May 31, 2009

Sonja never stops!





85
Sonja Says:

May 30th, 2009 at 5:26 pm
yes, jeana, he's a BOY. Let him be a boy!!


Sonja is part of being a boy, drawing pictures of his teacher due to his anger at said teacher with a bullet hole in her head? One must really not need a brain in order to be an MRA/FR because if my male child or female child drew a picture of anyone with a bullet in their head (whether adult, child victim), I would be seriosuly seeking out some help for my child. To minimize this behavior as "being a boy" is to quite possibly cause some serious outcomes in this boy's life and in many other lives down the road. This mom is excusing her son's bad behavior and chocies. There is no other way to call it.

And you Sonja, are giving her the fire to continue the blaze.

Quentin0352 - I have not forgotten you my dear sweet (sick) MRA

You must be feeling soooooo lonely since it has been several days since I have spoken about you. Never fear, Petunia is gathering the evidence needed to bring your true motive to light. So keep coming back and keep searching for yourself. You will join the great club of those overly concerned that I post their rants on here. Men such as tm99us and Attila. Such great company (cough snort gag puke) for you to be with.



Hip Hip Hooray for Joshua Cartwright

Time to stand up and cheer:
Hip Hip Hooray!
Hip Hip Hooray!
Hip Hip Hooray for Joshua Cartwright!


You must be wondering - what in the world? Has Petunia lost her mind? Who is this "Joshua Cartwright? And why is she cheering him on?

Gentle Readers, it is not Petunia who cheers on the women haters of today. It is the lunacy of the MRA/FR movement who does so.

Read about Cartwright here:

Shooting deaths: 'None of it makes sense'

The events that led to the shooting deaths of two Okaloosa County sheriff's deputies Saturday began in a small top-floor apartment in Fort Walton Beach - with an argument over a tube of Clearasil.


Apparently this had much more to do with an an insane person than a "tube of Clearasil", however.

Now you understand why this is on here but who in god's name would be cheering on a man such as this you may ask?

For his courage, valor, and gun control in the face of violent criminal assault by the enemies of men, Mr. Joshua Cartwright is hereby awarded the coveted Golden Bull Award.

WARNING! MRA WEBSITE!!!!
The World According To Bob


In the future, Petunia will refer to comments from Bob and his site as TWAT Bob comments, so the reader can choose to visiti or not to visit. Keep in mind Petunia only posts what is out there, she never makes anything up. Please use caution when visiting these sites.


Petunia cannot even fathom the rantings of this man who claims to be an MRA/FR enough to even begin writing an opinion. I mean - where would she start? So gentle readers - I leave this one to you. Please comment and comment heavily!!!



Welcome to the "group" Lisa

20
NE Says:

May 28th, 2009 at 4:26 pm
Lisa Says:
May 28th, 2009 at 3:40 pm

Hi Lisa, welcome to the group!
I HIGHLY, HIGHLY recommend you read the book Legalizing Misandry, it really is a must read.

Legalizing Misandry: From Public Shame to Systemic Discrimination Against Men

http://www.amazon.com/Legalizing-Misandry-Systemic-Discrimination-Against/dp/0773528628


I welcome you, gentle readers, to click the link above leading to amazon. Read the description of this book.

Product Description
Lurid and sensationalized events such as the public response to Lorena Bobbitt after she cut off her abusive husband's penis, prurient fascination provoked by Anita Hill's allegations about Clarence Thomas, and the exploitation of the mass murder of fourteen women in Montreal have been processed through popular culture since the 1990s to produce pervasive misandry - contempt for men, the counterpart of misogyny. Paul Nathanson and Katherine Young believe that this reveals a shift in the United States and Canada to a worldview based on ideological feminism, which presents all issues from the point of view of women and, in the process, explicitly or implicitly attacks men as a class. They argue that ideological feminism is silently reshaping law, pubic policy, education, and journalism. "Legalizing Misandry" offers lively and compelling evidence to demonstrate the pervasiveness of this new thinking - from the courts, classrooms, government committees, and corporate bureaucracies to laws and policies affecting employment, marriage, divorce, custody, sexual harassment, violence, and human rights.


Now scroll down to see what other "books" are "recommended" reading for someone looking at this particular book?

