.

Norman then jumps into the fray by adding his two cents into the mix (which I might add has NOT been deleted):

30
Norman L. Says:

February 23rd, 2009 at 2:12 am
Jason,

sounds like a loser, doesn't she?


If you choose to read the rest of the attacks on New friend or Glenn's Cult (well at least the ones that were left up by GS or RF) you may do so by clicking Petunia.

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747880

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747771

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747799

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747774

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747732

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747860

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747751

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747759

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747830

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747799

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747722

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3350#comment-747829

Now to show you that these links do work for the active posts which are viewable right now please go to:

jeana's post, one of Jason's MANY posts, now one must wonder why my posts were deleted? I followed GS's rules, I provided a good email address. It is my firm opinion that GS and the others involved in this attempt to beat women down, must not ever allow anyone who shows credibility the permission to post. It also goes against everything the cult followers of this entity state. GS does censore his website. My only question is

What are you in fear of GS?

February 20, 2009

Doing the dance, doing the dance

Okay can I say it? These men will swear this is all us feminists know how to do so I can I do it...Please, pretty please? Well it is MY blog, and MY time, so I am going to say it!!!!!!

YOU GO GIRL!!!! ATTA GIRL JEANA!!!!

There now that is out of my system read below:

50
jeana Says:

February 20th, 2009 at 7:30 pm
Sonja,

How about a woman take responsibility and get herself on the pill or get an implanon if she can't remember to take a pill? Her body, her choice, her responsibility

Sonja, I agree as far as if I don’t want to become pregnant, I’d NEVER trust a guy. I know it is up to me. Because ultimately, you can’t trust guys with that. You just can’t. However, if you don’t want to pay CS or be a dad prematurely, then actually, it’s “your penis, your choice, your responsibility”.




Egads!!!! I should have read more of this disgusting dribble....

Had I have read further I would have awarded Eagle30 with the DUMAS of the Day award. Ehhh no worries eagle30, your day will come I am sure. Read below for more of his superman leaping abilities.

49
Eagle30 Says:

February 20th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Jenna: "Did I encourage the cover-up of male victims drugged by their girlfriends? No I didn’t."

Again, I quote you:

"It’s a shame when ANY rapist doesn’t go to jail. Vast majority of them are male, tho’. So to concentrate on the teeny tiny percentage who are female kind of makes me shake my head. Every time."

The fact you think you shake your head whenever this "Teeny" percentage of female abusers are focused on says it all. You condone male abuse.


Now where did jeana say that she did not want the perps of male victims, be they male or female locked up? She stated that these loonies only focus on male victims or in the case of female victim-female perps, the FEMALES who commit rape. This is so very true. Glenn and his cult never comment on any male perps.



Eagle30 I want your powers of leaping to conclusions please....

Now how he jumps from women are the vast majority of rape victims to feminists want to ignore any male victims out there is beyond me. jeana never stated that male victims should be ignored, she simply said female victims are the norm whereas male victims are not. Nowhere in her statement did she say male victims should be ignored. It is getting harder and harder to narrow down just one person a day for the DUMAS of the day award.

42
Eagle30 Says:

February 20th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
Jenna: "It’s a shame when ANY rapist doesn’t go to jail. Vast majority of them are male, tho’. So to concentrate on the teeny tiny percentage who are female kind of makes me shake my head. Every time."

So you would rather this issue not be addressed and swept under the rug? You think male victims of female abuse don't count because they're not the majority?


I actually see jeana saying here that all rapists should go to jail. Readers what do you see?



Ed learn to read DUMAS!!!!!

37
ed Says:

February 20th, 2009 at 3:25 pm
Jeana says: Children belong to women and so putting women in jail is bad for children. THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!

Gee...I hadn't thought of it (or heard it put) that way before. What a new and invigorating thought.


Ed why don't you go back and re-read what jeana wrote. You men have got to learn how to quote better - or at least use copy and paste.

Readers: Please click Petunia and when the page open do a search on that page for "belong to women" and you will see our dear misguided DUMAS Ed is the only one to have made that comment. Oh but again I digress...in these men;s minds wimmin are just too damn stupid to be able to think that much.



Again jeana withstands attacks in order to speak out about RAPE

I have written prviously on how the few women and women's rights advocates speak out on Sacks' forum, only to be attacked and belittled. Here we have another instance in which jeana - speaking out as she does on rape issues - get attacked by another of the frothing-mouth FR loonies (in Glenn's own words).

It's pretty straight forward, and talks to the lowest common denominator. I would think a 10y/o could understand it, so you may have to play it several times Jeanna.


