Known Father's Rights activists

Well Whortie here and back again. My dear sweet cousin has been giving lil' ol' me internet researchin' lessons. Now that we are done with that it is time to move on and start with the real exposin'. So hang on to your hats darlins' cause this will be a wild ride. We will be posting these guys and gals one by one and hopefully when they crawl out of the walls like the cockroaches they are and hopefully the industrial strength bug spray I have will keep them at bay.

Part Three: Teri Stoddard and her claim to fame in Father's Rights circles

Teri, this is not apples and oranges. You are helping men who have RO's on them (sometimes multiple RO's from many different women) and men who stalk women simply because they supplied one cell that resulted in a pregnancy. Children are nurtured by mothers in ALL species including the human species and mothers should never be removed from a child's life. Children do not NEED fathers, they need to be cared for which requires financial assistance and they need nurturing and love. Abraham Lincoln said it best when he said the best gift a man can give his children is to respect and love their mother. Beating her within an inch of her life or raping her is NOT respect or love.



Stop Family Violence and Liz Library ARE based on TRUE facts and TRUE stories. Women who are featured on SFV have evidence and documentation to support the facts that they or their children were abused and the courts gave the children to the abuser. Stitches and broken bones and black eyes and ripped hymens and STD's do NOT lie Teri.



Children are not protected in Shared Parenting states. I am in contact with many women (some who supply me with information for this blog) and they have either lost their children to the abuser, or the abuser has UNSUPERVISED contact with the children resulting in more abuse. There is one woman in Florida who was abused by her husband. She left and that man proceeded to gain "shared parental responsibility" and then called the state on this woman and several of her supporters. The most recent call involved an elementary aged female child and the removal of all of her clothes due to a sexual abuse claim by this man. This child was humiliated and for what? The child had a heat rash which was verified by the doctor. This father simply wanted to make mom's life a living hell because - how DARE she leave him?

Now here are the links to relevant statutes in Florida concerning DV and child custody.

Parenting Coordinator

This section discusses PC's (those famous court whores) and whether they can be appointed. The woman and children in the paragraph above have been threatened with a PC due to the many unresolved issues surrounding custody. The ONLY reason one has not been appointed is because the abusive father has stated he cannot afford it. NOT because the mother was a victim of DV.

Shared Parental Responsibility

This section discusses whether Shared custody should be granted and states that only a conviction of DV is used. Again the woman above TRIED to get her abuser prosecuted. The State Attorney of Florida where she lives REFUSED to do so, even after they were contacted by a police officer regarding this case. That police officer went on to do everything he could in order to give this woman the proof the SA office so desired but was also unable to get enough proof.

Child Support and DV

This statute discusses the Registry for CS cases and what should be done if there are family violence indicators. The woman listed above has requested anonymity and has been refused until just recently. This is because she now has a caseworker who realizes that she and her children are the client and this caseworker works for her.

Court Whores

We don't need to get into this one as there are many blogs out there that cover those infamous court whores. But, Florida grants full and complete immunity to them like many other states.

Other cases filed between parties

This involves court paperwork requirements and tells how other cases between the parties must be reported to the courts hearing custody/dissolution cases.

More paperwork requirements

More of the same as above.

Inconvenient forum

The woman listed above has tried getting her case moved because she is not being afforded protection in her current court. She has been told that since her abuser was violent once before (YES ONLY ONCE) and no other violent acts occurred until after the birth of the children, that she knew he was violent and now she has to deal with it.

Parenting Course

This has one tiny section about DV which states that a parenting course does not have to be taken by both parents at the same time if DV is present. The woman above was forced to take the class with her abuser while an active RO was in place. She simply disregarded the order and presented paperwork for a completed, certified parenting course when the order was made and was dismissed from this requirement.

Court-ordered electronic communication between a parent and a child.

First it says that each parent's DV history is to be included in whether a determination about communication with the child is made. The woman above had an active RO against the abuser AND the abuser had a history of previous RO's with other intimates and no such determination was given to the children. The abuser was allowed free and ready access to the children.