The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism is Harming Our Young Men
That BITCH: Protect Yourself Against Women With Malicious Intent
The Rantings of a Single Male
Taken Into Custody
The Myth of Male Power

So in these 5 books here we have at least 3 mainstream "men's rights" authors. We have one which degrades women (THAT BITCH?!?!?!). Two of the authors have less than stellar motives (one has actively tried to advocate for pedophile rights and the other hates child support). Need I say any more?



Notice the word "Transparently"?





9
lujlp Says:

May 29th, 2009 at 9:36 am
...Funny how angry MRAs get when one woman has one baby on her own. This idiot fathered 20. And can’t support them. And never will. The ultimate deadbeat dad. But I bet there is more support among MRAs for him than for a female who unexpectedly got pregnant and then continued the pregnancy


Seriouly can you not read? Quoted from Robert Franklin in the post above - should be easy enough to find its the first paragraph talking about this man

"Let me say clearly that Hatchett's behavior is transparently irresponsible. As a poorly-paid blue-collar worker, he cannot possibly support all those children. He cannot possibly contribute his fair share of support to them, and he knows it. His behavior is outrageous."

Yea, I can see how someone out of touch with reality would find that statment supportive


One must wonder why the octomom is labelled as irresponsible (with no qulifying adjectives) and this man who fathered 7 more children than octomom, is labelled as trasparently irresponsible? And exactly what does transparently irresponsible actually mean? That maybe there is more to this than meets the eyes? That maybe he is only slightly irresponsible?

Men's opinion of birth control (my comments in red)





9
lujlp Says:

May 29th, 2009 at 9:36 am
...And Robert Franklin’s second reason is that the women had more contraception available to them? Oh god. How can you seriously use that as an excuse?

Womens
1 Pills - dozens of viaietes pills are hormones which cause damage
2 Patches more homonal damage
3 Shots
4 Implants even more hormonal damage, plus the difficulty of removal
5 Morning after pill hormones again and moral beliefs
6 Surgery invasive procedure, many time irreversible, many complications
7 Abortion invasive procedure, moral beliefs
8 Adoption moral beliefs, community stigmatism, possibly being found years after the fact and disruption of life for both child and mother
9 Abandonment no comment on this - a motehr who abandons is not mother at all
10 Murder - I added this on due to the number how arent punished foe killing their children please point out the quantity of stories where a mother has murdered her child compared to a man killing his child

Mens
1 Condems no hormones, no surgery, maybe not quite "comfortable"
2 Surgery invasive, complications but less so than for a woman


I would like to add another for both the man and the woman. And here is where they are both equals (which is how a true feminist wants things)

WHAT ABOUT ABSTINENCE???????

'Nuff said.

Simple math and we can care for children

9
lujlp Says:

May 29th, 2009 at 9:36 am
Ok, so Robert Franklin thinks that a guy who fathered and can’t care of 20 kids by least 11 different women is somehow better than a woman who has 14 kids from one man. One of the reasons being that the children all have mothers to take care of them????

Lets see 14 kids divided by 1 parent equals 14
And 20 kids divided by 12 parents equals 1.6666

So yes simple math shows us it is better


Why don't you do this math then lujlp? 21 kids divided by one dad still equals 21 kids sharing ONE dad.



More kids means more chances to be "cared for" in your old age....

8
AnonymousPamphleteer Says:

May 29th, 2009 at 8:46 am
Hatchett seems to have figured out the only sensible strategy for a male in this country.

Give up on any chance of custody,
Give up on any chance of retaining any savings so as to live responsibly,
Give your seed to all takers, and
Hope/guess that some of your children or grandchildren will take care of you in your old age so that you won't be living in poverty like the typical man who has one or two kids and is then looted in court, sold into slavery, and alienated from his kids to they want nothing to do with him.

I say the man is a genius.

He has 21 shots at having someone actually care about him 20+ years from now.

The government is inherently corrupt in its war on families, so much so that responsible people are being restricted from reproducing by the punitive economic brutalities perpetrated against them by the state.

This man has found a way to outflank the states criminality against fathers, and not have his rights to reproduce stolen from him by the state.

A genius.


Now one must wonder why you MRA/FR types do not tell this man to go out and get a better job? Or why you blame the moms more than you blame him? One only needs to read this post to see where your true "motive" lies. It IS all about the man, men are GODS and as such MUST be catered to.

