Showing posts with label woman haters. Show all posts
Showing posts with label woman haters. Show all posts

January 19, 2011

More Misogyny online - Mel Gibson case

There is finally going to be some action on the Grigorieva/Gibson case soon. It appears that quite possibly Gibson will be arrested for the assault on Grigorieva. Read more about it here or under the commentary. Now you may ask - Petunia - (yep dats my name) why is this misogyny? This is NOT! What is blatant hatred of females is in the comments below the article. Wow women are less than children? Really?? How do you think children are brought into this world. You can have your little wigglies all you want but without the vessel to carry said child, you have nothing. You cease to exist. And we are much closer to not needing the wigglies than we are to not needing the vessel. One need only look at the internet and search for sperm banks to see evidence of this. Sperm Banks - legal, surrogate mothers - not so much so.

Anyone on to the hatred:

#

The Whammer

01/19/2011 12:53 AM


This is a She said/he said case and there were no witnesses. All we have is some female's accusation and as we all know, a female's word is worthless like a child's. And remember that the burden of proof is on the prosecution. Mel doesn't have to do anything or prove he's innocent. His lawyer doesn't even have to put on the defence because it's the prosecutor's job to prove the allegations and since all we have in this case is some female's claim then there is no case.

#
Report

The Whammer

01/19/2011 12:43 AM

P.S. and let's remember all of those "r@pe" cases where the female seemed so convincing but was shown to be a complete liar. 95% of r@pe cases are false.
#
Report

The Whammer

01/19/2011 12:41 AM

This is a She said/he said case and there were no witnesses. All we have is some female's accusation and as we all know, a female's word is worthless like a child's. And remember that the burden of proof is on the prosecution. Mel doesn't have to do anything or prove he's innocent. His lawyer doesn't even have to put on the defence because it's the prosecutor's job to prove the allegations and since all we have in this case is some female's claim then there is no case.



Well all we can say is lets hope Gibson does not put on a defense. Then maybe we will have one less female hating, racist, angry man off the streets. Now if we could only find this Whammer and warn the women in his life.


November 19, 2010

More from Biscuit Queen (telling a man to be deceitful)



Oh lets go sweetie, we are going to yank some of your hair out but be sure not to tell mommy about this. Or even better, I am going to play doctor and stick this little cotton swab in your cheek and rub it around. Again do not tell your mommy.

And what does daddy dearest do when or if child tell mommy? What then Biscuit Queen. Nice, real nice.

TMOTS on SYG and his opinion of rape



Seems that TMOTS feels that the rape victim cannot tell if she has been sexually assaulted because she was drunk/high on drugs and passed out. Are you as angry about this extremely hateful statement as I am? I can tell when I have been assaulted sexually or even for that matter when I have had consensual sex.

What a pig. Sorry but that is all I can muster at this point.

MTV DV mom Portwood and Marx's stupidity in ASS U ME'ing

Let's see now:

Police in Anderson, Ind., have officially charged "Teen Mom" star Amber Portwood with two felonies and one misdemeanor for domestic battery.

Excellent - it's about time women who use violence are actually highlighted as being violent - instead of the usual attempts to marginalize women's violence. So seeing 'domestic battery' (even though I thought it was domestic assault - not battery?) in there is definitely a step forward towards true equality, not this selective equality that feminists keep pushing for.


However, this is the disturbing part:

During a September episode of season two of the MTV hit show, Portwood was seen repeatedly slapping, punching and kicking her then-fiance, Gary Shirley. Police said that Portwood is facing felony charges because Portwood and Shirley's young daughter, Leah, was present when the alleged violence occurred.

Whoa... now, hold on - am I correct in understanding that she is facing a felony purely on the basis that their (not just hers) daughter was present and thus witnessed it - and NOT because she was abusing her then-fiancé?


This seems to suggest that it's perfectly acceptable to abuse men - so long as you do it quietly away from the children...


Screen shot below (and of course my commentary below that):



Well Marx do you understand that in most states Domestic Violence is a misdemeanor and it is only if a child is present (whether it is your child or someone else's child) that it becomes a felony? Well guess you know now dipshit. So much for females being the favored sex. If you assault a stranger you will be charged with a more serious crime than if you assault your wife or husband.

Rohara and the Paycheck Fairness Act

Actualy I was kind of looking forward to the passage of this bill because I would have loved to have seen the reaction when male performers in the porn industry sued for unequal pay for the exact same work.


Screen shot below:



Female Hatred Websites and Forum Posts

Petunia has been searching for hatred of females and have some very funny posts by these men (and women) who hate women. I will be highlighting some of those over the next few posts.

November 11, 2009

Forty percent of MRA's are female?






John D Says:

November 11th, 2009 at 3:26 pm
Thanks Joan for your kind consideration of mens rights.

When I talk about men's rights to family and friends, the first thing I point out is that MRA members are 40% female--if we were all about "extending control of abusive men" how could this be possible.


Maybe you need those 40% so you can play the games liek Terri Stoddard did:

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_10.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_6812.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_1470.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_641.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_6288.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_5424.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_358.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_1907.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_7891.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_5605.html

http://glennscult.blogspot.com/2009/10/teri-stoddard-real-play-or-role-play_9377.html

I will update to clickable links in a bit. Early day at work tomorrow and must go jump in the shower. But you get the drift on these posts if you copy and paste. I guess the reason for women being in the MRA movement is for little slave toys (or maybe because the second wives will not get off their butts and get a job and think that the money being paid for child suipport is a waste). It is one or the other. I actually think both.

October 27, 2009

Mike Hunter on child support (this one gets its own post due to the extreme hatred)






Mike Hunter Says:

October 25th, 2009 at 12:11 pm
"My ex makes 150K but will only pay 30 percent of first 75k for child support. Not enough to keep the kids at home with me home schooling."

