Captain Courageous at it again

Well well well.....

It seems that my dear old friend Captain Courageous is at it again. Only this time it looks like he cannot read!!! Well coming from someone who has the antiquated belief system of this man and who must take on the role of a super hero when he is anything but SUPER or a HERO, what do we expect? Now you night ask, Petunia what has caused you to stop your cruise around the world to post? Well reading SYG in order to slowly acclimate myself back to the twisted and deluded world of the FReak MRA, I have come across this post from Dear ol' Captain:



Why is this so amazing? Well if you see what the article claims, it is what we alleged "rabid" feminists have been saying all along. Children do better with a male figure but this article also states father or other consistent male role model. Now this is itself is nothing but read on to see what Brian (another 'special' FReak) has to say:



You see they both do not seem to be able to read or comprehend what they have read and they COMPLETELY miss the part that says "other consistent male role model." So the research is as we say. Consistent (which does not mean consistently BAD, it means consistently GOOD) male role model. Someone who is healthy for a child. Someone who does NOT abuse a child. Someone who does NOT abuse the child's mother. Someone who does not iignore court orders (like support orders). So what is Petunia's solution for Brian and Captain Courageous? Welllllllll, maybe one of those good male role models can teach them how to read and comprehend what they have read? That might be a good start......

More on the Stand Your Ground debate

I find this most amusing. They have a website which is for the most part public. They publish many statements that could and do upset people. And then they have the audacity to be angry when they are called on it? Hmmm that makes logical sense to me.

So to carry on with the Biscuit Queen/SYG/Teri Stoddard/Patriarchy and other items post this is where we are.

I never knew this but they have another entire post dedicated to little ol' me. Just a poor widdle piggy trying to highlight abuse. This post is all about how awful I am. Okay........................



First I have never said that all women are good and all men are evil. That would be kind of defeating our purpose wouldn't you say? I have ever (and will stand by it) that in considering amount of time spent with children, that men are and always will be more prone to abusing children than women. I would like for you to point out exactly where I said men are evil, women are good (all of them). Duh you cannot.





Now Captain Courageous is coming to the rescue. he seems to think he knows who I am. Hahahahahahaha not even close fool.



Poor poor widdle Johm Dias. Wrong again. You fools, keep trying.



And if I was a lesbian what is wrong with that Quentin Durrstein? I am not but that is beside the point. Who cares if I am or not? I am however all about exposing all of the MRA's stupidity in all of its finest glory.



How do I edit your posts? When I post screen shots and links (I quit that however because most of my readers feel safe here and can keep up to date on the stupid MRA movement). I also do not "edit" any of your comments on here. If I don't like the post it will hit file 13. This is my blog and you will all follow my rules when you come here. If you do not you will not be commenting here. I will not trigger abused women and children with your foolish statements.

Oh and John you can quit your whining, you are here now.

Captain Courageous aka Santo Christoforo MD

What's your beef about me,
What's your beef about me, you lying sack of fecal matter?

Submitted by Capt. Courageous on March 23, 2010 - 2:29pm.

MzPiggyWiggy:Stop using my
MzPiggyWiggy:



I know no one by the name of Irving. You have very obviously gone off the deep end.



Stop using my name on this board!

Submitted by Capt. Courageous on March 23, 2010 - 3:03pm.

Yet we have his own words on this board from SYG:

Link to comment HERE

Here's my contribution. My reactions are in bold type.

This article is fallacy-ridden! Shame on you!
"However, recent research shows that some men sabotage women’s use of birth control and some use coercion to get a woman pregnant. Abusive men use these tactics to control women." What recent research?

"We are actually witnessing an erosion of protections of women and children in abusive relationships. In this article, I examine the ways in which policies that reflect social biases painting women as “vindictive” liars, combine with the efforts of both alleged abusers to fight to regain control of their wives and children and fathers’ rights proponents are harming women and children trying to escape abuse. No, I'm afraid you did not examine social biases, assuming they are social biases in the first place!

When and where and how did Jay Silverman become such an expert?

Who, besides him, makes the same assertions you make?

Since when do several anecdotes amount to conclusive proof of anything, much less social biases?

"Thanks to the aid of the Internet, (mostly) men that make claims of being falsely accused or alienated find support, encouragement and targets for their anger -- which is aimed at their exes, or women in general and feminists in particular. Individuals and groups that promote studies referring to domestic violence as 50-50 or “mutual” also find supporters within this crowd. Many of these claims are based on studies that rely on self-reportage or pick up common couple violence. Their limitations include using self-report; not picking up severe violence or homicide; not putting violence into context (was it used for self-defense?); and not including violence during separation (the most dangerous time for a woman). What the promotion of these studies has done is introduce the element of doubt. If you combine this with women’s low credibility (due to societal bias and the biases of the legal system), you have danger." You must prove that these are flawed studies, not just slip the accusation into your article and proceed from there!

Submitted by Santo Christoforo MD on March 18, 2010 - 7:37pm.

You can very plainly see that Captain Courageous on SYG says the post made by Santo Christoforo MD are his, yet he goes on RHReality article and slams me with the profanity laced comments he has made? Tsk tsk tsk....

Reproductive Rights, Parental Rights and Family Violence

The memebrs of SYG are in an uproar. What about you might ask? This article (Reproductive Rights, Parental Rights and Family Violence) about Family Violence and how it relates to parental rights and family violence. Here is a portion of that article:

When do reproductive rights end? Do they end at birth? Do they continue throughout a child’s life? Do reproductive rights extend to parental rights? These are questions we are just starting to ask. And finding the answer can be, in many cases, the difference between life and death.

One poster at SYG wrote this:

They always wheel out the "battered woman". Who is this woman? She keeps appearing when feminists want to make a point or close down a debate. It's like a kind of Godwin's Law for Feminists. As soon as they mentioned "battered woman", the debate's over. No logic, just an appeal to sympathy toward a hypothetical woman.

Who is the battered woman? She is your mother, your sister, your aunt, your niece, your neighbor, your coworker. She is that woman in the grocery store. She is the cashier ringing up your groceries. She is the mom with her children at the park. She is everywhere.

Then we have the wonderful logic of outdoors on SYG again:

it's the fuckin' courts themselves that promote and create the conflict

what a joke

What an agressive man. Is it any wonder should he have an ex wife and/or chidlren that they are afraid and want protection?

Reading any more of their drivel makes me want to puke so just go to their site should you want any more enlightening. Don't argue with them though, especially if you are a female. That will get them telling you to pull the stick out of your butt (project your fatnasies much guys?) or calling you derogatory remarks like cookie, darling, little princess (I could do a whole post just on the little princess remark). But alas I am bored and must move on to better things right now :-)