Petunia sits and shakes her head in amazement that men such as you exist in today's world. AP why don't you go out and impregnate as many women as possible so you can have that one child who will "take care of" you when you are no longer able to work. That child will always have the evil woman who should get off her duff and work to care for the chidl, many time working two or three jobs to take up your lazy slack. (shakes head some more).....



How does a young man do anything?





23
John M Says:

May 31st, 2009 at 9:12 am
He may be a vindictive SOB, but exactly how did he get a hold of HER contact list?


Sometimes it pains me that things need to be explained to some as if they were chidlren. Ummm John M., quite possibly the way he accessed her "contact list" is because he KNEW said contacts? (Shakes head in amazement at the "knowledge" level and capcity of some)......

Not having sex should not be a crime?

15
chris Says:

May 30th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
Someone explain how a man who did not have sex is guilty of a sexual crime.


So I guess we should (at least according to chris) let all of those poor men who only had pictures of babies, young girls and boys; out of prison because they did not "have sex" with their victims?

Just think about THAT one folks.......



May 28, 2009

Emotional abuse illegal?

http://glennsacks.com/blog/?p=3783&cp=all#comments

It had to happen.

There is soon to be a bill before the Malaysian Parliament that would amend the Domestic Violence Act in that country to criminalize emotional harm to women. As one supporter of that bill described it here, "It could be a case in which a husband tells his wife she is ugly or humiliates her until she feels emotionally pressured (Malaysia Star, 5/27/09)." I hope that's clear.


and this also

Fortunately, I know we'll soon hear from American feminists about what a travesty the Malaysian bill would be if passed. I can almost hear the soft clatter of their keyboards now as they urgently explain how gender equality doesn't permit such special treatment. They'll remind us about how women are strong and resilient, and don't need that type of protection from male-dominated institutions. This isn't Victorian England, after all.

I can hardly wait.


Well I shall not disappoint >:-)~~~

I am curious as to why these MRA/FR types are so up in arms about the failure of PAS to fly through court when PAS is supposedly nothing more than emotional abuse of a father by a mother (according to THEM)? Or how about their newest brain child - MMS - Malicious Mother Syndrome? These are both nothing more than "emotional abuse" (again according to them).

I refuse to get into a discussion about these. I know the true information regarding these supposed syndromes and that they are not recognized and probably never will be recognized by any CREDIBLE medical agency or association. They were created by a pedophile protecting (cough snort) "man".

And keep an eye here folks, as I am sure there will be plenty of cult comments :-)

Original article here (for those who just cannot stomach the thought of going to THAT website)



Men teaching self respect to their daughters?!?!?!?

8
Offended_Dad Says:

May 27th, 2009 at 6:05 pm
...I know the value of the example I set, and the lessons they learn from me in self respect, confidence and dealing with the world at large. The only reason that I "date" at all is so that my girls see their father treat a woman respectfully.


Well Offended_Dad, I truly hope your "girls" do not know about your world wide web travels. I would hate to think what their opinion of dear old dad would be if they read some of what you write on the sacks site.



Men raising girls or women raising boys?

6
SerenityNow Says:

May 27th, 2009 at 5:00 pm
"I think how much crazier it is for a man raising girls alone."

Really? Please tell me why, Barbara. Why do you think it would be crazy for me to raise my daughters alone? I think it's far, far crazier for a women to be raising boys alone, and the data supports this. The problems associated with children raised by single mothers are not seen to anywhere near the same extent in children raised by single fathers. It's attitudes such as yours that fuels the bigotry fathers experience in "family" court.


I think what Barbara was trying to state is that each scenario is faced with its own set of challenges. Each set is different and neither set is "more" difficult. You speak many times of feminists being the crazy ones, I think this is a little pot calling the kettle black. But that is my two cents and everyone has their own opinion.



Bonus Dad is not okay?

1
jerry Says:

May 27th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
"Your daughter loves you and needs you and you are good at raising her—don’t ever let anyone tell you you’re of secondary importance, because you’re not."

I agree with you. My problem is the numbers of way that her mom, the new husband, and society send her the opposite message, including the court psychologist who encouraged her to call the new husband "dad".

It can be pretty depressing.


It is simply amazing to the author of this blog how it is completely acceptable for people to get upset at a mother who does not want another woman taking over her role (even part time) as a child's mother. Yet there are literally hundreds of websites that promote the "bonus" mom and say that women should just get over it. So why the upset feelings when your child has a "bonus" dad?

