NCP Moms - a rarely discussed topic

Doug Says:

July 28th, 2009 at 4:40 pm
Trisha,

I do sympathize with your plight, as much as I sympathize with any one (male or female) in this situation. Bad people come in both genders.

But this is equality....why should you be treated differently? Are you saying you should be?

I read the article and in no place did I see her ask to be treated differently. I saw her say that men are not the only ones to go through this issue. I know many women who are on the verge of homelessness or those who are there. Yet when "society" looks at these moms, they must be unfit monsters. They are not. They are many times women who have issues that could be fixed (like Spears) or in most cases, they have battled against an abusive ex-partner and LOST. And the NCM's who have lost ahve something else to bear, the children have lost too.

Armageddon Says:

July 28th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
Trisha-

NC Moms are like men with breast cancer. Same problem, tiny percentage of those who suffer from the condition.

However, unlike male breast cancer, NC Moms often don't have as severe of a condition. (If I remember correctly) less than half of NC Mothers are ordered to pay CS. When they are ordered, it's often a lower amount. From anecdotal evidence, I've seen mothers who are behind in CS get lenient treatment compared to men with arrears.

Okay lets examine this statistic posed by Armageddon. According to http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_1X_What_are_the_key_statistics_for_male_breast_cancer_28.asp, there were 1910 diagnosed cases of breast cancer in the US. Now how many diagnosed cases are there of NCM's? According to http://www.brainchildmag.com/essays/spring2009_read.asp there are over 2.2 million NCM's in the US. Hmmm that sort of puts your little comparison in doubt now doesn;t it Armageddon?

And here we have the ever-present "doubter":

Lewis Says:

July 28th, 2009 at 8:46 pm
I hate to be the cynic here and I'm certainly sorry for Trisha's plight but I have to ask if 'Trisha' is an alias? I can't help but wonder if she might have a more traditionally masculine appellation and got snagged because some bureaucrat thought she was male.

I'm also curious as to how many men may have been got up in the burst of energy that netted Trisha. Mostly this sort of thing comes as part of a big effort by the bureaucracy to crack down on the 'deadbeats' doesn't it?

Hmmm I wonder if his name was Tom would we be having this conversation Lewis?

And here we have more woman hate from Armageddon:

Armageddon Says:

July 29th, 2009 at 10:00 am
i find this hilarious because I've heard it a lot usually from the same people who claim that family courts are gender neutral

Isn't cognitive dissonance a wonderful thing? ;)

The courts are gender neutral, but there is no way a mother would lose custody unless she was really unfit!

Either they are holding two opposing beliefs as true, or their definition of "gender neutral" means women are superior to men.

You notice he does exactly as the NCM's say? Well if she lost the kids, she was unfit.

Or how about this (now we know again that this IS All about child support):

Burke Says:

July 29th, 2009 at 1:32 pm
...I myself am fairly lucky now that my kids are getting older, and are spending more time with me. I get them more then 50% of the time in the summer and vacations i get them plus every second week-end. I'm not sure what that works out to as a % but my payments sure don't change in the summer thats for sure.

Burke your time in the summer is already figured into the child support calculations. Also the need for the chidlren to have a home does not magically "go away" just because they are visiting you.

And last but not least, the ultimate "she must be bad, this never happens to women cry - the one these men are so damned good at:

DC Wornock Says:

August 6th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
The story is an obvious fabrication. It is not possible for that to have happened to a woman.

Cancers who has it worse? Or otherwise entitled - lets hate on women some more.

Gunner Retired Says:

August 16th, 2009 at 4:24 am

....And do not insult me by inferring I do not have grounds to be upset, or by accusing me of having 'anger management issues' because I appear more than "well gee wally, that's swell" over what I've been entreated to.

My daughter was STOLEN from me.

My daughters college tuition fund was STOLEN from me.

My savings and investments and retirement annuity were STOLEN ftom me.