Now what is John D attempting to convey with this little snark remark? That maybe in his opinion jeana is either younger than 10 therefore she would have to view this video several times in order to understand it, or that she is older than 10 and has the mentality of a less than 10 yr old? Knowing these men it is probably the latter, because they are constantly calling into question the intelligence (or lack thereof) of the defenders of victims posting on Sacks' site.

Read below Petunia for more snark from Glenn's Cult....



Hey Jeanna, I hear Mike Nifongs old district is looking for a new prosecutor? No experience required. The only criteria is an intense hatred of men.

Oh, you're probably not interested--you're OVER qualified.


jeana however, can truly handle herself with dignity and almost all of the time with a little humor (and if I may be so bold and follow in what the MRAs claim we "feminist" trolls do) Atta Girl!!! LMAO!!!!

I never libeled you; I told you my opinion on how I think you see rape cases.

"You seem to want to do everything in your power to prevent men from being charged or convicted with rape, regardless of their actual guilt."

"You seem to want to change the law and redefine rape so that it is virtually impossible to convict a man, like in the Middle East."

Is that libel? Nope. My opinion based on things you've said in this and other threads. And I now am considering making an additional citizen's arrest against you, once I determine if I can actually do this.


and here (jeana will you make an extra doll for me pretty please?)

Do it!! I dare you. I could go through the threads and show why I think what I do, but that would take too much time. And lucky for you I’ve decided not to arrest you. Instead, I will make a voodoo doll of you and stick it with pins whenever you write something that annoys me. Which is a lot.


February 12, 2009

Poor jeana :-( Everyone must pick on her....

'jeana' is attacked from all walks. The men (and even moreso - the women) of Sack's cult must attack and hurt jeana. She speaks a voice of reason. She never fully takes on the hard-nose feminist stance many accuse her of doing, nor does she fool hardily align herself with nutjob FR's (or as Sacks calls them - loonies). Read below to see what I mean:

29
jeana Says:

February 12th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
Very wise to separate out MRAs from Father’s Rights people. Better chance that you’ll be taken seriously. Good luck.


The Attacks?:

33
Hurley Hacker Says:

February 12th, 2009 at 6:46 pm
Jeana;

So what are you a MRA or a Father's Rights advocate??


35
Nick S Says:

February 12th, 2009 at 8:33 pm
Hurley Hacker, I think Jeana is saying that father's rights supporters should separate from MRAs, as MRAs are more extreme and only father's rights supporters have any legitimate claims.

Methinks Jeana takes us seriously merely by being here.


36
JeanB Says:

February 12th, 2009 at 9:06 pm
Hurley Hacker (33), I was wondering the same thing myself! But let her "talk", she just keeps digging deeper each time. I was also considering changing my user name so people don't confuse us.....................but I have been on here a long time with this user name, so I think I'll keep it. All I ask is other users please keep us straight. K? Thx!

Glenn, we know you will still be around, and we are so glad! So far, I like Robert. He is doing a good job. And we know you will be doing great work with Father's & Families. Our household is so proud of you!! Editor Note: Puke gag vomit JeanB get a life....




January 16, 2009

Just when i thought they had calmed down to a dull roar

19
Andre Lieven Says:

January 16th, 2009 at 3:29 pm
Georgia Girl avoids facing the consequences of her misandry:

"I have in mind a general profile of a typical MRA, but I don't wanna sit here and duck the arrows, so I'll pass."

Too cowardly to back up your claims, eh ?

How typical for the common sexist feminist bigot.

The truth that bigots such as GG and jeana wish weren't true is that MRA's are working for actual Equality. Equality in front of the law, such that the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" applied to BOTH men *and* women.

The article and thread titled "She admits she framed him, but he's still charged" shows clearly that men ARE treated in the law as being LESS than any woman. Thats sexism, and thats WRONG.

Those who defend wrongful sexism, including misandrous sexism, ARE sexist bigots. QED.


This was in reply to these statements:

14
jeana Says:

January 16th, 2009 at 3:03 pm
“and while you're at it, notice the sexes of the various players and their roles”

Ok, so instead of this being about what an awesome job the pilot did and the emergency workers, it is really more “boys are better than girls” because all of the helpers in the article were male.

But while you’re busy noticing the sex of those who helped the passengers, also please note their functions. Divers, police, pilot, and an Emergency Services chief. That is their JOB. They did their JOB. Thank you, dudes, for doing your JOB.

I hope no one is implying that if there were female officers that they’d just let the passengers drown????? Maybe they’d be too busy applying lip gloss.