In the words of one of your fellow cultists - goose meet gander.....



May 26, 2009

Sorry folks I just could not resist :-)

39
Attila L. Vinczer Says:

May 22nd, 2009 at 11:18 am

I'll second that with the exception that I will NEVER be afraid of speaking out, no matter what!!! I am not afraid of getting square into the faces of anyone to speak up and tell that there is something really, really wrong with our society who takes no notice of the suffering of men!


You sure do come here a lot Attila and say nothing on here. Hmmm wonder why that is lol......



May 23, 2009

Calling Quentin0352, yes you, with the L on your forehead



Why do you lie to your fellow cultists? You have made ONE comment on my blog. Want print screen proof folks? I will give it to you. Oh and how about this Quentin - just so you know that I KNOW who you are:

Lebanon, Ohio
Road Runner (75.186.28.112)

Look familiar?

Oh and how difficult is it to click on my blogger id and see the little link on my blogger profile ID that says "EMAIL ME". Oh but I forgot, when you only gots a six grade edumacation, reading just aint part of that adumacattion now is it?

Yup, no surprises, she is afraid to accept the challenge or even publish a post I made that was polite, pointed out a few errors in the claims of the guy and backed up his general assertions with census studies.





May 21, 2009

Auditions......



Can you fill this role? You must have broad shoulders, be able to type about 2 words a minute and have a desire to expose mysogyny the world over. We are looking to fill the role of Penelope the Pig. This is Petunia's long lost 2nd cousin once removed. She has jumped in the fray and as she has even fewer typing and internet skills than poor Petunia, she needs a human mouth and finger piece.... Can you fill this role?



The TRUTH about FALSE allegation in his eyes

My momma oinked at me and said Petunia young lady patience is a virtue. Now being as how I have four legs, it is kind of hard to do anything with my hooved feet (including all this typing I do), I just waited and waited. I waited some more. I knew the day would come and one of them would say it. I knew it would come. And to what do my wondering eyes should appear? Nope not a jolly little man and eight tiny reindeer (that is another story folks), but this:

8
Pierce Harlan Says:

May 19th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
Corrrect, Thomas. "Unfounded" should be regarded as the moral equivalent of "false."


Yep there you have it folks!!!!! Unfounded "should" mean false..... Do I need to say anything else? I guess I can quit blogging now? Nope not on your life!!!! I will expose these "men" (cough snort gag cough hack puke) until my little hooves cannot move. Why? Because we must show the truth!!!! When women and chidlren are no longer penalized for making good faith reports of abuse and when women are not penalized and branded with the letters FA (false accuser), then and only then can I rest. Sorry Pierce you now join the ranks at Petunia's club for good. We badasses will be watching you......





May 20, 2009

Sarah Palin........ and Stan the Man.....

Sarah Palin has my gratitude and any support she may ever need in politics in the future.


Thanks for sharing that Stan.....We now know who NOT to back in any further political bids. Thanks so much :-)




May 17, 2009

That's Mister Sir to you





Norman L. Says:

May 13th, 2009 at 4:22 am
that's Mister Sir to you.


Rather controlling and condescending appearing here are we Norman L?

Where are these airbrushed photos?

12
Bob Denton Says:

May 16th, 2009 at 9:06 pm
I just came across some more airbrushed photos of abused women.As long as the industry keeps actively promoting the myths,men dont stand a chance of receiving recognition as DV victims


Please share the location of the supposed airbrushed photos with us Bob Denton so we may be enlightened as well....



May 14, 2009

PARASITE?!?!?!?!?!?!?

And people wonder why I created this blog?!?!?!?!?!?

24
theOtherJim Says:

May 14th, 2009 at 1:28 pm
why any guy, if he's crazy enough to marry in the 1st place, would want to spend the rest of his life supporting a parasite is beyond me


Yet again another million dollar question.....We are supposeed to tolerate this filth (not saying whether the words or the poster are said filth - YOU figure it out) :-)



Attila wants an accounting.....

7
Attila L. Vinczer Says:

May 14th, 2009 at 12:18 am
What would be OK is that we had 50/50 custody of children as a datum. Therefore no CS would need be paid as child rearing expenses would be equal. Nothing to litigate! The savings would be huge! I would also like to see an accounting of ALL the CS funds that are paid usually to the mother who can spend it on what ever she wants...