My ability to provide for any family I might wish to try to start again was STOLEN from me.

My good reputation was STOLEN from me.

Shall we discuss my dignity and self respect?

And you speak of "what's fair"?

And do excuse me please if I don't boo fooking hoo over your womens plight.

Gunner Retired

Your daughter is not just YOUR daughter. She also has a mother. Are you leaving anything out? Like maybe this child WANTS to be with her mom? Girls need a female figure to look up to, and maybe this female child decided it was time to be with mom. And wah wah wah you got no child support? Seems from your post HERE that you make twice what she does. And here we go again with I said this happened so it did and it does not matter what she says, because we all know all women lie all the time. Yeah okay GR go cry a river, build a bridge, and get the hell over it already.

Now for the readers who are wondering what the original article concerns, it is about women's cancer funding for breast, ovarian, and cervical cancerS (yes that is more than one kind of cancer) versus the funding for male prostate cancer (one cancer). So lets see now, the types of cancers that affect women can hit at generally any age after puberty, and prostate cancer hits in middle age. Women's cancers affect child bearing, wheras prostate cancer victims/survivors are generally past child producing stages.

The older you are, the greater the risk for getting prostate cancer. The remarkably sharp increase in incidence with age is a hallmark of the disease. Sixty percent of all newly diagnosed cases and almost 80 percent of all deaths occur in men 70 years of age and older.

From 1998 to 2002, the median age at diagnosis was 68 years. The percentages of people diagnosed with prostate cancer based on age were as follows:

0.0 percent were diagnosed under age 20
0.0 percent between 20 and 34
0.5 percent between 35 and 44
8.3 percent between 45 and 54
26.9 percent between 55 and 64
37.0 percent between 65 and 74
22.6 percent between 75 and 84
4.7 percent 85+ years of age.

Compare to the breast cancer stats:

Approximately 0.0% were diagnosed under age 20;
1.9% between 20 and 34;
10.5% between 35 and 44;
22.5% between 45 and 54;
23.7% between 55 and 64;
19.6% between 65 and 74;
16.2% between 75 and 84;
and 5.5% 85+ years of age.

Now how about cervical cancer:

Approximately 0.2% were diagnosed under age 20;
14.9% between 20 and 34;
26.2% between 35 and 44;
23.5% between 45 and 54;
15.8% between 55 and 64;
10.4% between 65 and 74;
6.6% between 75 and 84;
and 2.5% 85+ years of age.

Here we see that women under the age of 20 are being diagnosed with cervical cancer - hear that UNDER 20!!!! And almost half of all cervical cancer cases (41.3 percent) were diagnosed in women who were still in childbearing stage. Couple that to men at .5 percent - 1/2 of one percent.

Now on with the last one - ovarian cancer - one that will directly affect childbearing more so than cervical cancer. For those men who need a science lesson, this is where our HALF of the genetic material for those beautiful children comes from. Yes we donate one half, you dimwits!!!

Approximately 1.3% were diagnosed under age 20;
3.5% between 20 and 34;
7.4% between 35 and 44;
18.9% between 45 and 54;
22.3% between 55 and 64;
19.9% between 65 and 74;
19.0% between 75 and 84;
and 7.6% 85+ years of age.

Again we have 12.2 percent of all diagnosis are made in child bearing years and women under 20 are affected AGAIN!!!! Men truly do not become affected by prostate cancer until the age of 45. If precautions are taken and MEN get over there I am he-man attitudes and go to their doctors for the exam (oh yeah lets not get into THAT conversation) chances are excellent that discovery will be made at an early point in time. Many of the survivors of prostate cancer implore men to get THE exam, they say they did not.

Okay now that we have seen more female hatred in full swing, lets move on.

Woman hate/Man hate?

Now this is quite ironic. Over "there" you will on ocassion see a post about a comic strip and how that comic strip is anti-male displaying hatred or bias towards men. Feminists (much like myself) have yet to fall into that trap. But I just thought I would show you an example of woman bashing in a comic. The only difference with mens rights activists and feminists regarding these cartoons? Men get their panties in a knot over them. Feminists can laugh at them and themselves. I know I can.