Parental Relocation with a child

This discusses the rules and laws about relocation. Again, the woman above lived within a few miles of her abuser and was experiencing break-ins, stalking, harassment, and many other such issues. She moved 32 miles away from the father to a more highly populated area and the abuser took her back to court. He knew where the mother lived as he had resumed his stalking behavior yet again but perjured himself to the courts which was proven in court. Nothing was done to the abuser (no punishment for perjury) and thankfully the mother only got a lecture.

Dissolution

This woman asked for and received an injunction but the cases (dissolution and injunction) were combined against her wishes. This allowed the abuser to take the focus off the real issue of family violence and focus it on the non-issue of divorce. Dissolution and injunction/RO cases should NEVER be combined. EVER!

Definitions

Again this states that domestic violence is to be considered when creating a parenting plan, yet we can see from the many examples above that no such consideration was afforded this woman.

Now what do you suppose was the reason for all these 'blunders?' Well if you guessed that this woman was a SAHM and had not worked in many years and was only able to get a minimum wage job and relied on legal aid for a lawyer, you would have guessed right.

But enough of that - we should move on here. This is not about her this is about you, Teri, and just how deluded you can be.

You also state here that 80% of abuse claims are false? Other times you say 50%, other times it has been 90%. Which is it Teri? Can't you get your statistics straight?

Onward Ho!



I know of many cases where the NON-CUSTODIAL mother has sought assistance from a fatherhood program for visitation and child support in order to reduce the child support so she may be able to afford to live and NOT be HOMELESS and the result was being dumped to other agencies and then being turned away. These mothers are still homeless.

NEXT!







I only have one thing to say to this.

CLICK HERE!

HUNDREDS and HUNDREDS of cases where the father killed the children and there are so many this blogger has not time to list every single one. And often the stories do not make the news. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.....



Ah so we should have parents spying and stripping their children in order to keep an eye out for marks? We saw what happened to the woman and young female child above with shared parenting and abuser dad keeping an eye out for marks. Which by the way, the abuser also would get heat rashes due to his weight, just like the child does. Should a complaint of abuse or neglect be called in on abuser's new wife? Maybe on himself since he has a rash?

As far as your argument that mothers commit more abuse, we should factor in time spent with children. If it is as you say and women get custody 90% of the time and fathers only 10% of the time, we should play with the numbers some. Let's say there are 1,000 custody cases (there are more but this is just for example). So 900 children with moms, 100 children with dads. So if moms commit twice the abuse of dads, that must mean that mom abuser is 66% and dad abuse is 33% (again simplified because there is stranger abuse as well). How many children are abused? Let's say 100, unless you can give me a percentage of abused children compared to the whole population of children. So if you have 2/3 of 100 children abused by mom that would mean 66 children by mom and 33 children by dad. Now lets compare that to the entire group (not just the abuse victims). Sixty-children out of 900 works out to 7.3% of mothers abuse and 33% of the fathers abuse. There is no other way to work the numbers Teri, MEN do abuse more often than women - the numbers are completely skewed if you look at only part of the picture.

And if my small explanation is not helpful to you, you can simply go HERE and see what the NIS-3 (the most complete study which lists gender and marital status of abusers - the NIS-4 does not separate like the NIS-3 - hmmmm Fatherhood groups at work here?).

NEEEEEEEEEEEXXXXT......



Now we move on to placating and condescending behavior. What you are known for best. Next you will block and talk about behind their backs. Watch out ladies, myself and several others are on her little block list. She even has some from the father's movement on her little list as well, isn't that right Ray? And do not deny Teri is right out there in the open for everyone to see. Well most everyone :-)

You also help alleged abusers, why else would you be searching for a ride for a well-known father's rights activist who was supposed to be in court in OHIO yet was stranded in ILLINOIS, which just so happened to be where his alleged victims live?