ACCOUNTING OF CS=MORE CONTROL BY FREAK MAN

Would this be you Attila?

And by the way Attila, child support is nmot only to be used for basic needs such as clothing, foo, and shelter - it is also to provide the child with as close to the lifestyle they had before the parents were divorced. In other words, if the family lilved in BelAir pre-divorce, the child should not be forced to live in a slum post-divorce. If the child was an avid dancer, she should not be forced to quit doing so, simply because freak dad wants mom to account for where every penny goes. And how do you propose she do that if she remarries, and both of thes epeople work? Do you propose the new spouse be forced to divulge information about his finances? When your lovely (NOT!!!!) second wives fight tooth and nail to keep from divulging information about themselves? Ummm yeah okay Attila, I was born but it dam sure weren't yesterday!!!!



Work it out with an abusive man? You have got to be kidding me!!!!

Well just when I thought they might actually have a few brain cells they go and write this:

6
terri Says:

May 14th, 2009 at 7:36 pm
The best way to reduce the total national child support debt is to dismantle child support system. Let the two adults work it out themselves.

The government ought to mind their own business, it’s not like anything they run works. Governments tax and spend; they’re not good at managing anything.


Ummmm terri, how do you "compromise" with an abusive man? The answer is.....
YOU DON'T!!!!!!

Now do you have any more SPECIAL words of wisdom for us terri?



Judgement Day? Sounds more like April Fools day?

Or at least one can hope that this is an April Fool's joke several weeks late:

Judgement day (2 friends, send message) wrote: 16h 2m ago

Give that man a medal!

Killing her was a public service. She was not just an attorney but a family law attorney. They are the most corrupt and use the courts (with crooked family law attorneys as judges) to wreck people’s lives.




May 13, 2009

Men are more moral?!?!?!?!?!

9
donnie w Says:

May 13th, 2009 at 5:09 pm
...men are more moral, trustworthy and willing to be held to higher standards than women.


Again here we go genralilzing and stereotyping ALL women.... Truth be known men can be immoral, untrustworthy, and willing to stoop to low low standards......



Why do you want children to be considered adults at 13?

8
bell Says:

May 13th, 2009 at 4:55 pm
I think we should follow the Jewish example and consider our children adults from 13 years old. That settles that.


Now one must question why you feel this way? Is it because then child support payments would cease? Or is there some other ulterior motive that should not be spoken of in mixed company? Readers clue here: I _ _ _ _ T (fill in the blanks)



If all else fails resort to blackmail

Brian Says:

February 27th, 2009 at 2:46 pm
The best thing I ever did was get a vasectomy. I make six figures a year. It’s unbelevable how pissed off women get when they discover they can’t “forget” their birth control and get a paycheck out of me. I learned the hard way. I was married young, had a baby with my ex and divorced when she started running around. I was lucky since we had joint custody; only because I had a private detective follow her and take pictures going into motels with her various boyfriends. She was gearing up to rape me financially until I showed her the pictures and threatened to give copies to all of her family and friends. All of a sudden she wanted me back.


She wanted you back because she could not trust you - after all who could trust someone who would resort to blackmail. If you are seperated she has the right to live her life. I am sure you were not leading the life of a priest. Again more goose gander stuff goin' on here folks.

And may I add, I will NEVER run out of material at this rate. I am so backlogged it is unreal. I could make this a full time job and still never get caught up on the blatant mysogyny of these men.



Married 15 years? Hmmmmm, the million dollar question....

On occassion Petunia must break free and explore this wonderful creation we call the World Wide Web. And since she is dead set on exposing FR/MRA types by using their words imagine her surprise when she stumbled on this little tidbit:

dadsrites (0 friends, send message) wrote: 2h 33m ago
Mama Liberty is a joke herself. Sorry to disappoint. I've been with a very beautiful woman for the past 15 years. She is my second wife and my soul-mate.


To which Petunia must ask the million dollar question

I never knew blow up dolls last that long...





