RICH!!! Biscuit Queen and Birth Control

I have only one thing to say before posting the picture and text below.

Biscuit Queen - how about the fact that the WOMAN gets pregnant, the WOMAN'S body changes over the course of 9 months (give or take), the WOMAN is the one risking HER life to give birth to the child. HOW ABOUT THEM APPLES? I AM SO EXTREMELY DISGUSTED THAT THIS CLAPTRAP IS COMING FROM A WOMAN. OBVIOUSLY YOU HAVE NEVER GIVEN BIRTH OR YOU MUST REALLY THINK MEN ARE SUPERIOR.

It is not the man who will undergo changes during the 9 months of pregnancy and the lifetime afterward (her physical changes - not the fact she is now a mother). Pregnancy and childbirth change a woman and is hard on HER body.

YES!!! HER BODY, not HIS.

Why is everything the responsibility of the woman? Why should she have to worry whether he has birth control or not. By the very act of consenting to have sex with anyone you are saying you know pregnancy can result. If you don;t want that don't do it.

Even if he did walk away, how is that any different than the mother putting the child up for adoption??

There needs to be a way for men to fairly have the right women already have, which is deciding not to become a parent between conception and birth. The "old keep your pants on" is not an answer, nor is the "use birth control"; if these are not good reasons to stop abortion or adoption by women, it should not be used to shame men. I am so tired of these double standards.

More on the Stand Your Ground debate

I find this most amusing. They have a website which is for the most part public. They publish many statements that could and do upset people. And then they have the audacity to be angry when they are called on it? Hmmm that makes logical sense to me.

So to carry on with the Biscuit Queen/SYG/Teri Stoddard/Patriarchy and other items post this is where we are.

I never knew this but they have another entire post dedicated to little ol' me. Just a poor widdle piggy trying to highlight abuse. This post is all about how awful I am. Okay........................



First I have never said that all women are good and all men are evil. That would be kind of defeating our purpose wouldn't you say? I have ever (and will stand by it) that in considering amount of time spent with children, that men are and always will be more prone to abusing children than women. I would like for you to point out exactly where I said men are evil, women are good (all of them). Duh you cannot.





Now Captain Courageous is coming to the rescue. he seems to think he knows who I am. Hahahahahahaha not even close fool.



Poor poor widdle Johm Dias. Wrong again. You fools, keep trying.



And if I was a lesbian what is wrong with that Quentin Durrstein? I am not but that is beside the point. Who cares if I am or not? I am however all about exposing all of the MRA's stupidity in all of its finest glory.



How do I edit your posts? When I post screen shots and links (I quit that however because most of my readers feel safe here and can keep up to date on the stupid MRA movement). I also do not "edit" any of your comments on here. If I don't like the post it will hit file 13. This is my blog and you will all follow my rules when you come here. If you do not you will not be commenting here. I will not trigger abused women and children with your foolish statements.

Oh and John you can quit your whining, you are here now.

Stalking? You have got to be kidding me!

So Petunia is being accused of stalking now. Wowsers! I simply research "protective mother" issues and when I find the garbage posted by the MRA lunatic fringe faction (and yes they are a faction - a group of people forming a minority within a larger body, esp a dissentious group)

, I expose that here. With that said, I posted quite a few months back on "The Patriarchy". I have since received this comment (amazingly enough it landed in SPAM click small picture to view large one, it will open in a new window):




Now why should I "communicate" with her when I had attempted to do so on Glenn Sacks website many times and I was ignored or villified? So guess what "Biscuit Queen"? I see blatant hatred, stupidity, and mother-hate and it will be posted. Have a problem with that? take it up elsewhere. Next time I will dig a little deeper and come up with more. Oh and since I am at it, there is already one comment on here speaking about your participation in Glenn Sacks' website. Why you not asking her to explain herself or communicate with you?


Things that make you go hmmmmmmm.......

More evidence of where the FReaks priorities lie (not with the child - in case you thought otherwise)

Accordingly, I've 'lost' my case and I had the privilege of paying $1000 to her local lawyer, beside paying some $2500 to my jerk of a lawyer.

That's when I quit my well-paying job; I've figured that as long as I have money, they're going to do their best to detach as much of it off me as they can. After that nobody harrassed me...

http://standyourground.com/forums/index.php?PHPSESSID=56bfbc1f126367dcd3abc6e3841ec6ce&topic=19657.msg207929#msg207929

Biscuit Queen AKA Jen from SYG

I tried warning her yet she paid no mind. Now you can click on any of these links:

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_10.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_6812.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_1470.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_641.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_6288.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_5424.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_358.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_1907.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_7891.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_5605.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_9377.html

Or perhaps even go here: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ThePatriarchy/ to see just how BQ aka Jen views her own sex. She will subject herself to denigration in the name of father's rights - just like her cohort Teri Stoddard. We even have a small picture of her (possibly).