Anyway, here is the link to the cartoon. Hope you enjoy it like I did!

Oh and note to the "offended" MRA's..... GET OVER YOURSELF!!!!

Atilla wants a time machine back to 1918 or even before

Simply read this clear and convincing proof of how much Atilla HATES, DESPISES women. He wants to keep us loked up, not allowed to have a voice. I wonder if he expects his children to be seen and not heard as well. Actually I know the answer to that question... He expects his children (notice the male form of that pronoun - they are HIS not THEIRS) to only speak when he says they can. Like in forced interviews so he can show how awful his ex (their MOTHER btw) is. Anyway that is another post (yep Atilla I want you to keep coming back so just hold your horses, you will enjoy it when it comes out). Here is his most recent anti-woman vomit:

Attila L. Vinczer Says:

July 18th, 2009 at 8:36 pm
I think the day women got the right to vote is the day the slippery slope of injustice against males began! Clearly women abuse power and authority without batting an eye or feeling any sense of remorse.........

Attila

So Atilla, am I to assume this means you would like to go back to when women could NOT vote? Never mind, I know you will just upchuck more hatred at us - the gentle gender.

TWAT Bob - who is he?

Well I promised you and I deliver on my promises. Now prepare to be amused, disgusted and more lmao!!!!! You may have noticed that I highlighted over several posts the anti-woman hate speech of TWAT Bob. I know you may have wondered as well as me - OMG Petunia, is this woman hater close to me? Do I need to worry about my family being exposed to this character? Is he part of my family. Well Petunia hopes to lay those worries and fears to rest. TWAT Bob exposed at your servcie. I recently searched for TWAT Bob and thanks to his massive internet tracks, Petunia has some "stuff" to share with you.

First I wonder if "The Secret Naturist Society" knows of TWAT Bob's beliefs? From their website:

A naturist loves to enjoy the many splendours of the great outdoors without being hampered by wearing clothing. The secret naturist does so as well, yet adds the element of stealth from other human eyes. The secret naturist has been with us for many years but few people are even aware of their existence. This is most probably due to the secretive and furtive nature, keeping well concealed within the cover of dense woodland or even under cover of darkness, and only venturing out when confident of being alone and not being observed. It is also believed that the secret naturist could, in fact, be relatively common through out the all parts of the world but a distinct lack of official sightings and reports prevents any firm guess at the true numbers.

The availability of the internet has proven by far to be the best way of learning about the secret naturist. By communicating using electronic means such as community forums, anonymity can be assured yet ideas and tales, hints & tips and other information can be shared freely without any risk of discovery.


This website, The Secret Naturist Society, takes an in-depth look at the elusive and often cunning world and lifestyle of the secret naturist. It draws on many sources and includes contributions from active secret naturists, historical literature and also on the webmasters own experiences of many years of secret naturism. Many sources have been difficult to substantiate and some could be said to be the stuff of legends, though it is said a legend is often based on real facts somewhere in the mists of time.




Aims & Directives


Most websites have a specific purpose and The Secret Naturist Society is no different. It's main purpose is to act as an information resource on the subject of secret naturism and also to be a contact point for secret naturists themselves who wish to communicate their experiences and ideas to others.

Since the site was first launched in October 1999, the original very secretive approach has changed slightly over the years as the site developed, changed hands, and grew. The inspiration for this site sprang from a book called The Nudist Way by David Martin, which is generally about nude rambling in the countryside. It could almost be described as a companion guide to The Secret Naturist Society and has a more open and less secretive approach than this website. This led to wondering, perhaps there is a better way of doing things, out in the open, almost going public as it were but still holding to the general principles of the secret naturist.