Must not disappoint Stan the Man :-)

Imagine my surprise when calling into a fathers rights phone-online radio show. And the things I heard will simply amaze you. This will be a rather long post so bear with me please :-) I could not catch the names very well as apparently these guys do not know how to speak into a phone (so forgive any errors). But the written word is not mistaken. And what words do suddenly appear before my eyes straight from this show?

the term "bitch" is a slang term used on the street or in informal settings to indicate a female.. but the term itself, on THIS SITE, is being used in a TRAINING CONTEXT because we are a professional bitch retraining organization..


women are supposed to be the missing puzzle pieces that FIT into men BY DESIGN..

Are we also supposed to do whatever he says he wants us to do? Hmmmmm


men are supposed to be leaders.. men are supposed to be in charge.. men are smarter than women.. men are more capable than women.. men are more competent than women.. men are stronger than women..


men are obviously more capable than women. and yet what do we see on TV and in the media today? bumbling, oafish, incompetent men being outwitted and out-accomplished by women.. this is not only against nature, it's against REALITY..


This is what they intend to do with their "training":

1. meet the sexual needs of men.
2. retrain women to respond to the expectations and needs of men.
3. retrain women to grow up and act like adults who respond according to principle rather than temporary emotional or childish impulses.
4. level the playing field in all areas (work, relationships, legal system, etc.) for all men in general.
5. produce relationships based upon a MAN'S TERMS/EXPECTATIONS.


Their "methods":

1. the man should be in charge and lead the interaction.

2. men should demand that their needs and expectations be met.

3. men should maintain an attitude of self-respect-- you are worth just as much as any woman. you do not need to pay for their presence (ie. buy drinks, dinners, etc.)

4. learn to say NO to women. do not SPOIL a woman or she will become a SPOILED bitch.

5. make sure women RECIPROCATE your effort/attention/time/money/etc. whatever you invest. make sure you get a RETURN ON INVESTMENT, otherwise stop investing IMMEDIATELY.

6. keep women under your authority.


I cannot even comment on this rubbish. Biggest reason for no comment is this is not rated XXX and sadly if I let MY thoughts run wild, it will quickly become XXX. So readers chime in for me.



May 12, 2009

Welcome QueenB to our colluders list

17
Queen B Says:

May 12th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
Stories like this really make me angry. I am getting so sick and tired of the media giving an extraordinary amount of attention to missing white females and hardly any attention to missing black females or men for that matter. Just yesterday Dr. Phil did a show about a missing white teenage girl who disobeyed her parents by running off with her friends to SC only to go missing down there. Then the week before that Oprah did a show about that little British girl who went missing while her parents were in Portugal on holiday. What do Jon Benet Ramsey, Elizabeth Smart, Chandra Levy, Natalee Holloway and Caylee Anthony all have in common-all white females.


And QueenB shall I add a name to your list that very few seem to be paying attention to (and I do pay attention believe me, the girl I will mention has a less than stellar father - lets say he will probably never win father of the year). Does the name Hayleigh Marie Cummings ring any bells? The dad marries his UNDERAGE live in girlfriend who just so happens to be the last person to ever see Hayleigh? Dad gets no punishment for being with a 17 yr old (who btw is not so stellar herself - just look at her myspace page) whilst he is 25? Or lets look at the dv allegations which quite probably happened to the mother, yet custody was given to the "stellar" father? And again when was the last time you heard anything about this little girl? And I might add she is pretty, young, and female as well......



Color, race, economic status in crime reports



Wow jeana hit the mail on the head again, I think we need to create some sort of honorary award or something!!!! Read below:

8
jeana Says:

May 12th, 2009 at 2:18 pm
I really think this is more about race and socioeconomic status than gender. While there’s more sympathy for dead females than dead males, think about what it would be like if the genders were reversed. Would they care more about a dead Latina immigrant than a white successful businessman? I’m betting not.


I would like to go one step further in this. If you have two white girls missing, one is from a successful family and one is from a family at poverty level (ie: what one would consider a white trash sort of family) chances are great you will hear more about the rich little white girl. Let's take this one step further, if it was a rich little white boy and a poor little white girl, chances are great rich kid/family will get more press. Case in point: Caylee Anthony versus Hayleigh Cummings. There is news nearly every day on Caylee and we know where she is sadly. Not so with Hayleigh, but when was the last time you heard about her? Need I say more?

I would like to add that race and socio-economic status are about equal in the playing field, I really do not know which comes first. Although a poor minority girl who is dead or missing sadly in society's eyes (IE: White Men) is not as important as a rich white girl. I wonder who would be more important, a poor white girl or a rich minority girl? Now that is one to ponder.....

duncan and his spews yet AGAIN!!!!