Hmmm she is with a man here. One must wonder if she is a standing member of the second wives club? Oh and for one last perusal you really should look to this post on SYG where she plays suck up to one of the crazies who has decided that nobody will listen to him so their little club should just delete his account. What outdoors - you can't figure it out on your own how to delete your account? You have to make some public display of oh woe is me so everyone will feel sorry for you? Or do you truly not know how to operate a computer? I think we should start a "I do not know how to operate a computer and I am a angry man who used to beat my wife and kids" club. Oh wait they already have several of those online - they are just disguised as "My wife left me and hates all men so I will post online as a man who is hated by women" club or even better they are disgguised as "I beat my wife because she would not do what I told her to do and she defended herself so now I am a victim" club. Their names are:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Do I really need to post the names? I think all of my readers are computer literate and can figuse out what boards and forums I am talking about.

Oh and be looking for more information on this Biscuit Queen - a preliminary search of Google has turned up quite a bit of material :-)

Captain Courageous aka Santo Christoforo MD

What's your beef about me,
What's your beef about me, you lying sack of fecal matter?

Submitted by Capt. Courageous on March 23, 2010 - 2:29pm.

MzPiggyWiggy:Stop using my
MzPiggyWiggy:



I know no one by the name of Irving. You have very obviously gone off the deep end.



Stop using my name on this board!

Submitted by Capt. Courageous on March 23, 2010 - 3:03pm.

Yet we have his own words on this board from SYG:

Link to comment HERE

Here's my contribution. My reactions are in bold type.

This article is fallacy-ridden! Shame on you!
"However, recent research shows that some men sabotage women’s use of birth control and some use coercion to get a woman pregnant. Abusive men use these tactics to control women." What recent research?

"We are actually witnessing an erosion of protections of women and children in abusive relationships. In this article, I examine the ways in which policies that reflect social biases painting women as “vindictive” liars, combine with the efforts of both alleged abusers to fight to regain control of their wives and children and fathers’ rights proponents are harming women and children trying to escape abuse. No, I'm afraid you did not examine social biases, assuming they are social biases in the first place!

When and where and how did Jay Silverman become such an expert?

Who, besides him, makes the same assertions you make?

Since when do several anecdotes amount to conclusive proof of anything, much less social biases?

"Thanks to the aid of the Internet, (mostly) men that make claims of being falsely accused or alienated find support, encouragement and targets for their anger -- which is aimed at their exes, or women in general and feminists in particular. Individuals and groups that promote studies referring to domestic violence as 50-50 or “mutual” also find supporters within this crowd. Many of these claims are based on studies that rely on self-reportage or pick up common couple violence. Their limitations include using self-report; not picking up severe violence or homicide; not putting violence into context (was it used for self-defense?); and not including violence during separation (the most dangerous time for a woman). What the promotion of these studies has done is introduce the element of doubt. If you combine this with women’s low credibility (due to societal bias and the biases of the legal system), you have danger." You must prove that these are flawed studies, not just slip the accusation into your article and proceed from there!

Submitted by Santo Christoforo MD on March 18, 2010 - 7:37pm.

You can very plainly see that Captain Courageous on SYG says the post made by Santo Christoforo MD are his, yet he goes on RHReality article and slams me with the profanity laced comments he has made? Tsk tsk tsk....

Reproductive Rights, Parental Rights and Family Violence

The memebrs of SYG are in an uproar. What about you might ask? This article (Reproductive Rights, Parental Rights and Family Violence) about Family Violence and how it relates to parental rights and family violence. Here is a portion of that article:

When do reproductive rights end? Do they end at birth? Do they continue throughout a child’s life? Do reproductive rights extend to parental rights? These are questions we are just starting to ask. And finding the answer can be, in many cases, the difference between life and death.

One poster at SYG wrote this:

They always wheel out the "battered woman". Who is this woman? She keeps appearing when feminists want to make a point or close down a debate. It's like a kind of Godwin's Law for Feminists. As soon as they mentioned "battered woman", the debate's over. No logic, just an appeal to sympathy toward a hypothetical woman.

Who is the battered woman? She is your mother, your sister, your aunt, your niece, your neighbor, your coworker. She is that woman in the grocery store. She is the cashier ringing up your groceries. She is the mom with her children at the park. She is everywhere.

Then we have the wonderful logic of outdoors on SYG again:

it's the fuckin' courts themselves that promote and create the conflict

what a joke

What an agressive man. Is it any wonder should he have an ex wife and/or chidlren that they are afraid and want protection?