Cry me a river. That comes out to $22,500 a year; much more then it costs to support a kid or two. I support a family of 3 on $17,500 a year, go to college full time, and actually have to work for my money instead of the government taking from someone and giving it to me. Not to mention that I have to pay taxes on the money I make unlike child support which is tax free. Also I bet Texas has a much lower cost of living then Florida.

I have to find a job to support them.

You mean you have to find a job to support yourself. Child support is not mommy support. How did you plan to obtain money to live if you have no job, and use child support for the children? The magical money tree in your back yard?

Also shouldn't you be required to support your children. Child support is suppose to cover 50% of the cost of raising a child. The custodial parent is responsible for paying for the other 50%. I'm willing to bet that the child support you receive covers a lot more then half of the cost of raising your children. If the child support gets spent on the children at all.

I do believe you're entitled to some financial support.

Why? She chose not to continue her education. She chose to stay at home instead of working. Why shouldn't be responsible for her decisions? If any other person would have chose not to continue their education, and not to advance their career they would still be expected to work.

Is there some reason that she can't work such as disability? If she wanted to find employment she could find a job somewhere to support herself. Jobs flipping burgers, cleaning toilets, or washing dishes aren't too hard to find. Why should she not be forced to be financially accountable for herself, and the children she elected to have; just like every male born in this country is.


Okay nothing like some real hatred right at first blow - "Cry me a river"?

Now again we come to choices and decisions. Terri and her husband made a choice as to what Terri would do if they had children and up until this point, they had been following that path. Now because her husband has made a choice without consulting anyone and with very little thought as to how this would affect the children, he is going to become a woman. Hmmm lets see if I have this right? Two people discussing how life will work in regards to homeschooling versus one person arbitrarily deciding to do something which will not only affect himself but many others? Yep I think I got that scenario right - PATRIARCHY and it is okay in this FR/MRA eyes.

And gotta love this one - child support is supposed to be 50%. Men constantly are saying oh but I buy them clothes, I buy them food, I do this or I do that when they are with me. They do not get the costs of raising a child. They do not see the day in day out costs. This woman might be lucky and find a job (in this economy people with excellent resumes are unemployed so good luck with that one). So she is going to be able to find a job to go along with the 22.5k PER YEAR that she might or might not get from him. Again this is what she MIGHT get.

And again in his closing statement he is de-focusing on the choice made by the husband and focusing on a choice that was in all likelihood made by both the wife and the husband and condemning her for it. Nothing like victim blame in all it's glory here.

On a side note - Mike please share where in Florida you live so when I vacation there with my family, I can avoid the obvious hate filled area in which you live. And I say that simply because you are walking about able to post on websites and nobody has seen fit to expose your hate? You have yet to commit a hate crime against anyone? And you expect a judge to give you some sort of parenting time with your children? What so you can perpetuate your hate? Give us another generation of haterz?

October 25, 2009

Celtic Druid do you blindly spend thousands without research?

If you do then I can see why you are now divorced. I would NEVER purchase something or hire a person spending thousands of dollars without knowing something about the product or the person I was to hire. Let's see - I am going to the car lot, I will walk up to the first car I see and say okay I will take it. No test drive, no research on any issues this car might have, no reading of any reviews. Do you get the picture here? This is defintely an UNintelligent person speaking. But then what do we expect - coming from a site such as antimisandry.com?

Celtic Druid says:
I've read some samples of this woman's aggressive blatherings, and it's apparent she's in need of some psychiatric help. Quickly!!

Just imagine as a man you innocently stumble upon her law firm in/on the yellow pages/internet. Do you think a feminist this clearly demented is going to do everything in her power to properly represent you? Especially against a woman?

You could clearly kiss your kids goodbye in custody court, and your property and assets being stripped in divorce court - whilst she maintains a semblance of a defence on your behalf. It's bad enough going up against the opposing counsel and the usual default gynocentric judge, but this completes a totally rigged system.

Shouldn't she be forced to make some sort of disclosure that she is a radical feminist, and as such is incapable of effectively representing you, as a man, in a court of law?





October 6, 2009

More woman hate (and possible condoning of illegal actions) by 6ame






Just watching Countdown and the presenter was saying the best way to know which is your best friend, your wife or your dog, is to put them both in the boot (trunk) of your car for an hour, and when you open it, you're best friend will be the one happiest to see you :D


Hmmm this is some joke. 6ame thinks it would be amusing to lock a dog and a woman into a trunk for an hour. Need I say more?

Nintendo beware!!!! Woman haters illegally downloading software






Oh God, I just seen the latest advert for Professor Layton And The Curious Box, a great game by the way. A man is playing the game on a train, he's trying to work out one of the puzzles, it shows the train travelling along the tracks and it turns into night time, he's still on the puzzle, so he leans over and hands the DS to his girlfriend, and she of course solves the puzzle in a heartbeat.
Imagine girls were lagging behind boys in school, and this was how females were constantly portrayed, there would be uproar.
I'm glad I illegally downloaded the game a few weeks before it came out, now I won't be buying it. (comment from 6ame on antimisandry.com)


This is interesting to learn. I wonder how Nintendo would feel if they were to learn that MEN are downloading ILLEGAL, PIRATED copies of the game software that has taken months and even years to develop, create, and test. Only to be ILLEGALLY downloaded by LAW BREAKERS such as 6ame.

And a cursory search has revelaed what could be 6ame's youtube account. The hatred for women is dripping over there.

Anyway Nintendo beware - woman haters from antimisandry.com are ILLEGALLY downloading your software in order to avoid purchasing said software.
enter