In light of this we’ve decided to be more open and honest about our secret naturist activities and to make less use of secret, secluded locations and to come out into the open. Instead of hiding or slipping away when approached by non-naturists, an approach of contact and discussion will be implemented if the situation allows.

This website will continue to be as originally intended, about secret naturism but will also encourage a more open approach to nudity. However, this does not mean that social nudity or "normal" naturism is the ultimate goal, secret naturism will always be the main aim and objective of this website.

The Secret Naturist Society is nurtured by individuals around the world with the common interest of being naked in the great outdoors and the Societies prime directives and aims are set out below.

The prime directives of the Society are:

- to achieve total nudity in everyday locations.
- to remain undiscovered at all times.

The principle aims of the Society are:

- to provide a friendly and open forum to share thoughts, experiences, feelings and tips on the subject of secret naturism.
- to provide support and encouragement to both new and experienced secret naturists who wish to develop their secret naturist skills further.
- to push the boundaries of secret naturism to the highest level possible yet still keeping within the prime directives.
- to develop new skills, methods and other ways and means of achieving safe total nudity.


If any or all of the above apeals to you, please take this opportunity to join the Secret Naturist Society. Registration is totally free and is only required to ensure a safe, friendly environment for all our members. A valid email address is required in order to recieve your personal password to gain access to this site, and to retrieve it in the future should you forget your password. Your email address will be used for no other purpose and will not end up on some spammers mailing list.


Posted on Monday, June 30

WARNING BELOW:

WARNING BELOW:

WARNING BELOW:

WARNING BELOW:

WARNING BELOW:



Or how about this screenshot:



Bob has a Flickr as well.

Let's not forget the infamous Stand Your Ground website either. Posts made by Bob: 172 and he is generally available between the hours of 9am and 12 noon. Hmm makes one think - does TWAT Bob have a job? Oh yeah he is "retired" lol. Guess that leaves him plenty of time to expose himself huh? And what does Bob contribute to Stand Your Ground?

Bobx23456
Member

Posts: 172


Re: Unbelievable dinner conversation
« Reply #35 on: January 29, 2008, 08:48:27 PM »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote from: Rusty Shackleford on January 29, 2008, 05:57:30 PM
what the fuck does OJ have to do with anything in the first place
why bring him up at all


OJ Stood his ground and ended up with custody of his minor children. He should be a model to us all.

Logged

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Catch more of The World According to Bob at: http://bobstruth.blogspot.com

It's time for men to retake our natural and age old leadership position.

And what else does TWAT Bob have to say on Stand Your Ground?

Links to the most outrageous:

OJ Comment

OJ Comment

Child Comment

About Daughters Comment

Another OJ Comment

Complete List of TWAT Bob Comments

Okay I am growing weary of SYG. Let's move to something else interesting about TWAT Bob.

TWAT Bob may still and at one time belonged to AUM (American Union of Men).

Screenshot:




From the main page of AUM:

This is a discussion area for all issues pertaining to the Men's Movement, with special emphasis on Anti-Feminism, Masculism, Brotherhood . The moderator is the founder of the American Union of Men (AUM) with an orientation that is masculist, religious, and politically liberal on non feminist issues. We have no delusions about the evil nature of feminism. Anything resembling feminism is quickly put on moderated status. Legitimate feminist critiques are welcomed, but need to be tightly controlled due to the nature of the list. Please feel free to join and participate or just read about the issues. Tom Smith (QIM) President of the American Union of Men (AUM) Yahoo Profile: http://profiles.yahoo.com/qim PHOTO ON RIGHT of Phil Hendrie, comic genius on the radio from 7-10PM, and Ann Coulter, conservative talking head.

YAWN!!!!! AUM is more of the same ol' same ol' spews from disturbed individuals. Let's move on....

Now for the good stuff lol. Bob apprently has issues.... He can't seem to find a woman..... See his "ad" HERE.

Screenshot:



I am sure you get the picture here. In case you want more woman hate go to google and type in bobx23456. 23,700 results await you!!!!