One non-professional, a male passenger, was also credited for helping women and children. Great for him. Not his job, but he helped out. More people should be like him. The lady with the baby on her shoulder who he helped—should she have helped out the men in business suits?

I, for one, am very glad that Jeff Kolodjay was not an MRA. For if he was, he’d have trampled the women and children on his mad dash to get out of the plane.


and these:

8
Georgia Girl Says:

January 16th, 2009 at 2:15 pm
Sully is my hero!

It also warmed my heart that more than one of the male survivors put the lives of women and children above his own. That clearly indicates, to me, that the majority of men in our country do not fit the MRA profile.


11
Georgia Girl Says:

January 16th, 2009 at 2:53 pm
Wayne, you have described traits that are not exclusive to MRAs, but to mankind.

I have in mind a general profile of a typical MRA, but I don't wanna sit here and duck the arrows, so I'll pass.


Basically this post goes on and on ad infinitum about how wonderful men are, and how women are crybabies and always victims and always in need of rescuing and how these particular men (well at least the vast majority of them anyway) will not help because they are tired of being victims themselves. Thankfully both GG and jeana can hold their own against these MCPs and need no help from me. I however thought that MY readers should get an example of the levels to which these MRAs will stoop when writing about the 'victimization of men.' I am only on post 45 as of this writing and am nearly 100% disgusted with what I have read. Some of the cult followers have 'claimed' that women REFUSE to take jobs as police officers, divers, EMT, fire rescue personnel. One even claimed there were - get this - ZERO female responders at Ground Zero. Men do typically take these types of jobs more often than women. The tides are turning however. Fifty years ago you would never see a female EMT or fire fighter. They are gaining ground today however. And the notion that NO women were on Ground Zero is defeated with this link and this link.

Oh and my favorite (gag) MRA has surfaced again.

60
Bill Christen Says:

January 16th, 2009 at 5:25 pm
Kinda like when the first Space Shuttle blew up. You would have thought that the only person on board was the female teacher.


BC you have about no brains as well. The ONLY reason Christina Mcauliffe was mentioned so often is because she was NOT an astronaut. She WAS a schoolteacher, so therefore she was DIFFERENT. Just because she happened to be a she is of no call. If you recall, there have been two shuttle catastrophes and in the second (all were military/astronauts) two were women. On the first shuttle disaster, there were also two women (one of whom was Mcauliffe). These women were mentioned no more and no less than the other MALE astronauts. To say that society is anti-male because Mcauliffe was mentioned more is simply - words don't describe you BC. You are in a class of your own. One must expect that with your fantasy level, however.

Andre Lieven at it again (shakes head in amazement that he ACTUALLY believes himself)

65
Andre Lieven Says:

January 16th, 2009 at 5:35 pm
jeana cluelessed:

"Do you want news reports to say, “And a MAN helped out the victims! Can you believe it, a MAN!!”"

Why NOT ? The daily news is FULL of reports that say "A BAD MAN did (X)".

Why can't it, Equally, say that "A GOOD MAN did (Y)" ? Or, "A bunch of Good Men did (Y)" ?

Why do you so OPPOSE Real Equality ?


Ummm Andre - the papers and TV news stations DO run stories about people all over the world every day who do good things. They also inform the public of those who do bad things. And sadly it is men consistently over time who "do bad things" - more so than women. It should also be pointed out that when a woman does the ultimate in horrendous (IE - the taking of the life of a child or the mere allegation of that act - such as Casey Anthony) we are constantly bombarded daily with her actions, words, thoughts. We are BOMBARDED with the thoughts of those close to that case. Where is the followup to Bruce Pardo? What of the followups with the survivors? Why is this not done? Simple....Men are quite often the type of perpetrator who would take the lives of his children, of his wife (ex-wife). Men are more frequently, MORE violent than women. Men cause more damage when they are violent than women do. This has come to be somewhat 'expected' (although it should not be). So we will see one or two articles on the 'bad men', and then they fall by the wayside. Simply put - bad men do not make controversy. 'Bad women' do...

I could continue on and on with this post but I think all of my faithful readers get the picture. Andre Lieven (in post 78 at the Petunia link) also discusses the Titanic survivor/fatality rates, delves into some severe misogyny in and of itself. And one last parting remark regarding the Paul/Linda debate....I would save PAUL simply because he has given much more to society. He is one of the Beatles for gosh sakes :-) Seriously though, I would give my life if it meant saving both of them. I would hope I would never be in the position to choose between saving one person or another. Given a choice the only time an easy choice would be made would be a child versus an adult. That would be a no-brainer. The child would ALWAYS come first.