Ahh here we go.... Why don't you name some of these alleged victims you have helped? Name one man who is known to have been a victim in your circle of friends. I imagine between myself and others we could dig up his history and show a history of abuse and self indulgent behavior (traffic tickets, civil lawsuits, etc). Are you talking about Mark Godbey? Hmmmm that one was recently in court for violations. Have any more you want to share? I am up for tearing any claim you have completely apart, Teri.



This is so not even worth the time to discuss - NEXXXXXXXTTTTT!



There are no lies about you Teri. Did you forget you condoned child sexual abuse on your single parents email group? Did you forget your run that group like a little Gestapo and those who disagree are moderated or kicked off? Do we need to remind you of your sexist website - Jugs For Justice? No link back - not giving THAT filth any kudos.

Oh and we all know WHY you write about fathers more than mothers. Isn't it because your son and his ex-girlfriend went through a custody battle back in 2002 or 2003? And you were angry at HER mother because she hired a lawyer for her daughter and grandaughter? You sure complained about it often enough on not only the group you now own (which you did NOT own back then) and several other single parent/mom groups. You go so angry with one group that you quit that group. Like I said, know thine enemy Teri and I know you rather well.



Oh here we go. Teri says we are done so we are done. Well guess what Teri? You cannot control Facebook like you do your little Gestapo single parents group. So again put THAT in your little pipe.



Oh boo hoo hoo, poor widdle Teri has someone picking on her. Actually it looks like to me that teri is having fact and logic thrown at her and she has no clue how to respond. She is very much like some of the alleged abusers she helps. When the victim does not back down Teri resorts to the "oh woe is me routine". Pretty sad....

Nextttttttttttt!



One comment:

NOW THAT IS A SCARY THOUGHT!

Nexxxxtttttttttt!



Murray Straus? That explains the skewed reports. He does not know anything about intimate partner violence. If a woman yells at her partner to stop beating her she is just as violent as he is - even if he is shooting at her with a gun or trying to stab her. Yeah go on with yo bad self Teri.

Nextttttttttttt!



Names Teri, Names. And again because you cannot take it like you dish it out and you cannot silence these two women, you are done. WHATEVER!!!!

NEXTTTTTTTTT!! (This is getting really old btw Teri - when will you just go away?)......



Oh and here we go with the self promotion. You keep right up with that Teri. See how far it gets you.

We will now begin lawsuit proceedings against Mark Godbey of San Ramon CA

nothing could be more proof than libelous attacks that members of the “pig pen” cult of followers that attack fathers only, and labels all mother and children as “battered” and the fathers as “abusive”.

Godbey uotes an article placed not by Lorraine Tipton but by an abuse advocate working tirelessly along with many others in order to protect Lorraine's child from further abuse. This child has NOT been given her day in court. Godbey ASS U ME s that Lorraine is an abusive and parentally alienating mother - because in his mind all mothers who do not want a child to visit a father are such.

Now as one of the members of the so called pig pen cult he calls out so bravely on his website, I plan to contact lawyers in California and undertake a lawsuit against Mark Godbey for libel. He needs to produce his evidence that any of the bloggers who posted this article concerning Lorraine are indeed engaging in libel against her ex-husband and ex-abuser. Court records are generally a matter of public record Markie. Why don't you do a search for Hensberger. You will see that he has indeed been arrested for and convicted of dui. The child has disclosed not just to family but to others of the abuse she has endured in the father's house. And the mother has attested to his abuses of her.

So keep calling us out on your blog markie. I have forced way back machine to archive your site. It will be up for all to see. And you WILL answer in court for YOUR libel.