Reading any more of their drivel makes me want to puke so just go to their site should you want any more enlightening. Don't argue with them though, especially if you are a female. That will get them telling you to pull the stick out of your butt (project your fatnasies much guys?) or calling you derogatory remarks like cookie, darling, little princess (I could do a whole post just on the little princess remark). But alas I am bored and must move on to better things right now :-)

No, Gonzman, you are simply amazing (NOT!!!!!)

Gonzman says:
It's amazing how the nagging goes down if you (1) train a woman that if she does it, whatever she's nagging about gets pushed back and lowered in priority, if it is done at all, and (2) If she tries to hold ex back to manipulate you, you'll get it elsewhere.

Sometimes breaking them of this habit hurts, but it is for their own good.

Anything need to be added? Nope - think this says it all......

Why do they not take their own advice?

Siam says:
A dog is not considered a good dog because he is a good barker. A man is not considered a good man because he is a good talker.

So explain to me then Siam, why your fingers keep moving and why you keep spreading your hate everywhere?

Want some advice from Petunia? Quit moving yo dang fingers!!!!!

Breast Cancer Awareness and MRA's

Now this is not something I write about too frequently as I tend to stick to DV issues. However this is near and dear to my heart. I have several FEMALE relatives who have survived breast cancer. I truly do not believe they would have survived had they been diagnosed 40 years ago or even 20 years ago. They would have probably been left disfigured by the mastectomies that would have been ROUTINELY performed. But they survived, they are NOT disfigured, and I still have my wonderful aunts, sisters, and friends because of advances made in breast cancer research and awareness. So what do these MRA's have to say about research?

Gonzman says:
The damn Disease doesn't belong to you, ladies.

We never claimed it BELONGED to us. However if you look at the number of victims and split it down, breast cancer typically strikes almost 5 times as many women and there are almost 10 times as many female deaths of women due to breast cancer.

Mr. X says:
Breast cancer research is ultimately futile at this point. Over 40 years, billions of dollars and what do we know today we didn't know back then?

I am assuming here that you do not know anybody who has had breast cancer? You do not remember (or maybe you are too young and were too drunk or drugged up to remember what breast cancer meant for a woman (or even a man) in the 60's and 70's? It meant for women that they would forever be disfigured. Insurance would in most cases pay for a mastectomy, but they would NOT pay for reconstruction. So women were walking around lopsided and subjected to cruel stares. Sometimes even worse, the words that would follow would be inhumanely cruel. So yeah, Mr. X lets go back to chopping off women's breasts - that is the answer.

bluegrass says:
The problem with breast cancer research now is that it's basically sucking all of the cancer research dollars. That is, because there is sooo much money directed toward it, it's actually taking money AWAY from the study of other cancers.

Do you have figures on this? Point me to an OFFICIAL cancer research website which says they are losing money due to breast cancer sucking it all up? Didn't think so....

dr e says:
I know that NCI gives breast cancer a good deal more $ than they give prostate but I was wondering the other day about the "total" amount of money that goes to breast cancer which would include charitable contributions and govt funding. Anyone know?

If you researched the number of victims of breast cancer (both survivors and those who succumb to the disease) and those of protate cancer, and the fact that if men would simply set their pride aside and get the test done, those who succumb to breast cancer clearly outnumber those to prostate cancer. If the tests are done at the correct time rather than being full of pride due to the nature of the test, prognosis for prostate cancer is very good. In fact according to WHO, breast cancer deaths outnumber prostate cancer deaths nearly 3 to 1.

Mr. X says:
The price point is too high for the return on investment.

I guess the 1.3 MILLION women who will be diagnosed with breast cancer this year do not matter to Mr. X - as long as one of those women is not a friend or family member of his. Petunia thinks he might change his tune then - what do you readers think?

no2fembots says:
Support firearms rights! This is a Men's Rights Issue!!!

Ahhhhhhh Hah!!!! Now we are at the crux of the issue. NOW we are seeing the true light. MRA's want to have issues that are all about power and control. Because if you are holding a gun, then you are IN CONTROL. Mmm hmmmm......

Mr. X says:
I believe 5% to 10% of breast cancer patients are men. What's sad is these guys get no recognition.

Actually I covered it above. Male deaths to female deaths - more than 10 to one.

Okay I guess this about covers it.

SYG - Ya Right! - Like a woman could do this

Posted at SYG on October 10, 2009 link:
Ya Right! - Like a woman could do this

Nice try Goldie-Locks but I don't think so









Head nurse spoke up - she said leave this one alone -I can tell right away he is Bad to the Bone