UPDATE!!!!
103
Andre Lieven Says:

January 17th, 2009 at 12:03 am

.....-Whats the difference between NOW and the KKK?
The KKK has a dress code.-


Can we get any more disgusting than this?!?!?!?!?!?!

And it seems Andre Lieven is hung up on the KKK and NOW? What is his hangup? MEN have traditionally had it easier than women. White men have it easier than anyone else. This is a fact of life - no matter how you spin it Andre. Get over yourself and your poor misguided feelings of oh woe is me.......

January 10, 2009

“Men are human waste--kill them”

Okay now it seems Glenn is targetting a 'Nu-Metal' group who has a song out titled Menocide. First one must look at the obvious. Who has heard of this group? I certainly haven't, Glenn complaining about Beyonce is more apt to draw my attention than this group. They are not mainstream. next we must look at the prevelance of this type of music. How many girl metal bands are there? I did a search for this and here is what I found (courtesy Wikipedia). Notice that some of the names on this list are actually fairly mainstream singers (Lita Ford being one). Also notice if you scroll down to Otep, you will find a link to the band's page on Wikipedia. Amazingly enough what does one discover? The lead vocalist is female, but all the other band members are MALE!!!! I am not in any way condoning the music given to us by this band, but I like many others, have the choice to listen or to not listen. I choose to not listen. One last note, if you read the lyrics as written, the singer (IMO) is simpply saying that she is being killed (smothered?, degraded?, minmized?) by herself and by others. Again, Glenn could find much better things to blog about besdies some little known to many band called OTEP. Like how about discussing the well known rappers who degrade and villify women on a daily basis. Or that these rappers are much more mainstream? How about the music made by men that says things like women should get down on her knees and worse? No discussion of that activity now is there? Read bleow form some cult remarks....



3 (Editor Note - Post Number)
jim Says:

January 9th, 2009 at 9:08 pm
i like the female circumsision part.... funny that no one talks about it happening to men in our ouwn countrie(s)


Funny how it is that MEN decided males should be circumcised and MEN decided females should be circumcised...yet no mention is made of that.

5 (Editor Note - Post Number)
The Dapper Swindler Says:

January 9th, 2009 at 9:27 pm
Perhaps if someone recorded the antithesis to this song, ie about women, and played it to people who had never heard of it, then gauged their reaction. I suspect we'd get some very telling results about which people value more - men or women. Not that we don't already know the answer to that of course. It's obvious.


Funy thing is we do have it....it is called rap...

11 (Editor Note - Post Number)
David G Says:

January 9th, 2009 at 11:35 pm
"Men are human waste--kill them"

Actually you have to admire her honesty. She's articulating how society thinks of men - disposable and sub-human. And look at the male suicide and longevity figures - we ARE being killed off.


You are being killed off? If it is suicide, then again MALES are the ones doing the killing, not females. Why don't you learn accountability, instead of blaming?

15 (Editor Note - Post Number)
menscollegeactivist.org Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 12:20 am
She mentions Salems burning of witches in her lyrics....Am i mistaken or was it not 2 young girls that were responseable for the mass hystyeria that got these "withches" burned.
Funny how local hysterics blame men, when it was in fact young women who called in the Klan type hysteria, by making the false accusation of witchery, against other women.


Children 'began' the hysteria, but it was MEN who carried out the evil and vile killings of the supposed witches.

17 (Editor Note - Post Number)
John Kimble Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 12:54 am
"She mentions Salems burning of witches in her lyrics....Am i mistaken or was it not 2 young girls that were responseable for the mass hystyeria that got these "withches" burned"

What an excellent point - I guess fatal false allegations by women aren't exactly a new phenomena.

Many also forget that one third of the "witches" executed were in fact male.
And 2/3 were female. Your point? Mor ewomen were still killed due to the hysteria of a few children fueled on by some angry men. Again Men killing MEN and WOMEN.

18 (Editor Note - Post Number)
Just a metalhead Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 1:14 am
This is typical in the more extreme side of metal, lyrics that are violent, provoking, disgusting, racist, mysognynist, misanthropy, etc... Plus most of the time this is just a game, a fantasy, a way to expunge frustration and rage and nothing more. This is probably the case here, I mean she's the only female in a group of 4 in a genre vastly dominated by men. And personally I don't think there are many metal bands that are big enough to be considered "mainstream" or to use them as an example of how society is favorable to hating men and Otep is not one of them. Only reason I know of the group existence is because the name sounds a bit like a much better group called Opeth.

If I may be excused a bit of sarcasm "Wow, a metal song includes hate-filled ramblings, stop the presses!".