Wisonsin mother jailed over pre-teen refusal to visit abuser dad

I have had much sad news over the last few weeks. First we hear of Anonymums untimely passing (we will never be the same without her). Then a near and dear friend of mine, Lorraine, and her daughter M are going through the hell of family court. M will NOT visit her bio-dad because he:
A. Abused her
B. Abused her mother
C. Is a severe alcoholic
D. Drives drunk

Then we have the issue with bio-dad's mother. Her list of transgressions against M include:
A. Drinking to excess
B. Taking M to a bar
C. Being sooooooooo drunk she cannot even recognize her own vehicle
D. Driving drunk on this night with M in her vehicle
E. Forcing M to eat her own vomit after becoming ill

I could go on but these are just a few of the major abuses that M has had to tolerate.

So imagine my surprise as we join forces in order to publicize this child's/mother's tragedy to see this:

Message from Chief Justice

Dear Friend:

Welcome to the Wisconsin court system. The courts of our state belong not to the lawyers and the judges, but to you - the public. Perhaps you have come to us because you are involved in a case, or maybe you have been called to jury duty. Or perhaps you are simply interested in learning more about the courts - about careers in the law, volunteer opportunities, or the workings of the third branch of government. Whatever your reason for visiting our Web site, we are glad you are here. Your understanding of - and support for - our independent courts is critical to the integrity and effectiveness of their work.

The court system exists to help the people of our state to resolve their disputes peacefully, and to dispense justice fairly, impartially and according to the rule of law. This is the cornerstone of our democracy.

You have my commitment that the Wisconsin court system will always strive to be open, understandable and affordable. You are welcome here.

Sincerely yours,

Shirley S. Abrahamson
Chief Justice

How can this "chief justice" claim that these courts are OPEN??????? One of the judges in her very court is refusing to listen to a child, he is refusing to use evidence which without a doubt shows that M's father should NOT be allowed to continue in parenting access. He has denied a mother due process and has removed her freedoms from her (there will be another post on this one, coming soon). The family is already stretched to the max with all the back and forth in court brought on by fisherman (and sometimes cross dresser).

So I am sending out a challenge to Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson:

Look in your house!!! See what your judges are doing to families (specifically look at Judge David Miron



and see what he has done to families. Lorraine and her family want this information out there. How many are too afraid to tell their story? I also challenge You Ask We Investigate of NBC Channel 2 in Wisconsin to look into this case. Contact the loving STEPFATHER of M and husband to Lorraine and see what he has to say.

This is nothing more than threat therapy. Well guess what Judge Miron - you have met your match. Lorraine will continue to protect M and your UNCONSTITUTIONAL jailing of Lorraine for 30 days, then 30 more days, then 30 more days - until the child goes to the abuser's house, will not continue.

So here is the challenge:

Chief Justice look in your house! Clean it up!
Channel 2 investigate this matter!

Help this chidl have her mom home. Make the abuser accountable for his actions.

Provide your email contacts so the public can express the outrage they feel about this issue. Quit hiding Judge Miron!!!!!

John Boy pondering and questioning

John Boy Says:

November 10th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
I have often wondered why legal cases like Shockome are so important to gender feminists. There are enough actual DV claims out there that you would think they would focus their energy on something more productive. Why this one?

Well John Boy did you ever think that maybe, just maybe there are cases out there whcih would destroy any claims men had on children? Cases which could show how an abuser does exactly as he feels? Cases which would blow you FR's out of the water? And where are these cases? Well many times the abused woman is forced underground. Or they speak out in the only way they can - anonymously through blogs. Hmmm sound familiar Petunia? Makes you wonder who exactly Petunia is - doesn't it? And exactly what Petunia can do to the MRA movement. Well just keep waiting... You will one day see what Petunia can do

Will the MRA's ever leave Holly Collins and Jennifer Collins alone?????

I doubt it. He is getting too much free press by using this story of heartache. He is using Jennifer, Holly and their siblings in order to further a dangerous stance - the stand that all parents deserve or "have the right" to equal custody. NO THEY DO NOT!!! When on parent is abusive, then he/she shoudl not be allowed to influence children in any way. The children who are now grown have stated the father not only abused their mother, but also them. GS get over yourself and find some other story to talk about. Quit using and FURTHER ABUSING this mother and her GROWN children!!!!!!!!!!!!