Enjoy? have fun with this little expose and have a great day!!!!

UPDATE: OMG My poor poor readers!!!!!! I realized I left out the most important part!!!! Where oh where in this big huge world does TWAT Bob lay his head? Look no further gentle readers, Petunia is here to save the day:

DRMUROLL PLEASE!!!!!!

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
SPOKANE WASHINGTON USA!!!!!

Be wary Spookane Washington residents!!!!!

TWAT Bob at it again - this time blaming moms for single mothers

Bob said...
Note to anonymous:
We will never know how many because fathers no longer have any legal rights to decide about our children at all.

Before feminism ruined it, we once had an common arrangement for men to take care of women who were the mothers of our children. It was called "marriage." Feminism destroyed marriage. The failure of young women to find a husband to take care of her child is the fruit of feminist hate. A young pregnant single female has only her evil hate mongering mothers to blame.

June 23, 2009 5:27 AM

Bob did you ever stop to think that maybe there is another reason for single moms. Man in jail perhaps? Man has died or been killed? MAN IS NO GOOD? I guess all evils in this world are to be blamed on woman in Bob's eyes. He once was amusing but now Petunia feels sorry for Bob. Stay tuned for more on Bob. Apparently law enforcement has discovered his little corner of the world. (Petunia rocks back and forth on her heels whistling looking around to see who just might be responsible for that). NO!!!! Petunia will take full credit for that!!!! Enough of standing in the background, looking to the man for "PERMISSION" to act. I am an adult and am fully capable of making a decision and acting. Watch yourself BOB!!!! Petunia is watching you. And she will call again should the need arise.

Welcome to the "group" Lisa

20
NE Says:

May 28th, 2009 at 4:26 pm
Lisa Says:
May 28th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

Hi Lisa, welcome to the group!
I HIGHLY, HIGHLY recommend you read the book Legalizing Misandry, it really is a must read.

Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Discrimination Against Men

http://www.amazon.com/Legalizing-Misandry-Systemic-Discrimination-Against/dp/0773528628

I welcome you, gentle readers, to click the link above leading to amazon. Read the description of this book.

Product Description
Lurid and sensationalized events such as the public response to Lorena Bobbitt after she cut off her abusive husband's penis, prurient fascination provoked by Anita Hill's allegations about Clarence Thomas, and the exploitation of the mass murder of fourteen women in Montreal have been processed through popular culture since the 1990s to produce pervasive misandry - contempt for men, the counterpart of misogyny. Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young believe that this reveals a shift in the United States and Canada to a worldview based on ideological feminism, which presents all issues from the point of view of women and, in the process, explicitly or implicitly attacks men as a class. They argue that ideological feminism is silently reshaping law, pubic policy, education, and journalism. "Legalizing Misandry" offers lively and compelling evidence to demonstrate the pervasiveness of this new thinking - from the courts, classrooms, government committees, and corporate bureaucracies to laws and policies affecting employment, marriage, divorce, custody, sexual harassment, violence, and human rights.

Now scroll down to see what other "books" are "recommended" reading for someone looking at this particular book?

The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism is Harming Our Young Men
That BITCH: Protect Yourself Against Women With Malicious Intent
The Rantings of a Single Male
Taken Into Custody
The Myth of Male Power

So in these 5 books here we have at least 3 mainstream "men's rights" authors. We have one which degrades women (THAT BITCH?!?!?!). Two of the authors have less than stellar motives (one has actively tried to advocate for pedophile rights and the other hates child support). Need I say any more?

If all else fails resort to blackmail

Brian Says:

February 27th, 2009 at 2:46 pm
The best thing I ever did was get a vasectomy. I make six figures a year. It’s unbelevable how pissed off women get when they discover they can’t “forget” their birth control and get a paycheck out of me. I learned the hard way. I was married young, had a baby with my ex and divorced when she started running around. I was lucky since we had joint custody; only because I had a private detective follow her and take pictures going into motels with her various boyfriends. She was gearing up to rape me financially until I showed her the pictures and threatened to give copies to all of her family and friends. All of a sudden she wanted me back.