91
duncan macleod Says:

May 12th, 2009 at 6:28 am
Jeana, you have avoided my question ........ do i apoligise for chastising those who were abusive to you earlier in this thread ??


duncan you and some of those FR advocates you associate with believe that all women should be at your beck and call and we are all awful and vile creatures simply because you were allegedly abused by a woman. Again we have a goose/gander situation. You demand that women do something because of your life situation (and that applies to all women) yet men are all different and as such women should not stereotype. You can however. Uhhh yeah I like THAT scenario.....



duncan if you ACTUALLY defneded female victims of abuse....

Then I would agree with you. However since you only defend male victims of abuse (how quickly you have forgotten your attacks of me and several other female victims of abuse at the hands of their now ex-husbands). Or do I need to search these out and point them out to you? Won't be too hard as Google and the wayback machine are wonderful inventions. For now lets just read what you wrote on that female hater board.

77
duncan macleod Says:

May 11th, 2009 at 8:24 pm
so ill ask do you feel its " our turn" or do guys like me who will defend any wrong deserving of support?


NO COMMENT!!!!



Women only have rights because men supported those rights

68
Sonja Says:

May 11th, 2009 at 7:06 pm
GG, men supported women's rights. If they hadn't, women wouldn't have the freedoms they do.


I wonder sonja does this mean that since there are now men who are unhappy that a woman has these rights that were so nobly "given" to them by these wonderful men, that we should have to give them back? Or does it mean that we have to allow men to treat us however they would like and we cannot speak up about it? You were born in the wrong generation my dear, you need to move your date of birth back about 6 or 8 decades.



YOU CARE?!?!?!?!?! I would hate to see when you do NOT care....

65
Sonja Says:

May 11th, 2009 at 6:34 pm
I care that PEOPLE are abused.


As many times as I have exposed your comments on my site to show your TRUE feeling towards women who claim dv, I think the readers here at Petunia's Patch know your TRUE feelings towards female victims.....So please continue showing your TRUE COLORS....





Judge Judy gets it wrong!!!!



Judge Judy you need to get in touch with the local shelter where you live. Thankfully you are no LONGER responsible for a "real" court. If you were, this video in and of itself would be enough to get you excused from hearing any case with dv or abuse allegations. Judge Judy you REALLY need to get a life!!!!! Oh and Judge Judy you are NOT smart, YOU madam are rather STUPID IN MY OPINION!!!!!!

Ashley Brethen, the young lady shown in this video, if you see this on my site, please use my contact form and get in touch with me. You do not have to tolerate this from her or from your "alleged" ABUSER.



But she was a FAMILY-LAW ATTORNEY!!!!

He was anticipating a divorce and she was a FAMILY-LAW ATTORNEY!!!!

http://www.usatoday.com/news/2009-05-09-gaprofessor_N.htm

ATHENS, Ga. (AP) — Cadaver dogs found the body of a wanted professor "beneath the earth" in the north Georgia woods, two weeks after police say he shot his wife and two other people to death outside a community theater, then vanished.
Searchers on Saturday found two guns near the body of marketing professor George Zinkhan, 57, but police would not say how he died. They did say it appears he buried himself in brush and dirt.


So he figured this was the best way to go? Kill her then himslef and then he would have no worries and she was not allowed to have her day in court? I guess this is an FR answer to what to do when faced with a divorce. Watch out ladies, you could get this too. And is it any wonder why many women seek out restraining orders against these nnut jobs?

Thanks to Sacs1@XXXXXXXXXX.com for showing YOUR true colors.....And one last thing - do these thoughts just bubble forth from your MIND like a brook in the SPRING?????



May 11, 2009

Attila's anxiety?

42
Attila L. Vinczer Says:

May 11th, 2009 at 10:28 am

For me this mothers day was challenging as my ex wife thought it to be more important to go away with her two older children and her mother and other relatives, leaving our two boys out of celebrating mothers day with their mom. The children were very hurt by this and it took most of the day to help them quell their sorrow and despair. I told my boys to love their mother and to remember how important she is. One of them said they wish I could be their mother. No matter how hard I try, I just can't see how I could ever replace the love and compassion of a decent mom!