Also, to defend metal a bit, it's a much more diverse genre than most people think, there's a world of difference between Dream Theater and Burzum, one's a group reknown for musical prowess, flowing melody and clear voice and the other is a group formed of only one (mad, neo-nazi, christian-hating, murderous) man, with shrieks, horrible production and feverish music. Most metal artists would shirk at having their music called "commercial", that's actually an insult in the community, few metal musicians live from their music and most labels are independent and are run by people passionate enough by the genre that they dedicate a lot of time and effort in it without much return.


To be fair, I have included this post. This commenter is right on the money. If you listen to this (OTEP music or any metal) then more power to you. I myself choose NOT to listen to this. However it is not my right to take that right away from someone else. How often have you seen on the news of a woman who has killed a man simply based on the fact that OTEP discussed it in their music? Yet you often hear of young adult men raping and abusing women bvecause of rap music (or so they claim).

20 (Editor Note - Post Number)
David G Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 2:53 am
Notice the Nirvana t-shirt - an ALL-MALE band the last time I checked.


David, maybe you should go check out this band. They are a 4 person band - one female and 3 males. At one time they had 2 female mebers, but the decision wa smade to make the second female leave due to her age (too young in the other member's opinions to be touring).

25 (Editor Note - Post Number)
Nelson Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 5:17 am
Sounds like she's been reading the Scum Manifesto.
http://gos.sbc.edu/s/solanas.html

And yes, this is another good example of how society tolerates hatred of males in a way it would never tolerate hatred of women, blacks or gays. This woman should be thrown into jail along with all the other psychos, at the very least she should never be allowed to have male children.
One word nelson aka porky -RAP!!!

28 (Editor Note - Post Number)
David M Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 7:55 am
I get sooo tired of these immature women. They have been convinced that they don't "need " men. Most women can't last 24 hours without a man.

Stop living in your fantasy land sisters.


And how do you propose to live without women? Oh yeah I remember - surrogacy - slavery of women in order to continue YOUR lineage...

30 (Editor Note - Post Number)
peter Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 8:15 am
In the eyes of the Feminist Court we are Human Debris. When this "Debris" cannot pay child support due to excessive child support, no contact with my children and the weight of the Divorce Industry then I am "Wanted" in the worst way. Hyprocrites, thieves, liars, and lawyers. I may be exiled from this country but the truth will stand for me.......someday.


One dumb question here, peter....What does seeing your children have to do with paying your support? We women are told over and over like a mantra to our brains, you MUST allow dad to see the kids, whether he pays support or not. Why is it again, something that is good for the gander is NOT good for the goose? Or could it be that you are simply too angry and REFUSE to pay support? You state yourself you are in 'exile'....

32 (Editor Note - Post Number)
jeana Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 11:04 am
I’m sorry, Robert Franklin, I must have missed which feminist commentators praised this song. Could you point me to them?

And I would expect some kind of comparison to the violent, misogynistic lyrics that are in rap music. I guess what’s good for the gander is good for the goose. Or is can only guys sing about raping and beating (and who knows what else) girls?
Woohoooo I knew jeana would not be long before posting to this thread. Well I will fall to the standrads laid down by these men and completely fulfill their expectation with this....
YOU GO GIRL!!!
LMAO :-)

34 (Editor Note - Post Number)
jake steed Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 11:23 am
JEANNA

the point is that if a male wrote this song there will be an outcry from feminists.
the point is that why cant you feminists take things easy sometimes and stop bitching about stupid things.

because feminists bitch about stupid things it means men have to do it too to have EQUALITY.

for instance 99.9% of men dont give a fuck about those "boys are stupid....throw rocks at them" because we can take things easy.

but if it were "girls are sissies ...hit them with bricks" then there will be an outrage from the feministas.

if they take things easy there will be no REACTIONARY bitching about stupid things on glen sacks

and

35 (Editor Note - Post Number)
jerry Says:

January 10th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Jeana, perhaps no stated support for this song, but we have definitely seen lots of support for

Boys are stupid throw rocks at them

and of course, that wonderful old chestnut:

A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.

Not much support for the song menocide itself, but there seems to be lots of support, cheers, booyahs, for women expressing the concept behind the song...


how much longer do we need to hear about the "Boys are Stpuid" product line? As a mother of male and female chidlren, I would never allow any of my children to wear such garbage. A parent that does is not looking out for their child's best interests. I do not like those products and most women I know concerned over abusive men gaining rights through family court by using techniques such as named on many MRA wesbites would not allow their chidlren to wear or own any of these products.

We have reached 38 posts as of this writing. I will display all new women hating comments below as updates until there are no longer any new posts.

enter