She wanted you back because she could not trust you - after all who could trust someone who would resort to blackmail. If you are seperated she has the right to live her life. I am sure you were not leading the life of a priest. Again more goose gander stuff goin' on here folks.

And may I add, I will NEVER run out of material at this rate. I am so backlogged it is unreal. I could make this a full time job and still never get caught up on the blatant mysogyny of these men.

JeanB geez why don't you flush your spews instead of typing them out

You would sure use much less internet space and that is where they belong....

4
JeanB Says:

May 2nd, 2009 at 10:31 am
...So when people say that CPS investigates all allegations I tell them “BS”. They will investigate if mom says dad is abusing, but they can’t be bothered when it’s dad who reports mom because “why would a mother do such a thing?”

I’m with Mister-M, she needs to…………well, what he said.

And for those wondering Mister M was extremely crude (thankfully only using the first letters of each word but enough so readers cvan get the point. Why don't you BOTH do what Mister M suggested?

As far as CPS picking and choosing whose allegations to investigate, I know of several women who have been investigated. One had allegations of physical abuse called in on her. These were promptly added to upon CPS arrival to sexual abuse (both of which were unfounded but caused this woman to have to uproot herself and the children). I know of another case in which the FATHER alleged physical abuse by the motehr's boyfriend. Even managed to get one of his crony friends to call that one in. One problem with that issue - mother had NO boyfriend. CPS still investigated. I know of many other CPS investigations, I would share but confidentiality requests demand I not share, unless those people feel comfortable in doing so. I know of many cases also in the reverse whereby school officials and others have called in neglect or abuse complaints on the father (typically custodial - although I know of several non-custodial cases as well) and those were IGNORED. So go spout (or in this case) flush your shit talk down the drain. Shit belongs in a toilet, not on a blog. BuhBYE!!!!

Phil Leigh must need new reading lessons

In his comments on balls websites he states this:

8
Phil Leigh Says:

April 26th, 2009 at 3:27 pm
One annoying irony is that it remains politically correct to teach that girls mature faster than boys. Yet when boys do wrong they are invariably punished more severely than girls even though girls should have better judgment owing to their (presumed) more rapid maturity.

Actually Phil, maturity is based on several criteria. Emotional and psychological maturity are not identical across the board. This is why you can have a group of 15 year olds and all will be at different levels of maturity (physical, mental and emotional). Some of these 15 year olds are responsible enough to be left to care for younger chidlren. Others quite frankly are not. You also have differing levels of physicall maturity with several factors deciding on when a child will reach complete maturity. It has also been shown that boys mature quicker than girls on a physical level. You also have varying degrees of that also.

One simply cannot base anything on a blanket statement. This is why many so-called "feminists" have an issue with the MRA/FR type. On nearly every forum/blog/message board available to the MRA you see blanket misogyny. This is yet another case of - oh I was screwed over by one woman, so all women are bad, even female children are bad; men are good, there are no bad men, and boys are good since they have an appendage hanging between their legs and are by virtue - male.

There are bad men, there are bad women, sadly society is comprised of individuals who are less than perfect. We rely on some of these less than perfect individuals to mete out punishment for crimes. Sometimes they get it, sometimes they don't.

So Phil, next time why don't you think before you post in the future. To make such blanket statements does not bode well for your cause.

JeanB must have a very low IQ or.... well I guess there really is NO excuse for her stupidity

First TF who is one of the cult followers (and a regular one at that since he has been featured here before) makes remarks about a woman's appearance. Again this is one of the signs/symptoms of a controlling and angry man (verbal abuse). Second he is on an angry MRA/FR blog forum (sign #2). We must watch for further comments and see if sign #3 exists (wife accused me of abuse and stole my house, my car, my kids, and my money). If sign #3 exists then Petunia can just about guarantee he is an abusive person. Only way to figure this fact out quicker would be to deduce TF's identity and then do a search for his court records. Petunia doesn't waste her time on that though. Before deducing several of the cult members' identities she always guessed correctly as to their nature.