Attila


So Attila how much of this "anxiety" was created by you? Did you take some perverse satisfaction in letting these little innocents know that mommy dearest was not coming? Or did you play it up beforehand knowing that for whatever reason she would not be there? Or did she decide it would be best to not have to be in your presence? Hmmmmmmm............... (reverse PAS????)



May 10, 2009

So Pankaj, why do we have to........

......listen to your "brothers" when they whine and moan and sing the blues about their mean nasty vindictive ex-wives? Oh yeah, I forgot because you are MEN and because you said so.....Thanks for clearing that up for me......

42
Pankaj Says:

May 5th, 2009 at 9:38 am
Michelle,

Did I or anyone else, lets say - society - ASK you to marry that man? You did that on your own, who knows what you agreed to do with him. Now that you don't like his behavior, you want everyone else to force him to do it your way? Morally and personally, I would think he would pay for the kids and spend time with them. But then, he is not me. This business is between yourself and him - why should anyone else care?




jeana? HAMMER, NAIL, HEAD!!!!!

28
jeana Says:

May 5th, 2009 at 1:34 am
Michele,

“I truly think he only wanted shared parenting to avoid financial obligation”

Bingo. And therein lies one of the main issues “feminists” (and anyone who actually cares about the well being of children) are wary of so many men demanding shared parenting. Because what “shared parenting” means to most of them is that they don’t have to share any of their money with their kids or share any of their time with their kids. Ask any second wife. She’ll pretend to be all for shared parenting because it means that not a penny will go to the first wife. That is all it means. And the mother has to lose her children and watch them be ignored or worse by her ex-husband. Although I’ve never been divorced, I think that if a guy is not very involved with the kids while he’s married to the mother, what in God’s name would make anyone think he is all of a sudden willing and able to be a super duper fantastic father once he’s divorced? It makes no sense.


jeana all I can say is WOW!!!!! You hit the NAIL on the HEAD with a HAMMER!!!!!





I shall not disappoint you tweesdad





16
Bob Denton Says:

May 7th, 2009 at 8:37 pm
When will these men ever learn? You cant trust any woman.And a foreign woman will exploit the system just as readily as an american one.The only woman I would trust would have to be either retarded or on life support.


18
tweesdad Says:

May 7th, 2009 at 9:31 pm
Bob at 16:
That statement will get you top billing at the (anti-)Glenn's Cult website. Just because the system is misandrist doesn't mean we all have to be misogynists. A very few women have exploited this "privilege" of the system, I still believe that most (i.e. >50%) would not do it - even the THE DV SYSTEM ENCOURAGES _DISHONEST_ WOMEN TO EXPLOIT IT. That's what we should be focussing on.


I just could not dissapoint you tweesdad. I know just how much time you spend looking at my blog and how much you search for your name on my blog. But golly gee whiz, there is one who does more searching than you.....Gee where oh wehere is Atilla?

Don't like the stats? Just falsify and exxagerate them then....





20
terri Says:

May 8th, 2009 at 12:20 pm
At the end of the day, though I have a degree in psychology and a graduate degree in quantitative methods, fathers mean more to me than statistics, so I prefer the higher number; it ought to help create awareness about a serious social issue that is now marginalized.


Need I say more? Here is an FR type who does not care what the blog author says, if there are stats out there that could be stretched to mean what he wants those stats to mean, then by golly gee whiz, lets do that. We MUST make moms (women) look bad and dads (men) look good. Who cares if we are LYING????????

Real Women?

11
martin swash Says:

May 10th, 2009 at 3:26 pm
REAL women are on the side of dads, we must not let our terrible unjust experiences blind us from the fact . One day it will women, real women , who will overturn all these destructive family laws that are causing so much misery and anger.


Actually REAL women stand up for injustice no matter the form. We do not just stand there and let you lead us to believe that since we are women, this means we must be stupid and unable to form a cognizant thought. REAL women also stand up for chidlren before standing up for themselves and espoecially before standing up for men - especially those men who have been alleged to be abusive. GOT IT?????



More MINIMIZATION by another cultist

10
Fembuzzender Says:

April 4th, 2009 at 5:09 pm
Domestic violence is overblown. The real problems that we need to face are the low marriage rate and false accusations. Abuse isn't that common and doesn't affect the lives of many people.




enter