Well after TF insult Marcia Pappas, JeanB then gets into the fray by throwing out insults as only a woman colluder can. She appears to be insulting herself while all the while she is insulting Ms. Pappas.

Well JeanB, you say you are overweight due to being in your 40's and having had how many children? One? Well I have had multiple children (close to the octomom before the babies arrived) and I am not fat, not considered overweight and I am alsio in my 40's. In fact as a mom to an overweight child, feel the insults you are putting out to anyone who is overweight. Having children a long time ago does not make you overweight. Being over a certain age does not make you overweight. You become overweight when your metabolism slows down, when you do not eat properly and when you do not get the right combinations of food, vitamins and exercise.

So take your veiled insults and shove them where the sun don't shine (or better yet - send them down the drain in our flush-o-matic).

14
TF Says:

March 29th, 2009 at 9:49 pm
I've met Pappas and she is a very obese feminist who at my last meeting took and standing in front of me fed her fat face with three cream filled doughnuts from those provided by the fathers group at a legislative meeting. Her problem with men is her extreme obesity. Men are not responsible for her obesity.
Obesity is not an excuse for misandry and Pappas' cadre of feminist psychopath bimbos deserve no respect. Pappas is the poster child for a NOW feminist and the reason for their misandry..

16
JeanB Says:

March 29th, 2009 at 10:05 pm
#14, TF, as much as I am busting out laughing right now, shame on you for picking on the poor woman for her disorder. That’s what obesity is, yes? And we know that disorders are never one’s own fault.

And before anyone jumps all over me, I am about 25 or so pounds heavier than I should be. And yes, it is my own fault. But hey, I have a kid and am over 40. Such is life.

ROTFLMAO!

License to Kill? Not likely.....

23
IG Says:

March 29th, 2009 at 9:11 am
You could have the nicest husband and kill him in cold blood and just say "domestic violence" and walk.

Yep, the courts pretty much give them a liscense to kill....

So IG explain to me then why a woman who was abused (numerous people testified about this and this was during the time when abuse was NOT recognized) was tried for a murder that she did not commit - her husband committed this murder - was found guilty and was thrown in jail for 29 years!!!! Click Here to read more about Connie Keel.

Judge using his power on the bench incorrectly?

[2] Even for law-related organizations, a judge should consider whether the membership and purposes of the organization, or the nature of the judge’s participation in or association with the organization, would conflict with the judge’s obligation to refrain from activities that reflect adversely upon a judge’s independence, integrity, and impartiality.

RULE 1.2: Promoting Confidence in the Judiciary

A judge shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the independence,* integrity,* and impartiality* of the judiciary, and shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety.

Now how is it possible for a judge to perform fully under these rules of ethics when they give father's rights speeches to auditoriums filled with men. This same judge refuses (or maybe just hasn't done so yet) to give these same speeches to mothers, instead this judge routinely removes children more and more from the mothers lives, handing over more and more control to - you guessed it - the controlling and abusive ex-husbands.

Now the abused mom who is directly under the auspices of this judge knows who she is and I apologize for how long it took to post this. I sincerely hope that this judge will be removed from her case soon and her parenting time with her chidlren will be restored in an unsupervised manner.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH PEOPLE - GET WITH THE GAME!!!!!

Episodic Illogicality?

Okay now I HAVE heard it all.....Might I add here that the entire website on which this was written is HATE SPEECH?

46
Norman L. Says:

February 6th, 2009 at 11:12 pm
JeanB,

In "defense" of the men here (though I know you're not attacking us), some of us have "episodic illogicality". Also in a sense we are free to rant here, as long as there's not anything like hate speech and we are within blog rules.